A phase 1 study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity, and antitumor activity of the OX40 agonist MEDI0562 in combination with tremelimumab or durvalumab in adult aubjects with advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3100-TPS3100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brendan D. Curti ◽  
Todd Michael Bauer ◽  
Neeltje Steeghs ◽  
A. Craig Lockhart ◽  
Francis J. Giles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes ◽  
Immune Checkpoints ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Combination Methods

TPS3100 Background: Recent advances in treatment of solid tumors include single or combined use of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against the immune checkpoints CTLA-4 or PD-1/PD-L1 that can reactivate antitumor cytotoxic tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and significantly improve OS (Menon S, et al. Cancers (Basel). 2016;8:E106.) (Antonia S, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2016; 17:299-308). Activation of TILs via the costimulatory OX40 (CD134) molecule, may offer an alternative and non-redundant pathway for increasing antitumor immunity. OX40 costimulation promotes effector T cell expansion and longevity, overcomes regulatory T cell suppression and provides survival benefit in animal models of tumor challenge (Linch SN, et al. Front Oncol. 2015;5:34). MEDI0562 is an investigational, humanized IgG1κ anti-OX40 mAb that triggers OX40 signaling. Coadministration of an OX40 agonist and either a CTLA-4 or PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitor may promote synergistic effects against certain solid tumors and may be tolerable administered in combination. Methods: A Phase 1, multicenter, open-label study (NCT02705482) is underway to evaluate safety (primary endpoint), pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and antitumor activity (secondary endpoints) of MEDI0562 in combination with either anti-PD-L1 mAb durvalumab or anti-CTLA-4 mAb tremelimumab in adult subjects with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Subjects with primary CNS tumors and hematologic malignancies are excluded. The study includes a dose escalation and expansion phase, with 2 treatment arms in each: MEDI0562/durvalumab combination (Arm A) and MEDI0562/tremelimumab combination (Arm B). Safety assessments include AEs, serious AEs, dose-limiting toxicities, abnormal laboratory parameters, vital signs, and electrocardiogram results. Antitumor efficacy will be assessed as OR, disease control, duration of response, PFS, and OS using RECIST Version 1.1. Subjects will remain on treatment until unacceptable toxicity, progressive disease or other reasons for discontinuation. Clinical trial information: NCT02705482.

scholarly journals Tislelizumab in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors: an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000437
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jun Guo ◽  
Qingyuan Zhang ◽  
Hongming Pan ◽  
Ying Yuan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Programmed Cell Death ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Dose Verification ◽  
Open Label

BackgroundTislelizumab is an investigational, humanized, IgG4 monoclonal antibody with high affinity and binding specificity for programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) that was engineered to minimize binding to FcγR on macrophages in order to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy.MethodsThe purpose of this phase 1/2, open-label, non-comparative study was to examine the safety, tolerability, and antitumor activity of tislelizumab in adult (≥18 years) Chinese patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumors with measurable disease. The phase 1 portion of the study consisted of a dose-verification study and a pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy; phase 2 was an indication-expansion study including 11 solid tumor cohorts. Patients previously treated with therapies targeting PD-1 or its ligand, programmed cell death ligand-1 were excluded. During dose-verification, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were monitored; safety and tolerability were examined and the previously determined recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was verified. The primary endpoint of phase 2 was investigator-assessed objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors V.1.1.ResultsAs of December 1, 2018, 300 patients were treated with tislelizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (Q3W). Median duration of follow-up was 8.1 months (range 0.2–21.9). No DLTs were reported during the phase 1 dose-verification study and the RP2D was confirmed to be 200 mg intravenously Q3W. Most treatment-related adverse events (62%) were grade 1 or 2, with the most common being anemia (n=70; 23%) and increased aspartate aminotransferase (n=67; 22%). Of the 251 efficacy evaluable patients, 45 (18%) achieved a confirmed clinical response, including one patient from the PK substudy who achieved a complete response. Median duration of response was not reached for all except the nasopharyngeal carcinoma cohort (8.3 months). Antitumor responses were observed in multiple tumor types.ConclusionsTislelizumab was generally well tolerated among Chinese patients. Antitumor activity was observed in patients with multiple solid tumors.Trial registration numberCTR20160872.

