scholarly journals Tislelizumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000437
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jun Guo ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
Hongming Pan ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dose Verification ◽  
Open Label

BackgroundTislelizumab is an investigational, humanized, IgG4 monoclonal antibody with high affinity and binding specificity for programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) that was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages in order to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy.MethodsThe purpose of this phase 1/2, open-label, non-comparative study was to examine the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of tislelizumab in adult (≥18 years) Chinese patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors with measurable disease. The phase 1 portion of the study consisted of a dose-verification study and a pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy; phase 2 was an indication-expansion study including 11 solid tumor cohorts. Patients previously treated with therapies targeting PD-1 or its ligand, programmed cell death ligand-1 were excluded. During dose-verification, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were monitored; safety and tolerability were examined and the previously determined recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was verified. The primary endpoint of phase 2 was investigator-assessed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.ResultsAs of December 1, 2018, 300 patients were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W). Median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months (range 0.2–21.9). No DLTs were reported during the phase 1 dose-verification study and the RP2D was confirmed to be 200 mg intravenously Q3W. Most treatment-related adverse events (62%) were grade 1 or 2, with the most common being anemia (n=70; 23%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=67; 22%). Of the 251 efficacy evaluable patients, 45 (18%) achieved a confirmed clinical response, including one patient from the PK substudy who achieved a complete response. Median duration of response was not reached for all except the nasopharyngeal carcinoma cohort (8.3 months). Antitumor responses were observed in multiple tumor types.ConclusionsTislelizumab was generally well tolerated among Chinese patients. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with multiple solid tumors.Trial registration numberCTR20160872.

TRIDENT-1: A global, multicenter, open-label Phase II study investigating the activity of repotrectinib in advanced solid tumors harboring ROS1 or NTRK1-3 rearrangements.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9637-TPS9637
Author(s):  
Robert Charles Doebele ◽  
Jessica Jiyeong Lin ◽  
Misako Nagasaka ◽  
Viola Weijia Zhu ◽  
Nashat Y. Gabrail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Study

TPS9637 Background: Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1/TRK inhibitor with > 90-fold greater potency than crizotinib against ROS1 and > 100-fold greater potency than larotrectinib against TRK. Preclinical studies demonstrated inhibitory activity of repotrectinib against ROS1 resistance mutations, including the solvent-front mutation (SFM) G2032R. In the phase 1 portion of the study, repotrectinib was found to be well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity including a 91% confirmed overall response (cORR) in TKI-naïve ROS1+ NSCLC pts. In ROS1+ NSCLC pts who received 1 prior chemo and 1 prior TKI, the cORR was 57% at the clinical dose of 160 mg QD or above. Intra-cranial (IC) activity was observed in ROS1+ NSCLC pts with measurable CNS disease (100% IC-ORR in TKI-naïve and 75% IC-ORR in patients with 1 prior TKI). Encouraging antitumor activity was observed in pts with NTRK+ solid tumors. Methods: A global phase 2 study was initiated and is actively enrolling. The primary endpoint for the Phase 2 study is cORR assessed by BICR (Blinded Independent Central Review) using RECIST v1.1, in each expansion cohort in pts with advanced solid tumors that harbor a ROS1 or NTRK1/2/3 gene fusion. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), IC-ORR, IC-PFS, and quality of life assessments. All pts need to have RECIST 1.1 measurable disease confirmed by BICR and ECOG performance score ≤1. Repotrectinib is administered at 160 mg QD for 14 days and, if tolerated, the dose can be increased to 160 mg BID. Approximately 320 pts (≥12 years old) will be enrolled into 6 defined expansion cohorts, depending on the status of previous treatment with TKIs and cancer types (see table below). Clinical trial information: NCT03093116 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of rilotumumab in Japanese patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Toshihiko Doi ◽  
Rui Tang ◽  
Yilong Zhang ◽  
Elwyn Loh ◽  
Richard Lizambri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Dose Escalation Study

