scholarly journals Impact of glucocorticoids on the incidence of lupus-related major organ damage: a systematic literature review and meta-regression analysis of longitudinal observational studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000590
Author(s):  
Manuel Francisco Ugarte-Gil ◽  
Anselm Mak ◽  
Joanna Leong ◽  
Bhushan Dharmadhikari ◽  
Nien Yee Kow ◽  
...  

ObjectiveIn systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), disease activity and glucocorticoid (GC) exposure are known to contribute to irreversible organ damage. We aimed to examine the association between GC exposure and organ damage occurrence.MethodsWe conducted a literature search (PubMed (Medline), Embase and Cochrane January 1966–October 2021). We identified original longitudinal observational studies reporting GC exposure as the proportion of users and/or GC use with dose information as well as the occurrence of new major organ damage as defined in the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index. Meta-regression analyses were performed. Reviews, case-reports and studies with <5 years of follow-up, <50 patients, different outcomes and special populations were excluded.ResultsWe selected 49 articles including 16 224 patients, 14 755 (90.9%) female with a mean age and disease duration of 35.1 years and of 37.1 months. The mean follow-up time was 104.9 months. For individual damage items, the average daily GC dose was associated with the occurrence of overall cardiovascular events and with osteoporosis with fractures. A higher average cumulative dose adjusted (or not)/number of follow-up years and a higher proportion of patients on GC were associated with the occurrence of osteonecrosis.ConclusionsWe confirm associations of GC use with three specific damage items. In treating patients with SLE, our aim should be to maximise the efficacy of GC and to minimise their harms.

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 372-379 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murray B Urowitz ◽  
Robert L Ohsfeldt ◽  
Ronald C Wielage ◽  
Kari A Kelton ◽  
Yumi Asukai ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThe study (206347) compared organ damage progression in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who received belimumab in the BLISS long-term extension (LTE) study with propensity score (PS)-matched patients treated with standard of care (SoC) from the Toronto Lupus Cohort (TLC).MethodsA systematic literature review identified 17 known predictors of organ damage to calculate a PS for each patient. Patients from the BLISS LTE and the TLC were PS matched posthoc 1:1 based on their PS (±calliper). The primary endpoint was difference in change in Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) score from baseline to 5 years.ResultsFor the 5- year analysis, of 567 (BLISS LTE n=195; TLC n=372) patients, 99 from each cohort were 1:1 PS matched. Change in SDI score at Year 5 was significantly lower for patients treated with belimumab compared with SoC (−0.434; 95% CI –0.667 to –0.201; p<0.001). For the time to organ damage progression analysis (≥1 year follow-up), the sample included 965 (BLISS LTE n=259; TLC n=706) patients, of whom 179 from each cohort were PS-matched. Patients receiving belimumab were 61% less likely to progress to a higher SDI score over any given year compared with patients treated with SoC (HR 0.391; 95% CI 0.253 to 0.605; p<0.001). Among the SDI score increases, the proportion of increases ≥2 was greater in the SoC group compared with the belimumab group.ConclusionsPS-matched patients receiving belimumab had significantly less organ damage progression compared with patients receiving SoC.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 343
Author(s):  
Senthil Kumar Andy ◽  
Elayaraja Kandasamy

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an episodic multisystem autoimmune disease characterized by widespread inflammation of blood vessels and connective tissues and by the presence of antinuclear antibodies especially antibodies to native double stranded DNA. The aim was to study the clinical profile of SLE among children less than 12 years attending an urban referral hospital, SLEDAI scoring at onset and follow up at 1 year and SLICC/ACR damage index at 1 year.Methods: A descriptive, prospective and observational study was conducted in Medical, Nephrology, Rheumatology OPD wards, in ICH and HC, from November 2007 to August 2009 among all children diagnosed to have SLE. Results: In this study there were 50 cases over the last 2 years. Majority of the children were diagnosed within a year of their initial manifestation. The mean age at the time of onset of symptoms was 7.94 years. Female to male ratio in our study is 2.5:1.Conclusions: Efforts should be directed in diagnosing at earlier stage itself for better outcome. SLEDAI and SLICC/ACR DI can be incorporated in routine follow up to detect mild to moderate and severe flare and extent of organ damage.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1031.1-1031
Author(s):  
J. H. Kang ◽  
S. E. Choi ◽  
H. Xu ◽  
D. J. Park ◽  
S. S. Lee

