4E-BP1 and S6K1: translational integration sites for nutritional and hormonal information in muscle

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (4) ◽  
pp. E715-E729 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Jameel Shah ◽  
Joshua C. Anthony ◽  
Scot R. Kimball ◽  
Leonard S. Jefferson
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Cellular Protein ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translational Repressor ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E ◽  
Integration Sites ◽  
A Site

Maintenance of cellular protein stores in skeletal muscle depends on a tightly regulated synthesis-degradation equilibrium that is conditionally modulated under an extensive range of physiological and pathophysiological circumstances. Recent studies have established the initiation phase of mRNA translation as a pivotal site of regulation for global rates of protein synthesis, as well as a site through which the synthesis of specific proteins is controlled. The protein synthetic pathway is exquisitely sensitive to the availability of hormones and nutrients and employs a comprehensive integrative strategy to interpret the information provided by hormonal and nutritional cues. The translational repressor, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), and the 70-kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase (S6K1) have emerged as important components of this strategy, and together they coordinate the behavior of both eukaryotic initiation factors and the ribosome. This review discusses the role of 4E-BP1 and S6K1 in translational control and outlines the mechanisms through which hormones and nutrients effect changes in mRNA translation through the influence of these translational effectors.

scholarly journals Multiple Mechanisms Control Phosphorylation of PHAS-I in Five (S/T)P Sites That Govern Translational Repression

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 3558-3567 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Mothe-Satney ◽  
Daqing Yang ◽  
Patrick Fadden ◽  
Timothy A. J. Haystead ◽  
John C. Lawrence
Keyword(s):  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Hek293 Cells ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Phosphorylation Sites ◽  
Translational Repressor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E ◽  
Dependent Processes ◽  
Constitutive Phosphorylation

ABSTRACT Control of the translational repressor, PHAS-I, was investigated by expressing proteins with Ser/Thr → Ala mutations in the five (S/T)P phosphorylation sites. Results of experiments with HEK293 cells reveal at least three levels of control. At one extreme is nonregulated phosphorylation, exemplified by constitutive phosphorylation of Ser82. At an intermediate level, amino acids and insulin stimulate the phosphorylation of Thr36, Thr45, and Thr69 via mTOR-dependent processes that function independently of other sites in PHAS-I. At the third level, the extent of phosphorylation of one site modulates the phosphorylation of another. This control is represented by Ser64 phosphorylation, which depends on the phosphorylation of all three TP sites. The five sites have different influences on the electrophoretic properties of PHAS-I and on the affinity of PHAS-I for eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E). Phosphorylation of Thr45 or Ser64 results in the most dramatic decreases in eIF4E binding in vitro. However, each of the sites influences mRNA translation, either directly by modulating the binding affinity of PHAS-I and eIF4E or indirectly by affecting the phosphorylation of other sites.

scholarly journals Translational Control of Cell Fate: Availability of Phosphorylation Sites on Translational Repressor 4E-BP1 Governs Its Proapoptotic Potency

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 2853-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunan Li ◽  
Nahum Sonenberg ◽  
Anne-Claude Gingras ◽  
Mark Peterson ◽  
Svetlana Avdulov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Translational Control ◽  
Phosphorylation Site ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Internal Ribosomal Entry Sites ◽  
Translational Repressor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E ◽  
Quantitative Changes