130 Background: Rilotumumab (R) is an investigational, fully human monoclonal antibody to hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor, the only known MET receptor ligand. The MET pathway has been identified as a potentially useful target for therapeutic blockade in oncology. R has been studied in multiple phase 2 trials either as monotherapy or combination therapy, including a phase 2 trial in gastric cancer combining R with epirubicin, cisplatin, and capecitabine. A phase 1 study was done to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and PK of R in Japanese pts. Methods: An open-label, dose-escalation study was performed with R at 10 mg/kg (Cohort 1A), escalating to 20 mg/kg (Cohort 1B) if no dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Key eligibility criteria were Japanese pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma, age ≥ 20 yr, ECOG ≤ 1, and refractory to standard treatment (tx). Pts received R as an intravenous infusion on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, except for cycle 1 in which the day 15 dose was skipped to facilitate PK analysis. DLTs were evaluated in cycle 1. Results: A total of 9 pts were enrolled (1A, n = 3; 1B, n = 6). No DLTs were noted. As of 17 April 13, tx-emergent AEs were reported in 89% of pts. Tx-emergent AEs occurring in > 1 pt overall were vomiting (33%), diarrhea (22%), decreased hemoglobin (22%), hypoalbuminemia (22%), and nausea (22%). One grade 3 tx-emergent AE was observed (decreased hemoglobin; 10 mg/kg). Tx-related AEs were reported in 56% of pts. One grade ≥ 2 tx-related AE was observed (hypoalbuminemia; 20 mg/kg). 8 pts discontinued R due to disease progression; 1 pt remained on the investigational product. Mean exposure of R (Cmax and AUC) appeared to be doubled as dose increased from 10 to 20 mg/kg. The estimated mean CL was approximately 0.2 mL/hr/kg in both cohorts, suggesting a linear PK from 10 to 20 mg/kg. The terminal half-life of R was about 15 days. Conclusions: R monotherapy had an acceptable safety profile in Japanese pts with advanced solid tumors. These phase 1 safety and PK data support the further evaluation of R combined with chemotherapy in Japanese pts with MET-positive metastatic gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01791374.

Trial in progress: A phase 1-2 multicenter, open-label, dose-escalation and dose-expansion study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor activity of ABN401 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3157-TPS3157
Author(s):  
Dae Ho Lee ◽  
Aflah Roohullah ◽  
Byoung Chul Cho ◽  
Charlotte Rose Lemech ◽  
Paul L. de Souza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Tumor Type ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label

TPS3157 Background: c-MET (hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) receptor) overexpression, either by gene amplification, or mutation is associated with oncogenic transformation in numerous malignancies including lung, gastric, skin, renal, colorectal, and pancreatic cancers. ABN401 inhibits the activation of c-MET by reversibly interfering with the binding of c-Met tyrosine kinase to adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and blocking the receptor's downstream signaling that has demonstrated efficacy in NSCLC and gastric cancer in mouse xenograft and PDx models. This clinical trial is in progress in patients with advanced cancers. Methods: ABN401 is being evaluated in an open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation (phase 1) study in patients with advanced solid tumors, and dose-expansion (phase 2) in patients with targeted indications and c-MET biomarker expression (NCT04052971). The phase 1 explores ascending daily doses of oral ABN401 monotherapy in 21-day cycles to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D). A preplanned extension (pilot expansion) study has been initiated based on predefined positive efficacy signals at intermediate doses up to 10 NSCLC patients who have c-MET alteration. Once RP2D is determined, the phase 2 expansion of up to 10-29 patients in four specific tumor-type cohorts is planned, utilizing a Simon's optimal two-stage design to evaluate the clinical activity of ABN401. ABN401-001 study began enrolling patients in August 2019 and is ongoing in Korean and Australia. Dose escalation up to cohort 4 has been completed, enrollment to cohort 5 began in November 2020. AEs are assessed according to CTCAE v5. Tumor response is determined according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and safety findings reviewed by the DRC, which will determine the RP2D and MTD. Key Phase 1 eligibility criteria include 1) histological or cytological diagnosis of melanoma or any type of carcinoma or sarcoma and 2) refractory metastatic disease, or refractory locally advanced disease not amenable to local therapy. For the extension (pilot expansion) study, patients must have NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping, MET amplification and/or c-MET overexpression. An exploratory study is being conducted for co-development of a companion diagnostic (CDx) system including a CTC device and ddPCR kit through liquid biopsy. Clinical trial information: NCT04052971.

