Performance of a raft foundation supporting a multistorey structure

1988 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 138-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. O. Landva ◽  
A. J. Valsangkar ◽  
J. C. Alkins ◽  
P. D. Charalambous
Keyword(s):  
Soil Structure ◽  
Thick Layer ◽  
Field Testing ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Raft Foundation ◽  
Undisturbed Samples ◽  
Clayey Silt ◽  
Load Cells

A nine-storey structure was recently constructed on a raft founded on a 30 m thick layer of clayey silt at Fredericton, New Brunswick. Detailed soil investigations included conventional borings and self-boring pressuremeter, field vane, and flat dilatometer tests performed at the site. In addition to the field testing, undisturbed samples were obtained and tested in the laboratory to determine the compressibility and shear strength characteristics. To compare the performance of the foundation with the design assumptions, instrumentation consisting of piezometers, contact pressure load cells, and settlement points was installed. The instrumentation was monitored at regular intervals during the construction stage and at 6 month intervals following the completion of the building. This report presents (i) the results of the field and laboratory testing, (ii) the results of the field monitoring, and (iii) the results of a finite element computer analysis of the foundation-soil interaction. Key words: raft foundation, instrumentation, clayey silt, compressibility, soil tests, soil–structure interaction.

scholarly journals The Effect of Mass, Depth, and Properties of the Soil Below the Raft Foundation on the Seismic Performance of R.C. Plane Frames

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 4685-4688
Author(s):  
J. A. Alomari
Keyword(s):  
Modal Analysis ◽  
Modulus Of Elasticity ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Soil Mass ◽  
Seismic Excitation ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Raft Foundation ◽  
Soil Modulus

Soil structure interaction has been the subject of numerous studies. The foundation soil has a definite effect on the performance of structures during seismic excitation. Recent studies show that the effect of soil-structure interaction SSI may be detrimental to the structure during seismic excitation. In this study, the effect of consideration of the soil below foundation and its depth, and the soil modulus of elasticity on the response of structures is investigated. The number of mode shapes considered has an effect on the accuracy of the values of structure response. A structural model consisting of an 8-story reinforced concrete frame resting on raft foundation, and including the soil below the raft is analyzed. The frame is analyzed using SAP2000 software, and time history and modal analysis are carried out with varying values of both soil depth and soil modulus of elasticity. The soil below the foundation is connected to the raft elements by gap links. Gap element links are compression–only members with appropriate stiffness, which are active only in compression. Modal analysis results show that the periods of vibration decrease as the modulus of elasticity of the soil increases. Periods of vibration of the frame without the soil mass consideration are less than those when the soil mass below the raft is considered, and they increase with increased depth of foundation to a certain limit. The structures response in the form of columns shear forces and story displacements are also evaluated under the variable parameters considered.

Seismic Response of Multistoried Building with Different Foundations Considering Interaction Effects

2018 ◽  
Vol 877 ◽  
pp. 276-281
Author(s):  
Shreya Sitakant Shetgaonkar ◽  
Purnanand Savoikar
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Response Spectrum ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Soil Medium ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Raft Foundation ◽  
Fixed Base

Current seismic design practice assumes the base of the building to be fixed and does not consider the flexibility of foundation and soil. This assumption is realistic only when the structure is founded on solid rock or when the relative stiffness of the foundation soil compared to the superstructure is high. Whereas, in reality due to natural ability of soil to deform, supporting soil medium modifies the response of the structure during earthquake to some extent. In this work the effect of soil structure interaction on seismic response of building resting on different types of foundation was studied. Present work aims to study the effect of soil structure interaction on seismic response of building resting on fixed base, pile foundation, raft foundation and combined pile-raft foundation. G+9 RCC building is analyzed for earthquake loads considered in zone III by response spectrum method and storey displacement and base shear force of building by considering and without considering SSI effect is found out by using MIDAS GEN software.

Soil-Structure Interaction in Buildings from Earthquake Records

1990 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory L. Fenves ◽  
Giorgio Serino
Keyword(s):  
Soil Structure ◽  
Dynamic Properties ◽  
Strong Motion ◽  
Longitudinal Direction ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Base Shear ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Soil System ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Building Foundation

An evaluation of the response of a fourteen story reinforced concrete building to the 1 October 1987 Whittier earthquake and 4 October 1987 aftershock shows significant effects of soil-structure interaction. A mathematical model of the building-foundation-soil system provides response quantities not directly available from the records. The model is calibrated using the dynamic properties of the building as determined from the processed strong motion records. Soil-structure interaction reduces the base shear force in the longitudinal direction of the building compared with the typical assumption in which interaction is neglected. The reduction in base shear for this building and earthquake is approximately represented by proposed building code provisions for soil-structure interaction.

scholarly journals Effect of Dynamic Soil-Structure Interaction on Raft of Piled Raft Foundation of Chimneys

