CD147 expression is associated with poor overall survival in chemotherapy treated triple-negative breast cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1007-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Liu ◽  
Julia Y S Tsang ◽  
Michelle Lee ◽  
Yun-Bi Ni ◽  
Siu-Ki Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Functional Roles ◽  
Cd147 Expression ◽  
Basal Like Breast Cancer

AimsIn breast cancer models, the functional roles of CD147 in proliferation, invasion and treatment resistance have been widely reported. However, there are only a few studies examining the clinicopathological correlation and prognostic relevance of CD147 in breast cancer, especially in relation to breast cancer molecular subtypes.MethodsIn this study, we analysed CD147 expression in a large cohort of breast cancers, correlating with clinicopathological features and the expression of a comprehensive panel of biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC subsets. Its relationship with patients’ survival was also analysed.ResultsCD147 was expressed in 11.9%(140/1174) of all cases and in 23.8% (40/168) of TNBC. The expression was associated with tumour histological subtypes (p=0.01) and most commonly seen in carcinoma with medullary features (26.0%). CD147 expression correlated with high tumour grade, presence of necrosis and basal-like breast cancer (BLBC) subtype, high Ki67 and expression of some other basal markers and stem-like markers. CD147 expression was also associated with poor overall survival in chemotherapy treated patients with TNBC.ConclusionsCD147 is a putative marker in identifying TNBC or BLBC, and may be useful as a prognosis indicator for patients with TNBC or BLBC post chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Influence of Germline BRCA Genotype on the Survival of Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-147
Author(s):  
Cynthia Villarreal-Garza ◽  
Ana S. Ferrigno ◽  
Alejandro Aranda-Gutierrez ◽  
Paul H. Frankel ◽  
Nora H. Ruel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Treatment Resistance ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Mutational Status

The presence of BRCA pathogenic variants (PV) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a distinctive genomic profile that makes the tumor particularly susceptible to DNA-damaging treatments. However, patients with BRCA PVs can develop treatment resistance through the appearance of reversion mutations and restored BRCA expression. As copy-number variants (CNV) could be less susceptible to reversion mutations than point mutations, we hypothesize that carriers of BRCA CNVs may have improved survival after treatment compared with carriers of other BRCA PVs or BRCA wild-type. Women diagnosed with stage I–III TNBC at ≤50 years at a cancer center in Mexico City were screened for BRCA PVs using a recurrent PV assay (HISPANEL; 77% sensitivity). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the mutational status. Among 180 women, 17 (9%) were carriers of BRCA1 ex9–12del CNVs and 26 (14%) of other BRCA PVs. RFS at ten years for the whole cohort was 79.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 72.3–84.6], with no significant differences according to mutational status. 10-year OS for the entire cohort was 85.3% (95% CI, 78.7–90.0), with BRCA CNV carriers demonstrating numerically superior OS rates other PV carriers and noncarriers (100% vs. 78.6% and 84.7%; log-rank P = 0.037 and P = 0.051, respectively). This study suggests that BRCA1 ex9–12del CNV carriers with TNBC may have a better OS, and supports the hypothesis that the genotype of BRCA PVs may influence survival by limiting treatment resistance mediated by reversion mutations among CNV carriers. Significance: Large CNV BRCA carriers in a cohort of young Mexican patients with TNBC had superior OS rates than carriers of other BRCA pathogenic variants (i.e., small indels or point mutations). We hypothesize that this is due to the resistance of CNVs to reversion mutations mediating resistance to therapy. If validated, these findings have important prognostic and clinical treatment implications for BRCA-associated breast cancers.

scholarly journals G-CSF regulates macrophage phenotype and associates with poor overall survival in human triple-negative breast cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. e1115177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maija Hollmén ◽  
Sinem Karaman ◽  
Simon Schwager ◽  
Angela Lisibach ◽  
Ailsa J. Christiansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Macrophage Phenotype ◽  
Poor Overall Survival

scholarly journals Mass Spectrometry-Based Omics for the Characterization of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Bio-Signature

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 277
Author(s):  
Ioana-Ecaterina Pralea ◽  
Radu-Cristian Moldovan ◽  
Adrian-Bogdan Țigu ◽  
Corina Ionescu ◽  
Cristina-Adela Iuga
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Biomarker Discovery ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Behavior