ABSTRACT Translational control has been recently added to well-recognized genomic, transcriptional, and posttranslational mechanisms regulating apoptosis. We previously found that overexpressed eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) rescues cells from apoptosis, while ectopic expression of wild-type eIF4E-binding protein 1 (4E-BP1), the most abundant member of the 4E-BP family of eIF4E repressor proteins, activates apoptosis—but only in transformed cells. To test the possibility that nontransformed cells require less cap-dependent translation to suppress apoptosis than do their transformed counterparts, we intensified the level of translational repression in nontransformed fibroblasts. Here, we show that inhibition of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation by rapamycin triggers apoptosis in cells ectopically expressing wild-type 4E-BP1 and that expression of 4E-BP1 phosphorylation site mutants potently activates apoptosis in a phosphorylation site-specific manner. In general, proapoptotic potency paralleled repression of cap-dependent translation. However, this relationship was not a simple monotone. As repression of cap-dependent translation intensified, apoptosis increased to a maximum value. Further repression resulted in less apoptosis—a state associated with activation of translation through internal ribosomal entry sites. These findings show: that phosphorylation events govern the proapoptotic potency of 4E-BP1, that 4E-BP1 is proapoptotic in normal as well as transformed fibroblasts, and that malignant transformation is associated with a higher requirement for cap-dependent translation to inhibit apoptosis. Our results suggest that 4E-BP1-mediated control of apoptosis occurs through qualitative rather than quantitative changes in protein synthesis, mediated by a dynamic interplay between cap-dependent and cap-independent processes.

Translational Control Through the eIF4E Binding Proteins in the Brain

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Argel Aguilar-Valles ◽  
Edna Matta-Camacho ◽  
Nahum Sonenberg
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Messenger Rna ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Depressive Disorders ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E ◽  
Initiation Step ◽  
The Brain

Translation of messenger RNA (mRNA) into protein (protein synthesis) is a highly regulated process that controls gene expression. Various signaling pathways, including the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), control mRNA translation at the initiation step. mTOR is part of a multi-subunit complex that regulates mRNA translation initiation by phosphorylating and inactivating the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E binding proteins (4E-BPs). 4E-BPs are a central mechanism in the control of cap-dependent translation in the brain. This chapter reviews the involvement of the 4E-BPs, particularly 4E-BP2, in brain development and synaptic transmission. Furthermore, it discusses the involvement of 4E-BP2 in autistic-like alterations, learning and memory, circadian rhythm regulation, and its roles in the pathophysiology and treatment of psychiatric (depressive disorders, schizophrenia) and neurodegenerative disorders (Parkinson’s).

scholarly journals Cup is an eIF4E binding protein required for both the translational repression of oskar and the recruitment of Barentsz

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (6) ◽  
pp. 1197-1204 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Wilhelm ◽  
Meredith Hilton ◽  
Quinlan Amos ◽  
William J. Henzel
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Mrna Localization ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Translational Repressor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E ◽  
Microtubule Transport ◽  
Rnp Complex ◽  
Made In

In Drosophila oocytes, precise localization of the posterior determinant, Oskar, is required for posterior patterning. This precision is accomplished by a localization-dependent translational control mechanism that ensures translation of only correctly localized oskar transcripts. Although progress has been made in identifying localization factors and translational repressors of oskar, none of the known components of the oskar complex is required for both processes. Here, we report the identification of Cup as a novel component of the oskar RNP complex. cup is required for oskar mRNA localization and is necessary to recruit the plus end–directed microtubule transport factor Barentsz to the complex. Surprisingly, Cup is also required to repress the translation of oskar. Furthermore, eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is localized within the oocyte in a cup-dependent manner and binds directly to Cup in vitro. Thus, Cup is a translational repressor of oskar that is required to assemble the oskar mRNA localization machinery. We propose that Cup coordinates localization with translation.

Alternative mechanisms of initiating translation of mammalian mRNAs

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 1231-1241 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Aggregate Size ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Initiation Site ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Scanning Mechanism

