A Time Off Incentive Was Not Associated with Influenza Vaccination Acceptance among Healthcare Workers

Objectives. The national influenza vaccination rate among healthcare workers (HCWs) remains low despite clear benefits to patients, coworkers, and families. We sought to evaluate formally the effect of a one-hour time off incentive on attitudes towards influenza vaccination during the 2011-2012 influenza season. Methods. All HCWs at the Philadelphia Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center were invited to complete an anonymous web-based survey. We described respondents’ characteristics and attitudes toward influenza vaccination and determined the relationship of specific attitudes with respondents’ acceptance of influenza vaccination, using a 5-point Likert scale. Results. We analyzed survey responses from 154 HCWs employed at the Philadelphia VA Medical Center, with a response rate of 8%. Among 121 respondents who reported receiving influenza vaccination, 34 (28%, 95% CI 20–37%) reported agreement with the statement that the time off incentive made a difference in their decision to accept influenza vaccination. Conclusions. Our study provides evidence that modest incentives such as one-hour paid time off will be unlikely to promote influenza vaccination rates within medical facilities. More potent interventions that include mandatory vaccination combined with penalties for noncompliance will likely provide the only means to achieve near-universal influenza vaccination among HCWs.

Download Full-text

Use Of A Mobile Cart Influenza Program For Vaccination Of Hospital Employees

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/502320 ◽

2004 ◽

Vol 25 (11) ◽

pp. 918-922 ◽

Cited By ~ 99

Author(s):

Catherine Sartor ◽

Herve Tissot-Dupont ◽

Christine Zandotti ◽

Francoise Martin ◽

Pierre Roques ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Associate Professor ◽

University Hospital ◽

Vaccination Program ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Vaccination Acceptance ◽

The Impact ◽

Haenszel Test

AbstractObjective:Rates of annual influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) remained low in our university hospital. This study was conducted to evaluate the impact of a mobile cart influenza vaccination program on HCW vaccination.Methods:From 2000 to 2002, the employee health service continued its annual influenza vaccination program and the mobile cart program was implemented throughout the institution. This program offered influenza vaccination to all employees directly on the units. Each employee completed a questionnaire. Vaccination rates were analyzed using the Mantel–Haenszel test.Results:The program proposed vaccination to 50% to 56% of the employees. Among the nonvaccinated employees, 52% to 53% agreed to be vaccinated. The compliance with vaccination varied from 61% to 77% among physicians and medical students and from 38% to 55% among nurses and other employees. Vaccination of the chief or associate professor of the unit was associated with a higher vaccination rate of the medical staff (P < .01). Altogether, the vaccination program led to an increase in influenza vaccination among employees from 6% in 1998 and 7% in 1999 before the mobile cart program to 32% in 2000, 35% in 2001, and 32% in 2002 (P < .001).Conclusions:The mobile cart program was associated with a significantly increased vaccination acceptance. Our study was able to identify HCW groups for which the mobile cart was effective and highlight the role of the unit head in its success.

Download Full-text

Promotion of the influenza vaccination to hospital staff during pre-employment health check: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial

Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology ◽

10.1186/s12995-020-00285-w ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 15 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Michael Currat ◽

Catherine Lazor-Blanchet ◽

Giorgio Zanetti

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Vaccination Campaign ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Health Check ◽

Control Group ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Newly Hired

Abstract Background Vaccination is the most effective prevention of seasonal influenza. Despite its recommendation and active promotion, vaccination coverage remains low among healthcare staff. The goal of the study was to test if a pre-employment health check is a good opportunity to promote future vaccination against influenza among healthcare workers newly hired by a university hospital. Methods All new hospital employees active at the bedside who underwent a pre-employment health check between the end of 2016’s influenza epidemic and the start of the next influenza vaccination campaign were randomly allocated to a control group or an intervention group. The intervention consisted of a semi-structured dialog and the release of an information leaflet about influenza and influenza vaccination during the check-up, and the shipment of a postcard reminder 2 weeks before the next vaccination campaign. Vaccination rates during the campaign were compared among the two groups. Results Three hundred fifty-seven employees were included. Vaccination rates were similar in both groups: 79/172 (46%) in the control and 92/185 (50%) in the intervention group. A significantly higher rate of vaccination was noted among physicians (70/117, 60%) than among other employees (101/240, 42%, p = 0.001). In a pre-defined exploratory analysis among physicians, the vaccination rate was higher in the intervention group (36/51, 71%) than in the control group (34/65, 52%, p = 0.046). Conclusions Promotion of the influenza vaccine during pre-employment health check did not improve the vaccination rate of newly hired hospital healthcare workers overall during the next influenza vaccination campaign. Results suggest a favourable impact on the vaccination rate of physicians. Thus, there may be an interest in using communication strategies tailored to the different categories of healthcare workers to promote the influenza vaccine during pre-employment health check. Trial registration ClinicalTrials, NCT02758145. Registered 26 April 2016.

