scholarly journals Morbidity and Mortality Outcomes of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy at a Single Institution in Japan

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiyoshi Mizumoto ◽  
Emel Canbay ◽  
Masamitsu Hirano ◽  
Nobuyuki Takao ◽  
Takayuki Matsuda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Crs And Hipec

Background. Even though cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are associated with a high morbidity and mortality rates, it has been reported that CRS and HIPEC improved survival of selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. We aimed to report morbidity and mortality results of CRS and HIPEC from a single institution in Japan.Methods and Results. Total of 284 procedures of CRS were performed on patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei, peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) from colon cancer and gastric cancer between 2007 and 2011 in our institution. The morbidity rate was 49% of all procedure, and grades I/II and grades III/IV complications were 28% and 17%, respectively. Most frequent complication was surgical site infections including intraabdominal abscess. The mortality rate was 3.5%, and reoperation was needed in 11% of all procedures. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) greater than 20 was the only significant factor for occurrence of postoperative complications (P<0.01). In contrast, HIPEC significantly reduced postoperative complications (P<0.05).Conclusions. The morbidity and mortality rates of our institution are comparable with previous reports that are in acceptable rates. Optimal patient selection such as patients with PCI less than 20 seems to be of paramount importance to CRS and HIPEC.

Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Initial Experience in Oaxaca, Mexico

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 942-946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolando GarcÍA-Matus ◽  
Carlos Alberto HernÁNdez-HernÁNdez ◽  
Omar Leyva-GarcÍA ◽  
Sergio Vásquez-Ciriaco ◽  
Guillermo Flores-Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer Index ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Initial Experience ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Crs And Hipec

Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) has been traditionally considered a terminal disease with median survivals reported in the literature of 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are playing an ever increasing role in the treatment of these patients. Excellent results have been achieved in well-selected patients but there is a very steep learning curve when starting a new program. A program for peritoneal surface malignancies in which patients with PC of gastrointestinal or gynecological origin were treated using multi-modality therapy with combinations of systemic therapy, cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and HIPEC was initiated in December 2007 at “Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad de Oaxaca,” Mexico. We present the results of our initial experience. From December 2007 to February 2011, 26 patients were treated with CRS and HIPEC. There were 21 female patients. Most common indication (46%) was recurrent ovarian cancer. Mean duration of surgery was 260 minutes. Mean Peritoneal Cancer Index was 9. Twenty-three (88.5%) patients had a complete cytoreduction. Major morbidity and mortality rates were 19.5 and 3.8 per cent, respectively. Mean hospital stay was 8 days. At a mean follow-up of 20 months, median survival has not been reached. Rigorous preoperative workup, strict selection criteria, and mentoring from an experienced cytoreductive surgeon are mandatory and extremely important when starting a center for PC.

scholarly journals Survival outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claramae Shulyn Chia ◽  
Ramakrishnan Ayloor Seshadri ◽  
Vahan Kepenekian ◽  
Delphine Vaudoyer ◽  
Guillaume Passot ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Crs And Hipec

AbstractBackground: The current treatment of choice for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a new aggressive form of loco-regional treatment that is currently being used in pseudomyxoma peritoneii, peritoneal mesothelioma and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. It is still under investigation for its use in gastric cancer.Methods: The literature between 1970 and 2016 was surveyed systematically through a review of published studies on the treatment outcomes of CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer.Results: Seventeen studies were included in this review. The median survival for all patients ranged from 6.6 to 15.8 months. The 5-years overall survival ranged from 6 to 31%. For patients with complete cytoreduction, the median survival was 11.2 to 43.4 months and the 5-years overall survival was 13 % to 23%. Important prognostic factors were found to be a low peritoneal carcarcinomatosis index (PCI) score and the completeness of cytoreduction.Conclusion: The current evidence suggests that CRS and HIPEC has a role to play in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer. Long term survival has been shown for a select group of patients. However, further studies are needed to validate these results.

scholarly journals Cytoreductive Surgery and Perioperative Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Experience in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis: Single-Center Analysis of 180 Cases

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Kursat Karadayi ◽  
Meric Emre Bostanci ◽  
Murat Can Mollaoglu ◽  
Ufuk Karabacak
Keyword(s):  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Morbidity Rate ◽  
Survival Times