Background:Objectives:Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is a cornerstone drug in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), decreasing the risk of flares and comorbidities and improving survival. This study investigated the effects of HCQ adherence on clinical manifestations, disease activity, and organ damage in Korean patients with SLE.Methods:Data on 299 SLE patients were obtained from the Korean Lupus Network registry. Demographic variables, clinical manifestations, laboratory findings, PGA, and SLEDAI-2000 and SLICC damage index scores were recorded at the time of enrollment and repeated annually for 4 consecutive years. Patients were divided into two groups according to the level of HCQ adherence. Adherence was defined by the medication possession ratio and dichotomized as ≤ 80% vs. > 80%. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the impact of adherence to HCQ on clinical outcomes.Results:Of the 299 patients, 31 (10.4%) showed poor drug adherence during the follow-up period. Patients with poor HCQ adherence were older (P=0.011), less insured (P=0.024), experienced lower employment (P=0.033), and had a higher rate of comorbidities such as hypertension (P=0.048) and depression (P<0.001). The non-adherent group had higher mean and changed SLICC damage index scores than the adherent group across all 4 years. In the multivariate analysis, HCQ non-adherence was significantly associated with older age (OR, 1.043; 95% CI, 1.006–1.081; P=0.021), depression (OR, 11.98; 95% CI, 1.099–130.6; P=0.042), and an annual increase in the SLICC damage index score (OR, 2.275; 95% CI, 1.369–3.779; P=0.002).Conclusion:HCQ adherence might be influenced by age and depressive mood. Additionally, the poor adherence to HCQ in SLE patients was correlated with higher cumulative organ damage. Therefore, patients with SLE should be educated to take HCQ appropriately to improve their clinical outcome in clinical practice.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 657.2-657
Author(s):  
F. Cheldieva ◽  
T. Reshetnyak ◽  
A. Shumilova ◽  
N. Kosheleva ◽  
T. Lisitsyna ◽  
...  

Background:The role of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) as a cause of chronic organ damage in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is important. While acute disease manifestations of APS are well known, information on the long-term prognosis and damage in affected patients is still very limited.Objectives:Тo assess the severity of organ damage in patients with APS without SLE and with concomitant SLE, as well as the feature of irreversible damage to internal organs in patients with primary APS during a dynamic observation using SLICC/ACR Damage Index (SDI).Methods:Тhe study included 195 patients (41 men and 154 women) who were observed at the Institute of Rheumatology from 2007 to June 2018 with a diagnosis of SLE and APS. The study inclusion criteria were: a follow-up period of at least 3 years with the study of serological markers of APS for previous years, the possibility of dynamic monitoring of patients, patient consent. Patients were divided into 3 groups, depending on presence of APS: group I -SLE with APS (n=99 with average age 34.6 [25-44), group II - SLE without APS (n=45; 33.5[26-42]) and group III - 45 (average age 37.7 [27-46]) patients with primary APS (PAPS) diagnosed according to international diagnostic criteria, without signs of any disease. In all three groups organ damage was assessed using SDI. SDI 1-2 points corresponded to moderate damage, more than 2 points - to severe.Results:A linear increase in irreversible organ damage was noted over 10 years of follow-up. At the time of inclusion in the study, the average SDI was significantly higher in the SLE + APS group than in the SLE group: 1.32 versus 0 when included (p <0.0001). A direct correlation was found between the age of patients and the value of SDI both in the group I (p=0.004, r=0.284) and in the group II (p=0.04, r=0.281) when included in the study. There was a direct correlation between the activity of the disease on the SLEDAI at the end of the study and the value of SDI (p=0.03, r=0.41) in the group II. The number of patients by the 10th year of follow-up remained in group I were 44 of 99, in group II - 24 of 51 and in group III - 14 of 45. SDI was more than 2 points in 39 (89%) of 44 patients in group I, in 12 (50%) of 24 in group II and 9 (65%) of 14 in Group III (p=0.0002 OR=13; 95% CI 2,4-70). 5 years after the start of the observation average SDI in group I and II was 2.5 and 1.3 (p <0.0001) and after 10 years - 2.8 and 1.9 (p = 0.0008) accordingly. An increase of total SDI occurred primarily due to damage to peripheral vessels due to the large number of thromboses (in 55% of patients) in the group II. Using step-by-step multiple logistic regressions in the study groups only APS was an independent predictor of increased SDI. The most common cause of an increase in SDI in the PAPS group was damage to peripheral vessels (64%) as a result of a high frequency of venous thrombosis, followed by damage to the neuropsychiatric system (55%) and the cardiovascular system (40%).Conclusion:APS is an independent predictor of increased SDI. The determination of irreversible organ damage in patients with PAPS using SDI allows us to assess the functional disorders of organs and systems and can be used in clinical practice in these patients.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


