Differences between estimates and measured Pa CO 2 during rest and exercise in older subjects
Williams, J. S., and T. G. Babb. Differences between estimates and measured [Formula: see text] during rest and exercise in older subjects. J. Appl. Physiol. 83(1): 312–316, 1997.—Arterial[Formula: see text]([Formula: see text]) has been estimated during exercise with good accuracy in younger individuals by using the Jones equation (PJ co 2) ( J. Appl. Physiol. 47: 954–960, 1979). The purpose of this project was to determine the utility of estimating [Formula: see text] from end-tidal[Formula: see text]([Formula: see text]) or PJ co 2at rest, ventilatory threshold (V˙Th), and maximal exercise (Max) in older subjects.[Formula: see text] was determined from respired gases simultaneously (MGA 1100) with arterial blood gases (radial arterial catheter) in 12 older and 11 younger subjects at rest and during exercise. Mean differences were analyzed with paired t-tests, and relationships between the estimated [Formula: see text] values and the actual values of [Formula: see text] were determined with correlation coefficients. In the older subjects,[Formula: see text] was not significantly different from [Formula: see text] at rest (−1.2 ± 4.3 Torr), V˙Th (0.4 ± 2.5), or Max (−0.8 ± 2.7), and the two were significantly ( P < 0.05) correlated atV˙th ( r = 0.84) and Max ( r = 0.87) but not at rest ( r = 0.47). PJ co 2was similar to [Formula: see text] at rest (−1.0 ± 3.9) and V˙th (−1.3 ± 2.3) but significantly lower at Max (−3.0 ± 2.6), and the two were significantly correlated at V˙th ( r = 0.86) and Max ( r = 0.80) but not at rest ( r = 0.54).[Formula: see text] was significantly higher than [Formula: see text] during exercise in the younger subjects but similar to [Formula: see text] at rest. PJ co 2was similar to [Formula: see text] at rest andV˙th but significantly lower at Max in younger subjects. In conclusion, our data demonstrate that[Formula: see text] during exercise is better estimated by [Formula: see text] than by PJ co 2in older subjects, contrary to what is observed in younger subjects. This appears to be related to the finding that[Formula: see text] does not exceed[Formula: see text] during exercise in older subjects, as occurs in the younger subjects. However,[Formula: see text] at rest is best estimated by PJ co 2in both younger and older subjects.