scholarly journals GENERAL RELATIVITY, GRAVITATIONAL ENERGY AND SPIN–TWO FIELD

2007 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 147-169
Author(s):  
LESZEK M. SOKOŁOWSKI

In my lectures I will deal with three seemingly unrelated problems: i) to what extent is general relativity exceptional among metric gravity theories? ii) is it possible to define gravitational energy density applying field–theory approach to gravity? and iii) can a consistent theory of a gravitationally interacting spin–two field be developed at all? The connecting link to them is the concept of a fundamental classical spin–2 field. A linear spin–2 field introduced as a small perturbation of a Ricci–flat spacetime metric, is gauge invariant while its energy–momentum is gauge dependent. Furthermore, when coupled to gravity, the field reveals insurmountable inconsistencies in the resulting equations of motion. After discussing the inconsistencies of any coupling of the linear spin–2 field to gravity, I exhibit the origin of the fact that a gauge invariant field has the variational metric stress tensor which is gauge dependent. I give a general theorem explaining under what conditions a symmetry of a field Lagrangian becomes also the symmetry of the variational stress tensor. It is a conclusion of the theorem that any attempt to define gravitational energy density in the framework of a field theory of gravity must fail. Finally I make a very brief introduction to basic concepts of how a certain kind of a necessarily nonlinear spin–2 field arises in a natural way from vacuum nonlinear metric gravity theories (Lagrangian being any scalar function of Ricci tensor). This specific spin–2 field consistently interacts gravitationally and the theory of the field is promising.

2022 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 136-141
Author(s):  
Amer D. Al-Oqali ◽  

Lagrangians which depend on higher-order derivatives appear frequently in many areas of physics. In this paper, we reformulate Podolsky's Lagrangian in fractional form using left-right Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives. The equations of motion are obtained using the fractional Euler Lagrange equation. In addition, the energy stress tensor and the Hamiltonian are obtained in fractional form from the Lagrangian density. The resulting equations are very similar to those found in classical field theory.


Galaxies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 38
Author(s):  
Ismael Ayuso ◽  
José Mimoso ◽  
Nelson Nunes

In this work, we seek a cosmological mechanism that may define the sign of the effective gravitational coupling constant, G. To this end, we consider general scalar-tensor gravity theories as they provide the field theory natural framework for the variation of the gravitational coupling. We find that models with a quadratic potential naturally stabilize the value of G into the positive branch of the evolution and further, that de Sitter inflation and a relaxation to General Relativity is easily attained.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim Vegt

Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein lived in fundamentally different time frames. An interesting question would be: “Who would win the fundamental discussion about the interaction between gravity and light”? Einstein or Newton? Einstein with the fundamental concept of a “curved space-time continuum” within a gravitational field. Or Newton with the fundamental “3rd law of equilibrium between the forces (force-densities)”. It is still the question who was right? Einstein or Newton? Einstein assumes a deformation of the space-time continuum because of a gravitational field. But in general a deformation of any medium will be caused by the change of the energy density within the medium. Like the speed of sound will increase/ decrease when we change the air pressure. However, the speed of sound (which became higher or lower) will still be the same in any direction. The change of the speed of sound will be omni-directional.A gravitational field contains a gravitational energy-density. For that reason the change in the speed of light will be omni-directional within a gravitational field (with a omni-directional gravitational energy density). Einstein however assumes a one-directional change in the speed of light, (only in the direction of the gravitational field). When the change of the speed of light was omni-directional, a beam of light would never be deflected by a gravitational field which is in contradiction with what we measure. Only the absolute value of the speed of light would change omni-directional.The theory of Newton however results in the theory of a 2-directional inertia of photons. The inertia of photons equals zero only in the direction of propagation. Perpendicular to the direction of propagation the mass density of photons is according Einstein’s E = m c^2).The inertia of photons in the direction of propagation will not change within a gravitational field. Gravity can only interact with mass (inertia). Because the mass of the photons in the direction of propagation equals zero, there will ne no interaction with the gravitational field and the photon in the direction of propagation. The speed of light in the direction of propagation will remain unaltered. But according Newton, the photon will have inertia (mass) in the directions perpendicular to the direction of propagation and for that reason the photon will interact with the gravitational field and the photon will be deflected, only in the direction of the gravitational field.And that leads to the consequence that photons will be deflected within a gravitational field when the direction of the gravitational field is perpendicular to the direction of propagation of the photons.To find fundamental mathematical evidence for this concept, we have to make use of Quantum Light Theory. Quantum Light Theory (QLT) is the development in Quantum Field Theory (QFT). In Quantum Field Theory, the fundamental interaction fields are replacing the concept of elementary particles in Classical Quantum Mechanics. In Quantum Light Theory the fundamental interaction fields are being replaced by One Single Field. The Electromagnetic Field, generally well known as Light. To realize this theoretical concept, the fundamental theory has to go back in time 300 years, the time of Isaac Newton to follow a different path in development. Nowadays experiments question more and more the fundamental concepts in Quantum Field Theory and Classical Quantum Mechanics. The publication “Operational Resource Theory of Imaginarity“ in “Physical Review Letters” in 2021 (Ref. [2]) presenting the first experimental evidence for the measurability of “Quantum Mechanical Imaginarity” directly leads to the fundamental question in this experiment: How is it possible to measure the imaginary part of “Quantum Physical Probability Waves”? This publication provides an unambiguously answer to this fundamental question in Physics, based on the fundamental “Gravitational Electromagnetic Interaction” force densities. The “Quantum Light Theory” presents a new “Gravitational-Electromagnetic Equation” describing Electromagnetic Field Configurations which are simultaneously the Mathematical Solutions for the Quantum Mechanical “Schrodinger Wave Equation” and more exactly the Mathematical Solutions for the “Relativistic Quantum Mechanical Dirac Equation”. The Mathematical Solutions for the “Gravitational-Electromagnetic Equation” carry Mass, Electric Charge and Magnetic Spin at discrete values.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 489-512
Author(s):  
Larry M. Silverberg ◽  
Jeffrey W. Eischen

