Naloxone does not affect the cardiovascular and sympathetic adjustments to static exercise in humans

1994 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Ray ◽  
J. A. Pawelczyk
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Static Exercise ◽  
Burst Frequency ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Endogenous Opiates ◽  
Muscle Ischemia

Previous studies suggested that endogenous opiates may attenuate the cardiovascular and sympathetic adjustments to static exercise. We tested whether this effect originates from exercising skeletal muscle. Eight men performed 2 min of static handgrip (30% maximum) followed by 2 min of posthandgrip muscle ischemia after three interventions: 1) control, 2) intra-arterial injection of naloxone HCl (60 micrograms) or vehicle (saline) in the exercising arm, and 3) systemic infusion of naloxone (4 mg) or vehicle. Naloxone and vehicle trials were performed double blind on separate days. Preexercise baseline muscle sympathetic nerve activity (burst frequency), heart rate, and blood pressure were similar across interventions on either day. During static handgrip, control, intra-arterial, and systemic administration of vehicle and naloxone elicited similar increases in total muscle sympathetic nerve activity (58 +/- 24 vs. 68 +/- 26, 146 +/- 49 vs. 132 +/- 42, 137 +/- 54 vs. 164 +/- 44%, respectively), heart rate (9 +/- 2 vs. 8 +/- 3, 16 +/- 3 vs. 16 +/- 2, 20 +/- 4 vs. 19 +/- 3 beats/min, respectively), and mean arterial pressure (22 +/- 4 vs. 21 +/- 4, 29 +/- 5 vs. 26 +/- 3, 28 +/- 4 vs. 27 +/- 4 mmHg, respectively). Additionally, there were no differences between vehicle and naloxone trials during posthandgrip muscle ischemia. Thus, contrary to previous reports, we conclude that the endogenous opiate peptide system does not modulate cardiovascular and sympathetic responses to brief periods of static exercise or muscle ischemia in humans.

GABAA receptor activation modulates the muscle sympathetic nerve activity responses at the onset of static exercise in humans

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
André L. Teixeira ◽  
Igor A. Fernandes ◽  
Philip J. Millar ◽  
Lauro C. Vianna
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Stroke Volume ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Receptor Activation ◽  
Static Exercise ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Exercise Onset

Exercise is a well-known sympathoexcitatory stimulus. However, muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) can decrease during the onset of muscle contraction. Yet, the underlying mechanisms and neurotransmitters involved in the sympathetic responses at the onset of exercise remain unknown. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that GABAA receptors may contribute to the MSNA responses at the onset of static handgrip in humans. Thirteen young, healthy individuals (4 females) performed 30 s of ischemic static handgrip at 30% of maximum volitional contraction before and following oral administration of either placebo or diazepam (10 mg), a benzodiazepine that enhances GABAA activity. MSNA (microneurography), beat-to-beat blood pressure (finger photopletysmography), heart rate (electrocardiogram) and stroke volume (ModelFlow) were continuously measured. Cardiac output (CO = stroke volume x heart rate) and total vascular conductance (TVC = CO / mean blood pressure) were subsequently calculated. At rest, MSNA was reduced while hemodynamic variables were unchanged after diazepam administration. Before diazepam, static handgrip elicited a significant decrease in MSNA burst frequency (∆-7±2 bursts/min, P<0.01 vs. baseline) and MSNA burst incidence (∆-16±2 bursts/100 heart beats, P<0.01 vs. baseline); however, these responses were attenuated following diazepam administration (∆-1±2 bursts/min and ∆-7±2 bursts/100 heart beats, respectively; P<0.01 vs. before diazepam). Diazepam did not affect the increases in heart rate, blood pressure, CO and TVC at the exercise onset. Importantly, the placebo had no effect on any variable at rest or exercise onset. These findings suggest that GABAA receptor activation modulates the MSNA responses at the onset of static exercise in young, healthy humans.

