Current Measurements in Knight Inlet, British Columbia

One of the features of the circulation in an estuary is the net outflow in the surface layer of the fresh water discharged into the estuary together with an appreciable volume of salt water entrained. Continuity considerations require that there be an inflow of salt water to compensate for that taken out in the surface. In a shallow estuary, such as Chesapeake Bay, this results in a two-layer flow, out at the surface and in below it.In a deep estuary, the questions arise whether or not it also possesses this simple two-layer flow and what is the depth and extent of the inflow. Measurements have been made in several inlets in the British Columbia coast to obtain information about the circulation in a deep estuary. Preliminary experiments were made in Toba, Bute and Knight Inlets, the series made in Knight Inlet in July 1956 being the most complete. The techniques employed and the results obtained are described and discussed.In a shallow section (75 m), in-and-out (flood-and-ebb) flow occurred in phase from surface to bottom, with a net outflow in the upper half and inflow below this. In the presence of an up-inlet wind, the flow in the surface few metres reversed and became up-inlet, with an increased outflow below it.In a deep section, both oscillatory (tidal period) as well as net currents occurred at all depths from the surface to 300 m (relevant bottom depth was 350 m). In this deeper section, the oscillatory components were not in phase from surface to bottom, and the net flow showed a three- or four-layer pattern, rather than the simple two-layer pattern which has previously been assumed to exist. The wind had a marked direct effect on the upper layers to a depth of about 10 m and possibly deeper.The movement of the ship while at anchor was monitored and found to be considerable. Most of the current observations were corrected for ship motion before analysis.Calculations of the net fresh water transport (in the upper layer) give reasonable values but similar calculations for the deep water show a net transport which is not to be expected. This apparent net transport may be a consequence of assuming that the current profile across the entire inlet is the same as that in the centre where measurements were made. Other possible sources of error are suggested. In addition, several recommendations are made for future work.