scholarly journals Pregnancy Outcomes Following the First Frozen Blastocyst Transfer Among Women Aged Less Than 35 Years Old: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Le Hoang ◽  
Le Duc Thang ◽  
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong ◽  
Nguyen Minh Thuy ◽  
Vu Thi Mai Anh ◽  
...  

Background: Many guidelines have been issued regarding the number of embryos to be transferred after in vitro fertilization (IVF), but patients and clinicians may be reluctant to accept or offer a single embryo transfer due to the expected lower chance of pregnancy or live birth. This study was aimed to provide additional information on cycle outcome according to the number and quality of thawed transferred blastocysts. Methods:A retrospective cohort study was designed to collect the data of 505 patients who performed the first frozen blastocysts transfer at Tam Anh General Hospital from June 2018 to September 2019. One good-quality embryo was transferred for 121 patients (Group 1), two good for 214 patients (Group 2), one good and one poor for 112 patients (Group 3), one good and two poor for 25 patients (Group 4), and one or two poor for 33 patients (Group 5). Results:The pregnancy rate was 71.9%, 74.8%, 69.4%, 84.0%, and 39.4% in Group 1–5, respectively. The multiple pregnancy rate was 36.9%, 16.9%, and 32.0% in Groups 2–4, respectively, higher than Group 1 (4.9%). The live birth rate was 55.6%, 50.9%, and 60.0% in Group 2–4, respectively, but not significantly different from the Group 1 (47.9%). Conclusions:Transferring an additional good or poor embryo, along with a good embryo, does not increase the live birth rate while the incidence of multiple pregnancies rises significantly.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Le Hoang ◽  
Le Duc Thang ◽  
Nguyen Thi Lien Huong ◽  
Nguyen Minh Thuy ◽  
Vu Thi Mai Anh ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims of the study were to describe main outcomes (clinical, ongoing single and multiple pregnancy and live birth rates) following frozen blastocyst transfer performed for the first time among women aged less than 35 years old and analyzed according to both quantity and quality of the embryos. A descriptive cross-sectional study was applied to collect and analyze available data of 505 patients who performed transfer of frozen blastocysts for the first time between June, 2018 and September, 2019 at the Assisted Reproductive Technology Centre of Tam Anh General Hospital. One good quality embryo was transferred for 121 patients (Group 1), 2 good quality embryos for 214 patients (Group 2), 1 good and 1 poor quality embryo for 112 patients (Group 3), 1 good and 2 poor quality embryos for 25 patients (Group 4) and 1 or 2 poor quality embryos for 33 patients (Group 5). Main results showed that the pregnancy rate was 71.9%, 74.8%, 69.4%, 84.0% and 39.4% in Group 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. The rate of multiple pregnancy was 36.9%, 16.9%, and 32.0% in Group 2, 3, and 4, respectively, higher than in Group 1 (4.9%). Meanwhile, the live birth rate was 55.6%, 50.9%, and 60.0% in Group 2, 3 and 4, respectively, but not significantly different from the live birth rate in Group 1 (47.9%). In conclusion, pregnancy and live birth rates were not significantly different following transfer of 1 or 2 good quality blastocysts while the rate of multiple pregnancy was significantly increased following the transfer of 2 good quality ones. Transfer of 1 or 2 poor quality embryos in addition to 1 good embryo did not significantly improve the pregnancy rate.


Zygote ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chadi Yazbeck ◽  
Nadia Ben Jamaa ◽  
André Hazout ◽  
Paul Cohen-Bacrie ◽  
Anne-Marie Junca ◽  
...  

SummaryThe aim of this study was to evaluate the advantages of the two-step embryo transfer (ET) strategy combining a day 2/3 ET with a day 5/6 blastocyst transfer. In an observational comparative study, 400 infertile women were enrolled from two assisted reproductive technology (ART) units according to inclusion criteria: age below 42 years and at least three embryos obtained on day 2 thus allowing an extended in vitro culture. Two groups were defined according to the ET strategy adopted: group 1 had a two-step ET; and group 2 had a day 2/3 ET with (subgroup 2a) or without (subgroup 2b) blastocysts cryopreserved on day 5/6. Live birth rate was significantly higher in group 1 than in subgroups 2a and 2b (36.5% versus 29.4% and 13.4%, respectively; p < 10−3). Multiple pregnancy rates were comparable between groups. After adjusting on major prognostic factors, the two-step ET strategy was still associated with a significantly higher live birth rate than the day 2/3 ET (OR = 2.23; 95% CI: 1.32–3.77). The two-step ET provides better live birth rates than the cleavage-stage ET. It does not increase multiple pregnancy rates if the number of embryos transferred is limited. It also prevents cycle loss when embryos fail to develop into blastocysts.


