scholarly journals Towards a Unified Approach to Information-Disturbance Tradeoffs in Quantum Measurements

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (01) ◽  
pp. 29-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Buscemi ◽  
Michał Horodecki

We show that the global balance of information dynamics for general quantum measurements given in [F. Buscemi, M. Hayashi, and M. Horodecki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 210504 (2008)] makes it possible to unify various and generally inequivalent approaches adopted in order to derive information-disturbance tradeoffs in quantum theory. We focus in particular on those tradeoffs, constituting the vast majority of the literature on the subject, where disturbance is defined either in terms of average output fidelity or of entanglement fidelity.

Author(s):  
Arthur I. Fine

We use the term ‘measurement’ to refer to the interaction between an object and an apparatus on the basis of which information concerning the initial state of the object may be obtained from information on the resulting state of the apparatus. The quantum theory of measurement is a quantum theoretic investigation of such interactions in order to analyse the correlations between object and apparatus that measurement must establish. Although there is a sizeable literature on quantum measurements there appear to be just two sorts of interactions that have been employed. There are the ‘disturbing’ interactions consistent with the analysis of Landau and Peierls (8) as developed by Pauli (11) and by Landau and Lifshitz (7), and there are the ‘non-disturbing’ interactions explicitly set out by von Neumann ((10), chs. 5, 6), and that dominate the literature. In this paper we shall investigate the most general types of interactions that could possibly constitute measurements and provide a precise mathematical characterization (section 2). We shall then examine an interesting subclass, corresponding to Landau's ideas, that contains both of the above sorts of measurements (section 3). Finally, we shall discuss von Neumann measurements explicitly and explore the purported limitations suggested by Wigner(12) and Araki and Yanase (2). We hope, in this way, to provide a comprehensive basis for discussions of quantum measurements.


Author(s):  
Frank S. Levin

The subject of Chapter 8 is the fundamental principles of quantum theory, the abstract extension of quantum mechanics. Two of the entities explored are kets and operators, with kets being representations of quantum states as well as a source of wave functions. The quantum box and quantum spin kets are specified, as are the quantum numbers that identify them. Operators are introduced and defined in part as the symbolic representations of observable quantities such as position, momentum and quantum spin. Eigenvalues and eigenkets are defined and discussed, with the former identified as the possible outcomes of a measurement. Bras, the counterpart to kets, are introduced as the means of forming probability amplitudes from kets. Products of operators are examined, as is their role underpinning Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle. A variety of symbol manipulations are presented. How measurements are believed to collapse linear superpositions to one term of the sum is explored.


It will probably be agreed that among all the recent developments of the quantum theory, one of the least satisfactory is the theory of radiation. The present paper is intended as a preliminary to a new line of attack on the subject. It was begun some time ago, but owing to lack of success in carrying it to a conclusion, its publication has been much delayed. In the meantime other papers have appeared, which in some respects follow the same train of thought. The authors of these works have carried their methods further in some directions than I have attempted, but there is still perhaps room for the discussion of a number of questions from the rather different point of view adopted here. 1. The main principle of the present work is the idea that, since matter and light both possess the dual characters of particle and wave, a similar mathematical treatment ought to be applied to both, and that this has not yet bee done as fully as should be possible. Whereas we have a fairly complete calculus for dealing with the behaviour of any number of electrons or atoms, for photons the existing processes are much less satisfactory. The central difficulty, which makes it hard to apply the ordinary methods of wave mechanics to light, is the fact that (at least according to our present ideas) photons can be created and annihilated, and to represent this in a wave system we have to be able to think of a medium suddenly coming into existence and then going out again, when the light that it was carrying is absorbed. Such behaviour is a grave difficulty in the way of allowing us to think of the photon as a wave, and tends to make us think with more favour of its particle aspect, until we recall that after all it is quite unlike any known particle to come into existence and later to disappear without trace. The theories at present current, such as that of Heisenberg and Pauli, avoid these difficulties because they are mainly formal generalisations of the classical theory; this frees them from the above difficulties, but they pay for it in being highly abstract, and, as it has turned out, rather unsuccessful.


2014 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Geng Chen ◽  
Yang Zou ◽  
Xiao-Ye Xu ◽  
Jian-Shun Tang ◽  
Yu-Long Li ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 295-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walter D’Ambrogio ◽  
Aldo Sestieri

Substructures coupling is still an important tool in several applications of modal analysis, especially structural modification and structures assembling. The subject is particularly relevant in virtual prototyping of complex systems and responds to actual industrial needs. This paper analyzes the possibility of assembling together different substructures' models. The important role of rotational DoFs is highlighted, underlying the difficulty of assembling theoretical and experimental models, for which, usually, the rotational DoFs are not available. Expansion techniques can be used to provide this information as well as appropriate modelling of joints. With this information FRF models, modal models and FE models can be appropriately combined together and solutions for several cases of practical interest are presented. The analyzed procedures are tested on purpose-built benchmarks, showing limits and capabilities of each of them.


1974 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. d’Espagnat

1967 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell McCormmach

SynopsisThis essay concerns an aspect of the speculative contributions of J. J. Thomson to a field of physics somewhat removed from that upon which his popular fame and scientific eminence were alike founded. He published a number of statements in the period 1903–1910 advocating a discontinuous structure of the electromagnetic field. His unorthodox conception of the field was based upon the presumed discreteness of Faraday's physical lines of electric force. While his ideas led to significant experimental work, they were not brought together in the form of a completed theory. It was at this same time that the quantum theory was independently evolving notions of a structure of the field, and Thomson's efforts at developing a theory of light were diverted into a protracted criticism of the hypothesis of quanta. In 1924–1936 he returned to the subject of the structure of light, but these latter speculations no longer had much relevance to contemporary physical thought.


While the Quantum Theory is now almost universally accepted as the basis of discussion, when any question of energy-interchanges between molecules and free electrons is being considered, there is one collection of papers, of quite appreciable extent, that claims to treat part of the subject on totally different assumptions; these are the papers describing experiments performed in the laboratory of Prof. Townsend in Oxford. They do not claim to account for any of the results obtained by investigators elsewhere, but they do claim to have established phenomena which it is quite impossible to fit into the otherwise universally accepted views, and which necessitate, or at least justify, a number of different assumptions which Prof. Townsend formulates. The position can only be cleared up by reconciling the experiments of the one party with the theories of the other, and it is this task which will here be attempted. The experiments to be considered are of a quite different type from those which claimed to establish the existence of critical potentials; moreover, if the Quantum Theory statements are broadly correct, they are of a type unsuited to the problem. None the less, they would probably have led unaided, if not to the same conclusions, at least to the discovery of their own unsuitability, if it had not been for a somewhat unfortunate coincidence. This is, to put it briefly, the fact that the term-systems of the principal gases studied contain metastable states among their lowest excited levels. This fact is relatively unimportant in the critical potential work, but effects an enormous, and apparently quite unsuspected, disturbance when statistical high-pressure methods are employed, as is always the case in the work of Prof. Townsend.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document