Input of Anterior and Posterior Semicircular Canal Interneurons Encoding Head-Velocity to the Dorsal Y Group of the Vestibular Nuclei

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 2891-2904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo Blazquez ◽  
Agis Partsalis ◽  
Nicolaas M. Gerrits ◽  
Stephen M. Highstein
Keyword(s):  
Electric Pulse ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Mossy Fibers ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Interspike Intervals ◽  
Posterior Semicircular Canal ◽  
Viiith Nerve ◽  
Ventral Paraflocculus ◽  
Pulse Stimulation

Neurons in the Y group of the vestibular nuclei are activated disynaptically from the ipsilateral VIIIth nerve and polysynaptically from the contralateral nerve. The ipsilateral anterior and posterior semicircular canals project to the Y group via interneurons in the vestibular nuclei. Candidate interneurons located in the rostrolateral corner of the superior (SVN) and in the caudal medial (MVN) vestibular nuclei were retrogradely labeled by the iontophoretic injection of biocytin into the Y group. The physiology of these interneurons named Y-group projecting neurons (YPNs) was studied in the SVN. SVN-YPNs were activated antidromically by electric pulse stimulation in the Y group. The properties of SVN-YPNs are distinct from those of SVN flocculus projecting neurons (FPNs). Namely, YPNs have a lower resting rate than FPNs, have more irregular interspike intervals, show a different phase and gain during the vestibuloocular reflex, and are located differentially within the SVN. After the injection of biocytin into the Y group, the locations of Purkinje cells that project to the Y group were confined to the vertical zones of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus. However, mossy fibers originating in the Y group terminate in both the vertical and horizontal zones of the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus as well as in the ipsilateral nodulus.

scholarly journals Adaptive Balance in Posterior Cerebellum

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal H. Barmack ◽  
Vito Enrico Pettorossi
Keyword(s):  
Purkinje Cells ◽  
Stellate Cell ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Mossy Fibers ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Three Dimensions ◽  
Optokinetic Stimulation ◽  
Afferent Pathways ◽  
Vestibular Nuclear Neurons ◽  
Self Motion

Vestibular and optokinetic space is represented in three-dimensions in vermal lobules IX-X (uvula, nodulus) and hemisphere lobule X (flocculus) of the cerebellum. Vermal lobules IX-X encodes gravity and head movement using the utricular otolith and the two vertical semicircular canals. Hemispheric lobule X encodes self-motion using optokinetic feedback about the three axes of the semicircular canals. Vestibular and visual adaptation of this circuitry is needed to maintain balance during perturbations of self-induced motion. Vestibular and optokinetic (self-motion detection) stimulation is encoded by cerebellar climbing and mossy fibers. These two afferent pathways excite the discharge of Purkinje cells directly. Climbing fibers preferentially decrease the discharge of Purkinje cells by exciting stellate cell inhibitory interneurons. We describe instances adaptive balance at a behavioral level in which prolonged vestibular or optokinetic stimulation evokes reflexive eye movements that persist when the stimulation that initially evoked them stops. Adaptation to prolonged optokinetic stimulation also can be detected at cellular and subcellular levels. The transcription and expression of a neuropeptide, corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), is influenced by optokinetically-evoked olivary discharge and may contribute to optokinetic adaptation. The transcription and expression of microRNAs in floccular Purkinje cells evoked by long-term optokinetic stimulation may provide one of the subcellular mechanisms by which the membrane insertion of the GABAA receptors is regulated. The neurosteroids, estradiol (E2) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), influence adaptation of vestibular nuclear neurons to electrically-induced potentiation and depression. In each section of this review, we discuss how adaptive changes in the vestibular and optokinetic subsystems of lobule X, inferior olivary nuclei and vestibular nuclei may contribute to the control of balance.

Horizontal Vestibuloocular Reflex Evoked by High-Acceleration Rotations in the Squirrel Monkey. II. Responses After Canal Plugging

1999 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 1271-1285 ◽  
Author(s):  
David M. Lasker ◽  
Douglas D. Backous ◽  
Anna Lysakowski ◽  
Griffin L. Davis ◽  
Lloyd B. Minor
Keyword(s):  
High Frequency ◽  
Peak Velocity ◽  
Vestibular Function ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Half Cycle ◽  
High Acceleration ◽  
Linear And Nonlinear ◽  
Residual Response ◽  
Sinusoidal Rotations

