scholarly journals Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Erwin ◽  
Dimitri Alexei Gadotti
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Star Clusters ◽  
Careful Analysis ◽  
Stellar Mass ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Host Galaxy ◽  
Mass Ratio ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
The Masses

Studies have suggested that there is a strong correlation between the masses of nuclear star clusters (NSCs) and their host galaxies, a correlation which is said to be an extension of the well-known correlations between supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and their host galaxies. But careful analysis of disk galaxies—including 2D bulge/disk/bar decompositions—shows that while SMBHs correlate with the stellar mass of thebulgecomponent of galaxies, the masses of NSCs correlate much better with thetotalgalaxy stellar mass. In addition, the mass ratioMNSC/M⋆, totfor NSCs in spirals (at least those with Hubble types Sc and later) is typically an order of magnitude smaller than the mass ratioMBH/M⋆, bulof SMBHs. The absence of a universal “central massive object” correlation argues against common formation and growth mechanisms for both SMBHs and NSCs. We also discuss evidence for a break in the NSC-host galaxy correlation, galaxies with Hubble types earlier than Sbc appear to host systematically more massive NSCs than do types Sc and later.

scholarly journals Subaru High-z Exploration of Low-Luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). VIII. A less biased view of the early co-evolution of black holes and host galaxies

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takuma Izumi ◽  
Masafusa Onoue ◽  
Yoshiki Matsuoka ◽  
Tohru Nagao ◽  
Michael A Strauss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Far Infrared ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Star Forming ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Order Of Magnitude ◽  
Local Relation ◽  
Almost All

Abstract We present ALMA [C ii] line and far-infrared (FIR) continuum observations of three $z \gt 6$ low-luminosity quasars ($M_{\rm 1450} \gt -25$ mag) discovered by our Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) survey. The [C ii] line was detected in all three targets with luminosities of $(2.4\mbox{--}9.5) \times 10^8\, L_{\odot }$, about one order of magnitude smaller than optically luminous ($M_{\rm 1450} \lesssim -25$ mag) quasars. The FIR continuum luminosities range from $\lt 9 \times 10^{10}\, L_{\odot }$ (3 $\sigma$ limit) to ${\sim } 2 \times 10^{12}\, L_{\odot }$, indicating a wide range in star formation rates in these galaxies. Most of the HSC quasars studied thus far show [C ii]/ FIR luminosity ratios similar to local star-forming galaxies. Using the [C ii]-based dynamical mass ($M_{\rm dyn}$) as a surrogate for bulge stellar mass ($M_{\rm\, bulge}$), we find that a significant fraction of low-luminosity quasars are located on or even below the local $M_{\rm\, BH}$–$M_{\rm\, bulge}$ relation, particularly at the massive end of the galaxy mass distribution. In contrast, previous studies of optically luminous quasars have found that black holes are overmassive relative to the local relation. Given the low luminosities of our targets, we are exploring the nature of the early co-evolution of supermassive black holes and their hosts in a less biased way. Almost all of the quasars presented in this work are growing their black hole mass at a much higher pace at $z \sim 6$ than the parallel growth model, in which supermassive black holes and their hosts grow simultaneously to match the local $M_{\rm\, BH}$–$M_{\rm\, bulge}$ relation at all redshifts. As the low-luminosity quasars appear to realize the local co-evolutionary relation even at $z \sim 6$, they should have experienced vigorous starbursts prior to the currently observed quasar phase to catch up with the relation.

scholarly journals Supermassive black holes: Coevolution (or not) of black holes and host galaxies

2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (S295) ◽  
pp. 241-256
Author(s):  
John Kormendy
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Galaxy Formation ◽  
Globular Clusters ◽  
Hubble Space Telescope ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Host Galaxy ◽  
Late Time ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Energy Feedback ◽  
Negative Effect

AbstractSupermassive black holes (BHs) have been found in 75 galaxies by observing spatially resolved dynamics. The Hubble Space Telescope (HST) revolutionized BH work by advancing the subject from its ‘proof of concept’ phase into quantitative studies of BH demographics. Most influential was the discovery of a tight correlation between BH masses M• and the velocity dispersions σ of stars in the host galaxy bulge components at radii where the stars mostly feel each other and not the BH. Together with correlations between M• and bulge luminosity, with the ‘missing light’ that defines galaxy cores, and with numbers of globular clusters, this has led to the conclusion that BHs and bulges coevolve by regulating each other's growth. This simple picture with one set of correlations for all galaxies dominated BH work in the past decade.New results are now replacing the above, simple story with a richer and more plausible picture in which BHs correlate differently with different kinds of galaxy components. BHs with masses of 105—106M⊙ live in some bulgeless galaxies. So classical (merger-built) bulges are not necessary equipment for BH formation. On the other hand, while they live in galaxy disks, BHs do not correlate with galaxy disks or with disk-grown pseudobulges. They also have no special correlation with dark matter halos beyond the fact that halo gravity controls galaxy formation. This leads to the suggestion that there are two modes of BH feeding, (1) local, secular and episodic feeding of small BHs in largely bulgeless galaxies that involves too little energy feedback to drive BH–host-galaxy coevolution and (2) global feeding in major galaxy mergers that rapidly grows giant BHs in short-duration events whose energy feedback does affect galaxy formation. After these quasar-like phases, maintenance-mode BH feedback into hot, X-ray-emitting gas continues to have a primarily negative effect in preventing late-time star formation when cold gas or gas-rich galaxies get accreted. Finally, the highest-mass galaxies inherit coevolution effects from smaller galaxies; the tightness of their BH correlations is caused mainly by averaging during dissipationless major mergers.

