The insulin sensitivity index. Correlation in dogs between values determined from the intravenous glucose tolerance test and the euglycemic glucose clamp

Diabetes ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 362-368 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. T. Finegood ◽  
G. Pacini ◽  
R. N. Bergman
1994 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 317-322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan W. Swan ◽  
Christopher Walton ◽  
Ian F. Godsland

1. Simplified protocols for the measurement of insulin resistance will facilitate studies of this potentially important variable. 2. Using the euglycaemic clamp as the reference technique, we have assessed the validity of the insulin sensitivity index (inversely related to insulin resistance) obtained using a high-dose (500 mg/kg), unmodified intravenous glucose tolerance test with a 16 point sampling schedule and analysis using the minimal model of glucose disappearance. The two methods were compared in 10 clinically normal subjects and five patients with severe heart failure secondary to coronary heart disease. 3. The insulin sensitivity index of the minimal model was compared with four clamp-derived measures. Correlation coefficients of 0.72–0.92 (P < 0.01−P < 0.001) were obtained between the two methods over a wide range of insulin sensitivity [model values 1.03–14.63 min−1/(pmol/l) × 10−5]. Patients with heart failure had the lowest measures of insulin sensitivity. 4. The high-dose, unmodified intravenous glucose tolerance test with minimal model analysis is a straightforward and economical clinical procedure and provides a valid measure of insulin sensitivity, in health and disease.


2010 ◽  
Vol 298 (3) ◽  
pp. E440-E448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gianluigi Pillonetto ◽  
Andrea Caumo ◽  
Claudio Cobelli

The classical minimal model (MM) index of insulin sensitivity, SI, does not account for how fast or slow insulin action takes place. In a recent work, we proposed a new dynamic insulin sensitivity index, SID, which is able to take into account the dynamics of insulin action as well. The new index is a function of two MM parameters, namely SI and p2, the latter parameter governing the speed of rise and decay of insulin action. We have previously shown that in normal glucose tolerant subjects SID provides a more comprehensive picture of insulin action on glucose metabolism than SI. The aim of this study is to show that resorting to SID rather SI is even more appropriate when studying diabetic patients who have a low and slow insulin action. We analyzed insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test studies performed in 10 diabetic subjects and mixed meal glucose tolerance test studies exploiting the triple tracer technique in 14 diabetic subjects. We derived both SI and SID resorting to Bayesian and Fisherian identification strategies. The results show that SID is estimated more precisely than SI when using the Bayesian approach. In addition, the less labor-intensive Fisherian approach can still be used to obtain reliable point estimates of SID but not of SI. These results suggest that SID yields a comprehensive, precise, and cost-effective assessment of insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired insulin action like impaired glucose tolerant subjects or diabetic patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document