Lung compliance, lung volumes, and single-breath diffusing capacity in dogs.

1972 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 808-812 ◽  
Author(s):  
N E Robinson ◽  
J R Gillespie ◽  
J D Berry ◽  
A Simpson
Keyword(s):  
Lung Compliance ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Single Breath

THE SINGLE BREATH DIFFUSING CAPACITY AND THE PERMEABILITY OF THE LUNGS OF NORMAL MAN

1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 1283-1292
Author(s):  
Edith Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Sieve ◽  
The Other ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Alveolar Volume ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Test Gas ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Normal Man ◽  
Molecular Sieve Column

The single breath diffusing capacity for CO, DL, and the permeability of the lungs, K, were measured in six male and two female medical students at various lung volumes. The subjects rested 15 minutes before each test and the expired alveolar volume as well as breath-holding time and inspired volume were recorded on a spirogram. The test gas used consisted of 0.3% CO, 0.3% SF6, 20% O2, and the balance N2. The sample of alveolar gas expired after breath-holding was analyzed for CO and SF6 on a vapor fractometer using a 2-meter molecular sieve column. DL varied with the surface area of the subjects as well as with the alveolar volume at which the test was performed. K, on the other hand, was independent of the size of the subjects and decreased towards a constant value as lung volume became large. K should, therefore, be more reproducible than DL. The average permeability of the eight subjects used in this study was 0.0715 ml CO per second per ml of alveolar volume. In every experiment, alveolar volumes were also calculated from the SF6 dilution. These values, VD, were compared to alveolar volumes calculated from the maximum lung volumes, VA. For the males there was no measurable difference between alveolar volumes calculated by these two methods when 2 liters or more of test gas were inspired. It is suggested that the replacement of the measurement of DL in pulmonary function laboratories by an evaluation of K and VD may transform the single breath diffusing capacity test into a useful diagnostic tool.

THE SINGLE BREATH DIFFUSING CAPACITY AND THE PERMEABILITY OF THE LUNGS OF NORMAL MAN

1963 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 1283-1292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edith Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Sieve ◽  
The Other ◽  
Breath Holding ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Alveolar Volume ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Test Gas ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Normal Man ◽  
Molecular Sieve Column

The single breath diffusing capacity for CO, DL, and the permeability of the lungs, K, were measured in six male and two female medical students at various lung volumes. The subjects rested 15 minutes before each test and the expired alveolar volume as well as breath-holding time and inspired volume were recorded on a spirogram. The test gas used consisted of 0.3% CO, 0.3% SF6, 20% O2, and the balance N2. The sample of alveolar gas expired after breath-holding was analyzed for CO and SF6 on a vapor fractometer using a 2-meter molecular sieve column. DL varied with the surface area of the subjects as well as with the alveolar volume at which the test was performed. K, on the other hand, was independent of the size of the subjects and decreased towards a constant value as lung volume became large. K should, therefore, be more reproducible than DL. The average permeability of the eight subjects used in this study was 0.0715 ml CO per second per ml of alveolar volume. In every experiment, alveolar volumes were also calculated from the SF6 dilution. These values, VD, were compared to alveolar volumes calculated from the maximum lung volumes, VA. For the males there was no measurable difference between alveolar volumes calculated by these two methods when 2 liters or more of test gas were inspired. It is suggested that the replacement of the measurement of DL in pulmonary function laboratories by an evaluation of K and VD may transform the single breath diffusing capacity test into a useful diagnostic tool.

