scholarly journals 747 Ovarian cancer onset across different BRCA mutation type

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Marchetti ◽  
M D’indinosante ◽  
A Minucci ◽  
L Giacò ◽  
C Cassani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Mutation Type

Determinants of serum adiponectin levels: a cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Azar Sattarinezhad ◽  
Akbar Rasekhi Kazerouni ◽  
Gholamhossein Ranjbar Omrani ◽  
Mesbah Shams
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Bilateral Mastectomy ◽  
Ovarian Cancer Risk ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mutation Carriers

Abstract Objectives To review non-surgical prevention strategies in women with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndromes. Content Women with a gBRCA1 or 2 mutations face a high cumulative breast and ovarian cancer risk. While bilateral mastectomy (PBM) and bilateral salpingo-oophrectomy (PBSO) profoundly reduce the respective cancer risks, they are also associated with considerable side effects. There is therefore an urgent need for alternative and non-surgical risk reduction options. Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors have both been evaluated in secondary prevention, but their benefit in primary prevention is currently unknown in BRCA mutation carriers. In addition, their use is compromised by their side effect profile which makes them less appealing for a use in chemoprevention. Summary and outlook Denosumab is a well-tolerated osteoprotective drug, which has been demonstrated to have a potential preventive effect particularly in BRCA1-deficient models in vitro. The prospectively randomized double-blind BRCA-P trial is currently investigating the preventative effect of denosumab in healthy BRCA1 germ line mutation carriers.

scholarly journals Case series: Breast and ovarian cancer syndrome

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Carcinomas ◽  
Increased Risk

Aims and Objectives: To report a series of cases with breast and ovarian carcinomas either in same patient or in a family and identifying the importance of BRCA 1,2 genetic testing in such individuals. Materials and Methods: The medical records of breast and ovarian cancer patients operated over past 3 years at a single institute were reviewed retrospectively and their clinical profile, family history, final pathological reports and follow up data was collected. Results: 8 patients were found to have breast and ovarian malignancies, out of which 3 had synchronous breast and ovarian cancers, 4 had metachronous and 1 patient with ovarian cancer had history of breast cancer in family. Median age of presentation to the hospital was 47 years and median time interval in metachronous disease patients was 5.5 years. Conclusion: About 5% of people who have breast cancer and about 10% of women who have ovarian cancer have HBOC, caused by germline mutation in BRCA1, 2 gene. These individuals have increased risk of developing breast cancer at younger age, TNBC, or developing a second primary in breast or ovary plus an overall risk of breast/ovarian/prostate/pancreatic malignancies in other family members due to inheritable mutation. Identification of BRCA mutation in such individuals can help family members to undergo genetic counseling and follow different screening and prevention guidelines from general population thus reducing the cancer risks.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (13) ◽  
pp. 1300-1307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Gloria Huang ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Eva Chalas ◽  
Sandro Pignata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Genetic Counselors ◽  
Stakeholder Satisfaction ◽  
Use Of Resources ◽  
Counseling Model ◽  
Testing And Counseling

Purpose There is a growing demand for BRCA1/ 2 mutation ( BRCAm) testing in patients with ovarian cancer; however, the limited number of genetic counselors presents a potential barrier. To facilitate more widespread BRCAm testing in ovarian cancer, pretest counseling by the oncology team could shorten testing turnaround times and ease the pressure on genetic counselors. Patients and Methods The prospective, observational Evaluating a Streamlined Onco-genetic BRCA Testing and Counseling Model Among Patients With Ovarian Cancer (ENGAGE) study evaluated a streamlined, oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. The analysis population comprised 700 patients with ovarian cancer at 26 sites in the United States, Italy, and Spain. The primary objectives were to assess turnaround time and, using questionnaires, to evaluate stakeholder satisfaction (patients, oncologists, and geneticists or genetic counselors) with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway. Results The median overall turnaround time was 9.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), with median turnaround times in the United States, Italy, and Spain of 4.1 weeks (range, 0.9 to 37.1 weeks), 20.4 weeks (range, 2.9 to 35.4 weeks), and 12.0 weeks (range, 2.0 to 36.7 weeks), respectively. Patient satisfaction with the oncologist-led BRCAm testing pathway was high, with > 99% of patients expressing satisfaction with pre- and post- BRCAm test counseling. Oncologist satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway was also high, with > 80% agreeing that the process for performing BRCAm testing worked well and that counseling patients on BRCAm testing was an efficient use of their time. Oncologists expressed higher levels of satisfaction with the BRCAm testing pathway than did geneticists or genetic counselors. Conclusion The results of the ENGAGE study demonstrate that an oncologist-led BRCAm testing process is feasible in ovarian cancer. Development of local BRCAm testing guidelines similar to the one used in this study could allow faster treatment decisions and better use of resources in the management of patients with ovarian cancer.

scholarly journals High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: Associations between BRCA Mutation Status, CT Imaging Phenotypes, and Clinical Outcomes

Radiology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 285 (2) ◽  
pp. 472-481 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie Nougaret ◽  
Yulia Lakhman ◽  
Mithat Gönen ◽  
Debra A. Goldman ◽  
Maura Miccò ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Serous Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Mutation Status

scholarly journals Recommendations and Choices for BRCA Mutation Carriers at Risk for Ovarian Cancer: A Complicated Decision

Cancers ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelsey Lewis ◽  
Karen Lu ◽  
Amber Klimczak ◽  
Samuel Mok
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Mutation Carriers ◽  
Brca Mutation Carriers

scholarly journals A case series of sporadic breast and ovarian cancers in Salentinian families with BRCA mutation-associated Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (HBOC) syndrome

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. iv67
Author(s):  
E. De Matteis ◽  
M.R. De Giorgio ◽  
P. Tarantino ◽  
G. Ronzino ◽  
M. Ciccarese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Ovarian Cancers

BRCA mutation frequency and clinical features of ovarian cancer patients: A report from a Chinese study group

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 2267-2274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hualei Bu ◽  
Jingying Chen ◽  
Qingshui Li ◽  
Jianqing Hou ◽  
Yuan Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Mutation Frequency ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Chinese Study

scholarly journals Factors influencing women’s decisions to getting tested for BRCA mutation

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suha Al-Oballi Kridli ◽  
Holly Austin
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Genetic Mutations ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Breast And Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 ◽  
Brca Mutations ◽  
Factors Influencing ◽  
Brca1 And Brca2 Mutations ◽  
Internal And External Factors

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death among gynecological cancers. There are many risk factors that can increase a woman’s susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancers, some of which are modifiable.  However, non-modifiable risks for breast and ovarian cancer include the presence of genetic mutations (BRCA) increase the risk of these diseases. The purpose of this review was to identify factors, reported in the literature, known to affect women’s decision to get genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. A total of 31 studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in this review. Several internal and external factors, influencing women’s decision to getting tested for BRCA mutations, were identified and explained. Implications for clinical practice were provided.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document