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. R. Jayalekshmi ◽  
S. V. Jisha ◽  
R. Shivashankar ◽  
S. Soorya Narayana
Keyword(s):  
Soil Properties ◽  
Ground Motion ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Seismic Analysis ◽  
Direct Method ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Piled Raft ◽  
Piled Raft Foundation ◽  
Raft Foundation

This paper presents numerical analysis of soil-structure-interaction (SSI) of tall reinforced concrete chimneys with piled raft foundation subjected to El Centro ground motion (1940) using finite element method. Seismic analysis in time domain was performed on the basis of direct method of SSI on the three-dimensional SSI system. The chimney, foundation, and soil were assumed to be linearly elastic in the analysis. The stress resultants and settlement of raft of piled raft foundation were evaluated under different soil properties and different geometrical features of raft and chimney. Soil properties were selected based on the shear wave velocity corresponding to sand in the loose to dense range. Chimneys with different elevations of 100 m, 200 m, and 400 m were taken with a ratio of height to base diameter of chimney of 17. Raft of different thickness was considered to evaluate the effect of stiffness of foundation. Results were analysed to assess the significance of characteristic of the ground motion. It is found that the response in the raft depends on the different parameters of chimney, foundation, and soil. It is also found that the higher modes of SSI system are significant in determining the response in the raft.

Influence of Foundation Type on Seismic Performance of Buildings Considering Soil–Structure Interaction

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (08) ◽  
pp. 1550043 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aslan S. Hokmabadi ◽  
Behzad Fatahi
Keyword(s):  
Seismic Response ◽  
Pile Foundation ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Soft Soil ◽  
Shallow Foundation ◽  
Shaking Table ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Raft Foundation ◽  
Different Types

In selecting the type of foundation best suited for mid-rise buildings in high risk seismic zones, design engineers may consider that a shallow foundation, a pile foundation, or a pile-raft foundation can best carry the static and dynamic loads. However, different types of foundations behave differently during earthquakes, depending on the soil–structure interaction (SSI) where the properties of the in situ soil and type of foundation change the dynamic characteristics (natural frequency and damping) of the soil–foundation–structure system. In order to investigate the different characteristics of SSI and its influence on the seismic response of building frames, a 3D numerical model of a 15-storey full-scale (prototype) structure was simulated with four different types of foundations: (i) A fixed-based structure that excludes the SSI, (ii) a structure supported by a shallow foundation, (iii) a structure supported by a pile-raft foundation in soft soil and (iv) a structure supported by a floating (frictional) pile foundation in soft soil. Finite difference analyzes with FLAC3D were then conducted using real earthquake records that incorporated material (soil and superstructure) and geometric (uplifting, gapping and [Formula: see text] effects) nonlinearities. The 3D numerical modeling procedure had previously been verified against experimental shaking table tests conducted by the authors. The results are then presented and compared in terms of soil amplification, shear force distribution and rocking of the superstructure, including its lateral deformation and drift. The results showed that the type of foundation is a major contributor to the seismic response of buildings with SSI and should therefore be given careful consideration in order to ensure a safe and cost effective design.

scholarly journals Impact of initial stress field heterogeneity in dynamic soil–structure interaction

2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110416
Author(s):  
Marc-Denis Rioux ◽  
Marie-José Nollet ◽  
Bertrand Galy
Keyword(s):  
Stress Field ◽  
Initial Stress ◽  
Soil Structure ◽  
Soil Structure Interaction ◽  
Foundation Soil ◽  
Structure Interaction ◽  
Initial Stress Field ◽  
Geophysical Surveys ◽  
Field Heterogeneity ◽  
The Impact

This article covers the impact of soil initial stress field heterogeneity (ISFH) in wave-passage analysis and in prescribed structural acceleration in the context of dynamic soil–structure interaction (DSSI) analysis. ISFH is directly related to the natural behavior of soil where a significant increase in net effective confinement, as is the case in the foundation soil under a building, tends to increase the soil’s modulus and strain. This creates a heterogeneous stress field in the vicinity of the foundation elements, which results in a modification of the dynamic behavior of the soil–structure system. A simple method for considering the impact of ISFH on the value of the soil’s modulus and strain was developed using the direct DSSI approach. The method was used to analyze numerical artifacts and its impact on the surface acceleration values of a nonlinear two-dimensional (2D) numerical soil deposit under transient loading. This analysis was followed by a sample application for a three-story, three-bay concrete moment-resisting frame structure erected on a deep soil deposit. Floor acceleration and relative displacement were used for comparison. The soil deposit was modeled using the typical geotechnical properties of fine-grained, post-glacial soil samples obtained in Eastern Canada from in situ geotechnical borehole drilling, geophysical surveys, and laboratory testing. Ground motion was based on eastern calibrated seismic signals. The results of the soil deposit analysis show that ISFH had a significant impact on surface acceleration values. The effect was found to be period-dependent and to have a direct impact on prescribed acceleration values at the base of structure. Thus, failure to take the effects of ISFH into consideration can lead to errors in calculating prescribed structural accelerations (i.e. over- or underestimation).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document