Single-breath diffusing capacity and lung volumes in small laboratory mammals

1980 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 1052-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Takezawa ◽  
F. J. Miller ◽  
J. J. O'Neil
Keyword(s):  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Total Lung Capacity ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Lung Capacity ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Residual Capacity ◽  
Single Breath Method

We measured the single-breath diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), total lung capacity (TLC), functional residual capacity (FRC), and residual volume (RV) in anesthetized male hamsters, rats, guinea pigs, and rabbits whose weights varied from 40 to 3,500 g. TLC (defined as an airway pressure of 25 cmH2O) was calculated by neon dilution. The DLCO was estimated by a modification of the single-breath method. There was a high correlation between body weight and our measurement of both the diffusing capacity and the lung volumes. No significant difference in DLCO was observed in rats when measured in different body positions, at airway pressures of 10 or 20 cmH2O, from FRC or RV, in male or female rats, or following hyperventilation.

Lung volumes, mechanics, and single-breath diffusing capacity in anesthetized cats

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1148-1152 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Watanabe ◽  
R. Frank
Keyword(s):  
Body Weight ◽  
Mammalian Species ◽  
Lung Compliance ◽  
Pulmonary Mechanics ◽  
Lung Weight ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Unit Body Weight ◽  
Independent Constant ◽  
Predicted Values

We measured lung weight, lung volumes, pulmonary mechanics, and carbon monoxide transfer (DLCO, single-breath method) in healthy cats (3.3 +/- 0.4 kg) that were anesthetized, paralyzed, and mechanically ventilated through a tracheal cannula. Compared with Stahl's predicted values which were based on regression analyses of data collected from several species, our cats had larger and more compliant lungs in relation to body weight, higher DLCO per unit body weight, and similar DLCO/TLC (size independent constant). Compared with Robinson et al.'s values derived entirely from studies on dogs, our cats had significantly smaller lung volumes and DLCO per unit body weight, DLCO/TLC and similar ratios of CL/FRC. Several factors appear to contribute to the functional variations among mammalian species: differences in the relation of lung to body weight, differences in the relation of chest wall compliance to lung compliance, and differences in the fundamental structure and design of the respiratory systems. Differences in methodology are acknowledged to be an additional factor.

The effect of conductive ventilation heterogeneity on diffusing capacity measurement

2008 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1094-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Verbanck ◽  
Daniel Schuermans ◽  
Sophie Van Malderen ◽  
Walter Vincken ◽  
Bruce Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Vital Capacity ◽  
Experimental Situation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Capacity Measurement ◽  
Alveolar Volume ◽  
Estimation Errors ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Ventilation Heterogeneity

It has long been assumed that the ventilation heterogeneity associated with lung disease could, in itself, affect the measurement of carbon monoxide transfer factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential estimation errors of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DlCO) measurement that are specifically due to conductive ventilation heterogeneity, i.e., due to a combination of ventilation heterogeneity and flow asynchrony between lung units larger than acini. We induced conductive airway ventilation heterogeneity in 35 never-smoker normal subjects by histamine provocation and related the resulting changes in conductive ventilation heterogeneity (derived from the multiple-breath washout test) to corresponding changes in diffusing capacity, alveolar volume, and inspired vital capacity (derived from the single-breath DlCO method). Average conductive ventilation heterogeneity doubled ( P < 0.001), whereas DlCO decreased by 6% ( P < 0.001), with no correlation between individual data ( P > 0.1). Average inspired vital capacity and alveolar volume both decreased significantly by, respectively, 6 and 3%, and the individual changes in alveolar volume and in conductive ventilation heterogeneity were correlated ( r = −0.46; P = 0.006). These findings can be brought in agreement with recent modeling work, where specific ventilation heterogeneity resulting from different distributions of either inspired volume or end-expiratory lung volume have been shown to affect DlCO estimation errors in opposite ways. Even in the presence of flow asynchrony, these errors appear to largely cancel out in our experimental situation of histamine-induced conductive ventilation heterogeneity. Finally, we also predicted which alternative combination of specific ventilation heterogeneity and flow asynchrony could affect DlCO estimate in a more substantial fashion in diseased lungs, irrespective of any diffusion-dependent effects.