Of all the steps in mRNA translation, initiation is the one that differs most radically between prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Not only is there no equivalent of the prokaryotic Shine–Dalgarno rRNA–mRNA interaction, but also what requires only three initiation factor proteins (aggregate size ∼125 kDa) in eubacteria needs at least 28 different polypeptides (aggregate >1600 kDa) in mammalian cells, which is actually larger than the size of the 40 S ribosomal subunit. Translation of the overwhelming majority of mammalian mRNAs occurs by a scanning mechanism, in which the 40 S ribosomal subunit, primed for initiation by the binding of several initiation factors including the eIF2 (eukaryotic initiation factor 2)–GTP–MettRNAi complex, is loaded on the mRNA immediately downstream of the 5′-cap, and then scans the RNA in the 5′→3′ direction. On recognition of (usually) the first AUG triplet via base-pairing with the Met-tRNAi anticodon, scanning ceases, triggering GTP hydrolysis and release of eIF2–GDP. Finally, ribosomal subunit joining and the release of the other initiation factors completes the initiation process. This sketchy outline conceals the fact that the exact mechanism of scanning and the precise roles of the initiation factors remain enigmatic. However, the factor requirements for initiation site selection on some viral IRESs (internal ribosome entry sites/segments) are simpler, and investigations into these IRES-dependent mechanisms (particularly picornavirus, hepatitis C virus and insect dicistrovirus IRESs) have significantly enhanced our understanding of the standard scanning mechanism. This article surveys the various alternative mechanisms of initiation site selection on mammalian (and other eukaryotic) cellular and viral mRNAs, starting from the simplest (in terms of initiation factor requirements) and working towards the most complex, which paradoxically happens to be the reverse order of their discovery.

scholarly journals A Complementary Mechanism of Bacterial mRNA Translation Inhibition by Tetracyclines

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Barrenechea ◽  
Maryhory Vargas-Reyes ◽  
Miguel Quiliano ◽  
Pohl Milón
Keyword(s):  
Protein Synthesis ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Dissociation Rate ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Translation Elongation ◽  
Initiation Phase ◽  
Complementary Mechanism

Tetracycline has positively impacted human health as well as the farming and animal industries. Its extensive usage and versatility led to the spread of resistance mechanisms followed by the development of new variants of the antibiotic. Tetracyclines inhibit bacterial growth by impeding the binding of elongator tRNAs to the ribosome. However, a small number of reports indicated that Tetracyclines could also inhibit translation initiation, yet the molecular mechanism remained unknown. Here, we use biochemical and computational methods to study how Oxytetracycline (Otc), Demeclocycline (Dem), and Tigecycline (Tig) affect the translation initiation phase of protein synthesis. Our results show that all three Tetracyclines induce Initiation Factor IF3 to adopt a compact conformation on the 30S ribosomal subunit, similar to that induced by Initiation Factor IF1. This compaction was faster for Tig than Dem or Otc. Furthermore, all three tested tetracyclines affected IF1-bound 30S complexes. The dissociation rate constant of IF1 in early 30S complexes was 14-fold slower for Tig than Dem or Otc. Late 30S initiation complexes (30S pre-IC or IC) exhibited greater IF1 stabilization by Tig than for Dem and Otc. Tig and Otc delayed 50S joining to 30S initiation complexes (30S ICs). Remarkably, the presence of Tig considerably slowed the progression to translation elongation and retained IF1 in the resulting 70S initiation complex (70S IC). Molecular modeling of Tetracyclines bound to the 30S pre-IC and 30S IC indicated that the antibiotics binding site topography fluctuates along the initiation pathway. Mainly, 30S complexes show potential contacts between Dem or Tig with IF1, providing a structural rationale for the enhanced affinity of the antibiotics in the presence of the factor. Altogether, our data indicate that Tetracyclines inhibit translation initiation by allosterically perturbing the IF3 layout on the 30S, retaining IF1 during 70S IC formation, and slowing the transition toward translation elongation. Thus, this study describes a new complementary mechanism by which Tetracyclines may inhibit bacterial protein synthesis.

Apontic binds the translational repressor Bruno and is implicated in regulation of oskar mRNA translation

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (6) ◽  
pp. 1129-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y.S. Lie ◽  
P.M. Macdonald
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Untranslated Region ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Posterior Pole ◽  
Translational Repression ◽  
Yeast Two Hybrid ◽  
Functional Interaction ◽  
Translational Repressor ◽  
Two Hybrid

The product of the oskar gene directs posterior patterning in the Drosophila oocyte, where it must be deployed specifically at the posterior pole. Proper expression relies on the coordinated localization and translational control of the oskar mRNA. Translational repression prior to localization of the transcript is mediated, in part, by the Bruno protein, which binds to discrete sites in the 3′ untranslated region of the oskar mRNA. To begin to understand how Bruno acts in translational repression, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen to identify Bruno-interacting proteins. One interactor, described here, is the product of the apontic gene. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments lend biochemical support to the idea that Bruno and Apontic proteins physically interact in Drosophila. Genetic experiments using mutants defective in apontic and bruno reveal a functional interaction between these genes. Given this interaction, Apontic is likely to act together with Bruno in translational repression of oskar mRNA. Interestingly, Apontic, like Bruno, is an RNA-binding protein and specifically binds certain regions of the oskar mRNA 3′ untranslated region.

