scholarly journals Roles of Ascending Inhibition During Two Rhythmic Motor Patterns in Xenopus Tadpoles

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. 2316-2328 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. S. Green ◽  
S. R. Soffe
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Burst Duration ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Detailed Knowledge ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Vertebrate Model ◽  
Longitudinal Pattern

Green, C. S. and S. R. Soffe. Roles of ascending inhibition during two rhythmic motor patterns in Xenopus tadpoles. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 2316–2328, 1998. We have investigated the effects of ascending inhibitory pathways on two centrally generated rhythmic motor patterns in a simple vertebrate model, the young Xenopus tadpole. Tadpoles swim when touched, but when grasped respond with slower, stronger struggling movements during which the longitudinal pattern of motor activity is reversed. Surgical spinal cord transection to remove all ascending connections originating caudal to the transection (in tadpoles immobilized in α-bungarotoxin) did not affect “fictive” swimming generated more rostrally. In contrast, cycle period and burst duration both significantly increased during fictive struggling. Increases were progressively larger with more rostral transection. Blocking caudal activity with the anesthetic MS222 (pharmacological transection) produced equivalent but reversible effects. Reducing crossed-ascending inhibition selectively, either by midsagittal spinal cord division or rostral cord hemisection (1-sided transection) mimicked the effects of transection. Like transection, both operations increased cycle period and burst duration during struggling but did not affect swimming. The changes during struggling were larger with more rostral hemisection. Reducing crossed-ascending inhibition by spinal hemisection also increased the rostrocaudal longitudinal delay during swimming, and the caudorostral delay during struggling. Weakening inhibition globally with low concentrations of the glycine antagonist strychnine (10–100 nM) did not alter swimming cycle period, burst duration, or longitudinal delay. However, strychnine at 10–60 nM decreased cycle period during struggling. It also increased burst duration in some cases, although burst duration increased as a proportion of cycle period in all cases. Strychnine reduced longitudinal delay during struggling, making rostral and caudal activity more synchronous. At 100 nM, struggling was totally disrupted. By combining our results with a detailed knowledge of tadpole spinal cord anatomy, we conclude that inhibition mediated by the crossed-ascending axons of characterized, glycinergic, commissural interneurons has a major influence on the struggling motor pattern compared with swimming. We suggest that this difference is a consequence of the larger, reversed longitudinal delay and the extended burst duration during struggling compared with swimming.

Motor patterns for two distinct rhythmic behaviors evoked by excitatory amino acid agonists in the Xenopus embryo spinal cord

1996 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 1815-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Soffe
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Excitatory Amino Acids ◽  
Excitatory Amino Acid ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Sensory Evoked ◽  
Motor Root

1. Mechanisms underlying the selective expression of different motor patterns in vertebrates are poorly understood. Immobilized, spinal Xenopus embryos are used here to examine the motor patterns evoked by various concentrations of excitatory amino acids. 2. Relatively low concentrations of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) (40-60 microM), kainate (7-8 microM), and alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionate (AMPA) (5 microM) evoked motor root discharge characteristic of swimming. Brief applications of higher concentrations of kainate (20-40 microM), AMPA (25-30 microM), quisqualate (5 microM), and glutamate (1-4 mM) evoked sequences of a different motor pattern: struggling. This is characterized by a longer cycle period, increased burst duration, and a reversed longitudinal pattern of motor root discharge. The struggling pattern was never evoked by higher concentrations of NMDA (300-500 microM), but was evoked by 30 microM AMPA or 5 microM quisqualate in the presence of 50 microM D-2-amino-5-phosphonopentanoic acid. 3. Intracellular recordings from presumed spinal motoneurons showed different patterns of activity during agonist-evoked swimming and struggling. The patterns were like those described previously during sensory-evoked behavior. 4. Caudal applications of excitatory amino acids that produced struggling discharge did so only at caudal motor roots, whereas caudal applications of NMDA evoked swimming activity throughout the spinal cord. 5. During excitatory-amino-acid-evoked struggling, sensory Rohon-Beard neurons depolarized up to 7 mV, but did not fire. 6. The results show that expression of the struggling pattern, like swimming, is not critically dependent on sensory discharge. The results are also consistent with the idea that expression of the two very different motor patterns for swimming or struggling in this simple vertebrate preparation can be controlled by the level of excitation within the spinal motor circuitry, and need not involve the activity of a specific external neuromodulator.

