scholarly journals O-031 Role of resistivity index analysis in the prediction of hemodynamically significant venous sinus stenosis in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mohammaden ◽  
M Rizwan Husain ◽  
D Brunozzi ◽  
G Atwal ◽  
F Charbel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Resistivity Index ◽  
Index Analysis ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Role of Resistivity Index Analysis in the Prediction of Hemodynamically Significant Venous Sinus Stenosis in Patient With Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 631-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud H Mohammaden ◽  
Muhammad Rizwan Husain ◽  
Denise Brunozzi ◽  
Ahmed E Hussein ◽  
Gursant Atwal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Small Sample Size ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multicenter Studies ◽  
Resistivity Index ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Abstract BACKGROUND The resistivity index (RI) in cerebral venous sinus stenosis (VSS) has not been studied in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of RI measured by quantitative magnetic resonance venogram (QMRV) as a noninvasive tool in the diagnosis of venous hypertension associated with VSS in IIH. METHODS Retrospective evaluation of 13 consecutive IIH patients who underwent venous sinus stenting at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Patients’ demographics, clinical presentation, cerebral mean venous sinus pressure (MVP), and RI both pre- and poststenting were recorded. The baseline RI was also compared to a control group. RESULTS Among 13 patients of IIH, 11 had unilateral VSS in dominant sinus, whereas 2 had bilateral VSS. RI was significantly higher in IIH patients compared to the control group in the superior sagittal (SSS) and transverse sinuses (TS) (0.21 vs 0.11, P = .01 and 0.22 vs 0.13, P = .03, respectively). The MVP (in mm Hg) decreased significantly after venous sinus stenting in the SSS (41.9 to 22.5, P < .001) and TS (39.4 to 19.5, P < .001), which was also associated with a significant reduction of the RI (0.22 vs 0.17, P < .01 in SSS and 0.23 vs 0.17, P = .03 in TS) poststenting. CONCLUSION RI calculated using QMRV can serve as a noninvasive tool to aid in the diagnosis of hemodynamically significant VSS. The study had a small sample size, and larger multicenter studies would be required to validate the results further.

Prevalence of dural venous sinus stenosis and hypoplasia in a generalized population

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1173-1177 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher R Durst ◽  
David A Ornan ◽  
Michael A Reardon ◽  
Prachi Mehndiratta ◽  
Sugoto Mukherjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Multivariate Statistical ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus

Background and purposeWhile recent literature has described the prevalence of transverse sinus stenosis in patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension, tinnitus, and refractory headaches, it is unclear what the prevalence is in the general population. This study evaluates the prevalence of venous sinus stenosis and hypoplasia in the general patient population.Materials and methods355 of 600 consecutive patients who underwent CT angiography of the head met the inclusion criteria. The diameters of the dural venous sinuses were recorded. Each study was evaluated by a neuroradiologist for the presence of stenoses. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were performed by a statistician.ResultsThe prevalence of unilateral transverse sinus stenosis or hypoplasia in a sample of patients representing the general population was 33%, the prevalence of bilateral transverse sinus stenosis was 5%, and the prevalence of unilateral stenosis with contralateral hypoplasia was 1%. A multivariate analysis identified arachnoid granulations as a predictor of stenosis (p<0.001). Gender trended toward significance (p=0.094). Race was not a significant predictor of stenosis (p=0.745).ConclusionsThe prevalence of bilateral transverse sinus stenosis in the general population is not trivial. These data may be used as a reference for understanding the mechanistic role of stenoses in idiopathic intracranial hypertension, tinnitus, and refractory headaches.

scholarly journals Intracranial Venous Sinus Stenting in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 382
Author(s):  
Dinesh Ramanathan ◽  
Zachary D. Travis ◽  
Emmanuel Omosor ◽  
Taylor Wilson ◽  
Nikhil Sahasrabudhe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Vision Loss ◽  
Transverse Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Subdural Hygroma ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Minimal Improvement ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Work Up