A phase 1/2 trial of ORIN1001, a first-in-class IRE1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3080-3080
Author(s):  
Nashat Y. Gabrail ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
Anthony D. Elias ◽  
Mothaffar F. Rimawi ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label

3080 Background: ORIN1001 is a first-in-class small molecule with a novel, unique enzyme and mode of inhibition that selectively inhibits Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α (IRE1) RNAse and blocks X-Box Binding Protein 1 (XBP1) activation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). IRE1α/XBP1 has been implicated in a host of pathologies, and molecules that modulate it are under intense investigation for the treatment of oncologic, metabolic, neurodegenerative and other diseases. ORIN1001 has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with standard of care across multiple animal models including breast, prostate, lung, liver, pancreatic, brain, colon, ovarian, esophageal, and hematologic cancers and is now undergoing first-in-human testing. Methods: A phase 1, open label, 3+3 dose escalation trial is testing ORIN1001 administered PO daily to patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (single agent) or relapsed refractory breast cancer (in combination with Abraxane). The phase 1 dose escalation part of the trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ORIN1001. After identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the single agent, the dose expansion part of the trial will test ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane. Results: As of Jan 25, 2021, 22 patients with advanced cancer have received ORIN1001 dosed at 100mg, 200mg or 300mg per day in 21-day continuous cycles with a median age of 61 (range 42-77). The pts had received a median of 4 prior line of treatments. Two DLTs were observed at 200 mg with thrombocytopenia and rash. MTD has not been reached. Common (>15%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included nausea, vomiting, rash, fatigue, and hypokalaemia. The vast majority of these events were Grade 1-2 in severity. Seven (32%) pts had at least 1 TRAE grade≥ 3, the most frequent of which were thrombocytopenia (N=3) and rash (N=3). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis showed ORIN1001 exposure to increase in a dose proportional manner. Mean t1/2 at steady state was 18 hrs. Thirteen pts were evaluated for preliminary efficacy. Best response, per RECIST 1.1, was stable disease (SD) in 8 pts while 5 pts had progressive disease (PD). For 2 ongoing patients with advanced liver or colorectal cancer, duration of treatment has exceeded 300 days and 570 days, respectively. Conclusions: To date, the phase 1 part of the first-in-human trial has demonstrated a reasonable safety and pharmacokinetic profile for ORIN1001 at 100mg and 200mg dose levels. While efficacy data have yet to mature, chronic dosing achieved in pts with heavily treated advanced solid tumors, suggests clinical potential for in the setting of advanced solid cancers. The phase 2 part of the trial testing ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane is currently enrolling pts with advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03950570.

scholarly journals Phase IA/IB study of single-agent tislelizumab, an investigational anti-PD-1 antibody, in solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayesh Desai ◽  
Sanjeev Deva ◽  
Jong Seok Lee ◽  
Chia-Chi Lin ◽  
Chia-Jui Yen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Phase Ib