Lupus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1250-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Sabio ◽  
S De Betolaza ◽  
J A Vargas-Hitos

Objective The objective of this study was to determine the safety of tattoos in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods Patients ( N = 147; ≤55 years; 92% women) were asked if they had tattoos. The characteristics of the tattoos and the immediate complications were investigated and compared with those of a matched control group. We examined retrospectively after the tattoo was completed whether there had been flare-ups or increased organ damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American Collage of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI)). Finally, we compared the SLE-related characteristics of patients with and without tattoos. Results Twenty-eight patients (19%, 26 women, median (interquartile range) age 33 (25–42) years, 65 tattoos in total) had ≥1 tattoo. At the time the tattoo was done the median (interquartile range) SLEDAI and SDI were 2 (0–2) and 0 (0–1), respectively. The characteristics of the tattoos were similar to those of controls. No patients experienced acute complications. After a median follow-up of 17 (12–20) months (3 (2–4) visits/year) four patients had five mild-to-moderate flare-ups. The median time between the tattoo and the flare-up was 9 (6–14) months. No increase in SDI was observed. The SLE-related characteristics of patients with and without tattoos were similar. Conclusion Tattoos seem to be safe in SLE patients with inactive or low active disease.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1059.3-1059
Author(s):  
M. Garabajiu ◽  
L. Mazur-Nicorici ◽  
T. Rotaru ◽  
V. Salaru ◽  
S. B. Victoria ◽  
...  

Background:Systemic lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease with a major impact on patient’s quality of life.Objectives:To evaluate patient’s attitude toward early disease and factors that influence it.Methods:Performed case-control study included SLE patients that fulfilled SLICC, 2012 classification criteria. The research included two groups of patients: early SLE – 1stgroup (disease duration ≤24 months) and non-early SLE – 2ndgroup control (disease duration >24 months). The pattern of the disease activity was assessed by patient global assessment (PGA), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) and Systemic Lupus Activity Measure (SLAM), for SLE activity, SLICC/ACR Damage Index (DI) for disease irreversible changes and SF-8 for the Quality of Life (QoL).Results:A total of 101 SLE patients with 34 in the 1stgroup (early SLE) and 67 in the 2ndgroup (non-early SLE) was analyzed. The disease activity showed high disease activity in both groups by SLEDAI (7,02±4,16 and 6,26±4,43 points, p>0,05) and SLAM (7,47±4,40 and 7,31±4,10 points, p>0,05) such as (46,97±19,39 vs 47,98±22,41 points). The QoL was appreciated as low, by both components (mental and physical), in groups. The damage index was higher in the 2nd group (0,23±0,43 and 1,07±1,29, p<0,001), which can be explained by the development of irreversible changes with the increase of disease duration.The PGA in early SLE was influenced by subjective symptoms contained in SLAM index (r=0,48, p<0,05), such as fatigue and depression, and the level of the quality of life (r=0,65, p<0,001). Meantime, PGA in patients with longer disease duration (>2 years), was influenced by the presence of organ damage by SLICC/ACR DI (0,23, p<0,05) and objective findings of the disease activity contained in SLEDAI (r=0,33, p<0,005) and SLAM (0,44, p<0,001).Conclusion:The disease recognition in patients with early SLE was determined by subjective and psycho-emotional signs, while in patients with longer disease duration it was influenced by organ damage and complications.References:no referencesDisclosure of Interests:None declared


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e031850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene B Murimi-Worstell ◽  
Dora H Lin ◽  
Henk Nab ◽  
Hong J Kan ◽  
Oluwadamilola Onasanya ◽  
...  