Baroreflex modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity during posthandgrip muscle ischemia in humans

2001 ◽  
Vol 91 (4) ◽  
pp. 1679-1686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Cui ◽  
Thad E. Wilson ◽  
Manabu Shibasaki ◽  
Nicole A. Hodges ◽  
Craig G. Crandall
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Isometric Handgrip ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Muscle Ischemia ◽  
The Relationship

To identify whether muscle metaboreceptor stimulation alters baroreflex control of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA), MSNA, beat-by-beat arterial blood pressure (Finapres), and electrocardiogram were recorded in 11 healthy subjects in the supine position. Subjects performed 2 min of isometric handgrip exercise at 40% of maximal voluntary contraction followed by 2.5 min of posthandgrip muscle ischemia. During muscle ischemia, blood pressure was lowered and then raised by intravenous bolus infusions of sodium nitroprusside and phenylephrine HCl, respectively. The slope of the relationship between MSNA and diastolic blood pressure was more negative ( P < 0.001) during posthandgrip muscle ischemia (−201.9 ± 20.4 units · beat−1 · mmHg−1) when compared with control conditions (−142.7 ± 17.3 units · beat−1 · mmHg−1). No significant change in the slope of the relationship between heart rate and systolic blood pressure was observed. However, both curves shifted during postexercise ischemia to accommodate the elevation in blood pressure and MSNA that occurs with this condition. These data suggest that the sensitivity of baroreflex modulation of MSNA is elevated by muscle metaboreceptor stimulation, whereas the sensitivity of baroreflex of modulate heart rate is unchanged during posthandgrip muscle ischemia.

Isometric handgrip training reduces arterial pressure at rest without changes in sympathetic nerve activity

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (1) ◽  
pp. H245-H249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chester A. Ray ◽  
Dario I. Carrasco
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Isometric Handgrip ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Ischemia

The purpose of this study was to determine whether isometric handgrip (IHG) training reduces arterial pressure and whether reductions in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) mediate this drop in arterial pressure. Normotensive subjects were assigned to training ( n = 9), sham training ( n = 7), or control ( n = 8) groups. The training protocol consisted of four 3-min bouts of IHG exercise at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) separated by 5-min rest periods. Training was performed four times per week for 5 wk. Subjects' resting arterial pressure and heart rate were measured three times on 3 consecutive days before and after training, with resting MSNA (peroneal nerve) recorded on the third day. Additionally, subjects performed IHG exercise at 30% of MVC to fatigue followed by muscle ischemia. In the trained group, resting diastolic (67 ± 1 to 62 ± 1 mmHg) and mean arterial pressure (86 ± 1 to 82 ± 1 mmHg) significantly decreased, whereas systolic arterial pressure (116 ± 3 to 113 ± 2 mmHg), heart rate (67 ± 4 to 66 ± 4 beats/min), and MSNA (14 ± 2 to 15 ± 2 bursts/min) did not significantly change following training. MSNA and cardiovascular responses to exercise and postexercise muscle ischemia were unchanged by training. There were no significant changes in any variables for the sham training and control groups. The results indicate that IHG training is an effective nonpharmacological intervention in lowering arterial pressure.

Endotoxemia causes central downregulation of sympathetic vasomotor tone in healthy humans

2008 ◽  
Vol 295 (3) ◽  
pp. R891-R898 ◽  
Author(s):  
Friedhelm Sayk ◽  
Alexander Vietheer ◽  
Bernhard Schaaf ◽  
Peter Wellhoener ◽  
Gunther Weitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Blood Levels ◽  
Burst Frequency ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Healthy Humans ◽  
Vascular Bed

