The emergence of vascular surgery as a separate specialty: implications for the military

2014 ◽  
Vol 100 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-93
Author(s):  
D Ablett

AbstractVascular surgery is evolving from being a sub-specialty of general surgery to becoming a separate surgical specialty. This will have implications in terms of the training, skill-set and workload of surgeons working in the NHS. There are implications for the military too, as a deploying trauma team must have both general and vascular surgical capabilities. This article explores the reasons for the changes occurring and discusses the wider implications.

2012 ◽  
Vol 94 (7) ◽  
pp. 232-233 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lamont ◽  
Michael G Wyatt ◽  
A Ross Naylor

on 16 March 2012, vascular surgery entered the Parliamentary statute books as a separate surgical specialty in the United Kingdom. Up until that date, vascular surgery had been an integral part of general surgery. over the past two decades, the two specialties have been developing a dichotomous mix of surgical skills and clinical expertise, resulting in the present-day consultant vascular and endovascular surgeon being very different from the previous general surgeon with a vascular interest.


2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (9-10) ◽  
pp. e412-e416
Author(s):  
Samuel Grasso ◽  
Joshua Dilday ◽  
Brian Yoon ◽  
Avery Walker ◽  
Eric Ahnfeldt

Abstract Introduction Since inception of robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) in 1999, there has been an exponential rise in RAS in both number and complexity of surgical cases performed. The majority of these cases are gynecologic surgery in nature, with only a quarter of them labeled as general surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine if RAS in the Department of Defense (DoD) mirrors these trends. Methods A total of 6,204 RAS cases from across the DoD were reviewed between 01 January 2015 and 30 September 2017 from every Military Treatment Facility (MTF) that employs a robotic surgical device (various models of the da Vinci robotic surgical system by Intuitive Surgical). Specialty, number, and surgeon were recorded for each case. These end points were also examined for trends overtime and compared to similar civilian data. Results The number of MTFs performing robotic surgery and the number of cases performed increased significantly. An average of 373 cases per quarter-year were performed in 2015, 647 in 2016, and 708 in 2017. The number of RAS cases increased by about 10% every quarter-year during this time period. RAS was most commonly performed by general surgery in 10 of the 14 MTFs examined. Conclusions MTFs implemented RAS much later than the civilian world. However, since its implementation, the frequency of RAS use has increased at a faster rate in the DoD than in the civilian world. Possible reasons for this are a younger pool of surgeons in the military and less demands on cost-effective productivity, allowing these younger surgeons to focus on emerging technology rather than maximizing surgical cost efficiency. General surgery constitutes the majority of RAS cases in the DoD. It is unclear why this difference from the civilian world exists.


2014 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 308-311
Author(s):  
IG Panagiotopoulou ◽  
S Pilgrim ◽  
N Sengupta ◽  
S Iype ◽  
K Fareed ◽  
...  

Vascular surgery has recently been recognised as a full surgical specialty in the UK. Major vascular interventions are centralised into hub units where sufficient volume of cases exists to achieve good outcomes and support training. 1 If no consolidation onto a single site has occurred, clinical networks have formed to provide emergency vascular cover for their catchment area. In local district hospitals, visiting vascular surgeons can run clinics, perform day-case minor elective surgery and offer a vascular opinion. 1 In 2013 the first round of trainee recruitment at ST3 level in vascular surgery, separate from general surgery, was completed. Vascular trainees will do less general surgery and as consultants they will work on a pure vascular rota. 2


Author(s):  
Theresa N. Jackson ◽  
Tiffany P. Wheeler ◽  
Michael S. Truitt ◽  
Peter R. Nelson ◽  
Kelly Kempe

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. e257-e258
Author(s):  
Bernadette J. Goudreau ◽  
Jonathan M. Cullen ◽  
Alexander H. Shannon ◽  
John B. Hanks ◽  
Margaret C. Tracci ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ryan Mortman ◽  
Harold A. Frazier ◽  
Yolanda C. Haywood

ABSTRACT Background Increasing diversity in medicine is receiving more attention yet underrepresented in medicine (UiM) surgeons remain a small fraction of all surgeons. Whether surgical training programs attempt to attract UiM applicants to their programs, and therefore their specialties, through program website information is unclear. Objective To analyze the scope of diversity and inclusion (D&I) related information on US allopathic and osteopathic general surgery, integrated thoracic surgery, and integrated vascular surgery residency program websites. Methods Residency programs were identified through the Electronic Residency Application Service (ERAS) in July 2020. We searched surgical program websites and collected data on the presence or absence of variables labeled “diversity & inclusion” or “underrepresented in medicine.” Variables found on program websites as well as sites linked to the program website were included. We excluded programs identified in ERAS as fellowship training programs. Programs without webpages were also excluded. Results We identified 425 residency programs and excluded 22 from data analysis. Only 75 of the 403 included programs (18.6%) contained D&I-related information. The presence of individual variables was also low, ranging from 4.5% for opportunities related to early exposure to the specialty to 11.1% for a written or video statement of commitment to D&I. Conclusions In 2020, as recruitment and interviews moved entirely online, few US allopathic and osteopathic general surgery, integrated thoracic surgery, and integrated vascular surgery residency programs provided D&I-related information for residency applicants on their program websites.


2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 536-541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte K. Smith ◽  
P. Chulhi Kang ◽  
Chris McAninch ◽  
Glen Leverson ◽  
Sarah Sullivan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Renan Kleber Costa TEIXEIRA ◽  
Vitor Nagai YAMAKI ◽  
Ruy Victor Simões PONTES ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Henriques BRITO ◽  
José Antonio Cordero da SILVA

Background: The instructions to authors are the only means of communication between researchers and the editorial standards of a scientific journal. One of the mandatory items to be contained therein is about the ethical part, to prevent new research to carry out abuses with the enrolled on the research are published and stimulated. Aim: To verify the ethical questions on the guidelines of Brazilian surgical journals Method: Thirteen selected journals were divided into two groups: general surgery (n=3), and surgical specialty (n=10). The instructions to authors were analyzed by the quote of ethical requirements based on a specific research protocol, ranging from zero to six points. Results: The average score of the general surgery group was similar than that of the surgical specialty group (3.66±0.57 vs 3.30±1.15, p=0.6154). When each ethical requirement was compared between the groups, there was no significant difference between the ethical requirements (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was respect for most ethical questions evaluated, with no difference between the journals of general or specialty surgery.


2009 ◽  
Vol 151 (2) ◽  
pp. 242 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.J. Sideman ◽  
K.E. Taubman ◽  
T.A. Broughan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document