TRIDENT-1: A global, multicenter, open-label Phase II study investigating the activity of repotrectinib in advanced solid tumors harboring ROS1 or NTRK1-3 rearrangements.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS9637-TPS9637
Author(s):  
Robert Charles Doebele ◽  
Jessica Jiyeong Lin ◽  
Misako Nagasaka ◽  
Viola Weijia Zhu ◽  
Nashat Y. Gabrail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Previous Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Resistance Mutations ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 2 Study

TPS9637 Background: Repotrectinib is a next-generation ROS1/TRK inhibitor with > 90-fold greater potency than crizotinib against ROS1 and > 100-fold greater potency than larotrectinib against TRK. Preclinical studies demonstrated inhibitory activity of repotrectinib against ROS1 resistance mutations, including the solvent-front mutation (SFM) G2032R. In the phase 1 portion of the study, repotrectinib was found to be well tolerated with encouraging antitumor activity including a 91% confirmed overall response (cORR) in TKI-naïve ROS1+ NSCLC pts. In ROS1+ NSCLC pts who received 1 prior chemo and 1 prior TKI, the cORR was 57% at the clinical dose of 160 mg QD or above. Intra-cranial (IC) activity was observed in ROS1+ NSCLC pts with measurable CNS disease (100% IC-ORR in TKI-naïve and 75% IC-ORR in patients with 1 prior TKI). Encouraging antitumor activity was observed in pts with NTRK+ solid tumors. Methods: A global phase 2 study was initiated and is actively enrolling. The primary endpoint for the Phase 2 study is cORR assessed by BICR (Blinded Independent Central Review) using RECIST v1.1, in each expansion cohort in pts with advanced solid tumors that harbor a ROS1 or NTRK1/2/3 gene fusion. Secondary endpoints include duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), IC-ORR, IC-PFS, and quality of life assessments. All pts need to have RECIST 1.1 measurable disease confirmed by BICR and ECOG performance score ≤1. Repotrectinib is administered at 160 mg QD for 14 days and, if tolerated, the dose can be increased to 160 mg BID. Approximately 320 pts (≥12 years old) will be enrolled into 6 defined expansion cohorts, depending on the status of previous treatment with TKIs and cancer types (see table below). Clinical trial information: NCT03093116 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

390 Emerging safety and activity data from GEN-009–101: A phase 1/2a trial of GEN-009, a neoantigen vaccine in combination with PD-1 check-point inhibitors (CPI) in advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A415-A415
Author(s):  
Maura Gillison ◽  
Roger Cohen ◽  
Przemyslaw Twardowski ◽  
Ammar Sukari ◽  
Melissa Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Immune Responses ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
T Cell Responses ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Cell Responses

BackgroundGEN-009 is an adjuvanted personalized cancer vaccine containing up to 20 neoantigens selected by ATLAS™, an ex vivo bioassay screening autologous T cells to identify both neoantigens as well as Inhibigens™ empirically and without in silico predictions. Inhibigen-specific T cells suppress immunity and have been shown to accelerate tumor progression in mice. Inhibigens are avoided in GEN-009. Previous data from patients treated with GEN-009 monotherapy showed 99% of selected peptides generated immune responses including ex vivo CD4+ and CD8+ fluorospot responses specific for 51% and 41% of immunized peptides respectively.MethodsGEN-009 is being evaluated in patients (pts) with advanced cancer who received standard-of-care (SOC) PD-1 inhibitor as monotherapy or in combination therapy during vaccine manufacturing; they subsequently received 5 vaccine doses over 24 weeks in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor. Patients who progressed prior to vaccination could receive alternate therapy followed by GEN-009 combined with an appropriate salvage regimen. Peripheral T cell responses were evaluated pre-and post-vaccination by dual-analyte fluorospot assays measured both directly ex vivo and after in vitro stimulation.ResultsAs of August 18, 2020, 15 pts received GEN-009 in combination with a PD-1 inhibitor. Their median TMB was 1.37Mut/mb (range 0.31–6.55), with a median of 24 (6–99) neoantigens and 16 (1–86) Inhibigens. The number of neoantigens in each manufactured vaccine ranged from 4–18 (median 13). GEN-009-related adverse events were limited to Grade 1 injection site reactions. Ex vivo T cell responses peaked after the third vaccination for IFNγ and some patients showed evidence of epitope spread. The initial 5 patients are evaluable for antitumor activity with at least 3 months follow up after first vaccination. Three patients experienced early tumor responses followed by stabilization on PD-1 inhibitor SOC and demonstrated a further reduction in tumor volume after GEN-009 vaccination (figure 1). One patient experienced a complete response prior to vaccination and the 5th patient had progression on SOC, but had a Partial Response to salvage and remains stable after vaccination.Abstract 390 Figure 1Individual patient spider plots. Percent change in target lesion diameter over timeConclusionsVaccination with GEN-009 in combination with PD-1 CPI is feasible for patients with advanced solid tumors with little additive toxicity. Preliminary data demonstrate induction of robust, neoantigen-specific immune responses and a potential expansion of stimulatory targets with epitope spreading in the presence of PD-1 inhibitor. Possible additive antitumor activity in combination with PD-1 inhibitors is suggested by tumor shrinkage following GEN-009 dosing. More mature response and immunogenicity data on 10 additional patients is anticipated for November.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials. gov NCT03633110Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Western Institutional Review Board, approval number 1-1078861-1.