Experimental endotoxemia as a model of the initial septic response affects the autonomic nervous system with profound cardiovascular sequelae. Whether the postsynaptic sympathoneural activity to the muscle vascular bed is altered in the early septic phase remains to be determined. The present study aimed to elucidate the early effects of LPS on muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) and cardiovascular regulation in healthy humans. Young, healthy volunteers randomly received either an LPS bolus (4 ng/kg body wt, n = 11) or placebo (saline; n = 7). Experimental baroreflex assessment (baseline measurements followed by infusion of vasoactive drugs nitroprusside/phenylephrine) was done prior to and 90 min following LPS or placebo challenge. MSNA, heart rate, blood pressure, and blood levels of catecholamines, TNF-α and IL-6 were measured sequentially. Endotoxin but not placebo-induced flu-like symptoms and elevated cytokine levels. In contrast to placebo, LPS significantly suppressed MSNA burst frequency 90 min after injection [mean ± SE: 12.1 ± 2.9 vs. 27.5 ± 3.3 burst/min (post- vs. pre-LPS); P < 0.005] but increased heart rate [78.4 ± 3.1 vs. 60.6 ± 2.0 beats/min (post- vs. pre-LPS); P < 0.001]. Baseline blood pressure was not altered, but baroreflex testing demonstrated a blunted MSNA response and uncoupling of heart rate modulation to blood pressure changes in the endotoxin group. We conclude that endotoxin challenge in healthy humans has rapid suppressive effects on postsynaptic sympathetic nerve activity to the muscle vascular bed and alters baroreflex function which may contribute to the untoward cardiovascular effects of sepsis.

Modulation of sympathetic nerve activity during posthandgrip muscle ischemia in humans

1994 ◽  
Vol 266 (1) ◽  
pp. H79-H83 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. A. Ray ◽  
N. H. Secher ◽  
A. L. Mark
Keyword(s):  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Sensory Nerve ◽  
Vascular Occlusion ◽  
Voluntary Contraction ◽  
Central Command ◽  
Isometric Handgrip ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Ischemia

To evaluate modulation of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) during posthandgrip muscle ischemia (PHGMI), subjects performed 2 min of isometric handgrip at 33% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) followed by 2 min of PHGMI produced by forearm vascular occlusion. The response to PHGMI was studied in the absence and again during the addition of contralateral rhythmic handgrip (RHG; 40 times/min) at 15% (n = 6) and 30% (n = 10) MVC during the second minute of the PHGMI. Additionally, to isolate the effect of central command, response to PHGMI was studied during attempted RHG after sensory nerve blockade (n = 5). RHG for 2 min at 15 and 30% MVC and attempted RHG for 2 min did not increase MSNA. Isometric handgrip elicited an 130 +/- 48% increase in MSNA (P < 0.05), which was maintained during PHGMI. RHG at 15 and 30% MVC elicited an attenuation of MSNA (-10 +/- 7% and -14 +/- 6%, respectively) when performed during the second minute of PHGMI (P < 0.05). In contrast, attempted RHG did not significantly affect MSNA during PHGMI. The findings demonstrate modulation of MSNA during activation of the muscle metaboreflex. The attenuation of metaboreceptor-mediated increases in MSNA appear to be the result of mechanosensitive muscle afferents and not central command.

scholarly journals Disruption of phase synchronization between blood pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in postural vasovagal syncope

2013 ◽  
Vol 305 (8) ◽  
pp. H1238-H1245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher E. Schwartz ◽  
Elisabeth Lambert ◽  
Marvin S. Medow ◽  
Julian M. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Phase Synchronization ◽  
Vasovagal Syncope ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Control Subjects ◽  
Late Stages

Withdrawal of muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) may not be necessary for the precipitous fall of peripheral arterial resistance and arterial pressure (AP) during vasovagal syncope (VVS). We tested the hypothesis that the MSNA-AP baroreflex entrainment is disrupted before VVS regardless of MSNA withdrawal using the phase synchronization between blood pressure and MSNA during head-up tilt (HUT) to measure reflex coupling. We studied eight VVS subjects and eight healthy control subjects. Heart rate, AP, and MSNA were measured during supine baseline and at early, mid, late, and syncope stages of HUT. Phase synchronization indexes, measuring time-dependent differences between MSNA and AP phases, were computed. Directionality indexes, indicating the influence of AP on MSNA (neural arc) and MSNA on AP (peripheral arc), were computed. Heart rate was greater in VVS compared with control subjects during early, mid, and late stages of HUT and significantly declined at syncope ( P = 0.04). AP significantly decreased during mid, late, and syncope stages of tilt in VVS subjects only ( P = 0.001). MSNA was not significantly different between groups during HUT ( P = 0.700). However, the phase synchronization index significantly decreased during mid and late stages in VVS subjects but not in control subjects ( P < .001). In addition, the neural arc was significantly affected more than the peripheral arc before syncope. In conclusion, VVS is accompanied by a loss of the synchronous AP-MSNA relationship with or without a loss in MSNA at faint. This provides insight into the mechanisms behind the loss of vasoconstriction and drop in AP independent of MSNA at the time of vasovagal faint.

