Endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms with a Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS Jr) device

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1030-1033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edgar A Samaniego ◽  
German Abdo ◽  
Ricardo A Hanel ◽  
Andrey Lima ◽  
Santiago Ortega-Gutierrez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Phase ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Small Series ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Reconstructive Technique ◽  
Pica Aneurysms

ObjectiveTo describe the treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms with the Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Device (LVIS Jr) stent.Materials and methodsThe databases of three institutions were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms using a reconstructive technique where the LVIS Jr stent was totally or partially deployed into the PICA were included in the analysis. Clinical presentation, aneurysm and PICA sizes, procedural complications, and clinical and angiographic follow-up information was recorded and analyzed.ResultsSeven patients who underwent endovascular treatment of PICA aneurysms with an LVIS Jr stent were identified. Four aneurysms were treated in the acute phase of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). There were no symptomatic complications. One patient had spasm distal to the stent as a result of mechanical straightening of the vessel. One patient was treated in the acute phase of SAH and required a gycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor after the stent was implanted. This patient needed to be re-treated to complete embolization. All patients had good clinical outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 5). No in-stent stenosis or occlusion was seen on short-term angiographic follow-up and the aneurysms were occluded.ConclusionsThis small series suggests that the use of a reconstructive technique with the LVIS Jr stent for the treatment of PICA aneurysms is feasible, safe and effective in the short term.

Endovascular treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms: a 7-year single-center experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Xu ◽  
Yong Hong ◽  
Yongtao Zheng ◽  
Qiang Xu ◽  
Bing Leng
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Endovascular Embolization ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Selective Embolization ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Pica Aneurysms

AimTo report our experience with endovascular treatment of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms.MethodsBetween January 2007 and December 2014, 40 patients with 42 PICA aneurysms were treated with endovascular embolization at our institution. Twenty-eight patients had 29 saccular aneurysms and 12 patients had 13 fusiform/dissecting aneurysms. The endovascular modalities were: (1) selective occlusion of the aneurysm with or without stent assistance (n=19); (2) occlusion of the aneurysm and the parent artery (n=22); and (3) occlusion of the aneurysm including the vertebral artery and PICA origin (n=1). Specifically, selective embolization was performed in 93.3% of aneurysms (14/15) proximal to the telovelotonsillary segment.ResultsImmediate angiographic results included 31 complete occlusions (74%), 3 nearly complete occlusions (7%), and 8 incomplete occlusions (19%). Mean follow-up of 20 months in 31 aneurysms showed 27 stable results, 3 further thromoboses, and 1 recurrence. Final results included 27 complete occlusions (87.1%) and 4 incomplete occlusions (12.9%). There were 5 overall procedural-related complications (12.5%), including 1 infarction (2.5%) and 4 intraprocedural ruptures (10.0%). Procedure-related morbidity and morbidity was 5.0% (2/40) and 2.5% (1/40), respectively. Clinical outcome was excellent (Glasgow Outcome Scale 5 in 31 of 33 patients at long-term follow-up).ConclusionsPICA aneurysms may be effectively treated by different endovascular approaches with favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes. Further studies are required to compare the safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment with open surgery.

scholarly journals Ten years of experience in endovascular treatment of ruptured aneurysms of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Juszkat ◽  
Paweł Kram ◽  
Katarzyna Stanisławska ◽  
Roman Jankowski ◽  
Bogumiła Stachowska-Tomczak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Years Of Experience ◽  
Endovascular Stents ◽  
Ruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Pica Aneurysms

Background The aim of this study is to present our 10 years of experience in endovascular treatment of ruptured posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) saccular aneurysms and to compare clinical presentation and outcome after endovascular treatment between patients with PICA aneurysms and patients with aneurysms in different locations. Methods and findings Out of 932 patients with a ruptured intracranial aneurysm treated endovascularly in our institution, 38 aneurysms were located at the posterior inferior cerebellar artery. Clinical presentation, mean aneurysm diameter and outcome of the therapy in this group were compared with the same for ruptured aneurysms in other locations. Patients discharged with favourable outcomes were checked angiographically in the follow-up period. Thirty-four patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms were treated by selective endovascular coiling. Two patients with wide-necked aneurysms had endovascular stents implanted. In two cases, the parent vessel was occluded due to failure to catheterise the target aneurysm. The evaluated variables did not differ significantly between two groups, but significantly more ruptured aneurysms in the PICA group were under 6 mm in diameter. 29.4% of controlled aneurysms needed additional reembolisation in the follow-up period. Conclusions Clinical presentation, extension of subarachnoid haemorrhage and outcome after endovascular treatment did not differ significantly between patients with ruptured aneurysms located on the PICA and patients with aneurysms located elsewhere intracranially. Endovascular treatment is an effective method of therapy in patients with ruptured PICA aneurysms. In our experience, even when sacrificing of the PICA is required, the results of treatment are favourable.