Author(s):  
Xitong Liu ◽  
Li Tian ◽  
He Cai ◽  
Juanzi Shi ◽  
Haiyan Bai

Objective To assess the effects body mass index (BMI) on live birth rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) with trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) when transferring a single euploid blastocyst. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Public fertility center in China. Population 821 women who underwent first cycle of frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer between 2012 and 2020. Methods Patients were grouped by World Health Organization (WHO) BMI class: underweight (<18.5, n=80), normal weight (18.5-24.9, n=602), overweight (25-30, n=112), and obese (≥30, n=27). A logistic regression model was used to assess the association between BMI and live birth while adjusting for potential confounders. Main outcome measures Live-birth rate was primary outcome. Results There was no difference in the birth weight, miscarriage, preterm birth, pregnancy complication, type of delivery and fetal gender by BMI category. The clinical pregnancy rate was higher in the overweight and obese groups. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, we fail to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between BMI and live birth in underweight (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-1.35, p=0.402), overweight (AOR 0.85; 95% CI, 0.54-1.35, p=0.491) or obese (AOR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.48-2.38, p=0.864) patients compared with the normal weight reference group. Conclusion No statistically significant relationship was identified between BMI and live birth in patients undergoing IVF with PGT-A, suggesting that the negative impact of obesity on IVF and clinical outcomes may be related to aneuploidy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (8) ◽  
pp. 1939-1948
Author(s):  
Justin Tan ◽  
Chen Jing ◽  
Lisa Zhang ◽  
Jasmine Lo ◽  
Arohumam Kan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 1470-1478 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousuf ElMokhallalati ◽  
Rik van Eekelen ◽  
Siladitya Bhattacharya ◽  
David J McLernon

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What is the chance of a treatment-independent live birth following IVF (including ICSI) treatment? SUMMARY ANSWER Over 5 years of follow-up, the treatment-independent live birth rate was 17% in unsuccessfully treated women and 15% in those who had a live birth after IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY A limited number of studies have investigated the chance of treatment-independent conception following completion of IVF, but most of them have been based on surveys with poor response rates and limited sample sizes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This is a population-based, retrospective cohort study of 2133 women who received IVF treatment between 1998 and 2011 at a single regional IVF Unit and were followed for a minimum of 1 year and maximum of 15 years after their last IVF or ICSI treatment cycle. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS This study included all women, residing in the north-east of the UK, who attended the Aberdeen Fertility Clinic and received IVF treatment between 1998 and 2011. Clinical and diagnostic information of all women was linked with treatment and pregnancy outcome data. A total of 2133 women were divided into two groups: (i) those who achieved a live birth following successful IVF or ICSI treatment (n = 1060) and (ii) those in whom treatment was unsuccessful i.e. resulted in either no pregnancy or pregnancy loss (n = 1073). The two groups were followed from the date of the last embryo transfer until the first treatment-independent live birth or 31 December 2012, whichever came first. The primary outcome was the treatment-independent live birth rate at 1, 2.5, 5 and 10 years of follow-up. Cox regression was used to determine factors associated with treatment-independent live birth in each group. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Within 5 years of follow-up, the treatment-independent live birth rate was 17% (95% CI, 15–19%) among women whose IVF or ICSI treatment was unsuccessful and 15% (95% CI, 12–17%) among women whose treatment resulted in live birth. In both groups, shorter duration of infertility, younger female age and IVF as compared to ICSI were associated with a higher chance of achieving treatment-independent live birth. Among unsuccessfully treated women, the chance of post-IVF live birth was reduced in those with tubal factor infertility. Three or more previous IVF or ICSI embryo transfers were associated with a lower chance of treatment-independent live birth among successfully treated women. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study was conducted in a single fertility centre, which could compromise the generalizability of the findings. Moreover, data were unavailable on the women’s use of contraception or active attempts to get pregnant, both of which could influence treatment-independent live birth rates. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This study provides a better understanding of the long-term prognosis for treatment-independent live birth after completion of IVF or ICSI treatment. The results will inform women of their chances of a treatment-independent live birth following failed or successful treatment and the factors that are associated with it. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This work was funded by a Chief Scientist Office Postdoctoral Training Fellowship in Health Services Research and Health of the Public Research (Ref PDF/12/06). The views expressed here are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Chief Scientist Office. The authors have no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Not applicable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document