scholarly journals Consistent control of disease activity with fingolimod versus IFN β-1a in paediatric-onset multiple sclerosis: further insights from PARADIGMS

2019 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2019-321124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kumaran Deiva ◽  
Peter Huppke ◽  
Brenda Banwell ◽  
Tanuja Chitnis ◽  
Jutta Gärtner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Disability Progression ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Post Hoc

BackgroundIn PARADIGMS, a double-blind phase III trial in 215 paediatric patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) (10 to <18 years), fingolimod administered for up to 2 years significantly reduced the annualised relapse rate (ARR) and rate of new/newly enlarged T2 (n/neT2) lesions compared with interferon (IFN) β-1a.ObjectivesTo investigate (1) differences between treatment groups across subpopulations (treatment-naïve, younger/prepubertal patients); (2) disability progression.MethodsARRs at 10, 11 and 12 years were estimated based on predefined modelling extrapolations. Changes in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), and in 3 month (3M) and 6 month (6M) confirmed disability progression (CDP) were evaluated post hoc.ResultsIn the treatment-naïve subpopulation, fingolimod reduced ARR and n/neT2 lesions by 85.8% and 53.4%, respectively versus INF β-1a (both p<0.001), compared with 81.9% and 52.6% in the overall population. Model-based ARR reductions in younger patients (≤12 years) were 91.9%–94.6%. Twice as many IFN β-1a-treated than fingolimod-treated patients had worse EDSS scores at study end (20.6% vs 10.5%, p=0.043). Risk reductions in 3M-CDP and 6M-CDP were 77.2% (p=0.007) and 80.2% (p=0.040), respectively.ConclusionsFingolimod in paediatric MS was associated with consistent control of disease activity versus IFN β-1a (including treatment-naïve and younger patients) and resulted in less disability progression for up to 2 years.Trial registration numberNCT01892722.

scholarly journals Improvement in relapse recovery with peginterferon beta-1a in patients with multiple sclerosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 205521731667664 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas F Scott ◽  
Bernd C Kieseier ◽  
Scott D Newsome ◽  
Douglas L Arnold ◽  
Xiaojun You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Treatment Effect ◽  
Disability Progression ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Advance Study ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Relapsing Remitting ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Background Subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks significantly affects clinical outcomes in patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Objectives To explore relationships between relapses and worsening of disability in patients with RRMS, and assess the treatment effect of peginterferon beta-1a on relapse recovery. Methods Post-hoc analysis of the 2-year, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 3 ADVANCE study. The severity of relapses, proportion of patients with relapses associated with residual disability (onset of 24-week confirmed disability progression (CDP) within 90 days following a relapse), and persistence of changes in Functional Systems Scores, were compared between treatment groups. Results Subcutaneous peginterferon beta-1a every 2 weeks significantly reduced the proportion of patients experiencing relapse associated with CDP over 2 years (6.6%, compared with 15.1% of patients who received placebo in Year 1; p = 0.02). Reduction in relapses associated with residual disability was greater than the treatment effect on overall relapse rate, and occurred despite similar relapse severity across treatment groups. Conclusions The beneficial effect of peginterferon beta-1a on risk of CDP may be attributable to the combination of an overall reduction in the risk of relapses and improvement in recovery from relapses, thus limiting further disability progression. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00906399

scholarly journals Safety, immunogenicity and efficacy after switching from reference infliximab to biosimilar SB2 compared with continuing reference infliximab and SB2 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a randomised, double-blind, phase III transition study

2017 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josef S Smolen ◽  
Jung-Yoon Choe ◽  
Nenad Prodanovic ◽  
Jaroslaw Niebrzydowski ◽  
Ivan Staykov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Transition Period ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
American College Of Rheumatology ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Transition Study ◽  
To Receive