A phase I study evaluating COM701 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS2657-TPS2657
Author(s):  
Drew W. Rasco ◽  
Daniel A. Vaena ◽  
Ryan J. Sullivan ◽  
Jason J. Luke ◽  
Adam ElNaggar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Growth Inhibition ◽  
Mouse Tumor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

TPS2657 Background: There is a high unmet medical need for the treatment (tx) of patients (pt) who are refractory to or relapse following tx with checkpoint inhibitors. Newer checkpoint therapies with novel mechanisms of action that can activate T cells and demonstrate antitumor activity in this pre-tx pt population are urgently needed. COM701 is a novel first-in-class humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity to PVRIG (poliovirus receptor related immunoglobulin domain containing) blocking its interaction with its ligand, PVRL2. Both PVRIG and PVRL2 are part of the DNAM axis as are TIGIT and PD1. Inhibition of PVRIG leads to enhanced activation of T and NK cells, and PVRIG results in tumor growth inhibition in mouse tumor models. We hypothesize that COM701 will demonstrate antitumor activity in pts who are checkpoint inhibitor pre-tx. Methods: NCT03667716 is an ongoing open-label first-in-human phase 1 study in pts with advanced solid tumors. The initial part of this study (Arm A) will evaluate escalating doses of COM701 monotherapy IV Q3 weekly with single pt cohorts for the initial 4 and then 3+3 design. Key Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥18 yrs, histologically confirmed locally advanced/ metastatic solid malignancy and has exhausted available standard therapy, ECOG 0-1, prior anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, OX-40, CD137 permissible. Key Exclusion Criteria: Active autoimmune disease requiring systemic therapy in the last 2 years, symptomatic interstitial or inflammatory lung disease, untx or symptomatic central nervous system metastases. Primary objectives are safety and tolerability of COM701 as measured by the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and dose-limiting toxicities (21-day DLT window), pharmacokinetics of COM701, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose and/or the recommended dose for expansion. Secondary objectives are to characterize the immunogenicity and preliminary antitumor activity of COM701. Statistical Considerations: AEs graded as per CTCAE v4.03, responses as per RECIST v1.1. The analyses of all study objectives will be descriptive and hypothesis generating. No DLTs have been observed in the single pt cohorts. Assessment of pts enrolled into cohort 5 is ongoing at the time of this submission. Clinical trial information: NCT03667716.

AGEN1181, a clinical stage Fc-engineered anti-CTLA-4 antibody with improved therapeutic potential for the treatment of patients with advanced malignancies.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3157-TPS3157
Author(s):  
Steven O'Day ◽  
Chethan Ramamurthy ◽  
Andrea J. Bullock ◽  
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry ◽  
Lernik Ohanjanian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study

TPS3157 Background: AGEN1181 is a novel Fc-optimized anti-CTLA4 antibody, currently being evaluated in an ongoing multi-center, open-label, phase 1 study in all advanced solid tumors as mono-therapy and combination with anti-PD-1 antibody, AGEN2034 (NCT03860272). AGEN1181 is Fc-engineered to harness a novel mechanism for enhanced FcγR-dependent functionality relative to first-generation CTLA-4 antibodies. In pre-clinical models, AGEN1181 enhances T cell priming, depletion of intratumoral regulatory T cells (Treg) and improved memory formation compared to first-generation anti-CTLA-4 antibodies. Most notably, AGEN1181 demonstrates improved binding to FcyRIIIA and superior T cell responsiveness in populations that only express the low affinity FcγRIIIA receptor relative to first-generation IgG1 CTLA-4 antibodies. The combination of AGEN1181 and AGEN2034 further enhances T cell activation and effector function. Methods: This phase 1 study is an open-label, multi-center dose-escalation designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, dose limiting toxicity (DLT) PK, and pharmacodynamic profiles of patients with refractory advanced solid tumors who did not receive an anti-CTLA4 previously. The study is being conducted in 3 arms; with patients assigned using a standard 3+3 dose escalation design in the mono-therapy arms with AGEN1181 and an accelerated design in the combination with AGEN2034 arm. AGEN1181 is administered as IV infusion as mono-therapy on Day 1 of every 3 weeks (0.1,0.3,1,2,4 mg/kg), every 6-weeks (1,2,4 mg/kg) in parallel cohorts and every 6-weeks (0.1,0.3,1,2,4 mg/kg) in combination with AGEN2034 (3mg/kg Q2Weeks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (maximum 2 years). All 3 Arms are open and enrolling patients. The study is expected to enroll approximately 80 evaluable patients with solid tumors. Dose reductions are not allowed in the event of AGEN1181-related toxicities. Currently 3 cohorts have been completed, first cohort in the combination arm and the fourth cohort in the monotherapy arm are enrolling. Preclinical and clinical assessment of AGEN1181 supports continued development as a potential therapy for refractory or relapsed advanced solid tumors. Clinical trial information: NCT03860272 .