Nonlinear increases in diffusing capacity during exercise by seated and supine subjects

1981 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Stokes ◽  
N. R. MacIntyre ◽  
J. A. Nadel
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Monoxide ◽  
Oxygen Consumption ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Vital Capacity ◽  
Maximal Exercise ◽  
Sitting Position ◽  
Diffusing Capacity ◽  
Heavy Exercise ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Rate Of Increase

To study the effects of exercise on pulmonary diffusing capacity, we measured the lungs' diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) during exhalation from 30 to 45% exhaled vital capacity in eight healthy subjects at rest and during exercise while both sitting and supine. We found that DLCO at these lung volumes in resting subjects was 26.3 +/- 3.2% (mean +/- SE) higher in the supine than in the sitting position (P less than 0.001). We also found that, in both positions, DLCO at these lung volumes increased significantly (P less than 0.001) with increasing exercise and approached similar values at maximal exercise. The pattern of increase in DLCO with an increase in oxygen consumption in both positions was curvilinear in that the rate of increase in DLCO during mild exercise was greater than the rate of increase in DLCO during heavy exercise (P = 0.02). Furthermore, in the supine position during exercise, it appeared that DLCO reached a physiological maximum.

STUDIES OF RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGY IN CHILDREN

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1959 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-193
Author(s):  
C. D. Cook ◽  
P. J. Helliesen ◽  
L. Kulczycki ◽  
H. Barrie ◽  
L. Friedlander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tidal Volume ◽  
Respiratory Rate ◽  
Vital Capacity ◽  
Total Lung Capacity ◽  
Lung Compliance ◽  
Respiratory Physiology ◽  
Residual Volume ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Lung Capacity ◽  
Residual Capacity

Tidal volume, respiratory rate and lung volumes have been measured in 64 patients with cystic fibrosis of the pancreas while lung compliance and resistance were measured in 42 of these. Serial studies of lung volumes were done in 43. Tidal volume was reduced and the respiratory rate increased only in the most severely ill patients. Excluding the three patients with lobectomies, residual volume and functional residual capacity were found to be significantly increased in 46 and 21%, respectively. These changes correlated well with the roentgenographic evaluation of emphysema. Vital capacity was significantly reduced in 34% while total lung capacity was, on the average, relatively unchanged. Seventy per cent of the 61 patients had a signficantly elevated RV/TLC ratio. Lung compliance was significantly reduced in only the most severely ill patients but resistance was significantly increased in 35% of the patients studied. The serial studies of lung volumes showed no consistent trends among the groups of patients in the period between studies. However, 10% of the surviving patients showed evidence of significant improvement while 15% deteriorated. [See Fig. 8. in Source Pdf.] Although there were individual discrepancies, there was a definite correlation between the clinical evaluation and tests of respiratory function, especially the changes in residual volume, the vital capacity, RV/ TLC ratio and the lung compliance and resistance.

Inflection point on transpulmonary pressure-volume curves and closing volume

1975 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
pp. 228-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Demedts ◽  
J. Clement ◽  
D. C. Stanescu ◽  
K. P. van de Woestijne
Keyword(s):  
Inflection Point ◽  
Vital Capacity ◽  
Transpulmonary Pressure ◽  
Bronchial Obstruction ◽  
Closing Volume ◽  
Lung Volumes ◽  
Nitrogen Washout ◽  
Single Breath ◽  
Space Effect ◽  
Washout Curves

In 20 healthy subjects and 18 patients with bronchial obstruction, closing volume (CV) on single-breath nitrogen washout curves and inflection point (IP) on transpulmonary pressure-volume curves were recorded simultaneously during slow expiratory vital capacity maneuvers. IP and CV did not occur at identical lung volumes, IP being systematically larger than CV for small CV values. This discrepancy could not be attributed to an esophageal or mediastinal artifact. It is suggested that, though CV and IP both express “airway closure,” their sensitivity to closure may differ: CV underestimates closure because of a dead space effect; the latter may vary individually. On the other hand, IP may not reflect the true beginning of closure, particularly when it occurs at higher lung volumes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document