ObjectivesEfficacy, safety and immunogenicity results from the phase III study of SB2, a biosimilar of reference infliximab (INF), were previously reported through 54 weeks. This transition period compared results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from INF to SB2 with those in patients who maintained treatment with INF or SB2.MethodsPatients with moderate to severe RA despite methotrexate treatment were randomised (1:1) to receive SB2 or INF at weeks 0, 2 and 6 and every 8 weeks thereafter until week 46. At week 54, patients previously receiving INF were rerandomised (1:1) to switch to SB2 (INF/SB2 (n=94)) or to continue on INF (INF/INF (n=101)) up to week 70. Patients previously receiving SB2 continued on SB2 (SB2/SB2 (n=201)) up to week 70. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity were assessed up to week 78.ResultsEfficacy was sustained and comparable across treatment groups. American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 responses between weeks 54 and 78 ranged from 63.5% to 72.3% with INF/SB2, 66.3%%–69.4% with INF/INF and 65.6%–68.3% with SB2/SB2. Treatment-emergent adverse events during this time occurred in 36.2%, 35.6% and 40.3%, respectively, and infusion-related reactions in 3.2%, 2.0% and 3.5%. Among patients who were negative for antidrug antibodies (ADA) up to week 54, newly developed ADAs were reported in 14.6%, 14.9% and 14.1% of the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups, respectively.ConclusionsThe efficacy, safety and immunogenicity profiles remained comparable among the INF/SB2, INF/INF and SB2/SB2 groups up to week 78, with no treatment-emergent issues or clinically relevant immunogenicity after switching from INF to SB2.Trial registration numberNCT01936181; EudraCT number: 2012-005733-37.

scholarly journals POS0086 ANALYSIS OF DISEASE ACTIVITY MEASURES IN THE CONTEXT OF A METHOTREXATE WITHDRAWAL STUDY AMONG PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS TREATED WITH TOFACITINIB 11 MG ONCE DAILY + METHOTREXATE: POST HOC ANALYSIS OF DATA FROM ORAL SHIFT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 251.2-251
Author(s):  
R. Fleischmann ◽  
B. Haraoui ◽  
M. H. Buch ◽  
D. Gold ◽  
G. Sawyerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Activity Measures ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Disease Activity Measures

Background:The Phase 3b/4 study ORAL Shift demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety of tofacitinib modified-release (MR) 11 mg once daily (QD) following methotrexate (MTX) withdrawal that was non-inferior to continued tofacitinib + MTX use (per DAS28-4[ESR]), in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who achieved CDAI-defined low disease activity (LDA) with tofacitinib + MTX at Week (W)24.1Objectives:To assess the performance of alternative disease activity measures at W24 (randomisation) and W48 (study endpoint) in ORAL Shift.Methods:ORAL Shift (NCT02831855) enrolled pts aged ≥18 years with moderate to severe RA and an inadequate response to MTX. Pts received open-label tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD + MTX for 24 weeks. Achievement of CDAI LDA (≤10) at W24 was set as the criteria for entry to the 24-week double-blind MTX withdrawal phase, with pts randomised 1:1 to receive tofacitinib MR 11 mg QD + placebo (PBO) (ie blinded MTX withdrawal) or continue tofacitinib + MTX. In this post hoc analysis, efficacy analyses were performed in 8 subgroups defined by achievement of various disease activity criteria at W24: DAS28-4(ESR) remission (<2.6) or LDA (≤3.2); DAS28-4(CRP) <2.6 or ≤3.2; RAPID3 remission (≤3) or LDA (≤6); CDAI remission (≤2.8); and SDAI remission (≤3.3). For each subgroup, the proportion of pts who achieved the corresponding disease activity criterion at W48 was calculated, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. The change (Δ) from W24 to W48 in least squares (LS) mean DAS28-4(ESR) and DAS28-4(CRP) was also calculated in each subgroup, with a 95% CI for the difference between treatment groups estimated using a mixed model with repeated measures. Nominal p values were calculated and are presented with no formal statistical hypothesis testing formulated.Results:Overall, 694 pts entered the open-label phase of ORAL Shift, and 530 were randomised and received treatment in the double-blind phase; 264 and 266 pts received tofacitinib + PBO and tofacitinib + MTX, respectively (Figure 1a). Considering those pts who were randomised and treated, the proportion of pts achieving each disease activity criterion at W24 varied, but was similar between treatments within each subgroup (Figure 1a). Among pts who met each disease activity criterion at W24, generally the majority of pts in both treatment groups also met the same criterion at W48 (Figure 1b). Numerically more pts receiving tofacitinib + MTX vs tofacitinib + PBO continued to meet the corresponding criterion at W48. Regardless of the disease activity criterion met at W24, differences between treatment groups in LS mean ΔDAS28-4(ESR) (Figure 1c) and ΔDAS28-4(CRP) (data not shown) from W24 to W48 favoured tofacitinib + MTX vs tofacitinib + PBO.Conclusion:This post hoc analysis of data from pts randomised and treated in ORAL Shift demonstrated that, regardless of the disease activity state criterion met at W24, generally a majority of pts receiving tofacitinib maintained achievement of the corresponding disease activity criterion at W48, with or without continued MTX. Differences between treatment groups in LS mean ΔDAS28-4(ESR) from W24 to W48, as defined by achievement of LDA or remission with a variety of disease activity measures, were less than a change of 1.2, which is considered to be the threshold for a minimal clinically important improvement.2References:[1]Cohen et al. Lancet Rheumatol 2019; 1: E23-34.[2]Ward et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2015; 74: 1691-1696.Acknowledgements:Study sponsored by Pfizer Inc. Medical writing support was provided by Gemma Turner, CMC Connect, and funded by Pfizer Inc.Disclosure of Interests:Roy Fleischmann Speakers bureau: Pfizer Inc, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Samumed, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, VORSO, Boulos Haraoui Speakers bureau: Amgen, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Merck, Pfizer Inc, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Maya H Buch Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Gilead, MSD, Pfizer Inc, Roche, Sanofi, Grant/research support from: Pfizer Inc, Roche, UCB, David Gold Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Gosford Sawyerr Consultant of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Syneos Health Inc, Harry Shi Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Annette Diehl Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc, Kristen Lee Shareholder of: Pfizer Inc, Employee of: Pfizer Inc.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in patients aged 65 years or older: a post hoc analysis of three Phase III studies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Welte ◽  
Thomas WL Scheeren ◽  
J Scott Overcash ◽  
Mikael Saulay ◽  
Marc Engelhardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Skin Structure ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Post Hoc ◽  
Hospital Acquired ◽  
Phase Iii Studies