Antitumor activity and safety of MK-1308 (anti-CTLA-4) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) in patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Updated interim results from a phase I study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2558-2558 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth Perets ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoh ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
Jair Bar ◽  
Myung-Ju Ahn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Tumor Expression

2558 Background: An ongoing multicenter, open-label, phase 1 study of the anti–CTLA-4 antibody MK-1308 in combination with pembro in advanced solid tumors (NCT03179436) revealed a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy in pts with first-line (1L) advanced NSCLC. Data from a larger sample size and longer follow-up are presented. Methods: In dose escalation (DE), pts with advanced solid tumors received MK-1308 by IV administration at 25, 75, or 200 mg Q3W ×1 cycle then in combination with pembro 200 mg Q3W ×4 cycles followed by pembro monotherapy (up to 35 cycles). In dose confirmation (DC), pts with 1L advanced NSCLC received MK-1308 at 25 or 75 mg—Q3W or Q6W—plus pembro 200 mg Q3W (up to 35 cycles). Safety (all treated pts), efficacy (subset of 1L NSCLC pts), pharmacokinetics (PK, all treated pts), and PD-L1 tumor expression (subset of 1L NSCLC pts) were analyzed. Results: 213 pts were treated (DE, n=39; DC, n=174). All pts were included in the safety analyses (median follow-up, 8 months); 113 pts from DC were included in the efficacy analyses (median follow-up, 8 months). PK showed a dose-dependent increase in MK-1308 exposure. Neither target dose-limiting toxicity (≥10%) nor maximum tolerated dose were reached for MK-1308 plus pembro; however, toxicity increased with increasing MK-1308 dose and shorter dosing intervals. Treatment-related adverse events grade ≥3 occurred at the lowest rates at 25 mg Q3W in DE (0%) and 25 mg Q6W in DC (25%) and at the highest rates at 200 mg Q3W in DE (75%) and 75 mg Q3W in DC (50%). Efficacy was observed at all MK-1308 dose levels and intervals: confirmed ORR per RECIST 1.1 by central review in 1L advanced NSCLC was 39% at 25 mg Q3W, 33% at 25 mg Q6W, 22% at 75 mg Q6W, and 25% at 75 mg Q3W; 6-month PFS and OS rates are 67% and 89% for the 25 mg Q6W arm. There was a 25% ORR in PD-L1–negative 1L advanced NSCLC pts. Conclusions: MK-1308 plus pembro was generally well tolerated with no unexpected toxicity and conferred encouraging antitumor activity in 1L advanced NSCLC pts. Efficacy, safety, and PK data suggest that 25 mg given Q6W is the recommended phase 2 dose for MK-1308 in combination with pembro. Clinical trial information: NCT03179436.

Bgb-A425, an investigational anti-TIM-3 monoclonal antibody, in combination with tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors: A phase I/II trial in progress.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3146-TPS3146
Author(s):  
Jayesh Desai ◽  
Tarek Meniawy ◽  
Brandon Beagle ◽  
ZheZhen Li ◽  
Song Mu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Immune Response ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Tumor Types