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms Using the Novel Low Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support EVO Stent: Multicenter Early Feasibility Experience

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Foo ◽  
Julian Maingard ◽  
Jonathan Hall ◽  
Yifan Ren ◽  
Goran Mitreski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Aneurysms ◽  
Flow Diversion ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Dome Height ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Related Mortality

Purpose: Low-profile, self-expandable stents have broadened therapeutic options available for definitive treatment of intracranial aneurysms. The novel Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) EVO stent extends upon the success of its predecessor, the LVIS Jr stent, aiming to enable higher visibility and greater opening ability within a self-expandable and fully retrievable microstent system. In this study, we aim to report the early safety and feasibility experience with the LVIS EVO stent.Materials and Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted on patients who had intracranial aneurysms treated with the LVIS EVO stent across 3 Australian neurovascular centers between February 2020 and September 2020. Short-term technical and clinical outcomes were evaluated.Results: A total of 22 LVIS EVO stents were successfully implanted to treat 15 aneurysms (3 ruptured, 12 unruptured) in 15 patients. Aneurysms ranged from 2 mm to 35 mm in dome height. The LVIS EVO stent was used for stent-assisted coiling in 11 patients and flow diversion in 4 patients. There were no device-related procedural complications. There were 2 cases of peri-procedural symptomatic thromboembolic complications and no procedure-related mortality. At early radiological follow up, 10 patients had complete occlusion, 4 patients had small neck remnants, and 1 patient who was managed with flow diversion had a residual aneurysm.Conclusion: Early experience with the LVIS EVO stent demonstrated safety and feasibility for stent-assisted coiling as well as flow diversion for intracranial aneurysms. In this heterogeneous cohort, including ruptured, complex, and large aneurysms, all cases were technically successful.

Onyx embolization in distal dissecting posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 501-506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajit S Puri ◽  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Samuel Y Hou ◽  
Juan Diego Lozano ◽  
Mary Howk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Imaging ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Endovascular Coiling ◽  
Parent Artery ◽  
Small Series ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Mild Disability ◽  
Pica Aneurysms

BackgroundDissecting aneurysms located along the distal segments of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) are extremely rare, accounting for only 0.5–0.7% of all intracranial aneurysms. Treatment of these aneurysms is challenging, both surgically and endovascularly. We present our preliminary experience and clinical data utilizing Onyx as an embolization agent in the treatment of these lesions with proximal parent artery preservation.Methods7 consecutive ruptured peripheral PICA aneurysms, in 7 patients, were treated with superselective Onyx embolization at our institutions. According to the anatomical classification of Lister et al, these aneurysms were located in the lateral medullary segment (n=1), tonsillomedullary segment (n=1), and the telovelotonsillary segment (n=5) of the PICA. Technical feasibility, procedure related complications, angiographic results, follow-up diagnostic imaging, and clinical outcome were evaluated.ResultsIn all cases, endovascular treatment was successful, with complete occlusion of the aneurysm with proximal parent artery preservation at the final postprocedural angiogram. Procedure related complications were not observed. One patient with a poor clinical condition at admission died during the initial hospital stay due to extensive subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage. No rebleeding or recanalization was noted during follow-up. Two patients had a residual moderate to severe disability at follow-up. Favorable outcomes, with no or mild disability, were observed in four of the surviving patients.ConclusionsAngiographic, diagnostic imaging, and clinical results of our small series indicate that Onyx embolization of dissecting distal PICA aneurysms with parent artery preservation is an effective option with acceptable morbidity and mortality rate, in those cases in which surgical clipping or endovascular coiling of the aneurysmal sac is not suitable.