scholarly journals Heart rate variability and muscle sympathetic nerve activity response to acute stress: the effect of breathing

2010 ◽  
Vol 299 (1) ◽  
pp. R80-R91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay D. DeBeck ◽  
Stewart R. Petersen ◽  
Kelvin E. Jones ◽  
Michael K. Stickland
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Heart Rate Variability ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Spontaneous Breathing ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Cold Pressor ◽  
Isometric Handgrip ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Controlled Breathing

Previous research has suggested a relationship between low-frequency power of heart rate variability (HRV; LF in normalized units, LFnu) and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA). However, investigations have not systematically controlled for breathing, which can modulate both HRV and MSNA. Accordingly, the aims of this experiment were to investigate the possibility of parallel responses in MSNA and HRV (LFnu) to selected acute stressors and the effect of controlled breathing. After data were obtained at rest, 12 healthy males (28 ± 5 yr) performed isometric handgrip exercise (30% maximal voluntary contraction) and the cold pressor test in random order, and were then exposed to hypoxia (inspired fraction of O2 = 0.105) for 7 min, during randomly assigned spontaneous and controlled breathing conditions (20 breaths/min, constant tidal volume, isocapnic). MSNA was recorded from the peroneal nerve, whereas HRV was calculated from ECG. At rest, controlled breathing did not alter MSNA but decreased LFnu ( P < 0.05 for all) relative to spontaneous breathing. MSNA increased in response to all stressors regardless of breathing. LFnu increased with exercise during both breathing conditions. During cold pressor, LFnu decreased when breathing was spontaneous, whereas in the controlled breathing condition, LFnu was unchanged from baseline. Hypoxia elicited increases in LFnu when breathing was controlled, but not during spontaneous breathing. The parallel changes observed during exercise and controlled breathing during hypoxia suggest that LFnu may be an indication of sympathetic outflow in select conditions. However, since MSNA and LFnu did not change in parallel with all stressors, a cautious approach to the use of LFnu as a marker of sympathetic activity is warranted.

scholarly journals Adrenomedullin increases cardiac sympathetic nerve activity in normal conscious sheep

2005 ◽  
Vol 187 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
C J Charles ◽  
D L Jardine ◽  
M G Nicholls ◽  
A M Richards
Keyword(s):  
Heart Rate ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Vehicle Control ◽  
Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Burst Frequency ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Conscious Sheep

The sympathetic nervous system and adrenomedullin (AM) both participate in the regulation of cardiac and circulatory function but their interaction remains uncertain. We have examined the effects of AM on cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) and hemodynamics and contrasted these effects with pressure-matched nitro-prusside (NP) administration in normal conscious sheep. Compared with vehicle control, arterial pressure fell similarly with AM (P=0.04) and NP (P<0.001). Heart rate rose in response to both AM (P<0.001) and NP (P=0.002) but the rise with AM was significantly greater than that induced by NP (P<0.001). Cardiac output increased in response to AM compared with both control and NP (both P<0.001). CSNA burst frequency (bursts/min) were increased in response to both AM (P<0.001) and NP (P=0.005) with the rise in burst frequency being greater with AM compared with NP (P<0.001). CSNA burst area/min was also raised by both AM (P=0.03) and NP (P=0.002) with a trend for burst area being greater with AM than NP (P=0.07). CSNA burst incidence (bursts/100 beats) showed no significant differences between any treatment day. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that AM is associated with a greater increase in CSNA and heart rate for a given change in arterial pressure than seen with the classic balanced vasodilator NP.