BackgroundThe programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) axis plays a central role in suppressing antitumor immunity; axis dysregulation can be used by cancer cells to evade the immune system. Tislelizumab, an investigational monoclonal antibody with high affinity and binding specificity for PD-1, was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages to limit antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a potential mechanism of resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. The aim of this phase IA/IB study was to investigate the safety/tolerability, antitumor effects and optimal dose and schedule of tislelizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsPatients (aged ≥18 years) enrolled in phase IA received intravenous tislelizumab 0.5, 2, 5 or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks; 2 or 5 mg/kg administered every 2 weeks or every 3 weeks; or 200 mg every 3 weeks; patients in phase IB received 5 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary objectives were to assess tislelizumab’s safety/tolerability profile by adverse event (AE) monitoring and antitumor activity using RECIST V.1.1. PD-L1 expression was assessed retrospectively with the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) Assay.ResultsBetween May 2015 and October 2017, 451 patients (n=116, IA; n=335, IB) were enrolled. Fatigue (28%), nausea (25%) and decreased appetite (20%) were the most commonly reported AEs. Most AEs were grade 1–2 severity; anemia (4.9%) was the most common grade 3–4 AE. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 5.3% of patients. Grade 5 AEs were reported in 14 patients; 2 were considered related to tislelizumab. Pneumonitis (2%) and colitis (1%) were the most common serious tislelizumab-related AEs. As of May 2019, 18% of patients achieved a confirmed objective response in phase IA and 12% in phase IB; median follow-up duration was 13.6 and 7.6 months, respectively. Pharmacokinetics, safety and antitumor activity obtained from both phase IA and IB determined the tislelizumab recommended dose; ultimately, tislelizumab 200 mg intravenous every 3 weeks was the dose and schedule recommended to be taken into subsequent clinical trials.ConclusionsTislelizumab monotherapy demonstrated an acceptable safety/tolerability profile. Durable responses were observed in heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, supporting the evaluation of tislelizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks, as monotherapy and in combination therapy, for the treatment of solid tumors and hematological malignancies.Trial registration numberNCT02407990.

A phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity of the OX40 agonist MEDI0562 in combination with tremelimumab or durvalumab in adult aubjects with advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3100-TPS3100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
Todd Michael Bauer ◽  
Neeltje Steeghs ◽  
A. Craig Lockhart ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Combination Methods

TPS3100 Background: Recent advances in treatment of solid tumors include single or combined use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the immune checkpoints CTLA-4 or PD-1/PD-L1 that can reactivate antitumor cytotoxic tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and significantly improve OS (Menon S, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2016;8:E106.) (Antonia S, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17:299-308). Activation of TILs via the costimulatory OX40 (CD134) molecule, may offer an alternative and non-redundant pathway for increasing antitumor immunity. OX40 costimulation promotes effector T cell expansion and longevity, overcomes regulatory T cell suppression and provides survival benefit in animal models of tumor challenge (Linch SN, et al. Front Oncol. 2015;5:34). MEDI0562 is an investigational, humanized IgG1κ anti-OX40 mAb that triggers OX40 signaling. Coadministration of an OX40 agonist and either a CTLA-4 or PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitor may promote synergistic effects against certain solid tumors and may be tolerable administered in combination. Methods: A Phase 1, multicenter, open-label study (NCT02705482) is underway to evaluate safety (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and antitumor activity (secondary endpoints) of MEDI0562 in combination with either anti-PD-L1 mAb durvalumab or anti-CTLA-4 mAb tremelimumab in adult subjects with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Subjects with primary CNS tumors and hematologic malignancies are excluded. The study includes a dose escalation and expansion phase, with 2 treatment arms in each: MEDI0562/durvalumab combination (Arm A) and MEDI0562/tremelimumab combination (Arm B). Safety assessments include AEs, serious AEs, dose-limiting toxicities, abnormal laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiogram results. Antitumor efficacy will be assessed as OR, disease control, duration of response, PFS, and OS using RECIST Version 1.1. Subjects will remain on treatment until unacceptable toxicity, progressive disease or other reasons for discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02705482.

A phase I study evaluating COM701 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2657-TPS2657
Author(s):  
Drew W. Rasco ◽  
Daniel A. Vaena ◽  
Ryan J. Sullivan ◽  
Jason J. Luke ◽  
Adam ElNaggar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Mouse Tumor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

