scholarly journals A Second-Order Turbulence Model Based on a Reynolds Stress Approach for Two-Phase Flow—Part I: Adiabatic Cases

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Mimouni ◽  
F. Archambeau ◽  
M. Boucker ◽  
J. Laviéville ◽  
C. Morel
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Turbulence Modeling ◽  
Transport Model ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Model Based ◽  
Reynolds Stress Transport Model

In our work in 2008, we evaluated the aptitude of the code Neptune_CFD to reproduce the incidence of a structure topped by vanes on a boiling layer, within the framework of the Neptune project. The objective was to reproduce the main effects of the spacer grids. The turbulence of the liquid phase was modeled by a first-orderK-εmodel. We show in this paper that this model is unable to describe the turbulence of rotating flows, in accordance with the theory. The objective of this paper is to improve the turbulence modeling of the liquid phase by a second turbulence model based on aRij-εapproach. Results obtained on typical single-phase cases highlight the improvement of the prediction for all computed values. We tested the turbulence modelRij-εimplemented in the code versus typical adiabatic two-phase flow experiments. We check that the simulations with the Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM) give satisfactory results in a simple geometry as compared to aK-εmodel: this point is crucial before calculating rod bundle geometries where theK-εmodel may fail.

On the performance of a cascade of turbine rotor tip section blading in wet steam Part 3: Wake traverses

1997 ◽  
Vol 211 (8) ◽  
pp. 639-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Bakhtar ◽  
H Mashmoushy ◽  
O C Jadayel
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Turbine Rotor ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Wet Steam ◽  
Flow Conditions ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Blow Down ◽  
The Third ◽  
Phase Mixture

During the course of expansion of steam in turbines the fluid first supercools and then nucleates to become a two-phase mixture. The liquid phase consists of a large number of extremely small droplets which are difficult to generate except by nucleation. To reproduce turbine two-phase flow conditions requires a supply of supercooled vapour which can be achieved under blow-down conditions by the equipment employed. This paper is the third of a set describing an investigation into the performance of a cascade of rotor tip section profiles in wet steam and presents the results of the wake traverses.

Analysis of Two-Phase Flow Slug Regime With Engineering Approach

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nariman Ashrafi ◽  
Armin Chegini ◽  
Ali Sadeghi
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Phase ◽  
Velocity Gradient ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Back Pressure ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Engineering Approach ◽  
Basic Physics

In this research, the two-phase slug regime is investigated analytically with an engineering approach. due to the velocity gradient in the layers of the two-phase flow, numbers of waves form and grow in the liquid phase and may block the duct which in this case is called slug. Blocking the flow, it causes higher pressure accumulation which is the main reason of slug’s momentum through the duct. Simplifying the slug’s geometry and using basic physics laws yielded an equation between the slug’s back pressure and its length.

Analysis of Turbulence Structure and Void Fraction Distribution in Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow Under Bubbly and Slug Flow Regime

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isao Kataoka ◽  
Kenji Yoshida ◽  
Tsutomu Ikeno ◽  
Tatsuya Sasakawa ◽  
Koichi Kondo
Keyword(s):  
Void Fraction ◽  
Turbulence Model ◽  
Slug Flow ◽  
Two Phase Flow ◽  
Bubbly Flow ◽  
Turbulence Structure ◽  
Phase Flow ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Void Fraction Distribution ◽  
Fraction Distribution

Accurate analyses of turbulence structure and void fraction distribution are quite important in designing and safety evaluation of various industrial equipments using gas-liquid two-phase flow such as nuclear reactor, etc. Using turbulence model of two-phase flow and models of bubble behaviors in bubble flow and slug flow, systematic analyses of distributions of void fraction, averaged velocity and turbulent velocity were carried out and compared with experimental data. In bubbly flow, diffusion of bubble and lift force are dominant in determining void fraction distribution. On the other hand, in slug flow, large scale turbulence eddies which convey bubbles into the center of flow passage are important in determining void fraction distribution. In turbulence model, one equation turbulence model is used with turbulence generation and turbulence dissipation due to bubbles. Mixing length due to bubble is also modeled. Using these bubble behavior models and turbulence models, systematic predictions were carried out for void distributions and turbulence distributions for wide range of flow conditions of two phase flow including bubbly and slug flow. The results of predictions were compared with experimental data in round straight tube with successful agreement. In particular, concave void distributions in bubbly flow and convex distribution in slug flow were well predicted based on the present model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document