This article introduces a new field theory formulation. The new field theory formulation recognizes vector continuity as a general principle and begins with a field that satisfies vector continuity equations. Next, independent of the new formulation, this article introduces a new space-time adjustment. Then, we solve the one-body gravitational problem by applying the space-time adjustment to the new field theory formulation. With the space-time adjustment, the new formulation predicts precisely the same precession of Mercury and the same bending of light as general relativity. The reader will find the validating calculations to be simple. The equations of motion that govern the orbital equations are in terms of Cartesian coordinates and time. An undergraduate college student, with direction, can perform the validations.


2001 ◽  
Vol 10 (06) ◽  
pp. 905-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL S. WESSON ◽  
HONGYA LIU

We present technical results which extend previous work and show that the cosmological constant of general relativity is an artefact of the reduction to 4D of 5D Kaluza–Klein theory (or 10D superstrings and 11D supergravity). We argue that the distinction between matter and vacuum is artificial in the context of ND field theory. The concept of a cosmological "constant" (which measures the energy density of the vacuum in 4D) should be replaced by that of a series of variable fields whose sum is determined by a solution of ND field equations in a well-defined manner.


Author(s):  
Laurent Baulieu ◽  
John Iliopoulos ◽  
Roland Sénéor

General relativity. The equivalence principle and the derivation of the Einstein–Hilbert equations. The geometrical notions of curvature and affine connection are introduced. Geodesics and the bending of light by a gravitational field. General relativity as a gauge invariant classical field theory.


2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (13) ◽  
pp. 1443008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryotaro Kase ◽  
Shinji Tsujikawa

In this paper, we review the effective field theory of modified gravity in which the Lagrangian involves three-dimensional geometric quantities appearing in the 3+1 decomposition of spacetime. On the flat isotropic cosmological background, we expand a general action up to second-order in the perturbations of geometric scalars, by taking into account spatial derivatives higher than two. Our analysis covers a wide range of gravitational theories — including Horndeski theory/its recent generalizations and the projectable/nonprojectable versions of Hořava–Lifshitz gravity. We derive the equations of motion for linear cosmological perturbations and apply them to the calculations of inflationary power spectra as well as the dark energy dynamics in Galileon theories. We also show that our general results conveniently recover stability conditions of Hořava–Lifshitz gravity already derived in the literature.


This paper studies time sequences of axially symmetric static configurations which can be continuously deformed into each other. We find the restriction which characterizes those time sequences which are physically allowed. This restriction can be interpreted as the law governing the non-radiative, or near field, transfer of gravitational energy, - m = ∯ P . d S and helps to clarify the concept of mass-energy in general relativity. We consider only the regions of space surrounding a source where, for quasi-static systems, the exact, static, empty space solutions of Weyl and Levi-Civita are good approximations at all times, and exact whenever the motion stops. Our results are then valid for arbitrarily strong fields. The restriction on the time sequences can be expressed as a restriction on the time dependence of the multipole moments A l , B l (which are defined by the Weyl and Levi Civita solutions), becoming then -d/d t [ A 0 + ½ G ∑ l = 0 ∞ (2 l + 1) A l B l ] = ½ G ∑ l = 0 ∞ ( A l B l - A l B l ). The right-hand side of this expression corresponds exactly to the flux of energy across a surface, as given by Bondi’s Newtonian Poynting vector P = (1/8 π G ) ( ϕ ∇ ϕ - ϕ ∇ ϕ ). It is natural to identify A 0 + ½ G ∑ l = 0 ∞ (2 l + 1) A l B l with the total mass-energy m enclosed by the surface. m can also be expressed as a surface intergal. Our restriction was derived from the vanishing of a surface integral in much the same manner as the equations of motion are derived in post-Newtonain approximations. However, it holds in arbitrarily strong fields, whereas the usual post-Newtonian methods use in lowest order a trivial solution (flat space) and can only be used in weak fields.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document