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) represents an unmet medical need due to a high rate of metastatic occurrence and poor overall survival, pathology aggressiveness, heterogeneous clinical behavior and limited cytotoxic chemotherapy options available because of the absence of targetable receptors. The current standard of care in TNBC is represented by chemotherapy and surgery associated with low overall survival and high relapse rates. Hopes of overcoming current limited and unspecific approaches of TNBC therapy lie in studying the metabolic rewiring of these types of breast cancer, thus understanding the mechanisms involved in the occurrence and progression of the disease. Due to its heterogeneity, a clinically relevant sub-classification of this type of breast cancer based on biomarker panels is greatly needed in order to guide treatment decisions. Mass spectrometry-based omics may provide very useful tools to address the current needs of targetable biomarker discovery and validation. The present review aims to provide a comprehensive view of the current clinical diagnosis and therapy of TNBC highlighting the need for a new approach. Therefore, this paper offers a detailed mass spectrometry-based snapshot of TNBC metabolic adjustment, emphasizing a complex network of variables governing the diverse and aggressive clinical behavior of TNBC.

scholarly journals Formin Proteins FHOD1 and INF2 in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Association With Basal Markers and Functional Activities

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 117822341879224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanina D Heuser ◽  
Naziha Mansuri ◽  
Jasper Mogg ◽  
Samu Kurki ◽  
Heli Repo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell Lines ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Basal Like Breast Cancer

Basal-like breast cancer is an aggressive form of breast cancer with limited treatment options. The subgroup can be identified immunohistochemically, by lack of hormone receptor expression combined with expression of basal markers such as CK5/6 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In vitro, several regulators of the actin cytoskeleton are essential for efficient invasion of basal-like breast cancer cell lines. Whether these proteins are expressed in vivo determines the applicability of these findings in clinical settings. The actin-regulating formin protein FHOD1 participates in invasion of the triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. Here, we measure the expression of FHOD1 protein in clinical triple-negative breast cancers by using immunohistochemistry and further characterize the expression of another formin protein, INF2. We report that basal-like breast cancers frequently overexpress formin proteins FHOD1 and INF2. In cell studies using basal-like breast cancer cell lines, we show that knockdown of FHOD1 or INF2 interferes with very similar processes: maintenance of cell shape, migration, invasion, and proliferation. Inhibition of EGFR, PI3K, or mitogen-activated protein kinase activity does not alter the expression of FHOD1 and INF2 in these cell lines. We conclude that the experimental studies on these formins have implications in the clinical behavior of basal-like breast cancer.

Survival of patients with locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy: Experience of a single institute.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
E. A. Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Biological Entity ◽  
Breast Cancers

274 Background: Primary systemic chemotherapy is a standard approach to treating women with locally advanced breast cancers, with higher survival rates reported among patients who attain a pathologic complete response. Triple-negative breast cancer is a special biological entity that remains major challenge to oncologist. Around 12%-20% of breast cancers are triple negative. The current phase II study was conducted to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) using cis-platinum containing regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced triple negative breast cancer. Methods: Eighteen women with stage III triple negative breast cancer who were recruited between July 2007 and February 2010 at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of AC or FEC 100, followed by 4 cycles consisted of docetaxel-cisplatin every 3 weeks. Primary end point was pathological complete response. Results: Median age: 49 y (24-70); premenopausal: 16; 25% were below 35 years of age; Median tumor size: 9 cm (3.5-19); Grade III: 15; Stage IIIA: 3, IIIB:14, IIIC:1; all but 2 had positive nodes at diagnosis (89%). Clinical evaluation of response by RECIST criteria pre surgery: OR: 17/18 (94%), CR: 9 (50%); PR: 8 (44%).The second sequence with D-Cis-T doubled the rate of clinical CR obtained with AC/FEC. One patient was not operated due to disease progression. Pathological assessment, revealed that 8 (47%) pts had no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast; 3 (18%) had residual occasional scattered tumor cells less than 5 mm (pT1a); 10 (59%) had negative nodes; 8 achieved CpR and 2 nCpR. Patients with residual invasive component and/or nodal involvement had high baseline Ki 67 level. After a median follow up of 24 months, cumulative overall survival at 24 months is 88.9% for whole group. Cumulative overall survival in relation to response was 100% for patients who achieved pCR while overall cumulative survival rate for patients without pCR was 83.3% without statistical significance. Conclusions: This cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and achieved a high rate of pCR/npCR.

