Implementation of regional Acute Stroke Care Map increases thrombolysis rates for acute ischaemic stroke in Chinese urban area in only 3 months

BackgroundThe rate of intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke remains low in China. We investigated whether the implementation of a citywide Acute Stroke Care Map (ASCaM) is associated with an improvement of acute stroke care quality in a Chinese urban area.MethodsThe ASCaM comprises 10 improvement strategies and has been implemented through a network consisting of 20 tertiary hospitals. We identified 7827 patients with ischaemic stroke admitted from April to October 2017, and 506 patients underwent thrombolysis were finally included for analysis.ResultsCompared with ‘pre-ASCaM period’, we observed an increased rate of administration of tissue plasminogen activator within 4.5 hours (65.4% vs 54.5%; adjusted OR, 1.724; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.45; p=0.003) during ‘ASCaM period’. In multivariate analysis models, ‘ASCaM period’ was associated with a significant reduction in onset-to-door time (114.1±55.7 vs 135.7±58.4 min, p=0.0002) and onset-to-needle time (ONT) (169.2±58.1 vs 195.6±59.3 min, p<0.0001). Yet no change was found in door-to-needle time. Clinical outcomes such as symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, favourable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) and in-hospital mortality remained unchanged.ConclusionThe implementation of ASCaM was significantly associated with increased rates of intravenous thrombolysis and shorter ONT. The ASCaM may, in proof-of-principle, serve as a model to reduce treatment delay and increase thrombolysis rates in Chinese urban areas and possibly other highly populated Asian regions.

Download Full-text

Enhancing acute stroke services: a quality improvement project

BMJ Open Quality ◽

10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000258 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 7 (3) ◽

pp. e000258 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Keith McGrath ◽

Nora Cunningham ◽

Elizabeth Moloney ◽

Margaret O’Connor ◽

John McManus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

University Hospital ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Improvement Project ◽

Stroke Team ◽

Stroke Services

BackgroundIn a busy stroke centre in Ireland, care for acute stroke was provided by a mixture of general physicians. In acute ischaemic stroke, speed is essential for good outcomes.AimTo improve acute stroke services and decrease door-to-needle (DTN) time to less than 60 min by December 2016 in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who are eligible for intravenous thrombolysis.Design: A quality improvement (QI) project was undertaken in a 438 bed, acute, university hospital.MethodsMixture of qualitative and quantitative data collected. A process map and driver diagram were created. Interventions tested with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. Times compared between July and December 2015, January and July 2016, July and December 2016, when a new stroke team and pathway were introduced.ResultsBetween July and December 2015, the total number of ischaemic strokes was 216. 17 were thrombolysed (7.8%). Median door-to-CT (DTCT) time was 36 min (range 21–88). Median DTN time was 99 min (range 52–239). Between July and December 2016, there were 214 ischaemic strokes. 29 were thrombolysed (13.5%). 9 were seen directly by the stroke team during normal hours. With stroke team involvement, median DTCT time was 34 min (range 14–60) and DTN time was 43.5 min (range 24–65).ConclusionsThis project led to a significant and sustained improvement in acute stroke care in our hospital with the use of quality improvement techniques. A comprehensive protocol, recurrent and ongoing staff education, and good communication helped to mitigate delays and further enhance care provided to patients presenting with stroke. The approach described may be valuable to the improvement of other services.’

Download Full-text

Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000516309 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽

Álvaro García-Tornel ◽

Mònica Millán ◽

Marc Ribó ◽

Sergi Amaro ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Functional Outcome ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Point Of View ◽

Stroke Severity ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Prehospital Delays ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. Methods: Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. Results: Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], p 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], p 0.015) during the pandemic period. Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Download Full-text

Acute Stroke Care during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Reduction in the Number of Admissions of Elderly Patients and Increase in Prehospital Delays

Cerebrovascular Diseases ◽

10.1159/000514140 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Gabriel Velilla-Alonso ◽

Andrés García-Pastor ◽

Ángela Rodríguez-López ◽

Ana Gómez-Roldós ◽

Antonio Sánchez-Soblechero ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Elderly Patients ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Time Course ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Group Data ◽