Background. In peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), increased life span and disease-free survival times are shown in patients with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) following cytoreductive surgery (SRC). In this study, our main objective was to present our experience of performing SRC and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC and EPIC) on patients with PC, in light of the literature. Methods. Demographic data, follow-up results, peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI), completeness of cytoreduction (CCR) score, and morbidity and mortality rates of 180 patients treated with SRC + HIPEC + EPIC for PC at the Department of Surgical Oncology at Sivas Cumhuriyet University between January 2008 and July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Results. Distribution of 180 PC cases according to primary organs included 53 ovarian, 39 colorectal, 33 stomach, 25 primary peritoneum, 10 uterus, 10 tuba, five soft tissue, and five appendix originated carcinoma. The average PCI of the cases detected preoperatively was 21 (5–30). Completeness of cytoreduction scores of CCR-0 in 102 cases, CCR-1 in 67 cases, CCR-2 in eight cases, and CCR-3 in three cases was obtained. Median operation time was 300 (200–540) minutes. Perioperative morbidity rate was 47.0%, and perioperative mortality rate was 13.5%. Conclusion. The peritonectomy procedure is a difficult, long-lasting, troublesome intervention, but it is the most important treatment option with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates in patients selected for PC treatment in experienced centers.

scholarly journals Impact of Mitomycin-C-Induced Neutropenia after Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Cytoreductive Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suk Jun Lee ◽  
Youngbae Jeon ◽  
Hae Won Lee ◽  
Jeonghyun Kang ◽  
Seung Hyuk Baik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Severe Neutropenia ◽  
Crs And Hipec ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients

Abstract Background Mitomycin-C (MMC) is the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS). However, MMC has a side effect of myelosuppression. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical manifestations and impact of MMC-induced neutropenia after CRS and HIPEC in colorectal cancer patients. Methods A total of 124 colorectal cancer patients who underwent CRS with HIPEC between March 2015 and January 2019 were evaluated. Patients with malignancies of non-colorectal origin, hospital stay longer than 60 days, peritoneal cancer index > 30, and complete cytoreduction score > 2 were excluded. MMC 35 mg/m2 was administered for 90 min at 41–43 °C. The patients were divided into three groups: no neutropenia, mild neutropenia (grade 1–2), and severe neutropenia (grade 3–4). Results In total, mild and severe neutropenia occurred in 30 (24.2%) and 48 (38.7%) patients, respectively. Age and body surface area were significantly different among the neutropenia groups. Severe neutropenia developed significantly earlier than mild neutropenia (6.9 days vs. 10.4 days, p < 0.001) and also lasted significantly longer (4.6 days vs. 2.5 days, p = 0.005). The rate of major postoperative complications was significantly higher in the severe neutropenia group than in the no and mild neutropenia groups (8.3% vs. 6.7% vs. 6.5%, p = 0.015) Conclusions Severe neutropenia starts earlier and lasts longer than mild neutropenia after CRS and HIPEC using an MMC triple method. The higher rate of major postoperative complications in patients with severe neutropenia highlights the importance of postoperative management during the neutropenia period.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy post cytoreductive surgery in management of peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal primaries: Tertiary center experience.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 28-28
Author(s):  
Ahmed Badran Sobh ◽  
Ahmed Al-Wusaibie ◽  
Mahmoud Abdelsatar Elshenawy ◽  
Marwa Ismail Abdelgawad ◽  
Hakeam Hakeam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Peritoneal Carcinomatosis ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Intraoperative Radiation ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Signet Ring ◽  
Crs And Hipec

28 Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in addition to Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) has survival benefit observed in management of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (PC) from Colo-rectal cancer (CRC)origin. We report the outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with CRC, who presented with PC and underwent CRS and HIPEC at King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Methods: Patients presented with PC from CRC origin and underwent CRS and HIPEC; from February 2009 to September 2015 were recruited. Results: 52 patients identified. A total of 55 CRS procedures were performed, where 3 patients underwent repeated CRS and HIPEC for tumor recurrence. All except 3 used mitomycin-C for HIPEC, the remaining received either melphalan (2 patients) or cisplatin plus mitomycin-C regimen (1 patient). Melphalan used for patients who underwent repeated HIPEC as 2nd line chemotherapeutic agent. Intraoperative Radiation therapy performed in 5 patients with tumor invading the surrounding structures, where performing a safe or complete resection was either technically difficult or carried high risk. Complication assessment by Clavien-Dindo score, 62 % grade (I-II), while 31% had grade (3–4). Two patients (3.6%) died postoperatively; both from sepsis. Respiratory complications were the most commonly encountered morbidities. The 5-year overall survival(OS) was 50% with disease free survival (DFS) 29.5%. Univariate analysis showed poor OS and DFS encountered in; Signet-ring tumors (p < 0.0001) for both, peritoneal cancer index (PCI) ≥ 6 (p < 0.0009) for both, completeness of cytoreduction(CC) score >1 (p < 0.0001) for both, and high 3-month postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen value (p <0.0001) for both. In multivariate analysis; DFS was significant for (PCI) ≥ 6 (p < 0.0131) and (CC) score >1 (p < 0.0031) while PCI > 6 was the only significant factor (p < 0.0030) for OS. Conclusions: Addition of HIPEC to CRS was safe, and improved survival in patient with peritoneal Carcinomatosis of colo-rectal origin. PCI and CC score are prognostic factors of survival, signet-ring subtype may not benefit of this procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document