Outcomes of triple-negative versus non-triple-negative breast cancers managed with breast-conservative therapy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 70-70
Author(s):  
Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti ◽  
Amina Iqbal Khan ◽  
Neelam Siddiqui ◽  
Narjis Muzaffar ◽  
Mazhar Ali Shah
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Locoregional Recurrence ◽  
Conservative Therapy ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Breast Conservative Therapy ◽  
Disease Free

70 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer represents a subgroup of breast cancer associated with aggressive behavior and high risk of local and regional failure. Aggressive surgical intervention is considered optimal for this cancer which has made role of Breast conservative therapy (BCT) debatable in these patients. The objective of this study was to compare outcome of BCT for triple negative versus non-triple–negative breast cancers. Methods: Data of patients who underwent breast conservative therapy between 1997-2009 at Shaukat Khanum Cancer Hospital and had complete receptor status information were extracted. Patients were divided into triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-TNBC. Patient characteristics, medical treatment modalities and adverse events between two groups were compared. Five year locoregional recurrence free, disease free and overall survival was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis was done to identify independent predictors of outcome. Results: A total of 194 patients with TNBC and 443 with non-TNBC were compared. Significant differences was present for age at presentation (p<0.0001), family history (p=0.005), grade (p<0.0001) and use of hormonal therapy (p<0.0001). The actual number of locoregional failures, distant failures, and mortalities were not significantly different. No significant difference was present in 5-year locoregional recurrence free (96% vs. 92%, p=0.3), disease free (75% vs. 74%, p=0.7) and overall survival (78% vs. 83%, p=0.2). Tumor size, nodal involvement and hormonal treatment were independent predictors of survival on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Breast-conservative therapy has comparable outcomes for triple-negative and non-triple–negative breast cancers.

scholarly journals LncRNA-encoded polypeptide ASRPS inhibits triple-negative breast cancer angiogenesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 217 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yirong Wang ◽  
Siqi Wu ◽  
Xun Zhu ◽  
Liyuan Zhang ◽  
Jieqiong Deng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cancer Model ◽  
Down Regulation ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Mouse Xenograft ◽  
Stat3 Phosphorylation ◽  
Breast Cancer Model

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a subtype of breast cancer (BC) with the most aggressive phenotype and poor overall survival. Using bioinformatics tools, we identified LINC00908 encoding a 60–aa polypeptide and differentially expressed in TNBC tissues. We named this endogenously expressed polypeptide ASRPS (a small regulatory peptide of STAT3). ASRPS expression was down-regulated in TNBCs and associated with poor overall survival. We showed that LINC00908 was directly regulated by ERα, which was responsible for the differential down-regulation of LINC00908 in TNBCs. ASRPS directly bound to STAT3 through the coiled coil domain (CCD) and down-regulated STAT3 phosphorylation, which led to reduced expression of VEGF. In human endothelial cells, a mouse xenograft breast cancer model, and a mouse spontaneous BC model, ASRPS expression reduced angiogenesis. In a mouse xenograft breast cancer model, down-regulation of ASRPS promoted tumor growth, and ASRPS acted as an antitumor peptide. We presented strong evidence that LINC00908-encoded polypeptide ASRPS represented a TNBC-specific target for treatment.

Applicability of PD-L1 tests to tailor triple-negative breast cancer treatment in Brazil

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kátia Ramos Moreira Leite ◽  
Carlos Henrique Barrios ◽  
Antônio Carlos Buzaid ◽  
Débora Gagliato ◽  
Helenice Gobbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Treatment ◽  
Main Text ◽  
Critical Questions ◽  
Online Panel ◽  
Active Interest

Abstract Background Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease that represents 10–20% of breast cancer cases. The prognosis for advanced TNBC is usually poor, with a median overall survival of approximately 18 months or less. Main text New targeted therapies such as anti-PD-L1 agents are emerging as an option to treat advanced TNBC. A panel of 6 national experts with an active interest in breast cancer convened online. Panel members had either clinical or pathology experience in breast cancer. The experts pre-defined critical questions in the management of PD-L1 in TNBC, and a literature review was performed for selected topics before the online meeting. Conclusion The experts led active discussions involving a multidisciplinary team comprising pathologists and clinical oncologists. The meeting served to discuss the most relevant issues. A total of 10 critical questions for PD-L1+ TNBC were debated and are presented in this review. This article discusses the current landscape for PD-L1 tests in TNBC in Brazil.

scholarly journals Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Adjuvant Therapeutic Options

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayca Gucalp ◽  
Tiffany A. Traina
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progesterone Receptors ◽  
Cytotoxic Chemotherapy ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Targeted Agents ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Disproportionate Number

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), a subtype distinguished by negative immunohistochemical assays for expression of the estrogen and progesterone receptors (ER/PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2(HER2) represents 15% of all breast cancers. Patients with TNBC generally experience a more aggressive clinical course with increased risk of disease progression and poorer overall survival. Furthermore, this subtype accounts for a disproportionate number of disease-related mortality in part due to its aggressive natural history and our lack of effective targeted agents beyond conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. In this paper, we will review the epidemiology, risk factors, prognosis, and the molecular and clinicopathologic features that distinguish TNBC from other subtypes of breast cancer. In addition, we will examine the available data for the use of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the treatment of TNBC in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting and explore the ongoing development of newer targeted agents.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document