Principles of rhythmic motor pattern generation

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 687-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Marder ◽  
R. L. Calabrese
Keyword(s):  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Pattern Generation ◽  
Rhythmic Movements ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Nervous Systems ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Computational Analyses ◽  
Motor Pattern Generation ◽  
Rhythmic Motor Pattern

Rhythmic movements are produced by central pattern-generating networks whose output is shaped by sensory and neuromodulatory inputs to allow the animal to adapt its movements to changing needs. This review discusses cellular, circuit, and computational analyses of the mechanisms underlying the generation of rhythmic movements in both invertebrate and vertebrate nervous systems. Attention is paid to exploring the mechanisms by which synaptic and cellular processes interact to play specific roles in shaping motor patterns and, consequently, movement.

scholarly journals Fictive Rhythmic Motor Patterns Induced by NMDA in an In Vitro Brain Stem–Spinal Cord Preparation From an Adult Urodele

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. 1074-1077 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Delvolvé ◽  
Pascal Branchereau ◽  
Réjean Dubuc ◽  
Jean-Marie Cabelguen
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Rhythm Generation ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Bath Application ◽  
The Neural Networks ◽  
Ventral Roots ◽  
Pleurodeles Waltl

An in vitro brain stem–spinal cord preparation from an adult urodele ( Pleurodeles waltl) was developed in which two fictive rhythmic motor patterns were evoked by bath application of N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; 2.5–10 μM) with d-serine (10 μM). Both motor patterns displayed left-right alternation. The first pattern was characterized by cycle periods ranging between 2.4 and 9.0 s (4.9 ± 1.2 s, mean ± SD) and a rostrocaudal propagation of the activity in consecutive ventral roots. The second pattern displayed longer cycle periods (8.1–28.3 s; 14.2 ± 3.6 s) with a caudorostral propagation. The two patterns were inducible after a spinal transection at the first segment. Preliminary experiments on small pieces of spinal cord further suggested that the ability for rhythm generation is distributed along the spinal cord of this preparation. This study shows that the in vitro brain stem–spinal cord preparation from Pleurodeles waltl may be a useful model to study the mechanisms underlying the different axial motor patterns and the flexibility of the neural networks involved.

The central nervous origin of the swimming motor pattern in embryos of Xenopus laevis

1982 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Kahn ◽  
A. Roberts
Keyword(s):  
Motor Activity ◽  
Similar Pattern ◽  
Sensory Feedback ◽  
Motor Nerve ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Phase Lag ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Swimming Pattern

Rhythmic motor nerve activity was recorded in stage 37/38 Xenopus embryos paralysed with curare. The activity was similar to the swimming motor pattern in the following ways: cycle period (40–125 ms), alternation of activity on either side of a segment, rostro-caudal phase lag. Episodes of rhythmic motor activity could be evoked by stimuli that evoke swimming and inhibited by stimuli that normally inhibit swimming. On this basis we conclude that the swimming motor pattern is generated by a central nervous mechanism and is not dependent on sensory feedback. In addition to the swimming pattern, another pattern of motor activity (‘synchrony’) was sometimes recorded in curarized embryos. In this, the rhythmic bursts on either side of a segment occurred in synchrony, and the rhythm period (20–50 ms) was half that in swimming. This was probably not an artifact of curarization as there were indications of a similar pattern in uncurarized embryos. Its function remains unclear.

scholarly journals Central pattern generators in the turtle spinal cord: selection among the forms of motor behaviors

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (2) ◽  
pp. 422-440 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul S. G. Stein
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Central Pattern Generators ◽  
Knee Extensor ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Motor Behaviors ◽  
Multiple Behaviors ◽  
Pattern Generators ◽  
Electrical Stimuli

Neuronal networks in the turtle spinal cord have considerable computational complexity even in the absence of connections with supraspinal structures. These networks contain central pattern generators (CPGs) for each of several behaviors, including three forms of scratch, two forms of swim, and one form of flexion reflex. Each behavior is activated by a specific set of cutaneous or electrical stimuli. The process of selection among behaviors within the spinal cord has multisecond memories of specific motor patterns. Some spinal cord interneurons are partially shared among several CPGs, whereas other interneurons are active during only one type of behavior. Partial sharing is a proposed mechanism that contributes to the ability of the spinal cord to generate motor pattern blends with characteristics of multiple behaviors. Variations of motor patterns, termed deletions, assist in characterization of the organization of the pattern-generating components of CPGs. Single-neuron recordings during both normal and deletion motor patterns provide support for a CPG organizational structure with unit burst generators (UBGs) whose members serve a direction of a specific degree of freedom of the hindlimb, e.g., the hip-flexor UBG, the hip-extensor UBG, the knee-flexor UBG, the knee-extensor UBG, etc. The classic half-center hypothesis that includes all the hindlimb flexors in a single flexor half-center and all the hindlimb extensors in a single extensor half-center lacks the organizational complexity to account for the motor patterns produced by turtle spinal CPGs. Thus the turtle spinal cord is a valuable model system for studies of mechanisms responsible for selection and generation of motor behaviors. NEW & NOTEWORTHY The concept of the central pattern generator (CPG) is a major tenet in motor neuroethology that has influenced the design and interpretations of experiments for over a half century. This review concentrates on the turtle spinal cord and describes studies from the 1970s to the present responsible for key developments in understanding the CPG mechanisms responsible for the selection and production of coordinated motor patterns during turtle hindlimb motor behaviors.