TPS3146 Background: While immune surveillance plays a critical role in preventing tumor proliferation and metastasis, tumors develop resistance mechanisms to suppress and/or escape the immune system. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM-3) and programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) function as immune checkpoint receptors on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Overlap in expression and function suggests TIM-3 and PD-1 cooperate to maximize effector T-cell exhaustion, leading to a decreased antitumor immune response. Although blockade of TIM-3 alone is unlikely to result in an efficacious antitumor immune response, combined TIM-3/PD-1 blockade may enhance the antitumor properties of anti-PD-1 therapies alone. BGB-A425 is an investigational IgG1-variant monoclonal antibody against TIM-3. Tislelizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, was engineered to minimize binding to FcɣR on macrophages in order to abrogate antibody-dependent phagocytosis, a mechanism of T-cell clearance and potential resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy. This phase 1/2 study will assess the safety/tolerability, pharmacokinetic (PK) profile, and antitumor activity of BGB-A425 in combination with tislelizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: This is an open-label phase 1/2 study (NCT03744468) of BGB-A425 in combination with tislelizumab in patients with histologically/cytologically confirmed advanced, metastatic, unresectable solid tumors. Phase 1 will determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for combination treatment; phase 2 will assess the antitumor effects of the combination in select tumor types. In phase 1, up to 42 patients will be enrolled into sequential cohorts of increasing doses of intravenous (IV) BGB-A425 in combination with tislelizumab 200 mg IV, based on a 3+3 study design. During Cycle 1, patients will receive BGB-A425 alone on Day 1 followed by tislelizumab alone on Day 8. If no dose-limiting toxicities are observed, patients will receive both BGB-A425 and tislelizumab sequentially on Day 29 and every 21 days thereafter. Once the RP2D is determined, the combination therapy will be evaluated in up to 120 patients with select tumor types in phase 2. Safety/tolerability profile and RP2D determination (phase 1) and objective response rate per RECIST v1.1 (phase 2) are primary objectives; secondary objectives include antitumor activity, PK profile, and immunogenicity of combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT03744468 .

scholarly journals P863 KEYNOTE-022 parts 4 and 5: pembrolizumab plus trametinib for patients with solid tumors or BRAF wild-type melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A10.2-A11
Author(s):  
Michele Maio ◽  
Matteo Carlino ◽  
Anthony Joshua ◽  
Elaine McWhirter ◽  
Antoni Ribas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Skin Reactions ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundPembrolizumab+dabrafenib+trametinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in BRAF-mutant melanoma in phase 1/2 KEYNOTE-022 parts 1 and 2 (NCT02130466). Pembrolizumab+dabrafenib+trametinib numerically prolonged PFS and DOR versus placebo+dabrafenib+trametinib but had a higher grade 3-5 TRAE rate in part 3. KEYNOTE-022 parts 4 and 5 evaluated pembrolizumab+trametinib.MethodsIn part 4 (open-label, 3+3 dose-finding) patients with advanced solid tumors (irrespective of BRAF status) or unresectable/metastatic BRAF wild-type melanoma received pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W with trametinib as concurrent (2 or 4 weeks of trametinib run-in [1.5 or 2 mg QD], then pembrolizumab+trametinib [1.5 or 2 mg QD]) or intermittent dosing (2 weeks of trametinib run-in [1.5 or 2 mg QD], then pembrolizumab+trametinib [1.5 or 2 mg QD; 1 week off/2 weeks on]). Interim MTDs identified in part 4 were confirmed in part 5 using a modified toxicity probability interval design. The primary objectives were safety, tolerability, and ORR by investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1 of the maximum administered or tolerated dose (MAD/MTD) of pembrolizumab+trametinib. Safety was analyzed for all patients who received ≥1 dose of study drug; patients treated during the trametinib run-in who discontinued study before receiving pembrolizumab were included; patients who did not complete trametinib run-in or receive ≥66% of planned doses during the 6-week dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) evaluable period were not included for DLT evaluation. AEs were graded per NCI CTCAE v4.ResultsOf 42 enrolled patients, most were female (61.9%); median age was 55.0 years; 57.1% had received ≥2 prior lines of therapy. At database cutoff (June 26, 2019), median follow-up was 9.0 months (range, 1.4-25.6 months). Of 38 DLT-evaluable patients, 10 had DLTs (table 1). Dosing regimens were selected for confirmation in part 5 based on safety data. Any-grade TRAEs occurred in 39 (92.9%) patients; grade 3-4 TRAEs occurred in 19 (45.2%), none were grade 5. TRAEs led to discontinuation in 8 (19.0%) patients. Immune-mediated AEs occurred in 12 (28.6%) patients, most commonly severe skin reactions (n=6; 14.3%), pneumonitis (n=3; 7.1%), hypothyroidism (n=2; 4.8%). The MTD of concurrent pembrolizumab+trametinib was pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus trametinib 1.5 mg with 2 weeks of trametinib run-in (ORR, 0/16; 0%) and the MTD of intermittent pembrolizumab+trametinib was pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W plus trametinib 2 mg with 2 weeks of run-in (ORR, 4/15; 26.7%).Abstract P863 Table 1DLT, TRAE, and ORR in KEYNOTE-022 parts 4 and 5ConclusionsBoth concurrent or intermittent pembrolizumab+trametinib dosing were feasible and the combination showed antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors or advanced BRAF wild-type melanoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document