We describe a case of severe headaches, double vision, and progressive vision loss secondary to a ruptured intracranial cyst (IAC) in a 31-year-old woman with no relevant past medical history. The case is peculiar because drainage of the subdural hygroma led to a minimal improvement in vision with persistent elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). Further exploration revealed transverse sinus stenosis necessitating stenting. Evaluation post-stenting showed marked reduction of ICP and improvement in symptoms. This report underscores the importance of comprehensive work-up and suspicion of multiple underlying etiologies that may be crucial to complete resolution of presenting symptoms in some cases. We provide an overview of the clinical indications and evidence for venous sinus stenting in treating idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH).

scholarly journals Intracranial Venous Hypertension and Venous Sinus Stenting in the Modern Management of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 508
Author(s):  
Robert K. Townsend ◽  
Kyle M. Fargen
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Hypertension ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Venous Outflow ◽  
The Status ◽  
Insight Into ◽  
Symptom Recurrence

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a debilitating condition that has traditionally been difficult to treat. In recent years, there has been increasing focus on the role of intracranial venous hypertension in the pathophysiology of IIH. Based on increased understanding of this pathophysiology, venous sinus stenting (VSS) has emerged as a safe and reliable treatment for a certain population of patients with IIH. Stratifying patients with IIH based on the status of their venous outflow can provide insight into which patients may enjoy reduction in their symptoms after VSS and provides information regarding why some patients may have symptom recurrence. The traditional view of IIH as a disease due to obesity in young women has been cast into doubt as the understanding of the role of intracranial venous hypertension has improved.

FIRST CASE SERIES OF VENOUS SINUS STENTING IN IIH PATIENTS IN WALES

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (11) ◽  
pp. e4.113-e4
Author(s):  
Gauhar Abbas Malik ◽  
Yogish Joshi
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Headache Disorder ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
First Line ◽  
Venous Stenting ◽  
First Case ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

BackgroundIdiopathic Intracranial Hypertension (IIH), is defined by increased cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) pressure in the absence of other causes of intracranial hypertension. There has been recent interest in the role of intracranial venous sinus stenosis in IIH. The raised pressures in IIH are argued to worsen by the secondary appearance of the venous sinus stenosis.Objective5 patients have undergone endovascular pressure measurement in Wales and their clinical details including history, examination, initial management, neuroimaging pre- and post venous stenting, and follow-up (6–24 months) to provide the first case study of patients undergoing Venous sinus stenting in Wales.Methods5 patients with IIH refractory to first line treatments underwent venography and manometry and 4 patients underwent stenting of the venous sinuses after this procedure had shown a pressure gradient proximal to stenosis in the lateral sinuses.ResultsThree patients were rendered asymptomatic, two were improved including one patient unmasking a different headache disorder following treatment.ConclusionsStenting in venous stenosis provides a further treatment option to patients refractory to first line treatments with IIH. This case series highlights in selected cases treatment is promising with good outcomes.

Abstract 1122‐000232: The Importance of Performing Venous Pressure Measurements Following Venous Sinus Stenting for Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh
Keyword(s):  
Pressure Gradient ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Pressure ◽  
Sigmoid Sinus ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Pressure Measurements ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
The Right

Introduction : Although venous sinus stenting is an established treatment for medically refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension, a subset of patients shows little or no improvement of symptoms after stenting. While this could be related to a number of factors, failure to sufficiently address the pressure gradient is one that can be recognized during the treatment procedure. We describe two patients who had a persistent venous pressure gradient after stent placement. Once identified, a second stent was placed with subsequent resolution of the pressure gradient. Methods : This retrospective chart review identified patients at a single institution who underwent venous sinus stenting and required immediate placement of a second venous sinus stent for a persistent pressure gradient. Results : Two patients with refractory idiopathic intracranial hypertension underwent cerebral angiography with venous manometry. In the first patient, unilateral venous sinus stenosis was present with a maximum pressure of 50 mmHg, which only decreased to 30 mmHg after placement of a right transverse‐sigmoid sinus stent. Subsequent manometry revealed a persistent gradient between the superior sagittal sinus and the right transverse sinus, which resolved after placement of a second stent in this location. In the second patient, bilateral stenosis was observed at the transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction; the maximum venous pressure was 40 mmHg, and a gradient of 30 mmHg was measured at the right transverse‐sigmoid junction, where a venous sinus stent was placed. Venous sinus pressure measurements performed immediately after the stent placement demonstrated a persistent pressure gradient of 20 mmHg in the contralateral transverse‐sigmoid sinus junction, which resolved after contralateral stent placement. Both patients showed sustained improvement in their symptoms at 1 year follow up. Conclusions : In some patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension and venous sinus stenosis, a single stent may not sufficiently reduce the pressure gradient. A second stent may be required; however, this is only detectable with post‐stent pressure measurements. Performing manometry after stent placement should be routinely performed in order to detect persistent venous pressure gradient.