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in patients aged ≥65 years. Materials & methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of three randomized, double-blind, Phase III studies in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, community-acquired pneumonia and hospital-acquired pneumonia. Results: Findings for patients aged ≥65 years (n = 633) were consistent with those for the overall study populations, although a trend toward improved outcomes was reported in some subgroups, for example, patients aged ≥75 years with community-acquired pneumonia were more likely to achieve an early clinical response with ceftobiprole than comparator (treatment difference 16.3% [95% CI:1.8–30.8]). The safety profile was similar between treatment groups in all studies. Conclusion: This analysis further supports the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole in older patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections or pneumonia. Clinicaltrials.gov trial identifiers: NCT03137173 , NCT00326287 , NCT00210964 , NCT00229008

scholarly journals Interferon β-1a in relapsing multiple sclerosis: four-year extension of the European IFNβ-1a Dose-C omparison Study

2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-144 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Clanet ◽  
L Kappos ◽  
H-P Hartung ◽  
R Hohlfeld ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Neutralizing Antibody ◽  
Disability Progression ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Clinical Endpoints ◽  
Treatment Objective

Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease requiring long-term monitoring of treatment. Objective: To assess the four-year clinical efficacy of intramuscular (IM) IFNb-1a in patients with relapsing MS from the European IFNb-1a Dose-C omparison Study. Methods: Patients who completed 36 months of treatment (Part 1) of the European IFNb-1a Dose-C omparison Study were given the option to continue double-blind treatment with IFNb-1a 30 mcg or 60 mcg IM once weekly (Part 2). Analyses of 48-month data were performed on sustained disability progression, relapses, and neutralizing antibody (NA b) formation. Results: O f 608/802 subjects who completed 36 months of treatment, 493 subjects continued treatment and 446 completed 48 months of treatment and follow-up. IFNb-1a 30 mcg and 60 mcg IM once weekly were equally effective for up to 48 months. There were no significant differences between doses over 48 months on any of the clinical endpoints, including rate of disability progression, cumulative percentage of patients who progressed (48% and 43%, respectively), and annual relapse rates; relapses tended to decrease over 48 months. The incidence of patients who were positive for NAbs at any time during the study was low in both treatment groups. Conclusion: C ompared with 60-mcg IM IFNb-1a once weekly, a dose of 30 mcg IM IFNb-1a once weekly maintains the same clinical efficacy over four years.