Abstract 529: Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity is Higher in Winter than Other Seasons

Hypertension ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Cui ◽  
Matthew D Muller ◽  
Allen R Kunselman ◽  
Cheryl Blaha ◽  
Lawrence I Sinoway
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Epidemiological Data ◽  
Repeated Measurements ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Cardiovascular Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Significant Difference

Epidemiological data suggest that blood pressure tends to be higher in winter and lower in summer, particularly in the elderly. Moreover, hospitalization and mortality rates due to cardiovascular disease have higher rates in winter than summer. Whether autonomic adjustment including muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) varies with season is unclear. To test the hypothesis that resting MSNA varies along the seasons, we retrospectively analyzed the supine baseline (6 min) MSNA and heart rate (from ECG) of 57 healthy subjects (33M, 24F, 29 ± 1 yrs, range 22-64 yrs) from studies in our laboratory (room temperature ~23 °C). Each of these subjects from central Pennsylvania was studied during 2 or more seasons (total 231 visits). A linear-mixed effects model, which is an extension of the analysis of variance model accounting for repeated measurements (i.e. season) per subject, was used to assess the association of season with the cardiovascular outcomes. The Tukey-Kramer procedure was used to account for multiple comparisons testing between the seasons. MSNA burst rate in winter (21.3 ± 1.0 burst/min) was significantly greater than in summer (13.7 ± 1.0 burst/min, P < 0.001), spring (17.5 ± 1.6 burst/min, P = 0.04) and fall (17.0 ± 1.2 burst/min, P < 0.002). There was no significant difference in MSNA in other comparisons (spring vs. summer, P = 0.12; spring vs. fall, P = 0.99; summer vs. fall, P = 0.054). Heart rate (63.6 ± 1.1 vs. 60.8 ± 1.2 beats/min, P = 0.048) was significantly greater in winter compared to summer. Blood pressure (automated sphygmomanometry of the brachial artery) was not significantly different between seasons. The results suggest that baseline sympathetic nerve activity varies along the seasons, with peak levels evident in winter. We speculate that the seasonal MSNA variation may contribute to seasonal variations in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

scholarly journals Influence of Sex and Age on Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity of Healthy Normotensive Adults

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 997-1005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Keir ◽  
Mark B. Badrov ◽  
George Tomlinson ◽  
Catherine F. Notarius ◽  
Derek S. Kimmerly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Systematic Change ◽  
Burst Frequency ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Age Related

As with blood pressure, age-related changes in muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) may differ nonlinearly between sexes. Data acquired from 398 male (age: 39±17; range: 18–78 years [mean±SD]) and 260 female (age: 37±18; range: 18–81 years) normotensive healthy nonmedicated volunteers were analyzed using linear regression models with resting MSNA burst frequency as the outcome and the predictors sex, age, MSNA, blood pressure, and body mass index modelled with natural cubic splines. Age and body mass index contributed 41% and 11%, respectively, of MSNA variance in females and 23% and 1% in males. Overall, changes in MSNA with age were sigmoidal. At age 20, mean MSNA of males and females were similar, then diverged significantly, reaching in women a nadir at age 30. After 30, MSNA increased nonlinearly in both sexes. Both MSNA discharge and blood pressure were lower in females until age 50 (17±9 versus 25±10 bursts·min −1 ; P <1×10 −19 ; 106±11/66±8 versus 116±7/68±9 mm Hg; P <0.01) but converged thereafter (38±11 versus 35±12 bursts·min −1 ; P =0.17; 119±15/71±13 versus 120±13/72±9 mm Hg; P >0.56). Compared with age 30, MSNA burst frequency at age 70 was 57% higher in males but 3-fold greater in females; corresponding increases in systolic blood pressure were 1 (95% CI, −4 to 5) and 12 (95% CI, 6–16) mm Hg. Except for concordance in females beyond age 40, there was no systematic change with age in any resting MSNA-blood pressure relationship. In normotensive adults, MSNA increases after age 30, with ascendance steeper in women.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document