scholarly journals Correlations between supermassive black holes and hot gas atmospheres in IllustrisTNG and X-ray observations

2020 ◽  
Vol 501 (2) ◽  
pp. 2210-2230
Author(s):  
Nhut Truong ◽  
Annalisa Pillepich ◽  
Norbert Werner
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
High Mass ◽  
Mass Relation ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Hierarchical Assembly ◽  
Hot Gas ◽  
The Masses

ABSTRACT Recent X-ray observations have revealed remarkable correlations between the masses of central supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and the X-ray properties of the hot atmospheres permeating their host galaxies, thereby indicating the crucial role of the atmospheric gas in tracing SMBH growth in the high-mass regime. We examine this topic theoretically using the IllustrisTNG cosmological simulations and provide insights to the nature of this SMBH – gaseous halo connection. By carrying out a mock X-ray analysis for a mass-selected sample of TNG100 simulated galaxies at $z$ = 0, we inspect the relationship between the masses of SMBHs and the hot gas temperatures and luminosities at various spatial and halo scales – from galactic (∼Re) to group/cluster scales (∼R500c). We find strong SMBH-X-ray correlations mostly in quenched galaxies and find that the correlations become stronger and tighter at larger radii. Critically, the X-ray temperature (kBTX) at large radii (r ≳ 5Re) traces the SMBH mass with a remarkably small scatter (∼0.2 dex). The relations emerging from IllustrisTNG are broadly consistent with those obtained from recent X-ray observations. Overall, our analysis suggests that, within the framework of IllustrisTNG, the present-time MBH–kBTX correlations at the high-mass end (MBH ≳ 108M⊙) are fundamentally a reflection of the SMBH mass–halo mass relation, which at such high masses is set by the hierarchical assembly of structures. The exact form, locus, and scatter of those scaling relations are, however, sensitive to feedback processes such as those driven by star formation and SMBH activity.

scholarly journals Coevolution (or not) of supermassive black holes and host galaxies: Black hole scaling relations are not biased by selection effects

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (S353) ◽  
pp. 186-198
Author(s):  
John Kormendy
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Black Hole ◽  
Velocity Dispersion ◽  
Stellar Mass ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Scaling Relations ◽  
Selection Effects ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Scatter Plots ◽  
Host Properties

AbstractThe oral version of this paper summarized Kormendy & Ho 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511. However, earlier speakers at this Symposium worried that selection effects bias the derivation of black hole scaling relations. I therefore added – and this proceedings paper emphasizes – a discussion of why we can be confident that selection effects do not bias the observed correlations between BH mass M• and the luminosity, stellar mass, and velocity dispersion of host ellipticals and classical bulges. These are the only galaxy components that show tight BH-host correlations. The scatter plots of M• with host properties for pseudobulges and disks are upper envelopes of scatter that does extend to lower BH masses. BH correlations are most consistent with a picture in which BHs coevolve only with classical bulges and ellipticals. Four physical regimes of coevolution (or not) are suggested by Kormendy & Ho 2013 and are summarized here.

scholarly journals Interactions among intermediate redshift galaxies

2020 ◽  
Vol 639 ◽  
pp. A30
Author(s):  
Persis Misquitta ◽  
Micah Bowles ◽  
Andreas Eckart ◽  
Madeleine Yttergren ◽  
Gerold Busch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Emission Line ◽  
Initial Conditions ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Emission Lines ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
The Galaxy ◽  
Line Features ◽  
The Masses ◽  
Narrow Emission

We present the properties of the central supermassive black holes and the host galaxies of the interacting object SDSS J134420.86+663717.8. We obtained optical long slit spectroscopy data from the Large Binocular Telescope using the Multi Object Double Spectrograph. Analysing the spectra revealed several strong broad and narrow emission lines of ionised gas in the nuclear region of one galaxy, whereas only narrow emission lines were visible for the second galaxy. The optical spectra were used to plot diagnostic diagrams, deduce rotation curves of the two galaxies, and calculate the masses of the central supermassive black holes. We find that the galaxy with broad emission line features has Seyfert 1 properties, while the galaxy with only narrow emission line features seems to be star-forming in nature. Furthermore, we find that the masses of the central supermassive black holes are almost equal at a few times 107 M⊙. Additionally, we present a simple N-body simulation to shed some light on the initial conditions of the progenitor galaxies. We find that for an almost orthogonal approach of the two interacting galaxies, the model resembles the optical image of the system.