Endovascular treatment of proximal and distal posterior inferior cerebellar artery aneurysms

2013 ◽  
Vol 118 (5) ◽  
pp. 991-999 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nohra Chalouhi ◽  
Pascal Jabbour ◽  
Robert M. Starke ◽  
Stavropoula I. Tjoumakaris ◽  
L. Fernando Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Parent Vessel ◽  
Unruptured Aneurysms ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Pica Aneurysms ◽  
Aneurysm Coiling

Object Surgical clipping of posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms can be challenging and carries a potentially significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Experience with endovascular therapy has been limited to a few studies. The authors assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endovascular therapy in the largest series of proximal and distal PICA aneurysms to date. Methods A total of 76 patients, 54 with proximal and 22 with distal PICA aneurysms, underwent endovascular treatment at Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience between 2001 and 2011. Results Endovascular treatment was successful in 52 patients (96.3%) with proximal aneurysms and 19 patients (86.4%) with distal aneurysms. Treatment consisted of selective aneurysm coiling in 60 patients (84.5%) (including 4 with stent assistance and 4 with balloon assistance) and parent vessel trapping in 11 patients (15.5%). Specifically, a deconstructive procedure was necessary in 9.6% of proximal aneurysms (5 of 52) and 31.6% of distal aneurysms (6 of 19). There were 9 overall procedural complications (12.7%), 6 infarcts (8.5%; 4 occurring after deliberate occlusion of the PICA), and 3 intraprocedural ruptures (4.2%). The rate of procedure-related permanent morbidity was 2.8%. Complete aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 63.4% of patients (45 of 71). One patient (1.4%) treated with selective aneurysm coiling suffered a rehemorrhage on postoperative Day 15. The mean angiographic follow-up time was 17.2 months. Recurrence and re-treatment rates were, respectively, 20% and 17.1% for proximal aneurysms compared with 30.8% and 23.1% for distal aneurysms. Favorable outcomes (moderate, mild, or no disability) at follow-up were seen in 93% of patients with unruptured aneurysms and in 78.7% of those with ruptured aneurysms. Conclusions Endovascular therapy is a feasible, safe, and effective treatment in patients with proximal and distal PICA aneurysms, providing excellent patient outcomes and adequate protection against rehemorrhage. The long-term incidence of aneurysm recanalization appears to be high, especially in distal aneurysms, and requires careful angiographic follow-up.

scholarly journals Endovascular Treatment of Vertebral and Basilar Artery Aneurysms with Low-Profile Visualized Intraluminal Support Device

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanlong Hong ◽  
Wenqiang Li ◽  
Jing Ma ◽  
Peng Jiang ◽  
Yisen Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Basilar Artery ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Endovascular Embolization ◽  
Low Profile ◽  
Closed Cell ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Permanent Morbidity ◽  
A Minor

Abstract Background: The Low-profile Visualized Intraluminal Support (LVIS) device is a self-expanding, nitinol, single-braid, closed-cell device that was recently developed for endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysms. However, current knowledge regarding the use of LVIS devices to treat vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms is limited. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of the LVIS device for treating vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms.Methods: Between January 2015 and December 2017, patients with vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms treated using LVIS stents were enrolled in this study. We analyzed patients’ demographic, clinical and aneurysmal characteristics, procedural details, complications, and angiographic and clinical follow-up results.Results: We identified 63 patients with 64 vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms who underwent treatment with (n=59) or without (n=5) LVIS stenting, including 10 patients with ruptured aneurysms. Forty-one aneurysms were located at the vertebral artery, and 23 at the basilar artery. Intraprocedural-related complications developed in three (4.8%) patients, while none of these patients developed morbidities or died during follow-up. Three patients developed post-procedural complications (4.8%). Two patients experienced ischemic events immediately post-procedure. A minor permanent morbidity developed in one of the two patients (1.6%). The mortality rate was 1.6%, for that the patient died of brainstem hemorrhage after 1 month of follow-up. At a mean follow-up of 12.5 months, 39/43 (90.7%) patients had stable or improved aneurysms, and four (9.3%) had recanalized.Conclusions: Endovascular treatment of vertebral and basilar artery aneurysms with the LVIS device is feasible, safe, and effective in the short-term. Long-term and larger cohort studies are necessary to validate our results.

Anticoagulation in addition to dual antiplatelet therapy has no impact on long-term follow-up after endovascular treatment of (sub)acute lower limb ischemia