Long-Term Expression of Two Interacting Motor Pattern-Generating Networks in the Stomatogastric System of Freely Behaving Lobster

1998 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 1396-1408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Clemens ◽  
Denis Combes ◽  
Pierre Meyrand ◽  
John Simmers
Keyword(s):  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Burst Duration ◽  
Cycle Period ◽  
Gastric Mill ◽  
Pyloric Network ◽  
Freely Behaving ◽  
Stomatogastric System

Clemens, Stefan, Denis Combes, Pierre Meyrand, and John Simmers. Long-term expression of two interacting motor pattern-generating networks in the stomatogastric system of freely behaving lobster. J. Neurophysiol. 79: 1396–1408, 1998. Rhythmic movements of the gastric mill and pyloric regions of the crustacean foregut are controlled by two stomatogastric neuronal networks that have been intensively studied in vitro. By using electromyographic recordings from the European lobster, Homarus gammarus, we have monitored simultaneously the motor activity of pyloric and gastric mill muscles for ≤3 mo in intact and freely behaving animals. Both pyloric and gastric mill networks are almost continuously active in vivo regardless of the presence of food. In unfed resting animals kept under “natural-like” conditions, the pyloric network expresses the typical triphasic pattern seen in vitro but at considerably slower cycle periods (2.5–3.5 s instead of 1–1.5 s). Gastric mill activity occurs at mean cycle periods of 20–50 s compared with 5–10 s in vitro but may suddenly stop for up to tens of minutes, then restart without any apparent behavioral reason. When conjointly active, the two networks express a strict coupling that involves certain but not all motor neurons of the pyloric network. The posterior pyloric constrictor muscles, innervated by a total of 8 pyloric (PY) motor neurons, are influenced by the onset of each gastric mill medial gastric/lateral gastric(MG/LG) neuron powerstroke burst, and for one cycle, PY neuron bursts may attain >300% of their mean duration. However, the duration of activity in the lateral pyloric constrictor muscle, innervated by the unique lateral pyloric (LP) motor neuron, remains unaffected by this perturbation. During this period after gastric perturbation, LP neuron and PY neurons thus express opposite burst-to-period relationships in that LP neuron burst duration is independent of the ongoing cycle period, whereas PY neuron burst duration changes with period length. In vitro the same type of gastro-pyloric interaction is observed, indicating that it is not dependent on sensory inputs. Moreover, this interaction is intrinsic to the stomatogastric ganglion itself because the relationship between the two networks persists after suppression of descending inputs to the ganglion. Intracellular recordings reveal that thisgastro-pyloric interaction originates from the gastric MG and LG neurons of the gastric network, which inhibit the pyloric pacemaker ensemble. As a consequence, the pyloric PY neurons, which are inhibited by the pyloric dilator (PD) neurons of the pyloric pacemaker group, extend their activity during the time that PD neuron is held silent. Moreover, there is evidence for a pyloro-gastric interaction, apparently rectifying, from the pyloric pacemakers back to the gastric MG/LG neuron group.

scholarly journals Rhythmic motor patterns accompanying ejaculation in spinal cord-transected male rats

2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 191-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Carro-Juárez ◽  
G Rodríguez-Manzo ◽  
M de Lourdes Rodríguez Peña ◽  
M Á Franco
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Cord ◽  
Male Rats ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Rhythmic Motor

Hormonal Modulation of Two Coordinated Rhythmic Motor Patterns

2010 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 654-664
Author(s):  
Debra E. Wood ◽  
Melissa Varrecchia ◽  
Michael Papernov ◽  
Denise Cook ◽  
Devon C. Crawford
Keyword(s):  
Motor Pattern ◽  
Projection Neuron ◽  
Frequency Regulation ◽  
Gastric Mill ◽  
Stomatogastric Nervous System ◽  
Motor Patterns ◽  
Rhythmic Motor ◽  
Hormonal Modulation ◽  
Frequency Relationship ◽  
Pyloric Rhythm

Neuromodulation is well known to provide plasticity in pattern generating circuits, but few details are available concerning modulation of motor pattern coordination. We are using the crustacean stomatogastric nervous system to examine how co-expressed rhythms are modulated to regulate frequency and maintain coordination. The system produces two related motor patterns, the gastric mill rhythm that regulates protraction and retraction of the teeth and the pyloric rhythm that filters food. These rhythms have different frequencies and are controlled by distinct mechanisms, but each circuit influences the rhythm frequency of the other via identified synaptic pathways. A projection neuron, MCN1, activates distinct versions of the rhythms, and we show that hormonal dopamine concentrations modulate the MCN1 elicited rhythm frequencies. Gastric mill circuit interactions with the pyloric circuit lead to changes in pyloric rhythm frequency that depend on gastric mill rhythm phase. Dopamine increases pyloric frequency during the gastric mill rhythm retraction phase. Higher gastric mill rhythm frequencies are associated with higher pyloric rhythm frequencies during retraction. However, dopamine slows the gastric mill rhythm frequency despite the increase in pyloric frequency. Dopamine reduces pyloric circuit influences on the gastric mill rhythm and upregulates activity in a gastric mill neuron, DG. Strengthened DG activity slows the gastric mill rhythm frequency and effectively reduces pyloric circuit influences, thus changing the frequency relationship between the rhythms. Overall dopamine shifts dependence of frequency regulation from intercircuit interactions to increased reliance on intracircuit mechanisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document