Transverse venous sinus stenosis in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: a prospective pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 401-405
Author(s):  
Wesley Chan ◽  
A. Laine Green ◽  
Anuradha Mishra ◽  
Charles Maxner ◽  
Jai J.S. Shankar
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Prospective Pilot Study ◽  
Sinus Stenosis

Venous sinus stenting in patients without idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 512-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael R Levitt ◽  
Felipe C Albuquerque ◽  
Bradley A Gross ◽  
Karam Moon ◽  
Ashutosh P Jadhav ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Congenital Hydrocephalus ◽  
Pulsatile Tinnitus ◽  
Venous Sinus Thrombosis ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus

BackgroundVenous sinus stenting is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) and venous sinus stenosis.ObjectiveTo determine the usefulness of venous sinus stenting in the treatment of patients with symptomatic venous sinus stenosis without a diagnosis of IIH.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of a prospective multicenter database of patients undergoing venous sinus stenting between January 2008 and February 2016. Patients with acute dural venous sinus thrombosis, arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous malformation, or IIH were excluded. Clinical, radiological, and ophthalmological information was recorded.ResultsNine patients met the inclusion criteria and underwent venous sinus stenting for symptomatic dural venous sinus stenosis. Reasons for treatment included isolated unilateral pulsatile tinnitus (n=1), congenital hydrocephalus (n=2), unilateral pulsatile tinnitus following prior venous sinus thrombosis (n=1), acquired hydrocephalus following dural sinus thrombosis (n=2), meningitis (n=2) and tumor invasion into the dural venous sinus (n=1). Six patients underwent lumbar puncture or shunt tap, and all of these patients had elevated intracranial pressure. All stenoses were located in the transverse sinus, transverse–sigmoid junction and/or jugular bulb, and all were treated with self-expanding bare-metal stents. At follow-up, clinical symptoms had resolved in all but two patients, both of whom had congenital hydrocephalus and pre-existing shunts. There was no significant in-stent stenosis, and patients with ophthalmological follow-up demonstrated improvement of papilledema.ConclusionsDural venous sinus stenting may be an effective treatment for patients with symptomatic venous sinus stenosis without IIH in carefully selected cases, but may not be effective in resolving the symptoms of congenital hydrocephalus.

Retrograde 3D rotational venography (3DRV) for venous sinus stent placement in idiopathic intracranial hypertension

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 777-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher C Young ◽  
Ryan P Morton ◽  
Basavaraj V Ghodke ◽  
Michael R Levitt
Keyword(s):  
Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Stent Placement ◽  
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Venous Sinus ◽  
Flat Panel ◽  
Venous Sinuses ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Sinus Stenosis ◽  
Dural Venous Sinus

BackgroundDural venous sinus stenting has emerged as an effective and durable treatment for idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). Improved visualization of the venous sinuses can improve stent placement.MethodsWe present two cases of IIH treated with venous sinus stenting in which retrograde three-dimensional rotational venography (3DRV) provided superior anatomical details of the venous sinuses for optimal sizing and positioning of stent.ResultsComparison of pre-stent 3DRV with post-stent contrast-enhanced flat panel detector CT allowed confirmation of stent placement and the result of stenosis dilation.ConclusionThis 3DRV technique provides precise visualization of venous sinus stenosis prior to stenting without the need for arterial cerebral angiography during the treatment course.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document