scholarly journals Post Hoc Assessment of Time to Clinical Response Among Adults Hospitalized with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia Who Received Either Lefamulin or Moxifloxacin in 2 Phase III Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Clinical Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
Sam Colman ◽  
Daniel S Stein ◽  
David Fitts ◽  
Lisa Goldberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Bacterial Pneumonia ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Discharge Readiness ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Time to clinical response, a proxy for hospital “discharge readiness,” was compared between CABP inpatients who received lefamulin or moxifloxacin in the Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia (LEAP) trials. The analysis included 926 inpatients. A short and comparable median time to clinical response (4 days) was observed in both treatment groups.

scholarly journals 935. Effect of Tesamorelin in People with HIV with and without Dorsocervical Fat: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase III Double Blind Placebo Control Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S500-S501
Author(s):  
Farah Rahman ◽  
Marilyn de Chantal ◽  
Pedro Mesquita ◽  
Judith A Aberg
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Abdominal Fat ◽  
Fat Deposition ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
People Living With Hiv ◽  
Anthropometric Parameters ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Post Hoc Analysis ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Background Lipohypertrophy is defined as excess fat deposition in abdominal defined as visceral adipose tissue (VAT) as well as in the dorsocervical region, breasts, trunk, and along with possible fat deposition in liver, muscle, myocardium and epicardium. Multiple factors have been described as contributing to lipohypertrophy in people living with HIV (PLWH), including patient characteristics, antiretroviral therapy (ART) and also impaired growth hormone (GH) secretion. Tesamorelin, a synthetic form of growth-hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH), is indicated for reduction of excess abdominal fat in PLWH with lipodystrophy Methods Post-hoc analysis was done on phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter trials. Patients were eligible if between 18 and 65 years of age, had confirmed HIV infection, had evidence of excess abdominal fat accumulation and on stable ART regimen for 8 weeks or more. Participants were randomized to receive tesamorelin 2 mg daily or placebo daily for 26 weeks. Only tesamorelin responders, defined as patients with at least 8% decrease in VAT and who were adherent to the medication, were used for this analysis. Results are reported for patients with and without dorsocervical (DC) fat deposition. Results Demographic characteristics of responders at week 26 are shown according to presence or absence of DC fat (Table 1). At week 26, on average, the patients with DC fat deposition had higher BMI and waist circumference (WC) than the group without DC fat. Most patients in both groups had lipoatrophy. Metabolic and anthropometric parameters were measured at week 26 in patients with and without DC fat (Table 2). There was a decrease in VAT and also an improvement in their WC at week 26 in both groups. Table 1: Baseline Characteristics of Tesamorelin Responder Subjects at Week 26, by Dorsocervical Status Table 2: Change in Abdominal Adiposity, Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 Levels, and Metabolic Parameters Between Baseline and Week 26 Among Tesamorelin Responders Conclusion This data demonstrates that tesamorelin is effective at reducing VAT in both patients with and without DC fat. The medication was well tolerated without significant changes to metabolic based measurements. Treatment of excessive VAT with tesamorelin has seemingly positive results in fat reduction in patients with or without DC fat deposition and our study contributes to the growing literature. Disclosures Marilyn de Chantal, PhD, Theratechnologies Inc (Employee) Pedro Mesquita, PhD, Theratechnologies, Inc. (Employee) Judith A. Aberg, MD, Theratechnology (Consultant)

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab over 6 years: final results of the 4-year CARE-MS extension trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175628642098213
Author(s):  
Alasdair J. Coles ◽  
Douglas L. Arnold ◽  
Ann D. Bass ◽  
Aaron L. Boster ◽  
D. Alastair S. Compston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Brain Volume Loss ◽  
Disease Modifying Therapy ◽  
Core Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Multiple Sclerosis Patients ◽  
Extension Trial