Radiological Data ◽

History Of ◽

Prehospital Delays

Introduction: We analyzed whether the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis affected acute stroke care in our center during the first 2 months of lockdown in Spain. Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective study. We collected demographic, clinical, and radiological data; time course; and treatment of patients meeting the stroke unit admission criteria from March 14 to May 14, 2020 (COVID-19 period group). Data were compared with the same period in 2019 (pre-COVID-19 period group). Results: 195 patients were analyzed; 83 in the COVID-19 period group, resulting in a 26% decline of acute strokes and transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) admitted to our center compared with the previous year (p = 0.038). Ten patients (12%) tested positive for PCR SARS-CoV-2. The proportion of patients aged 65 years and over was lower in the COVID-19 period group (53 vs. 68.8%, p = 0.025). During the pandemic period, analyzed patients were more frequently smokers (27.7 vs. 10.7%, p = 0.002) and had less frequently history of prior stroke (13.3 vs. 25%, p = 0.043) or atrial fibrillation (9.6 vs. 25%, p = 0.006). ASPECTS score was lower (9 [7–10] vs. 10 [8–10], p = 0.032), NIHSS score was slightly higher (5 [2–14] vs. 4 [2–8], p = 0.122), onset-to-door time was higher (304 [93–760] vs. 197 [91.25–645] min, p = 0.104), and a lower proportion arrived within 4.5 h from onset of symptoms (43.4 vs. 58%, p = 0.043) during the COVID-19 period. There were no differences between proportion of patients receiving recanalization treatment (intravenous thrombolysis and/or mechanical thrombectomy) and in-hospital delays. Conclusion: We observed a reduction in the number of acute strokes and TIAs admitted during the COVID-19 period. This drop affected especially elderly patients, and despite a delay in their arrival to the emergency department, the proportion of patients treated with recanalization therapies was preserved.

Download Full-text

Abstract W MP104: Quality of Acute Stroke Care at Primary Stroke Centers Before and After Certification in Comparison to Never-Certified Hospitals

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.45.suppl_1.wmp104 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Nerses Sanossian ◽

May A Kim-Tenser ◽

David S Liebeskind ◽

Justina Breen ◽

Scott Hamilton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Los Angeles ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Phase 3 ◽

Before And After ◽

Beneficial Impact ◽

Mean Time

Background: Primary Stroke Centers (PSC) provide better acute stroke care than non-PSC hospitals, including faster times to imaging and lytic treatment, and higher rates of lytic delivery. Nationwide less than 1 in 3 hospital has achieved this designation. We aimed to determine the extent to which the better performance at PSC is driven by improvements within hospitals after PSC designation versus better baseline hospital care among facilities seeking PSC certification. Methods: From 2005 to 2012, the NIH Field Administration of Stroke Therapy -Magnesium (FAST-MAG) Phase 3 clinical trial enrolled subjects with likely stroke within 2 hours of onset in a study of prehospital start of a neuroprotective agent. Subjects were routed to 59 community and academic centers in Los Angeles and Orange Counties. Of the original 59 centers, 39 eventually achieved PSC status during the study period. Each subject was classified as enrolled at a PSC before certification (pre-PSC), at a PSC post certification (post-PSC), or at a hospital that never achieved PSC (non-PSC). Results: Of 1700 cases, 529 (31%) were enrolled at pre-PSC, 856 (50%) at post-PSC, and 315 (19%) at non-PSC hospitals. Mean time in minutes from ED arrival to first scan was 33 minutes at post-PSC, 47 minutes at pre-PSC and 49 at non-PSCs [p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney]. Among cases of cerebral ischemia (CI) [N=1223], rates of TPA utilization were 43% at post-PSC, 27% at pre-PSC and 28% at non-PSC hospitals [p<0.001 by X2]. Time in minutes from ED arrival to thrombolysis in treated cases was 71 at post-PSC, 98 at pre-PSC, and 95 at non-PSC hospitals [p<0.001 by Mann-Whitney]. Hospitals that achieved PSC showed improvements in pre-PSC and post-PSC performance on door to imaging time, from 47 to 33 minutes [p=0.014]; percent TPA use in CI, from 27% to 43% [p<0.001], and reduced door-to-needle times, from 98 to 71 minutes [p=0.003]. There was no difference in time to imaging [47 vs. 49 minutes], time to thrombolysis [98 vs. 95 minutes] and percent TPA use [27% vs. 28%] between pre-PSC hospitals and non-PSC hospitals. Conclusions: Better performance of Primary Stroke Centers on acute care quality metrics is primarily driven by a beneficial impact of the PSC-certification process, and not better performance prior to seeking PSC status.

