Corporate governance in relationship with bank risk management

Author(s):  
Ika Permatasari

The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between corporate governance and risk management of Indonesian banks. Bank risk managements are measured by market risk, credit risk, and liquidity risk. The samples used in this study were all banks registered in Indonesia during the 2010–2016 period. The data sources were obtained from the annual reports and bank financial reports. The results show that corporate governance implementation in Indonesia was able to affect credit risk and liquidity risk. There were differences in credit risk and liquidity risk in banks with different governance ratings, but not at market risk.

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 127-139
Author(s):  
Ika Permatasari

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between corporate governance and risk management of Indonesian banks.Design/methodology/approachImplementation of good corporate governance is measured by good corporate governance composite rating, which is the result of bank's self-assessment. Bank risk managements are measured by market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and operational risk.FindingsThe study results showed that good corporate governance implementation in Indonesia was able to influence bank risk. There were differences in credit risk, liquidity risk and operational risk in banks with different governance ratings, but not at market risk.Originality/valueThe effectiveness of risk management and good corporate governance implementation is needed to enable banks to identify problems early, to follow up on rapid improvements and to be more resilient to crises. This study is an analysis of the relationship between corporate governance and banks' risk management in Indonesia. In particular, risk management is measured by four risks: market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and operation risk.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azrul Bin Abdullah ◽  
Ku Nor Izah Ku Ismail

This study examines the extent of information about hedging activities disclosures within the annual reports of Main Market companies listed on Bursa Malaysia. The extent of hedging activities disclosures is captured through a 32-item-template, which consists of a mandatory and voluntary disclosure scores. The results of this study indicate that the extent of information on hedging activities disclosure is still insufficient among the sampled companies even though the disclosure scored is quite high. This study also examines the relationship between the existence of risk management committee (RMC), its characteristics and the extent of information on hedging activities disclosure in two separate statistical models. The regression results imply that the existence of RMC is positive but does not significantly influence the extent of information on hedging activities disclosure. However its characteristics (i.e. RMC independence and RMC meeting) have a significant influence. The findings may provide some meaningful insights to regulators, policymakers and researchers, towards the establishment of RMC as a part of the internal corporate governance mechanisms. In addition to its existence, the effectiveness of RMC also needs to be emphasised.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-107
Author(s):  
Gedion Alang’o Omwono ◽  
Kayumba Annette

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between risk management practices and investment decisions in Bank of Kigali, Rwanda. This study adopted correlational research design. Descriptive statistics include those of the mean, standard deviation and frequency distribution while inferential statistics involves use of spearman’s coefficient correlations. Linear regression was used where ANOVA was carried on each variable. The study found that there was a correlation between liquidity risk management, default risk management and market risk management with performance of the Banks. The study findings indicated that credit risk management (r=0.096, p<0.01), liquidity risk management (r=0.347, p<0.01), market risk management (r=0.506, p<0.01) and operational risk management (r=0.612, p<0.01) on financial performance. It however found that the Banks do not involve experts and consultants in market risk management thus recommendations were made for the Banks to revise their credit risk management policies, open up and share information with other players on market risk thus involve consultants more in their market risk management and to be more proactive than reactive in risk management. The study concluded that, risk management has a positive influence on the investment decisions and that risk monitoring can be used to make sure that risk management practices are in line with proper best practice risk monitoring policies which also helps bank management to discover exposures at early stages and make corrective actions. The study recommended that, Senior management should develop strategies, policies and practices to manage risk in accordance with the Banks risk tolerance and to ensure that the bank maintains sufficient liquidity risk cover.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 356
Author(s):  
Skalis Winda Munte ◽  
Selmi Dedi ◽  
Ted Matheus Suruan

This research was aimed to analysis risk base bank rating using RGEC (Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earning, and Capital ) method in Bank of Public Company 2013-2017. This research was a comparative research. The analyzer was used in this research is RGEC method. Risk Profile was assessed by, credit risk, market risk, and liquidity  risk. Good Corporate Governance was assessed by self assessment of bank report. Earning was assessed by, i.e ROA, ROE, NIM, and BOPO. And for capital was assessed by CAR. The results of the study that PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk obtains the highest average weighted Composite Rating, which is 94.67%., PT. Bank Negara Indonesia (Persero) Tbk came in second place at 87.11%. and PT. Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero) Tbk obtains the lowest weighted Composite Rating weight of 85.78%. However, overall the three State-Owned Banks are still rated very healthy. However, it is hoped that further researchers will be able to take on more banks to provide a broader picture.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-26
Author(s):  
Arfan Anugrah Asyhari ◽  
Rangga Putra Ananto ◽  
Eka Rosalina

