DNA damage and osmotic regulation in the kidney

2005 ◽  
Vol 289 (1) ◽  
pp. F2-F7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia I. Dmitrieva ◽  
Maurice B. Burg ◽  
Joan D. Ferraris
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Osmotic Regulation ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
And Function

Renal medullary cells normally are exposed to extraordinarily high interstitial NaCl concentration as part of the urinary concentrating mechanism, yet they survive and function. Acute elevation of NaCl to a moderate level causes transient cell cycle arrest in culture. Higher levels of NaCl, within the range found in the inner medulla, cause apoptosis. Recently, it was surprising to discover that even moderately high levels of NaCl cause DNA double-strand breaks. The DNA breaks persist in cultured cells that are proliferating rapidly after adaptation to high NaCl, and DNA breaks normally are present in the renal inner medulla in vivo. High NaCl inhibits repair of broken DNA both in culture and in vivo, but the DNA is rapidly repaired if the level of NaCl is reduced. The inhibition of DNA repair is associated with suppressed activity of some DNA damage-response proteins like Mre11, Chk1, and H2AX but not that of others, like GADD45, p53, ataxia telangiectasia-mutated kinase (ATM), and Ku86. In this review, we consider possible mechanisms by which the renal cells escape the known dangerous consequences of persistent DNA damage. Furthermore, we consider that the persistent DNA damage may be a sensor of hypertonicity that activates ATM kinase to provide a signal that contributes to protective osmotic regulation.

scholarly journals DNA Damage-Induced Cell Cycle Regulation and Function of Novel Chk2 Phosphoresidues

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (21) ◽  
pp. 7832-7845 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Buscemi ◽  
Luigi Carlessi ◽  
Laura Zannini ◽  
Sofia Lisanti ◽  
Enrico Fontanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ataxia Telangiectasia ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Independent Manner ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
And Function ◽  
Cycle Regulation

ABSTRACT Chk2 kinase is activated by DNA damage to regulate cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis. Phosphorylation of Chk2 in vivo by ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) on threonine 68 (T68) initiates a phosphorylation cascade that promotes the full activity of Chk2. We identified three serine residues (S19, S33, and S35) on Chk2 that became phosphorylated in vivo rapidly and exclusively in response to ionizing radiation (IR)-induced DNA double-strand breaks in an ATM- and Nbs1-dependent but ataxia telangiectasia- and Rad3-related-independent manner. Phosphorylation of these residues, restricted to the G1 phase of the cell cycle, was induced by a higher dose of IR (>1 Gy) than that required for phosphorylation of T68 (0.25 Gy) and declined by 45 to 90 min, concomitant with a rise in Chk2 autophosphorylation. Compared to the wild-type form, Chk2 with alanine substitutions at S19, S33, and S35 (Chk2S3A) showed impaired dimerization, defective auto- and trans-phosphorylation activities, and reduced ability to promote degradation of Hdmx, a phosphorylation target of Chk2 and regulator of p53 activity. Besides, Chk2S3A failed to inhibit cell growth and, in response to IR, to arrest G1/S progression. These findings underscore the critical roles of S19, S33, and S35 and argue that these phosphoresidues may serve to fine-tune the ATM-dependent response of Chk2 to increasing amounts of DNA damage.

scholarly journals Loss of p53 suppresses replication-stress-induced DNA breakage in G1/S checkpoint deficient cells

eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bente Benedict ◽  
Tanja van Harn ◽  
Marleen Dekker ◽  
Simone Hermsen ◽  
Asli Kucukosmanoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breakage ◽  
Cycle Arrest

In cancer cells, loss of G1/S control is often accompanied by p53 pathway inactivation, the latter usually rationalized as a necessity for suppressing cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. However, we found an unanticipated effect of p53 loss in mouse and human G1-checkpoint-deficient cells: reduction of DNA damage. We show that abrogation of the G1/S-checkpoint allowed cells to enter S-phase under growth-restricting conditions at the expense of severe replication stress manifesting as decelerated DNA replication, reduced origin firing and accumulation of DNA double-strand breaks. In this system, loss of p53 allowed mitogen-independent proliferation, not by suppressing apoptosis, but rather by restoring origin firing and reducing DNA breakage. Loss of G1/S control also caused DNA damage and activation of p53 in an in vivo retinoblastoma model. Moreover, in a teratoma model, loss of p53 reduced DNA breakage. Thus, loss of p53 may promote growth of incipient cancer cells by reducing replication-stress-induced DNA damage.

scholarly journals Multiple autophosphorylation sites are dispensable for murine ATM activation in vivo

2008 ◽  
Vol 183 (5) ◽  
pp. 777-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremy A. Daniel ◽  
Manuela Pellegrini ◽  
Ji-Hoon Lee ◽  
Tanya T. Paull ◽  
Lionel Feigenbaum ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoints ◽  
Activation Mechanism ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Physiological Importance ◽  
Evolutionarily Conserved