Download Full-text

Relationship of Influenza Vaccination Declination Statements and Influenza Vaccination Rates for Healthcare Workers in 22 US Hospitals

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/588590 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 29 (7) ◽

pp. 675-677 ◽

Cited By ~ 57

Author(s):

Philip M. Polgreen ◽

Edward J. Septimus ◽

Michael F. Parry ◽

Susan E. Beekmann ◽

Joseph E. Cavanaugh ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Negative Consequences ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Relationship Of

The use of declination statements was associated with a mean increase of 11.6% in influenza vaccination rates among healthcare workers at 22 hospitals. In most hospitals, there were no negative consequences for healthcare workers who refused to sign the forms, and most policies were implemented along with other interventions designed to increase vaccination rates.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Healthcare Worker Influenza Vaccination on Nosocomial Influenza in a Tertiary Hospital: An Ecological Study

10.21203/rs.2.13528/v2 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wycliffe Enli Wei ◽

Stephanie Fook-Chong ◽

Wen Kai Chen ◽

Maciej Piotr Chlebicki ◽

Wee Hoe Gan

Keyword(s):

Protective Effect ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Worker ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Ecological Study ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Incidence Rates ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: To protect hospitalized patients who are more susceptible to complications of influenza, seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCW) has been recommended internationally. However, its effectiveness is still being debated. To assess the effectiveness of HCW influenza vaccination, we performed an ecological study to evaluate the association between healthcare worker influenza vaccination and the incidence of nosocomial influenza in a tertiary hospital within Singapore between 2013-2018. Methods: Nosocomial influenza was defined by influenza among inpatients diagnosed 7 days or more post-admission by laboratory testing, while healthcare worker influenza vaccination rate was defined as the proportion of healthcare workers that was vaccinated at the end of each annual seasonal vaccination exercise. A modified Poisson regression was performed to assess the association between the HCW vaccination rates and monthly nosocomial influenza incidence rates. Results: Nosocomial influenza incidence rates followed the trend of non-nosocomial influenza, showing a predominant mid-year peak. Across 2,480,010 patient-days, there were 256 nosocomial influenza cases (1.03 per 10,000 patient-days). Controlling for background influenza activity and the number of influenza tests performed, no statistically significant association was observed between vaccination coverage and nosocomial influenza incidence rate although a protective effect was suggested (IRR 0.89, 95%CI:0.69-1.15, p =0.37). Conclusion: No significant association was observed between influenza vaccination rates and nosocomial influenza incidence rates, although a protective effect was suggested. Aligning local HCW vaccine timing and formulation to that of the Southern Hemisphere may improve effectiveness. HCW vaccination remains important but demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing nosocomial influenza is challenging.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Healthcare Worker Influenza Vaccination on Nosocomial Influenza in a Tertiary Hospital: An Ecological Study

10.21203/rs.2.13528/v3 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Wycliffe Enli Wei ◽

Stephanie Fook-Chong ◽

Wen Kai Chen ◽

Maciej Piotr Chlebicki ◽

Wee Hoe Gan

Keyword(s):

Protective Effect ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Worker ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Ecological Study ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Incidence Rates ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background: To protect hospitalized patients who are more susceptible to complications of influenza, seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCW) has been recommended internationally. However, its effectiveness is still being debated. To assess the effectiveness of HCW influenza vaccination, we performed an ecological study to evaluate the association between healthcare worker influenza vaccination and the incidence of nosocomial influenza in a tertiary hospital within Singapore between 2013-2018. Methods: Nosocomial influenza was defined by influenza among inpatients diagnosed 7 days or more post-admission by laboratory testing, while healthcare worker influenza vaccination rate was defined as the proportion of healthcare workers that was vaccinated at the end of each annual seasonal vaccination exercise. A modified Poisson regression was performed to assess the association between the HCW vaccination rates and monthly nosocomial influenza incidence rates.Results: Nosocomial influenza incidence rates followed the trend of non-nosocomial influenza, showing a predominant mid-year peak. Across 2,480,010 patient-days, there were 256 nosocomial influenza cases (1.03 per 10,000 patient-days). Controlling for background influenza activity and the number of influenza tests performed, no statistically significant association was observed between vaccination coverage and nosocomial influenza incidence rate although a protective effect was suggested (IRR 0.89, 95%CI:0.69-1.15, p=0.37). Conclusion: No significant association was observed between influenza vaccination rates and nosocomial influenza incidence rates, although a protective effect was suggested. Aligning local HCW vaccine timing and formulation to that of the Southern Hemisphere may improve effectiveness. HCW vaccination remains important but demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing nosocomial influenza is challenging.