Epidermal induction and inhibition of neural fate by translation initiation factor 4AIII

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4235-4242
Author(s):  
D.C. Weinstein ◽  
E. Honore ◽  
A. Hemmati-Brivanlou
Keyword(s):  
Cell Fate ◽  
Translation Initiation ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Bmp Signaling ◽  
Translation Initiation Factor ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Neural Fate ◽  
Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
Dissociated Cells ◽  
A Site

Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 (BMP-4) is a potent epidermal inducer and inhibitor of neural fate. We have used differential screening to identify genes involved in epidermal induction downstream of BMP-4 and report here evidence of a novel translational mechanism that regulates the division of the vertebrate ectoderm into regions of neural and epidermal fate. In dissociated Xenopus ectoderm, addition of ectopic BMP-4 leads to an increase in the expression of translation initiation factor 4AIII (eIF-4AIII), a divergent member of the eIF-4A gene family until now characterized only in plants. In the gastrula embryo, Xenopus eIF-4AIII (XeIF-4AIII) expression is elevated in the ventral ectoderm, a site of active BMP signal transduction. Moreover, overexpression of XeIF-4AIII induces epidermis in dissociated cells that would otherwise adopt a neural fate, mimicking the effects of BMP-4. Epidermal induction by XeIF-4AIII requires both an active BMP signaling pathway and an extracellular intermediate. Our results suggest that XeIF-4AIII can regulate changes in cell fate through selective mRNA translation. We propose that BMPs and XeIF-4AIII interact through a positive feedback loop in the ventral ectoderm of the vertebrate gastrula.

scholarly journals Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E Binding Protein Family of Proteins: Sentinels at a Translational Control Checkpoint in Lung Tumor Defense

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (21) ◽  
pp. 8455-8462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Y. Kim ◽  
Linda Von Weymarn ◽  
Ola Larsson ◽  
Danhua Fan ◽  
Jon M. Underwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Lung Tumor ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Protein Family ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor ◽  
Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E

scholarly journals A Retrospective on eIF2A—and Not the Alpha Subunit of eIF2

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2054
Author(s):  
Anton A. Komar ◽  
William C. Merrick
Keyword(s):  
Translational Control ◽  
Ribosomal Subunit ◽  
Initiation Factor ◽  
Single Chain ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Eif2α Phosphorylation ◽  
Specific Mrnas ◽  
Internal Initiation ◽  
And Function ◽  
Polypeptide Chains

Initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotes is a complex process requiring more than 12 different initiation factors, comprising over 30 polypeptide chains. The functions of many of these factors have been established in great detail; however, the precise role of some of them and their mechanism of action is still not well understood. Eukaryotic initiation factor 2A (eIF2A) is a single chain 65 kDa protein that was initially believed to serve as the functional homologue of prokaryotic IF2, since eIF2A and IF2 catalyze biochemically similar reactions, i.e., they stimulate initiator Met-tRNAi binding to the small ribosomal subunit. However, subsequent identification of a heterotrimeric 126 kDa factor, eIF2 (α,β,γ) showed that this factor, and not eIF2A, was primarily responsible for the binding of Met-tRNAi to 40S subunit in eukaryotes. It was found however, that eIF2A can promote recruitment of Met-tRNAi to 40S/mRNA complexes under conditions of inhibition of eIF2 activity (eIF2α-phosphorylation), or its absence. eIF2A does not function in major steps in the initiation process, but is suggested to act at some minor/alternative initiation events such as re-initiation, internal initiation, or non-AUG initiation, important for translational control of specific mRNAs. This review summarizes our current understanding of the eIF2A structure and function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document