Cellular responses to both physiological and pathological DNA double-strand breaks are initiated through activation of the evolutionarily conserved ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase. Upon DNA damage, an activation mechanism involving autophosphorylation has been reported to allow ATM to phosphorylate downstream targets important for cell cycle checkpoints and DNA repair. In humans, serine residues 367, 1893, and 1981 have been shown to be autophosphorylation sites that are individually required for ATM activation. To test the physiological importance of these sites, we generated a transgenic mouse model in which all three conserved ATM serine autophosphorylation sites (S367/1899/1987) have been replaced with alanine. In this study, we show that ATM-dependent responses at both cellular and organismal levels are functional in mice that express a triple serine mutant form of ATM as their sole ATM species. These results lend further support to the notion that ATM autophosphorylation correlates with the DNA damage–induced activation of the kinase but is not required for ATM function in vivo.

scholarly journals Genetic Separation of Sae2 Nuclease Activity from Mre11 Nuclease Functions in Budding Yeast

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (24) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sucheta Arora ◽  
Rajashree A. Deshpande ◽  
Martin Budd ◽  
Judy Campbell ◽  
America Revere ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nuclease Activity ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Endonuclease Activity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Ends

ABSTRACT Sae2 promotes the repair of DNA double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The role of Sae2 is linked to the Mre11/Rad50/Xrs2 (MRX) complex, which is important for the processing of DNA ends into single-stranded substrates for homologous recombination. Sae2 has intrinsic endonuclease activity, but the role of this activity has not been assessed independently from its functions in promoting Mre11 nuclease activity. Here we identify and characterize separation-of-function mutants that lack intrinsic nuclease activity or the ability to promote Mre11 endonucleolytic activity. We find that the ability of Sae2 to promote MRX nuclease functions is important for DNA damage survival, particularly in the absence of Dna2 nuclease activity. In contrast, Sae2 nuclease activity is essential for DNA repair when the Mre11 nuclease is compromised. Resection of DNA breaks is impaired when either Sae2 activity is blocked, suggesting roles for both Mre11 and Sae2 nuclease activities in promoting the processing of DNA ends in vivo. Finally, both activities of Sae2 are important for sporulation, indicating that the processing of meiotic breaks requires both Mre11 and Sae2 nuclease activities.

scholarly journals βarrestin-1 regulates DNA repair by acting as an E3-ubiquitin ligase adaptor for 53BP1

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 1200-1213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ainhoa Nieto ◽  
Makoto R. Hara ◽  
Victor Quereda ◽  
Wayne Grant ◽  
Vanessa Saunders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ionizing Radiation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
E3 Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Strand Break ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Molecular Scaffold ◽  
Strand Breaks

Abstract Cellular DNA is constantly under threat from internal and external insults, consequently multiple pathways have evolved to maintain chromosomal fidelity. Our previous studies revealed that chronic stress, mediated by continuous stimulation of the β2-adrenergic-βarrestin-1 signaling axis suppresses activity of the tumor suppressor p53 and impairs genomic integrity. In this pathway, βarrestin-1 (βarr1) acts as a molecular scaffold to promote the binding and degradation of p53 by the E3-ubiquitin ligase, MDM2. We sought to determine whether βarr1 plays additional roles in the repair of DNA damage. Here we demonstrate that in mice βarr1 interacts with p53-binding protein 1 (53BP1) with major consequences for the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. 53BP1 is a principle component of the DNA damage response, and when recruited to the site of double-strand breaks in DNA, 53BP1 plays an important role coordinating repair of these toxic lesions. Here, we report that βarr1 directs 53BP1 degradation by acting as a scaffold for the E3-ubiquitin ligase Rad18. Consequently, knockdown of βarr1 stabilizes 53BP1 augmenting the number of 53BP1 DNA damage repair foci following exposure to ionizing radiation. Accordingly, βarr1 loss leads to a marked increase in irradiation resistance both in cells and in vivo. Thus, βarr1 is an important regulator of double strand break repair, and disruption of the βarr1/53BP1 interaction offers an attractive strategy to protect cells against high levels of exposure to ionizing radiation.

scholarly journals Bromodomain proteins: repairing DNA damage within chromatin

2017 ◽  
Vol 372 (1731) ◽  
pp. 20160286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li-Ya Chiu ◽  
Fade Gong ◽  
Kyle M. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Modification ◽  
Chromatin Remodelling ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Cellular Functions ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Bromodomain Proteins ◽  
Molecular Signals ◽  
Key Participants

