scholarly journals Applications of Fixed-Point and Optimization Methods to the Multiple-Set Split Feasibility Problem

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yonghong Yao ◽  
Rudong Chen ◽  
Giuseppe Marino ◽  
Yeong Cheng Liou

The multiple-set split feasibility problem requires finding a point closest to a family of closed convex sets in one space such that its image under a linear transformation will be closest to another family of closed convex sets in the image space. It can be a model for many inverse problems where constraints are imposed on the solutions in the domain of a linear operator as well as in the operator’s range. It generalizes the convex feasibility problem as well as the two-set split feasibility problem. In this paper, we will review and report some recent results on iterative approaches to the multiple-set split feasibility problem.

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-320
Author(s):  
QIAO-LI DONG ◽  
◽  
DAN JIANG ◽  

The split feasibility problem (SFP) has many applications, which can be a model for many inverse problems where constraints are imposed on the solutions in the domain of a linear operator as well as in the operator’s range. In this paper, we introduce a new projection method to solve the SFP and prove its convergence under standard assumptions. Our results improve previously known corresponding methods and results of this area. The preliminary numerical experiments illustrates the advantage of our proposed methods.


Mathematics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (11) ◽  
pp. 1012
Author(s):  
Suthep Suantai ◽  
Narin Petrot ◽  
Montira Suwannaprapa

We consider the split feasibility problem in Hilbert spaces when the hard constraint is common solutions of zeros of the sum of monotone operators and fixed point sets of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings, while the soft constraint is the inverse image of a fixed point set of a nonexpansive mapping. We introduce iterative algorithms for the weak and strong convergence theorems of the constructed sequences. Some numerical experiments of the introduced algorithm are also discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 47
Author(s):  
Guash Haile Taddele ◽  
Poom Kumam ◽  
Anteneh Getachew Gebrie ◽  
Kanokwan Sitthithakerngkiet

In this paper, we study an iterative method for solving the multiple-set split feasibility problem: find a point in the intersection of a finite family of closed convex sets in one space such that its image under a linear transformation belongs to the intersection of another finite family of closed convex sets in the image space. In our result, we obtain a strongly convergent algorithm by relaxing the closed convex sets to half-spaces, using the projection onto those half-spaces and by introducing the extended form of selecting step sizes used in a relaxed CQ algorithm for solving the split feasibility problem. We also give several numerical examples for illustrating the efficiency and implementation of our algorithm in comparison with existing algorithms in the literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Hasanen A. Hammad ◽  
Habib ur Rehman ◽  
Yaé Ulrich Gaba

The goal of this manuscript is to establish strong convergence theorems for inertial shrinking projection and CQ algorithms to solve a split convex feasibility problem in real Hilbert spaces. Finally, numerical examples were obtained to discuss the performance and effectiveness of our algorithms and compare the proposed algorithms with the previous shrinking projection, hybrid projection, and inertial forward-backward methods.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Huijuan Jia ◽  
Shufen Liu ◽  
Yazheng Dang

The paper proposes an inertial accelerated algorithm for solving split feasibility problem with multiple output sets. To improve the feasibility, the algorithm involves computing of projections onto relaxed sets (half spaces) instead of computing onto the closed convex sets, and it does not require calculating matrix inverse. To accelerate the convergence, the algorithm adopts self-adaptive rules and incorporates inertial technique. The strong convergence is shown under some suitable conditions. In addition, some newly derived results are presented for solving the split feasibility problem and split feasibility problem with multiple output sets. Finally, numerical experiments illustrate that the algorithm converges more quickly than some existing algorithms. Our results extend and improve some methods in the literature.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tongxin Xu ◽  
Luoyi Shi

AbstractIn this paper, we propose a new iterative algorithm for solving the multiple-sets split feasibility problem (MSSFP for short) and the split equality fixed point problem (SEFPP for short) with firmly quasi-nonexpansive operators or nonexpansive operators in real Hilbert spaces. Under mild conditions, we prove strong convergence theorems for the algorithm by using the projection method and the properties of projection operators. The result improves and extends the corresponding ones announced by some others in the earlier and recent literature.


Mathematics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Xinglong Wang ◽  
Jing Zhao ◽  
Dingfang Hou

The split feasibility problem models inverse problems arising from phase retrievals problems and intensity-modulated radiation therapy. For solving the split feasibility problem, Xu proposed a relaxed CQ algorithm that only involves projections onto half-spaces. In this paper, we use the dual variable to propose a new relaxed CQ iterative algorithm that generalizes Xu’s relaxed CQ algorithm in real Hilbert spaces. By using projections onto half-spaces instead of those onto closed convex sets, the proposed algorithm is implementable. Moreover, we present modified relaxed CQ algorithm with viscosity approximation method. Under suitable conditions, global weak and strong convergence of the proposed algorithms are proved. Some numerical experiments are also presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed algorithms. Our results improve and extend the corresponding results of Xu and some others.


2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 2071-2084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yair Censor ◽  
Tommy Elfving ◽  
Nirit Kopf ◽  
Thomas Bortfeld

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document