ObjectiveAt least half of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) develop organ damage as a consequence of autoimmune disease or long-term therapeutic steroid use. This study synthesised evidence on the association between organ damage and mortality in patients with SLE.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsElectronic searches were performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature for observational (cohort, case-control and cross-sectional) studies published between January 2000 and February 2017. Included studies reported HRs or ORs on the association between organ damage (measured by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index (SDI) score) and mortality. Study quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa assessment. Pooled HRs were obtained using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochrane Q (Q) and I2 statistics.ResultsThe search yielded 10 420 articles, from which 21 longitudinal studies were selected. Most studies (85%) were of high quality. For 10 studies evaluating organ damage (SDI) as a continuous variable and reporting HR as a measure of association, a 1-unit increase in SDI was associated with increased mortality; pooled HR was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.24 to 1.44, p<0.001; Q p=0.027, I2=52.1%). Exclusion of one potential outlying study reduced heterogeneity with minimal impact on pooled HR (1.33 (95% CI: 1.25 to 1.42), p<0.001, Q p=0.087, I2=42.0%). The 11 remaining studies, although they could not be aggregated because of their varying patient populations and analyses, consistently demonstrated that greater SDI was associated with increased mortality.ConclusionsOrgan damage in SLE is consistently associated with increased mortality across studies from various countries. Modifying the disease course with effective therapies and steroid-sparing regimens may reduce organ damage, improve outcomes and decrease mortality for patients with SLE.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Elera-Fitzcarrald ◽  
Cristina Reátegui-Sokolova ◽  
Rocio Violeta Gamboa-Cardenas ◽  
Mariela Medina ◽  
Francisco Zevallos ◽  
...  

IntroductionSerum uric acid levels have been reported as predictors of cardiovascular, pulmonary, neurological and renal morbidity in patients with SLE. However, their role in cumulative global damage in these patients has not yet been determined.ObjectiveTo determine whether serum uric acid levels are associated with new damage in patients with SLE.MethodsThis is a longitudinal study of patients with SLE from the Almenara Lupus Cohort, which began in 2012. At each visit, demographic and clinical characteristics were evaluated, such as activity (Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2K or SLEDAI-2K) and cumulative damage (Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index or SDI). Treatment (glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive drugs and antimalarials) was also recorded. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine the impact of serum uric acid levels on the risk of new damage.ResultsWe evaluated 237 patients, with a mean age (SD) at diagnosis of 35.9 (13.1) years; 220 patients (92.8%) were women, and the duration of the disease was 7.3 (6.6) years. The mean SLEDAI-2K and SDI scores were 5.1 (4.2) and 0.9 (1.3), respectively. Serum uric acid level was 4.5 (1.4) mg/dL. Follow-up time was 3.1 (1.3) years, and 112 (47.3%) patients accrued damage during follow-up. In univariable and multivariable analyses, serum uric acid levels were associated with new damage (HR=1.141 (95% CI 1.016 to 1.282), p=0.026; HR=1.189 (95% CI 1.025 to 1.378), p=0.022, respectively).ConclusionHigher serum uric acid levels are associated with global damage in patients with SLE.


Lupus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 1556-1565
Author(s):  
Leyre Riancho-Zarrabeitia ◽  
Victor Martínez-Taboada ◽  
Iñigo Rúa-Figueroa ◽  
Fernando Alonso ◽  
María Galindo-Izquierdo ◽  
...  

Introduction Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have been associated with organ damage and certain features in systemic lupus erythematosus(SLE) patients. Our aim was to investigate the differences between SLE patients according to the presence of aPL and/or clinical antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Materials and methods Patients from the RELESSER-T registry were included. RELESSER-T is a Spanish multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective, SLE registry. Results We included 2398 SLE patients, 1372 of whom were positive for aPL. Overall 1026 patients were classified as SLE, 555 as SLE-APS and817 as SLE-aPL. Regarding cardiovascular risk factors, SLE-APS patients had higher rates of hypertension, dyslipidemia and diabetes than those with SLE-aPL and SLE ( p < 0.001). SLE-APS patients showed higher rates of neuropsychiatric, cardiac, pulmonary, renal and ophthalmological manifestations than the other groups ( p < 0.001). SLE-APS patients presented greater damage accrual with higher SLICC values (1.9 ± 2.2 in SLE-APS, 0.9 ± 1.4 in SLE-aPL and 1.1 ± 1.6 in SLE, p < 0.001) and more severe disease as defined by the Katz index (3 ± 1.8 in SLE-APS, 2.7 ± 1.7 in SLE-aPL and 2.6 ± 1.6 in SLE, p  < 0.001). SLE-APS patients showed higher mortality rates ( p < 0.001). Conclusions SLE-APS patients exhibited more severe clinical profiles with higher frequencies of major organ involvement, greater damage accrual and higher mortality than SLE-aPL and SLE patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document