Computational analysis of hereditary spastic paraplegia mutations in the kinesin motor domains of KIF1A and KIF5A

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (06) ◽  
pp. 2041003
Author(s):  
Vidhyanand Mahase ◽  
Adebiyi Sobitan ◽  
Christina Johnson ◽  
Farion Cooper ◽  
Yixin Xie ◽  
...  

Hereditary spastic paraplegias (HSPs) are a genetically heterogeneous collection of neurodegenerative disorders categorized by progressive lower-limb spasticity and frailty. The complex HSP forms are characterized by various neurological features including progressive spastic weakness, urinary sphincter dysfunction, extra pyramidal signs and intellectual disability (ID). The kinesin superfamily proteins (KIFs) are microtubule-dependent molecular motors involved in intracellular transport. Kinesins directionally transport membrane vesicles, protein complexes, and mRNAs along neurites, thus playing important roles in neuronal development and function. Recent genetic studies have identified kinesin mutations in patients with HSPs. In this study, we used the computational approaches to investigate the 40 missense mutations associated with HSP and ID in KIF1A and KIF5A. We performed homology modeling to construct the structures of kinesin–microtubule binding domain and kinesin–tubulin complex. We applied structure-based energy calculation methods to determine the effects of missense mutations on protein stability and protein–protein interaction. The results revealed that the most of disease-causing mutations could change the folding free energy of kinesin motor domain and the binding free energy of kinesin–tubulin complex. We found that E253K associated with ID in KIF1A decrease the protein stability of kinesin motor domains. We showed that the HSP mutations located in kinesin–tubulin complex interface, such as K253N and R280C in KIF5A, can destabilize the kinesin–tubulin complex. The computational analysis provides useful information for understanding the roles of kinesin mutations in the development of ID and HSPs.

Author(s):  
Christina Schindler ◽  
Hannah Baumann ◽  
Andreas Blum ◽  
Dietrich Böse ◽  
Hans-Peter Buchstaller ◽  
...  

Here we present an evaluation of the binding affinity prediction accuracy of the free energy calculation method FEP+ on internal active drug discovery projects and on a large new public benchmark set.<br>


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Wright ◽  
Fouad Husseini ◽  
Shunzhou Wan ◽  
Christophe Meyer ◽  
Herman Van Vlijmen ◽  
...  

<div>Here, we evaluate the performance of our range of ensemble simulation based binding free energy calculation protocols, called ESMACS (enhanced sampling of molecular dynamics with approximation of continuum solvent) for use in fragment based drug design scenarios. ESMACS is designed to generate reproducible binding affinity predictions from the widely used molecular mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MMPBSA) approach. We study ligands designed to target two binding pockets in the lactate dehydogenase A target protein, which vary in size, charge and binding mode. When comparing to experimental results, we obtain excellent statistical rankings across this highly diverse set of ligands. In addition, we investigate three approaches to account for entropic contributions not captured by standard MMPBSA calculations: (1) normal mode analysis, (2) weighted solvent accessible surface area (WSAS) and (3) variational entropy. </div>


Oncology ◽  
2017 ◽  
pp. 829-847
Author(s):  
Shubhandra Tripathi ◽  
Akhil Kumar ◽  
Amandeep Kaur Kahlon ◽  
Ashok Sharma

Molecular docking was earlier considered to predict the binding affinity of the receptor and ligand molecules. With the progress in computational power and developing approaches, new horizons are now opening for accurate prediction of molecular binding affinity. In the current book chapter, recent strategies for Computer-Aided Drug Designing (CADD) including virtual screening and molecular docking, encompassing molecular dynamics simulations, and binding free energy calculation methods are discussed. Brief overview of different binding free energy methods MMPBSA, MMGBSA, LIE and TI have also been given along with the recent Relaxed Complex Scheme protocol.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document