The horizontal angular vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) evoked by high-frequency, high-acceleration rotations was studied in four squirrel monkeys after unilateral plugging of the three semicircular canals. During the period (1–4 days) that animals were kept in darkness after plugging, the gain during steps of acceleration (3,000°/s2, peak velocity = 150°/s) was 0.61 ± 0.14 (mean ± SD) for contralesional rotations and 0.33 ± 0.03 for ipsilesional rotations. Within 18–24 h after animals were returned to light, the VOR gain for contralesional rotations increased to 0.88 ± 0.05, whereas there was only a slight increase in the gain for ipsilesional rotations to 0.37 ± 0.07. A symmetrical increase in the gain measured at the plateau of head velocity was noted after animals were returned to light. The latency of the VOR was 8.2 ± 0.4 ms for ipsilesional and 7.1 ± 0.3 ms for contralesional rotations. The VOR evoked by sinusoidal rotations of 0.5–15 Hz, ±20°/s had no significant half-cycle asymmetries. The recovery of gain for these responses after plugging was greater at lower than at higher frequencies. Responses to rotations at higher velocities for frequencies ≥4 Hz showed an increase in contralesional half-cycle gain, whereas ipsilesional half-cycle gain was unchanged. A residual response that appeared to be canal and not otolith mediated was noted after plugging of all six semicircular canals. This response increased with frequency to reach a gain of 0.23 ± 0.03 at 15 Hz, resembling that predicted based on a reduction of the dominant time constant of the canal to 32 ms after plugging. A model incorporating linear and nonlinear pathways was used to simulate the data. The coefficients of this model were determined from data in animals with intact vestibular function. Selective increases in the gain for the linear and nonlinear pathways predicted the changes in recovery observed after canal plugging. An increase in gain of the linear pathway accounted for the recovery in VOR gain for both responses at the velocity plateau of the steps of acceleration and for the sinusoidal rotations at lower peak velocities. The increase in gain for contralesional responses to steps of acceleration and sinusoidal rotations at higher frequencies and velocities was due to an increase in the gain of the nonlinear pathway. This pathway was driven into inhibitory cutoff at low velocities and therefore made no contribution for rotations toward the ipsilesional side.

scholarly journals Contribution of intravestibular sensory conflict to motion sickness and dizziness in migraine disorders

2016 ◽  
Vol 116 (4) ◽  
pp. 1586-1591 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Wang ◽  
Richard F. Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Motion Sickness ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Rotational Axis ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Sensory Conflict ◽  
Velocity Signal ◽  
Episodic Vertigo

Migraine is associated with enhanced motion sickness susceptibility and can cause episodic vertigo [vestibular migraine (VM)], but the mechanisms relating migraine to these vestibular symptoms remain uncertain. We tested the hypothesis that the central integration of rotational cues (from the semicircular canals) and gravitational cues (from the otolith organs) is abnormal in migraine patients. A postrotational tilt paradigm generated a conflict between canal cues (which indicate the head is rotating) and otolith cues (which indicate the head is tilted and stationary), and eye movements were measured to quantify two behaviors that are thought to minimize this conflict: suppression and reorientation of the central angular velocity signal, evidenced by attenuation (“dumping”) of the vestibuloocular reflex and shifting of the rotational axis of the vestibuloocular reflex toward the earth vertical. We found that normal and migraine subjects, but not VM patients, displayed an inverse correlation between the extent of dumping and the size of the axis shift such that the net “conflict resolution” mediated through these two mechanisms approached an optimal value and that the residual sensory conflict in VM patients (but not migraine or normal subjects) correlated with motion sickness susceptibility. Our findings suggest that the brain normally controls the dynamic and spatial characteristics of central vestibular signals to minimize intravestibular sensory conflict and that this process is disrupted in VM, which may be responsible for the enhance motion intolerance and episodic vertigo that characterize this disorder.

Probing the human vestibular system with galvanic stimulation

2004 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 2301-2316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Fitzpatrick ◽  
Brian L. Day
Keyword(s):  
Balance Control ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Vestibular Stimulation ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Sources Of Information ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Human Balance ◽  
Cortical Inputs ◽  
Vestibular Organs

Galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) is a simple, safe, and specific way to elicit vestibular reflexes. Yet, despite a long history, it has only recently found popularity as a research tool and is rarely used clinically. The obstacle to advancing and exploiting GVS is that we cannot interpret the evoked responses with certainty because we do not understand how the stimulus acts as an input to the system. This paper examines the electrophysiology and anatomy of the vestibular organs and the effects of GVS on human balance control and develops a model that explains the observed balance responses. These responses are large and highly organized over all body segments and adapt to postural and balance requirements. To achieve this, neurons in the vestibular nuclei receive convergent signals from all vestibular receptors and somatosensory and cortical inputs. GVS sway responses are affected by other sources of information about balance but can appear as the sum of otolithic and semicircular canal responses. Electrophysiological studies showing similar activation of primary afferents from the otolith organs and canals and their convergence in the vestibular nuclei support this. On the basis of the morphology of the cristae and the alignment of the semicircular canals in the skull, rotational vectors calculated for every mode of GVS agree with the observed sway. However, vector summation of signals from all utricular afferents does not explain the observed sway. Thus we propose the hypothesis that the otolithic component of the balance response originates from only the pars medialis of the utricular macula.