Download Full-text

Ten Years of Improving Acute Stroke Management in a Metropolitan Area: A Population-Based Quantification of Quality Indicators

European Neurology ◽

10.1159/000518428 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Anna Alegiani ◽

Michael Rosenkranz ◽

Leonie Schmitz ◽

Susanne Lezius ◽

Günter Seidel ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Quality Indicators ◽

Metropolitan Area ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Units ◽

Stroke Treatment ◽

Acute Stroke Treatment ◽

Over Time

Background and Purpose: Rapid access to acute stroke treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. We aimed to shorten the time to admission and to acute stroke treatment for patients with acute stroke in the Hamburg metropolitan area by collaborative multilevel measures involving all hospitals with stroke units, the Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and health-care authorities. Methods: In 2007, an area-wide stroke care quality project was initiated. The project included mandatory admission of all stroke patients in Hamburg exclusively to hospitals with stroke units, harmonized acute treatment algorithms among all hospitals, repeated training of the EMS staff, a multimedia educational campaign, and a mandatory stroke care quality monitoring system based on structured data assessment and quality indicators for procedural measures. We analyzed data of all patients with acute stroke who received inhospital treatment in the city of Hamburg during the evaluation period from the quality assurance database data and evaluated trends of key quality indicators over time. Results: From 2007 to 2016, a total of 83,395 patients with acute stroke were registered. During this period, the proportion of patients admitted within ≤3 h from symptom onset increased over time from 27.8% in 2007 to 35.2% in 2016 (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients who received rapid thrombolysis (within ≤30 min after admission) increased from 7.7 to 54.1% (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Collaborative stroke care quality projects are suitable and effective to improve acute stroke care.

Download Full-text

Off-Hours Admission and Acute Stroke Care Quality

Stroke ◽

10.1161/strokeaha.114.005535 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 45 (12) ◽

pp. 3663-3669 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Nina Sahlertz Kristiansen ◽

Jan Mainz ◽

Bente Mertz Nørgård ◽

Paul D. Bartels ◽

Grethe Andersen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Care Quality ◽

Acute Stroke Care

Download Full-text

The Dutch Acute Stroke Audit: Benchmarking acute stroke care in the Netherlands

European Stroke Journal ◽

10.1177/2396987318787695 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (4) ◽

pp. 361-368 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Laurien S Kuhrij ◽

Michel WJM Wouters ◽

Renske M van den Berg-Vos ◽

Frank-Erik de Leeuw ◽

Paul J Nederkoorn

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Best Practice ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Favourable Outcome ◽

Hospital Level ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Related Factors ◽

Variation In Care

Introduction In the nationwide Dutch Acute Stroke Audit (DASA), consecutive patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) are prospectively registered. Acute stroke care is a rapidly evolving field in which intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and intra-arterial thrombectomy (IAT) play a crucial role in increasing odds of favourable outcome. The DASA can be used to assess the variation in care between hospitals and develop ‘best practice’ in acute stroke care. Patients and methods: We describe the initiation and design of the DASA as well as the results from 2015 and 2016. Results In 2015 and 2016, 55,854 patients with AIS and 7727 patients with ICH were registered in the DASA. Treatment with IVT was administered to 10,637 patients (with an increase of 1.3% in 2016) and 1740 patients underwent IAT (with an increase of 1% in 2016). Median door-to-needle time for IVT and median door-to-groin time for IAT have decreased from 27 to 25 min and 66 to 64 min, respectively. Mortality during admission was 4.9% in patients with AIS, whereas 26% of patients with ICH died. Modified Rankin Scale score at three months was registered in 49% of AIS patients and 45% of ICH patients. Discussion During the nationwide DASA, time to treatment is reduced for IVT as well as IAT. With the rapidly evolving treatment of acute stroke care, the DASA can be used to monitor the quality provided on patient- and hospital level. Conclusion Increasing completeness of registration of the outcome, in combination with adjustment for patient-related factors, is necessary to define and further improve the quality of the acute stroke care.

