scholarly journals Early Posttreatment Audiometry Underestimates Hearing Recovery after Intratympanic Steroid Treatment of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin J. Wycherly ◽  
Jared J. Thompkins ◽  
H. Jeffrey Kim
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
History Of

Objective. To review our experience with intratympanic steroids (ITSs) for the treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL), emphasizing the ideal time to perform follow-up audiograms.Methods. Retrospective case review of patients diagnosed with ISSNHL treated with intratympanic methylprednisolone. Injections were repeated weekly with a total of 3 injections. Improvement was defined as an improved pure-tone average ≥20 dB or speech-discrimination score ≥20%.Results. Forty patients met the inclusion criteria with a recovery rate of 45% (18/40). A significantly increased response rate was found in patients having an audiogram >5 weeks after the first dose of ITS (9/13) over those tested ≤5 weeks after the first dose of ITS (9/27) ().Conclusions. Recovery from ISSNHL after ITS injections occurs more frequently >5 weeks after initiating ITS. This may be due to the natural history of sudden hearing loss or the prolonged effect of steroid in the inner ear.

Long-Term Prognosis of Tinnitus Associated with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Tongxiang Diao ◽  
Xin Ma ◽  
Jingjing Li ◽  
Jen-Tsung Lai ◽  
Lisheng Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Recovery Time ◽  
Sudden Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

<b><i>Objective:</i></b> To analyze the factors affecting the long-term prognosis of tinnitus accompanied by unilateral idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A total of 161 patients with sudden hearing loss (HL) accompanied by tinnitus were enrolled. All patients had two separate telephone follow-ups and were asked about changes in tinnitus. The severity of tinnitus at admission and the outcome at discharge were assessed in terms of the patients’ sex, age, level of HL, type of audiogram, etc. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The prognosis of tinnitus after SSNHL had no relationship with grades of HL or hearing recovery. Initial tinnitus level was remarkably associated with tinnitus improvement at discharge and was an independent risk factor for the long-term prognosis of residual tinnitus after SSNHL (odds ratio 0.722, 95% confidence interval 0.550–0.949, <i>p</i> = 0.019), and the median recovery time was 23.00 ± 3.80 months. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Residual tinnitus after SSNHL has a tendency of self-recovery. The short-term prognosis of tinnitus may be related to psychological changes caused by hearing recovery, while the long-term prognosis of residual tinnitus after SSNHL is related only to the initial tinnitus level, with a median recovery time of approximately 2 years.

Delayed Recovery in Pediatric Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Predicted via Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2018 ◽  
Vol 127 (6) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Wu ◽  
Hongyan Jiang ◽  
Lanying Wen ◽  
Ling Zong ◽  
Kaitian Chen
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Threshold ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Speech Discrimination ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Hearing Recovery

Objectives: To evaluate the potential origins via magnetic resonance imaging and the relevant hearing recovery course of pediatric sudden sensorineural hearing loss. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 25 pediatric patients from our center with sudden sensorineural hearing loss from January 2011 to December 2016. All individuals were closely followed up at baseline and 1 and 6 months. Results: Magnetic resonance imaging identified presumed causes in 9 cases, 5 of which showed intralabyrinthine hyperintensity, suggesting presumptive intralabyrinthine hemorrhage. The remaining 20 patients showed no hyperintensity. Restoration of hearing and speech discrimination abilities were noted in these 25 children at 6 months versus the initial levels (74.2 ± 22.6 vs 93.5 ± 20.5 dB, p = .000, and 45.8 ± 36.0 vs. 18.3 ± 22.1%, p = .004, respectively). The prognosis of the individuals with intralabyrinthine hemorrhage were superior in terms of frequency and hearing threshold at 6 months compared with that of the no-hemorrhage participants. Word recognition scores improved in either studied group. Conclusion: The potential recovery of hearing in children raises concerns about very early surgical intervention within the first 6 months. Rational imaging and sequential audiometric evaluation to monitor the progression of recovery may be beneficial.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Various Treatments for Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss—A Retrospective Study

Life ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Magdalena B. Skarżyńska ◽  
Aleksandra Kołodziejak ◽  
Elżbieta Gos ◽  
Milaine Dominici Sanfis ◽  
Piotr H. Skarżyński
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Success Rate ◽  
Complete Recovery ◽  
Sudden Onset ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Prolonged Treatment ◽  
Retrospective Clinical Study ◽  
Hearing Recovery