scholarly journals Convergence of linear acceleration and yaw rotation signals on non-eye movement neurons in the vestibular nucleus of macaques

2018 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shawn D. Newlands ◽  
Ben Abbatematteo ◽  
Min Wei ◽  
Laurel H. Carney ◽  
Hongge Luan
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movement ◽  
Multisensory Integration ◽  
Vestibular Nucleus ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Linear Acceleration ◽  
Vestibular Nuclei ◽  
Otolith Organs ◽  
Angular Rotation ◽  
Sensory Signals ◽  
Nonlinear Integration

Roughly half of all vestibular nucleus neurons without eye movement sensitivity respond to both angular rotation and linear acceleration. Linear acceleration signals arise from otolith organs, and rotation signals arise from semicircular canals. In the vestibular nerve, these signals are carried by different afferents. Vestibular nucleus neurons represent the first point of convergence for these distinct sensory signals. This study systematically evaluated how rotational and translational signals interact in single neurons in the vestibular nuclei: multisensory integration at the first opportunity for convergence between these two independent vestibular sensory signals. Single-unit recordings were made from the vestibular nuclei of awake macaques during yaw rotation, translation in the horizontal plane, and combinations of rotation and translation at different frequencies. The overall response magnitude of the combined translation and rotation was generally less than the sum of the magnitudes in responses to the stimuli applied independently. However, we found that under conditions in which the peaks of the rotational and translational responses were coincident these signals were approximately additive. With presentation of rotation and translation at different frequencies, rotation was attenuated more than translation, regardless of which was at a higher frequency. These data suggest a nonlinear interaction between these two sensory modalities in the vestibular nuclei, in which coincident peak responses are proportionally stronger than other, off-peak interactions. These results are similar to those reported for other forms of multisensory integration, such as audio-visual integration in the superior colliculus. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study to systematically explore the interaction of rotational and translational signals in the vestibular nuclei through independent manipulation. The results of this study demonstrate nonlinear integration leading to maximum response amplitude when the timing and direction of peak rotational and translational responses are coincident.

scholarly journals Angular vestibuloocular reflex responses in Otop1 mice. I. Otolith sensor input is essential for gravity context-specific adaptation

2019 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 2291-2299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serajul I. Khan ◽  
Charles C. Della Santina ◽  
Americo A. Migliaccio
Keyword(s):  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Neural Circuitry ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Training Context ◽  
Specific Adaptation ◽  
Axis Parallel ◽  
Vor Adaptation ◽  
Context Specific

The role of the otoliths in mammals in the angular vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) has been difficult to determine because there is no surgical technique that can reliably ablate them without damaging the semicircular canals. The Otopetrin1 (Otop1) mouse lacks functioning otoliths because of failure to develop otoconia but seems to have otherwise normal peripheral anatomy and neural circuitry. By using these animals we sought to determine the role of the otoliths in angular VOR baseline function and adaptation. In six Otop1 mice and six control littermates we measured baseline ocular countertilt about the three primary axes in head coordinates; baseline horizontal (rotation about an Earth-vertical axis parallel to the dorsal-ventral axis) and vertical (rotation about an Earth-vertical axis parallel to the interaural axis) sinusoidal (0.2–10 Hz, 20–100°/s) VOR gain (= eye/head velocity); and the horizontal and vertical VOR after gain-increase (1.5×) and gain-decrease (0.5×) adaptation training. Countertilt responses were significantly reduced in Otop1 mice. Baseline horizontal and vertical VOR gains were similar between mouse types, and so was horizontal VOR adaptation. For control mice, vertical VOR adaptation was evident when the testing context, left ear down (LED) or right ear down (RED), was the same as the training context (LED or RED). For Otop1 mice, VOR adaptation was evident regardless of context. Our results suggest that the otolith translational signal does not contribute to the baseline angular VOR, probably because the mouse VOR is highly compensatory, and does not alter the magnitude of adaptation. However, we show that the otoliths are important for gravity context-specific angular VOR adaptation. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This is the first study examining the role of the otoliths (defined here as the utricle and saccule) in adaptation of the angular vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) in an animal model in which the otoliths are reliably inactivated and the semicircular canals preserved. We show that they do not contribute to adaptation of the normal angular VOR. However, the otoliths provide the main cue for gravity context-specific VOR adaptation.