Download Full-text

Management of Acute Ischaemic Stroke

Acute Medicine Journal ◽

10.52964/amja.0108 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

pp. 88-91

Author(s):

David Jarrett ◽

◽

Hemang Dave ◽

Keyword(s):

Blood Pressure ◽

Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Good Care ◽

Stroke Service ◽

Basic Care ◽

The Uk ◽

Proven Benefit

National audits of stroke care in the UK have repeatedly shown deficiencies in basic care. The key to good care is prompt thorough assessment, investigation and management of physiological parameters i.e blood pressure, glycaemia, temperature and oxygenation. Three interventions are of proven benefit in acute ischaemic stroke: admission to an organised stroke service, early aspirin and intravenous thrombolysis. The use of multidisciplinary guidelines and education and audit around these improves care.

Download Full-text

Diagnosis and management of acute ischaemic stroke

Practical Neurology ◽

10.1136/practneurol-2020-002557 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 20 (4) ◽

pp. 304-316 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Robert Hurford ◽

Alakendu Sekhar ◽

Tom A T Hughes ◽

Keith W Muir

Keyword(s):

Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Acute Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Neuronal Damage ◽

Early Recognition ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Close Monitoring ◽

Endovascular Thrombectomy ◽

Early Neurological Deterioration ◽

Ischaemic Penumbra

Acute ischaemic stroke is a major public health priority and will become increasingly relevant to neurologists of the future. The cornerstone of effective stroke care continues to be timely reperfusion treatment. This requires early recognition of symptoms by the public and first responders, triage to an appropriate stroke centre and efficient assessment and investigation by the attending stroke team. The aim of treatment is to achieve recanalisation and reperfusion of the ischaemic penumbra with intravenous thrombolysis and/or endovascular thrombectomy in appropriately selected patients. All patients should be admitted directly to an acute stroke unit for close monitoring for early neurological deterioration and prevention of secondary complications. Prompt investigation of the mechanism of stroke allows patients to start appropriate secondary preventative treatment. Future objectives include improving accessibility to endovascular thrombectomy, using advanced imaging to extend therapeutic windows and developing neuroprotective agents to prevent secondary neuronal damage.

Download Full-text

Validation of Hospital Performance Measures of Acute Stroke Care Quality. Riksstroke, the Swedish Stroke Register

Neuroepidemiology ◽

10.1159/000444679 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 46 (4) ◽

pp. 229-234 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Anna Söderholm ◽

Birgitta Stegmayr ◽

Eva-Lotta Glader ◽

Kjell Asplund ◽

Keyword(s):

Data Quality ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Hospital Performance ◽

Care Quality ◽

Sufficient Data ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Stroke Register ◽

Care Performance

Background: Registers are increasingly used to monitor stroke care performance. Fair benchmarking requires sufficient data quality. We have validated acute care data in Riksstroke, the Swedish Stroke Register. Methods: Completeness was assessed by comparisons with diagnoses at hospital discharge recorded in the compulsory National Patient Register and content validity by comparisons with (a) key variables identified by European stroke experts, and (b) items recorded in other European stroke care performance registers. Five test cases recorded by 67 hospitals were used to estimate inter-hospital reliability. Results: All 72 Swedish hospitals admitting acute stroke patients participated in Riksstroke. The register was estimated to cover at least 90% of acute stroke patients. It includes 18 of 22 quality indicators identified by international stroke experts and 14 of 15 indicators used by at least 2 stroke performance registers in other European countries. Inter-hospital reliability was high (≥85%) in 77 of 81 Riksstroke items. Conclusions: A nationwide stroke care register can be maintained with sufficient data quality to permit between-hospital performance benchmarking. Our experiences may serve as a model for other stroke registers while evaluating data quality.

Download Full-text