This study aims to determine the Bank Soundness Level with the object of Islamic Rural Banks registered with the Financial Services Authority in 2015-2019. The type of the research that used in this research is descriptive research with a qualitative approach. Assessment using the Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) method consists of four factors, namely the Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings and Capital of each bank. The Risk Profile consists of credit risk and liquidity risk. Credit risk is measured using NPF and liquidity risk is measured using FDR. Earnings factor is measured by ROA and NIM ratio, Capital factor is calculated by CAR ratio. The results showed that the results obtained the predicate of being unhealthy and even quite healthy on the NPF, FDR, ROA, and NIM ratios, while the CAR ratios for the last 3 years received the predicate Very Healthy appropriate to Bank Indonesia regulations, which exceeded 12%  ABSTRAK  Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Tingkat Kesehatan Bank dengan objek Bank Perkreditan Rakyat Syariah yang terdaftar di Otoritas Jasa Keuangan pada tahun 2015-2019. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian desktiptif dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Penilaian dengan metode Risk-Based Bank Rating (RBBR) terdiri dari empat faktor yaitu Risk Profile, Good Corporate Governance, Earnings dan Capital dari setiap bank. Risk Profile terdiri dari risiko kredit dan risiko likuiditas. Risiko kredit diukur dengan menggunakan NPF dan risiko likuiditas diukur dengan menggunakan FDR. Faktor Earnings diukur dengan rasio ROA, ROE dan NIM, faktor Capital dihitung dengan rasio CAR. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan hasil yang memperoleh predikat kurang sehat bahkan cukup sehat atas rasio NPF, FDR, ROA, ROE dan NIM, sedangkan pada rasio CAR pada 3 tahun terakhir memperoleh predikat Sangat Sehat sesuai ketentuan Bank Indonesia yaitu melebihi 12%.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 411-415
Author(s):  
Venny S. W. Chong ◽  
Jason M. S. Lam ◽  
S. H.Tan

Purpose: This study is to determine the effects of risk management towards the domestic and foreign Islamic bank’s financial performance in Malaysia. The ten Islamic banks in Malaysia have been chosen as the sample bank in which domestic and foreign banks were equally divided. The credit risk, liquidity risk as well as solvency risk acted as the independent variables to determine the effects towards the bank’s profitability as measured by return on equity. Methodology: The panel data analysis has employed fixed effect and random effect regression models and the Hausman test in this study. Furthermore, the independent sample T-test was conducted to examine the significant difference between domestic and foreign Islamic banks. Result: The finding of this study showed that liquidity risk and insolvency risk would have a greater impact towards the Islamic bank’s profitability while the credit risk has no significant influence on Islamic bank’s financial performance in Malaysia. The study concludes that domestic Islamic banks had better financial performance as compared to foreign Islamic banks in Malaysia. Applications: This research can be used for universities, teachers, and students. Novelty/Originality: In this research, the model of The Relationship of Risk Management and Bank Profitability Performance between Domestic and Foreign Islamic Banks in Malaysia is presented in a comprehensive and complete manner.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ag Kaifah Riyard Bin Kiflee ◽  
Mohd Noor Azli Bin Ali Khan

Past accounting scandals (Transmile and Megan Media) and recent 2007/2008 global financial crisis have triggered the need for vibrant risk management and high quality of risk reporting through sound corporate governance. This study will measure risk management through the disclosure in the annual reports. It wishes to determine the presence of risk information within the annual report of non-financial companies in Malaysia. The objective of the study is to examine the relationship between corporate governance characteristics and risk disclosure practice. The corporate governance characteristics examined include board independence, the board size, board gender, auditor independence and auditor tenure. A total of 721 companies are expected to be analyzed based on the Bursa Malaysia list from 2008 to 2017. To determine the level of risk disclosure, this study will employ content analysis. Descriptive statistics and multiple regression will be used in this study to examine this relationship.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syahiza Arsad ◽  
Roshima Said ◽  
Haslinda Yusoff ◽  
Rahayati Ahmad

The paper attempts to examine the relationship between six (6) Corporate Governance mechanisms (namely board matters, nomination matters, audit matters, remuneration matters, communication matters and risk management matters) of Shari’ah Compliant Companies (ShCC) with Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility (i-CSR) disclosure. The i-CSR disclosure index was developed by incorporated the five values of Maqasid Shari’ah and Maslahah. While, this study employed the corporate governance index based on the Malaysian Code on Corporate Governance (MCCG) 2007 (Securities Commission, 2007b), MCCG 2012 (Securities Commission, 2012), Corporate Governance Guide issued by Bursa Malaysia (Bursa Malaysia, 2012), and MCCG Index 2011 from the Minority Shareholder Watchdog Group (MSWG, 2011); Omar & Abdul Rahman, (2009) and Mohammed et al. (2009).  The research used content analysis and a sample of 187 ShCC annual reports from 2008 to 2013. STATA was used to assess the relationship between CG mechanisms and i-CSR disclosure in this analysis. The result of the relationship between CG mechanisms and i-CSR disclosure after statistically control by firm size (proxy by total assets) and profitability (proxy by return on assets, net profit margin and return on equity) showed that only remuneration matters (RM), communication matters (CM) and risk management matters (RK) positive and significantly influenced the i-CSR disclosure.


Analisis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-35
Author(s):  
Nurfauziah Nurfauziah ◽  
Sri Mulyati

Risk management is part of a comprehensive business strategy with the aim of contributing to protecting and increasing shareholder value. An increase in stock value indicates an increase in stock returns obtained by investors. This study examines the effect of risk management implementation on bank stock returns as seen from the bank book group, namely bank book group 1, bank book group 2, bank book group 3 and bank book group 4. The application of risk management is seen from credit risk, liquidity risk, risk. operational and market risk. The research was conducted on all commercial banks that went public and were active from 2015 to 2019, as many as 44 banks. The results of the study state that: overall (for all bank book groups) the application of risk management, namely credit risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and market risk does not affect stock returns, except for bank book group 1, credit risk and operational risk and market risk for book group 4 has a significant effect on stock returns.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document