Genome surveillance and repair, termed the DNA damage response (DDR), functions within chromatin. Chromatin-based DDR mechanisms sustain genome and epigenome integrity, defects that can disrupt cellular homeostasis and contribute to human diseases. An important chromatin DDR pathway is acetylation signalling which is controlled by histone acetyltransferase (HAT) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes, which regulate acetylated lysines within proteins. Acetylated proteins, including histones, can modulate chromatin structure and provide molecular signals that are bound by acetyl-lysine binders, including bromodomain (BRD) proteins. Acetylation signalling regulates several DDR pathways, as exemplified by the preponderance of HATs, HDACs and BRD proteins that localize at DNA breaks to modify chromatin for lesion repair. Here, we explore the involvement of acetylation signalling in the DDR, focusing on the involvement of BRD proteins in promoting chromatin remodelling to repair DNA double-strand breaks. BRD proteins have widespread DDR functions including chromatin remodelling, chromatin modification and transcriptional regulation. We discuss mechanistically how BRD proteins read acetylation signals within chromatin to trigger DDR and chromatin activities to facilitate genome–epigenome maintenance. Thus, DDR pathways involving BRD proteins represent key participants in pathways that preserve genome–epigenome integrity to safeguard normal genome and cellular functions. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling’.

scholarly journals Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks

2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (12) ◽  
pp. 5794-5794
Author(s):  
C. Lundin ◽  
M. North ◽  
K. Erixon ◽  
K. Walters ◽  
D. Jenssen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Methyl Methanesulfonate ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Heat Labile

scholarly journals A nucleotide resolution map of Top2-linked DNA breaks in the yeast and human genome

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
William H. Gittens ◽  
Dominic J. Johnson ◽  
Rachal M. Allison ◽  
Tim J. Cooper ◽  
Holly Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Cleavage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Single Strand Breaks ◽  
Human Genomes ◽  
Nucleotide Resolution

Abstract DNA topoisomerases are required to resolve DNA topological stress. Despite this essential role, abortive topoisomerase activity generates aberrant protein-linked DNA breaks, jeopardising genome stability. Here, to understand the genomic distribution and mechanisms underpinning topoisomerase-induced DNA breaks, we map Top2 DNA cleavage with strand-specific nucleotide resolution across the S. cerevisiae and human genomes—and use the meiotic Spo11 protein to validate the broad applicability of this method to explore the role of diverse topoisomerase family members. Our data characterises Mre11-dependent repair in yeast and defines two strikingly different fractions of Top2 activity in humans: tightly localised CTCF-proximal, and broadly distributed transcription-proximal, the latter correlated with gene length and expression. Moreover, single nucleotide accuracy reveals the influence primary DNA sequence has upon Top2 cleavage—distinguishing sites likely to form canonical DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) from those predisposed to form strand-biased DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) induced by etoposide (VP16) in vivo.

scholarly journals Ubiquitylation, neddylation and the DNA damage response

Open Biology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 150018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica S. Brown ◽  
Stephen P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Post Translational Modification ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Sensing ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Repair Mechanisms ◽  
And Function

Failure of accurate DNA damage sensing and repair mechanisms manifests as a variety of human diseases, including neurodegenerative disorders, immunodeficiency, infertility and cancer. The accuracy and efficiency of DNA damage detection and repair, collectively termed the DNA damage response (DDR), requires the recruitment and subsequent post-translational modification (PTM) of a complex network of proteins. Ubiquitin and the ubiquitin-like protein (UBL) SUMO have established roles in regulating the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). A role for other UBLs, such as NEDD8, is also now emerging. This article provides an overview of the DDR, discusses our current understanding of the process and function of PTM by ubiquitin and NEDD8, and reviews the literature surrounding the role of ubiquitylation and neddylation in DNA repair processes, focusing particularly on DNA DSB repair.

Heterochromatin and the DNA damage response: the need to relaxThis paper is one of a selection of papers in a Special Issue entitled 31st Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kendra L. Cann ◽  
Graham Dellaire
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Atm Kinase ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Chromosomal Mutations

Higher order chromatin structure has an impact on all nuclear functions, including the DNA damage response. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that heterochromatin and euchromatin represent separate entities with respect to both damage sensitivity and repair. The chromatin compaction present in heterochromatin helps to protect this DNA from damage; however, when lesions do occur, the compaction restricts the ability of DNA damage response proteins to access the site, as evidenced by its ability to block the expansion of H2AX phosphorylation. As such, DNA damage in heterochromatin is refractory to repair, which requires the surrounding chromatin structure to be decondensed. In the case of DNA double-strand breaks, this relaxation is at least partially mediated by the ATM kinase phosphorylating and inhibiting the function of the transcriptional repressor KAP1. This review will focus on the functions of KAP1 and other proteins involved in the maintenance or restriction of heterochromatin, including HP1 and TIP60, in the DNA damage response. As heterochromatin is important for maintaining genomic stability, cells must maintain a delicate balance between allowing repair factors access to these regions and ensuring that these regions retain their organization to prevent increased DNA damage and chromosomal mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document