TPS2657 Background: There is a high unmet medical need for the treatment (tx) of patients (pt) who are refractory to or relapse following tx with checkpoint inhibitors. Newer checkpoint therapies with novel mechanisms of action that can activate T cells and demonstrate antitumor activity in this pre-tx pt population are urgently needed. COM701 is a novel first-in-class humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to PVRIG (poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing) blocking its interaction with its ligand, PVRL2. Both PVRIG and PVRL2 are part of the DNAM axis as are TIGIT and PD1. Inhibition of PVRIG leads to enhanced activation of T and NK cells, and PVRIG results in tumor growth inhibition in mouse tumor models. We hypothesize that COM701 will demonstrate antitumor activity in pts who are checkpoint inhibitor pre-tx. Methods: NCT03667716 is an ongoing open-label first-in-human phase 1 study in pts with advanced solid tumors. The initial part of this study (Arm A) will evaluate escalating doses of COM701 monotherapy IV Q3 weekly with single pt cohorts for the initial 4 and then 3+3 design. Key Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥18 yrs, histologically confirmed locally advanced/ metastatic solid malignancy and has exhausted available standard therapy, ECOG 0-1, prior anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, OX-40, CD137 permissible. Key Exclusion Criteria: Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic therapy in the last 2 years, symptomatic interstitial or inflammatory lung disease, untx or symptomatic central nervous system metastases. Primary objectives are safety and tolerability of COM701 as measured by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (21-day DLT window), pharmacokinetics of COM701, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose and/or the recommended dose for expansion. Secondary objectives are to characterize the immunogenicity and preliminary antitumor activity of COM701. Statistical Considerations: AEs graded as per CTCAE v4.03, responses as per RECIST v1.1. The analyses of all study objectives will be descriptive and hypothesis generating. No DLTs have been observed in the single pt cohorts. Assessment of pts enrolled into cohort 5 is ongoing at the time of this submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03667716.

Antitumor activity and safety of MK-1308 (anti-CTLA-4) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated interim results from a phase I study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2558-2558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Perets ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoh ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
Jair Bar ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Tumor Expression

2558 Background: An ongoing multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study of the anti–CTLA-4 antibody MK-1308 in combination with pembro in advanced solid tumors (NCT03179436) revealed a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy in pts with first-line (1L) advanced NSCLC. Data from a larger sample size and longer follow-up are presented. Methods: In dose escalation (DE), pts with advanced solid tumors received MK-1308 by IV administration at 25, 75, or 200 mg Q3W ×1 cycle then in combination with pembro 200 mg Q3W ×4 cycles followed by pembro monotherapy (up to 35 cycles). In dose confirmation (DC), pts with 1L advanced NSCLC received MK-1308 at 25 or 75 mg—Q3W or Q6W—plus pembro 200 mg Q3W (up to 35 cycles). Safety (all treated pts), efficacy (subset of 1L NSCLC pts), pharmacokinetics (PK, all treated pts), and PD-L1 tumor expression (subset of 1L NSCLC pts) were analyzed. Results: 213 pts were treated (DE, n=39; DC, n=174). All pts were included in the safety analyses (median follow-up, 8 months); 113 pts from DC were included in the efficacy analyses (median follow-up, 8 months). PK showed a dose-dependent increase in MK-1308 exposure. Neither target dose-limiting toxicity (≥10%) nor maximum tolerated dose were reached for MK-1308 plus pembro; however, toxicity increased with increasing MK-1308 dose and shorter dosing intervals. Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 occurred at the lowest rates at 25 mg Q3W in DE (0%) and 25 mg Q6W in DC (25%) and at the highest rates at 200 mg Q3W in DE (75%) and 75 mg Q3W in DC (50%). Efficacy was observed at all MK-1308 dose levels and intervals: confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1 by central review in 1L advanced NSCLC was 39% at 25 mg Q3W, 33% at 25 mg Q6W, 22% at 75 mg Q6W, and 25% at 75 mg Q3W; 6-month PFS and OS rates are 67% and 89% for the 25 mg Q6W arm. There was a 25% ORR in PD-L1–negative 1L advanced NSCLC pts. Conclusions: MK-1308 plus pembro was generally well tolerated with no unexpected toxicity and conferred encouraging antitumor activity in 1L advanced NSCLC pts. Efficacy, safety, and PK data suggest that 25 mg given Q6W is the recommended phase 2 dose for MK-1308 in combination with pembro. Clinical trial information: NCT03179436.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document