Reflections of Efferent Activity in Rotational Responses of Chinchilla Vestibular Afferents

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 1234-1244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meir Plotnik ◽  
Vladimir Marlinski ◽  
Jay M. Goldberg
Keyword(s):  
Rotation Axis ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Horizontal Canal ◽  
Efferent System ◽  
Type Iii ◽  
Complete Section ◽  
Viiith Nerve ◽  
Rotation Plane ◽  
Excitatory Responses ◽  
Stimulation Of

To study presumed efferent-mediated responses, we determined if afferents responded to head rotations that stimulated semicircular canals other than the organ being innervated. To minimize stimulation of an afferent's own canal, its plane was placed nearly orthogonal to the rotation plane. Otolith units were tested in a horizontal head position with the ear placed near the rotation axis to minimize linear forces. Under these circumstances, angular-velocity trapezoids (2-s ramps, 2-s plateau) evoked excitatory responses for both rotation directions. These type III responses were considerably larger in decerebrate than in anesthetized preparations. In addition to their being exclusively excitatory, the responses resembled those obtained with electrical stimulation of efferent pathways in including per-stimulus and more prolonged post-stimulus components and in being larger in irregularly discharging than in regularly discharging units. Responses, which were not seen for rotations <80°/s, grew as velocity increased between 80 and 500°/s but were seldom larger than 20 spikes/s. Complete section of the VIIIth nerve abolished type III responses, leaving conventional afferent responses intact. To study the separate contributions of canals on the two sides, responses were compared when the labyrinths were intact and when the ipsilateral or contralateral horizontal canal was mechanically inactivated. Both sides contributed to the efferent-mediated responses. That afferents could be influenced from the contralateral labyrinth was confirmed with the use of unilateral galvanic currents. Following inactivation, excitatory responses were produced by rotations exciting or inhibiting the intact horizontal canal with the responses resulting from excitatory rotations being much larger. Such a response asymmetry is consistent with a semicircular-canal origin for the type III responses. A similar asymmetry was seen in the post-stimulus responses to contralateral cathodal (excitatory) and anodal (inhibitory) galvanic currents. We conclude that the efferent system receives a sufficiently powerful vestibular input from both the ipsilateral and contralateral labyrinths to affect afferent discharge.

Role of Muscle Pulleys in Producing Eye Position-Dependence in the Angular Vestibuloocular Reflex: A Model-Based Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 639-650 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew J. Thurtell ◽  
Mikhail Kunin ◽  
Theodore Raphan
Keyword(s):  
Initial Period ◽  
Semicircular Canals ◽  
Pulse Signal ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Vestibuloocular Reflex ◽  
Primary Position ◽  
Head Velocity ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Head Impulses ◽  
Eye Velocity

It is well established that the head and eye velocity axes do not always align during compensatory vestibular slow phases. It has been shown that the eye velocity axis systematically tilts away from the head velocity axis in a manner that is dependent on eye-in-head position. The mechanisms responsible for producing these axis tilts are unclear. In this model-based study, we aimed to determine whether muscle pulleys could be involved in bringing about these phenomena. The model presented incorporates semicircular canals, central vestibular pathways, and an ocular motor plant with pulleys. The pulleys were modeled so that they brought about a rotation of the torque axes of the extraocular muscles that was a fraction of the angle of eye deviation from primary position. The degree to which the pulleys rotated the torque axes was altered by means of a pulley coefficient. Model input was head velocity and initial eye position data from passive and active yaw head impulses with fixation at 0°, 20° up and 20° down, obtained from a previous experiment. The optimal pulley coefficient required to fit the data was determined by calculating the mean square error between data and model predictions of torsional eye velocity. For active head impulses, the optimal pulley coefficient varied considerably between subjects. The median optimal pulley coefficient was found to be 0.5, the pulley coefficient required for producing saccades that perfectly obey Listing's law when using a two-dimensional saccadic pulse signal. The model predicted the direction of the axis tilts observed in response to passive head impulses from 50 ms after onset. During passive head impulses, the median optimal pulley coefficient was found to be 0.21, when roll gain was fixed at 0.7. The model did not accurately predict the alignment of the eye and head velocity axes that was observed early in the response to passive head impulses. We found that this alignment could be well predicted if the roll gain of the angular vestibuloocular reflex was modified during the initial period of the response, while pulley coefficient was maintained at 0.5. Hence a roll gain modification allows stabilization of the retinal image without requiring a change in the pulley effect. Our results therefore indicate that the eye position–dependent velocity axis tilts could arise due to the effects of the pulleys and that a roll gain modification in the central vestibular structures may be responsible for countering the pulley effect.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document