Supermassive Black Holes

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abraham Loeb ◽  
Steven R. Furlanetto
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Black Hole ◽  
Massive Stars ◽  
Galactic Nuclei ◽  
Stellar Mass ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Material Object ◽  
Formation Mechanisms ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Bright Source

This chapter analyzes formation mechanisms for supermassive black holes, their observable characteristics, and their interactions with their host galaxies and the wider Universe. A black hole is the end product of the complete gravitational collapse of a material object, such as a massive star. It is surrounded by a horizon from which even light cannot escape. Astrophysical black holes appear in two flavors: stellar-mass black holes that form when massive stars die, and the monstrous supermassive black holes that sit at the center of galaxies, reaching masses of up to ten billion Suns. The latter type is observed as active galactic nuclei (AGN), and the chapter introduces the quasar—a point-like (“quasi-stellar”) bright source at the center of a galaxy which serves as the most powerful type of AGN—in discussing the observable nature of supermassive black holes.

scholarly journals The Assembly of the First Massive Black Holes

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kohei Inayoshi ◽  
Eli Visbal ◽  
Zoltán Haiman
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Stellar Mass ◽  
Host Galaxy ◽  
Initial Growth ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Potential Wells ◽  
Massive Black Holes ◽  
History Of ◽  
Gas Accretion

The existence of ∼109M⊙ supermassive black holes (SMBHs) within the first billion years of the Universe has stimulated numerous ideas for the prompt formation and rapid growth of black holes (BHs) in the early Universe. Here, we review ways in which the seeds of massive BHs may have first assembled, how they may have subsequently grown as massive as ∼109M⊙, and how multimessenger observations could distinguish between different SMBH assembly scenarios. We conclude the following: ▪  The ultrarare ∼109 M⊙ SMBHs represent only the tip of the iceberg. Early BHs likely fill a continuum from the stellar-mass (∼10M⊙) to the supermassive (∼109) regimes, reflecting a range of initial masses and growth histories. ▪  Stellar-mass BHs were likely left behind by the first generation of stars at redshifts as high as ∼30, but their initial growth typically was stunted due to the shallow potential wells of their host galaxies. ▪  Conditions in some larger, metal-poor galaxies soon became conducive to the rapid formation and growth of massive seed holes, via gas accretion and by mergers in dense stellar clusters. ▪  BH masses depend on the environment (such as the number and properties of nearby radiation sources and the local baryonic streaming velocity) and on the metal enrichment and assembly history of the host galaxy. ▪  Distinguishing between assembly mechanisms will be difficult, but a combination of observations by the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (probing massive BH growth via mergers) and by deep multiwavelength electromagnetic observations (probing growth via gas accretion) is particularly promising.

scholarly journals Do Nuclear Star Clusters and Supermassive Black Holes Follow the Same Host-Galaxy Correlations?

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Erwin ◽  
Dimitri Gadotti ◽  
Victor P. Debattista ◽  
C. C. Popescu
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Star Clusters ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Host Galaxy

scholarly journals Correlations between supermassive black holes, hot atmospheres, and the total masses of early-type galaxies

2019 ◽  
Vol 488 (1) ◽  
pp. L134-L142 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Lakhchaura ◽  
N Truong ◽  
N Werner
Keyword(s):  
Black Holes ◽  
Linear Correlation ◽  
Supermassive Black Holes ◽  
Early Type ◽  
Host Galaxies ◽  
Massive Galaxies ◽  
Cluster Group ◽  
Black Hole Growth ◽  
Hole Growth ◽  
The Masses

ABSTRACT We present a study of relations between the masses of the central supermassive black holes (SMBHs) and the atmospheric gas temperatures and luminosities measured within a range of radii between Re and 5Re, for a sample of 47 early-type galaxies observed by the Chandra X-ray Observatory. We report the discovery of a tight correlation between the atmospheric temperatures of the brightest cluster/group galaxies (BCGs) and their central SMBH masses. Furthermore, our hydrostatic analysis reveals an approximately linear correlation between the total masses of BCGs (Mtot) and their central SMBH masses (MBH). State-of-the-art cosmological simulations show that the SMBH mass could be determined by the binding energy of the halo through radiative feedback during the rapid black hole growth by accretion, while for the most massive galaxies mergers are the chief channel of growth. In the scenario of a simultaneous growth of central SMBHs and their host galaxies through mergers, the observed linear correlation could be a natural consequence of the central limit theorem.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document