Background: In the 2-year CARE-MS I and II trials, alemtuzumab 12 mg administered on 5 consecutive days at core study baseline and on 3 consecutive days 12 months later significantly improved outcomes versus subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Here, we present the final 6-year CARE-MS extension trial results (CAMMS03409), and compare outcomes over 6 years in patients randomized to both treatment groups at core study baseline. Methods: Over a 4-year extension, alemtuzumab patients (alemtuzumab-only) received as-needed additional alemtuzumab (⩾12 months apart) for disease activity after course 2. SC IFNB-1a patients who entered the extension discontinued SC IFNB-1a and received 2 alemtuzumab 12 mg courses (IFN–alemtuzumab), followed by additional, as-needed, alemtuzumab. Results: Through year 6, 63% of CARE-MS I and 50% of CARE-MS II alemtuzumab-only patients received neither additional alemtuzumab nor other disease-modifying therapy, with lasting suppression of disease activity, improved disability, and slowing of brain volume loss (BVL). In CARE-MS I patients (treatment-naive; less disability; shorter disease duration), disease activity and BVL were significantly reduced in IFN–alemtuzumab patients, similar to alemtuzumab-only patients at year 6. Among CARE-MS II patients (inadequate response to prior treatment; more disability; longer disease duration), alemtuzumab significantly improved clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes, including BVL, in IFN–alemtuzumab patients; however, disability outcomes were less favorable versus alemtuzumab-only patients. Safety profiles, including infections and autoimmunities, following alemtuzumab were similar between treatment groups. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the high efficacy of alemtuzumab over 6 years, with a similar safety profile between treatment groups. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553

scholarly journals Olokizumab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 6, in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis inadequately controlled by methotrexate: efficacy and safety results of a randomised controlled phase III study

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-219876
Author(s):  
Evgeniy Nasonov ◽  
Saeed Fatenejad ◽  
Eugen Feist ◽  
Mariana Ivanova ◽  
Elena Korneva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acr20 Response

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of olokizumab (OKZ) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX).MethodsIn this 24-week multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive subcutaneously administered OKZ 64 mg once every 2 weeks, OKZ 64 mg once every 4 weeks, or placebo plus MTX. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response at week 12. The secondary efficacy endpoints included percentage of subjects achieving Disease Activity Score 28-joint count based on C reactive protein <3.2, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index at week 12, ACR50 response and Clinical Disease Activity Index ≤2.8 at week 24. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the study.ResultsA total of 428 patients were randomised. ACR20 responses were more frequent with OKZ every 2 weeks (63.6%) and OKZ every 4 weeks (70.4%) than placebo (25.9%) (p<0.0001 for both comparisons). There were significant differences in all secondary efficacy endpoints between OKZ-treated arms and placebo. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs) were reported by more patients in the OKZ groups compared with placebo. Infections were the most common TESAEs. No subjects developed neutralising antidrug antibodies.ConclusionsTreatment with OKZ was associated with significant improvement in signs, symptoms and physical function of rheumatoid arthritis without discernible differences between the two regimens. Safety was as expected for this class of agents. Low immunogenicity was observed.Trial registration numberNCT02760368.

scholarly journals Randomized, controlled trial of lasmiditan over four migraine attacks: Findings from the CENTURION study

Cephalalgia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 294-304 ◽  
Author(s):  
Messoud Ashina ◽  
Uwe Reuter ◽  
Timothy Smith ◽  
Judith Krikke-Workel ◽  
Suzanne R Klise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Statistical Testing ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Primary Endpoints ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Common Teaes

Background We present findings from the multicenter, double-blind Phase 3 study, CENTURION. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of and consistency of response to lasmiditan in the acute treatment of migraine across four attacks. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to one of three treatment groups – lasmiditan 200 mg; lasmiditan 100 mg; or a control group that received placebo for three attacks and lasmiditan 50 mg for either the third or fourth attack. The primary endpoints were pain freedom at 2 h (first attack) and pain freedom at 2 h in ≥2/3 attacks. Secondary endpoints included pain relief, sustained pain freedom and disability freedom. Statistical testing used a logistic regression model and graphical methodology to control for multiplicity. Results Overall, 1471 patients treated ≥1 migraine attack with the study drug. Both primary endpoints were met for lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg ( p < 0.001). All gated secondary endpoints were met. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was highest during the first attack. The most common TEAEs with lasmiditan were dizziness, paresthesia, fatigue, and nausea; these were generally mild or moderate in severity. Conclusions These results confirm the early and sustained efficacy of lasmiditan 100 mg and 200 mg and demonstrate consistency of response across multiple attacks. Trial Registration Number: NCT03670810

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document