Reappraisal of the intravenous glucose tolerance index for a simple assessment of insulin sensitivity in mice

2009 ◽  
Vol 296 (5) ◽  
pp. R1316-R1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Pacini ◽  
Maria Ahrén ◽  
Bo Ahrén

Mice are increasingly used in studies where measuring insulin sensitivity (IS) is a common procedure. The glucose clamp is labor intensive, cannot be used in large numbers of animals, cannot be repeated in the same mouse, and has been questioned as a valid tool for IS in mice; thus, the minimal model with 50-min intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) data was adapted for studies in mice. However, specific software and particular ability was needed. The aim of this study was to establish a simple procedure for evaluating IS during IVGTT in mice (CSI). IVGTTs ( n = 520) were performed in NMRI and C57BL/6J mice (20–25g). After glucose injection (1 g/kg), seven samples were collected for 50 min for glucose and insulin measurements, analyzed with a minimal model that provided the validated reference IS (SI). By using the regression CSI = α1 + α2 × KG/AUCD, where KG is intravenous glucose tolerance index and AUCd is the dynamic area under the curve, IS was calculated in 134 control animals randomly selected (regression CSI vs. SI: r = 0.66, P < 0.0001) and yielded α1 = 1.93 and α2 = 0.24. KG is the slope of log (glucose5-20) and AUCD is the mean dynamic area under insulin curve in the IVGTT. By keeping fixed α1 and α2, CSI was validated in 143 control mice (4.7 ± 0.2 min·μU−1·ml−1, virtually identical to SI: 4.7 ± 0.3, r = 0.89, P < 0.0001); and in 123 mice in different conditions: transgenic, addition of neuropeptides, incretins, and insulin (CSI: 6.0 ± 0.4 vs. SI: 6.1 ± 0.4, r = 0.94, P < 0.0001). In the other 120 animals, CSI revealed its ability to segregate different categories, as does SI. This easily usable formula for calculating CSI overcomes many experimental obstacles and may be a simple alternative to more complex procedures when large numbers of mice or repeated experiments in the same animals are required.

1994 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Swan ◽  
Christopher Walton ◽  
Ian F. Godsland

1. Simplified protocols for the measurement of insulin resistance will facilitate studies of this potentially important variable. 2. Using the euglycaemic clamp as the reference technique, we have assessed the validity of the insulin sensitivity index (inversely related to insulin resistance) obtained using a high-dose (500 mg/kg), unmodified intravenous glucose tolerance test with a 16 point sampling schedule and analysis using the minimal model of glucose disappearance. The two methods were compared in 10 clinically normal subjects and five patients with severe heart failure secondary to coronary heart disease. 3. The insulin sensitivity index of the minimal model was compared with four clamp-derived measures. Correlation coefficients of 0.72–0.92 (P < 0.01−P < 0.001) were obtained between the two methods over a wide range of insulin sensitivity [model values 1.03–14.63 min−1/(pmol/l) × 10−5]. Patients with heart failure had the lowest measures of insulin sensitivity. 4. The high-dose, unmodified intravenous glucose tolerance test with minimal model analysis is a straightforward and economical clinical procedure and provides a valid measure of insulin sensitivity, in health and disease.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document