(1) Background: A retrospective clinical study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of different pharmacological and non-pharmacological regimens for treating sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL). (2) Methods: Adult patients (n = 130) diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and hospitalized between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled in this study. Depending on the treatment regimen applied, patients were divided into five groups. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) hearing loss of sudden onset; (ii) hearing loss of at least 30 dB at three consecutive frequencies; (iii) unilateral hearing loss; (iv) age above 18 years. Exclusion criteria were as follows: (i) no follow-up audiogram; (ii) bilateral hearing loss; (iii) recognized alternative diagnosis such as tumor, disorder of inner ear fluids, infection or inflammation, autoimmune disease, malformation, hematological disease, dialysis-dependent renal failure, postdural puncture syndrome, gene-related syndrome, mitochondrial disease; and (iv) age below 18 years. (3) Results: Complete recovery was found in 14% of patients (18/130) and marked improvement was found in 6% (8/130), giving an overall success rate of 20%. The best results were obtained in the second group (i.e., patients given intratympanic glucocorticoid + prolonged orally administered glucocorticoid) where the success rate was 28%. In general, the older the patient, the smaller the improvement in hearing, a correlation that was statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: In treating SSNHL, the highest rate of hearing recovery—28%—was in the group of patients given intratympanic corticoid plus prolonged treatment with orally administered glucocorticoid.

scholarly journals The Relationship Between Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Vestibular Neuritis, and Infection With COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saeid Aarabi ◽  
Nasrin Yazdani ◽  
Javad Fakhri ◽  
Vida Rahimi ◽  
Parsa Cheraghipour ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Pure Tone Audiometry ◽  
Sudden Hearing Loss ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Vestibular Neuritis ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Pcr Test

Introduction: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between sudden sensorineural hearing loss, vestibular neuritis, and infection with COVID-19. Materials and Methods: In this study, a total of 56 Iranians (32 females and 24 males) with a Mean±SD age of 45.12±14 years were studied in Tehran City, Iran. Individuals diagnosed with Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (SSNHL) or vestibular neuritis based on definitive diagnostic criteria were included in the study. The methodology comprised four sections of underlying Sudden Hearing Loss,, auditory and vestibular inspection, SARS-CoV-2 Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) test, and statistical analysis. Also, the videonystagmography test was used in participants with vertigo to diagnose vestibular neuritis. Pure tone audiometry confirmed SSNHL in some patients with a complaint of hearing loss. Furthermore, tuning fork, Rinne and Weber tests were also performed. Results: The results of SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR in 56 subjects showed that eight subjects (22.2%) with vestibular neuritis and two with SSNHL (10%) had a positive RT-PCR test. The Chi- square and Fisher exact-tests with a 95% confidence interval revealed no statistically significant (P>0.05) relationship between COVID-19 infection and vestibular neuritis or SSNHL. Conclusion: The present study showed no statistically significant relationship between audiovestibular disorders and positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test. However, the possibility of this relationship cannot be ruled out, and there is a need for studies with larger sample sizes.

Intratympanic dexamethasone for profound idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss

2005 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
pp. 902-905 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Battista
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss ◽  
Sensorineural Hearing ◽  
Additional Patient ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Partial Recovery ◽  
Hearing Recovery ◽  
Intratympanic Dexamethasone

OBJECTIVES: To determine hearing recovery by using intratympanic dexamethasone for profound, idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: A prospective, clinical study was performed of 25 consecutive patients seen with profound ISSNHL. Patients received 4 intratympanic treatments of dexamethasone over the course of 2 weeks. Complete hearing recovery was defined as the final pure-tone average (PTA) within 10 dB of baseline. Partial recovery was defined as a final PTA with >50% hearing. The hearing in the contralateral ear was used as baseline. RESULTS: The average time to treatment was 28 days. Two patients had significant hearing recovery, and 1 additional patient had partial recovery. The 2 patients with significant hearing recovery were treated within 9 days of onset of hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: By using the treatment protocol and definition of hearing recovery of this study, intratympanic dexamethasone does not result in significant hearing improvement for patients with profound ISSNHL. There is a possible trend for improved hearing results if intratympanic treatment is performed within 11 days of onset of hearing loss.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document