VASA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 321-329
Author(s):  
Mariya Kronlage ◽  
Erwin Blessing ◽  
Oliver J. Müller ◽  
Britta Heilmeier ◽  
Hugo A. Katus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Bleeding Complications ◽  
Severe Bleeding ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Summary. Background: To assess the impact of short- vs. long-term anticoagulation in addition to standard dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) upon endovascular treatment of (sub)acute thrombembolic occlusions of the lower extremity. Patient and methods: Retrospective analysis was conducted on 202 patients with a thrombembolic occlusion of lower extremities, followed by crirical limb ischemia that received endovascular treatment including thrombolysis, mechanical thrombectomy, or a combination of both between 2006 and 2015 at a single center. Following antithrombotic regimes were compared: 1) dual antiplatelet therapy, DAPT for 4 weeks (aspirin 100 mg/d and clopidogrel 75 mg/d) upon intervention, followed by a lifelong single antiplatelet therapy; 2) DAPT plus short term anticoagulation for 4 weeks, followed by a lifelong single antiplatelet therapy; 3) DAPT plus long term anticoagulation for > 4 weeks, followed by a lifelong anticoagulation. Results: Endovascular treatment was associated with high immediate revascularization (> 98 %), as well as overall and amputation-free survival rates (> 85 %), independent from the chosen anticoagulation regime in a two-year follow up, p > 0.05. Anticoagulation in addition to standard antiplatelet therapy had no significant effect on patency or freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR) 24 months upon index procedure for both thrombotic and embolic occlusions. Severe bleeding complications occurred more often in the long-term anticoagulation group (9.3 % vs. 5.6 % (short-term group) and 6.5 % (DAPT group), p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our observational study demonstrates that the choice of an antithrombotic regime had no impact on the long-term follow-up after endovascular treatment of acute thrombembolic limb ischemia whereas prolonged anticoagulation was associated with a nominal increase in severe bleeding complications.

Procedural Complications During Early Versus Late Endovascular Treatment in Acute Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Errikos Maslias ◽  
Stefania Nannoni ◽  
Federico Ricciardi ◽  
Bruno Bartolini ◽  
Davide Strambo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Time Window ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Late Time ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Short Term Outcome ◽  
Procedural Complications

Background and Purpose: Endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke is effective in the late time window in selected patients. However, the frequency and clinical impact of procedural complications in the early versus late time window has received little attention. Methods: We retrospectively studied all acute ischemic strokes from 2015 to 2019 receiving EVT in the Acute Stroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne. We compared the procedural EVT complications in the early (<6 hours) versus late (6–24 hours) window and correlated them with short-term clinical outcome. Results: Among 695 acute ischemic strokes receiving EVT (of which 202 were in the late window), 113 (16.3%) had at least one procedural complication. The frequency of each single, and for overall procedural complications was similar for early versus late EVT (16.2% versus 16.3%, P adj =0.90). Procedural complications lead to a significantly less favorable short-term outcome, reflected by the absence of National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement in late EVT (delta-National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale-24 hours, −2.5 versus 2, P adj =0.01). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis of consecutive EVT, the frequency of procedural complications was similar for early and late EVT patients but very short-term outcome seemed less favorable in late EVT patients with complications.

Endovascular Treatment of Bilateral Intracranial Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Presenting With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

2011 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. ons75-ons81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Sam Shin ◽  
Byung Moon Kim ◽  
Se-Hyuk Kim ◽  
Sang Hyun Suh ◽  
Chang Woo Ryu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Vertebral Artery ◽  
Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Treatment Methods ◽  
Cerebellar Artery ◽  
Endovascular Methods ◽  
Dissecting Aneurysms

Abstract BACKGROUND: Optimal management of bilateral vertebral artery dissecting aneurysms (bi-VDAs) causing subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment methods and outcomes of bi-VDA causing SAH. METHODS: Seven patients were treated endovascularly for bi-VDA causing SAH. Treatment methods and outcomes were evaluated retrospectively. RESULTS: Two patients were treated with 2 overlapping stents for both ruptured and unruptured VDAs, 2 with 2 overlapping stents and coiling for ruptured VDA and with conservative treatment for unruptured VDA, 1 with internal trapping (IT) for ruptured VDA and stent-assisted coiling for unruptured VDA, 1 with IT for ruptured VDA and 2 overlapping stents for unruptured VDA, and 1 with IT for ruptured VDA and a single stent for unruptured VDA. None had rebleeding during follow-up (range, 15-48 months). All patients had favorable outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2). On follow-up angiography at 6 to 36 months, 9 treated and 2 untreated VDAs revealed stable or improved state, whereas 3 VDAs in 2 patients showed regrowth. Of the 3 recurring VDAs, 1 was initially treated with IT but recurred owing to retrograde flow to the ipsilateral posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA), the second was treated with single stent but enlarged, and the last was treated with 2 overlapping stents and coiling but recurred from the remnant sac harboring the PICA origin. All 3 recurred VDAs were retreated with coiling with or without stent insertion. CONCLUSION: Bilateral VDAs presenting with SAH were safely treated with endovascular methods. However, endovascular treatment may be limited for VDAs with PICA origin involvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document