Download Full-text

Effect of A Hospital Campaign for Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/504503 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 27 (6) ◽

pp. 612-617 ◽

Cited By ~ 53

Author(s):

Joon Young Song ◽

Cheong Won Park ◽

Hye Won Jeong ◽

Hee Jin Cheong ◽

Woo Joo Kim ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Vaccination Campaign ◽

Intervention Strategy ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Demographic Characteristics ◽

Tailored Intervention ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Knowledge And Attitudes ◽

Item Questionnaire

Objective.To identify the factors that inhibit or motivate influenza vaccination among healthcare workers (HCWs).Methods.In March 2000, we prepared 34-item questionnaire for both vaccine recipients and nonrecipients regarding demographic characteristics, factors motivating and inhibiting vaccination, and knowledge and attitudes about influenza vaccination. On the basis of the results of our survey, an aggressive hospital vaccination campaign was undertaken. In April 2004, after the 4-year campaign, the same questionnaire was again administered to HCWs.Results.In both 2000 and 2004, the main motives for undergoing influenza vaccination were “hospital campaign” and “recommendation by colleagues”; the percentage of respondents who were motivated by the hospital campaign had remarkably increased from 27% in 2000 to 52% in 2004 (P<.001), whereas the percentage who were motivated by recommendation by colleagues had not changed significantly (21% vs 14%). Qverall, the 4 reasons most frequently cited by HCWs for noncompliance with vaccination were insufficient available time, confidence in their health, doubt about vaccine efficacy, and fear of injection. In 2000, vaccination rates were below 30%, irrespective of occupation. After an aggressive vaccination campaign, the increase in the vaccination rate was highest among the nursing staff, increasing from 21% in 2000 to 92% in 2004, whereas the vaccination rate among the physicians was still below 60%.Conclusion.We conclude that a hospital campaign can markedly improve influenza vaccination rates among HCWs. Both a mobile cart system and free vaccine supply contributed to improving the vaccination rates in our study. In addition, a specifically tailored intervention strategy was required.

Download Full-text

Improving Influenza Vaccination of Healthcare Workers by Means of Quality Improvement Tools

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/660198 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 32 (6) ◽

pp. 616-618 ◽

Cited By ~ 13

Author(s):

Jose Cadena ◽

Teresa Prigmore ◽

Jason Bowling ◽

Beth Ann Ayala ◽

Leni Kirkman ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Improvement ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Worker ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Seasonal Influenza ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Improvement Project ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Grand Rounds ◽

Voluntary Vaccination

For a healthcare worker seasonal influenza vaccination quality improvement project, interventions included support of leadership, distribution of vaccine kits, grand rounds, an influenza website, a Screensaver, e-mails, phone messages, and audit feedback. Vaccination rates increased from 58.8% to 76.6% (P < .01). Quality improvement increased the voluntary vaccination rate but did not achieve a rate more than 80%.

Download Full-text

Correlation Between Healthcare Workers' Knowledge of Influenza Vaccine and Vaccine Receipt

Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology ◽

10.1086/502147 ◽

2003 ◽

Vol 24 (11) ◽

pp. 845-847 ◽

Cited By ~ 155

Author(s):

Richard A. Martinello ◽

Laura Jones ◽

Jeffrey E. Topal

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccine ◽

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Nursing Staff ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Basic Knowledge ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Significant Difference

AbstractObjective:Influenza vaccine receipt by healthcare workers (HCWs) is important because HCWs are at risk for occupational exposure to influenza and may act as vectors in the nosocomial transmission of influenza. HCWs were surveyed to determine whether belief in commonly held influenza vaccine misconceptions was associated with influenza vaccine acceptance.Design:Cross-sectional study.Setting:A large urban teaching hospital.Method:A self-administered survey was used to assess nursing and physician staff influenza vaccine knowledge, current vaccination status, and potential reasons for vaccine declination.Results:Two hundred twelve of 215 surveys were completed. The overall influenza vaccination rate was 73%. Physician staff were significantly more likely to have been vaccinated compared with nursing staff (82% vs 62%, respectively; P = .0009). HCWs answering the 5 influenza vaccine basic knowledge questions correctly were significantly more likely to have been vaccinated than those responding incorrectly to any question (84% vs 64%, respectively; P = .002). This association was present in the nursing group where 80% of those answering the knowledge questions correctly were vaccinated, but only 49% of those answering incorrectly were vaccinated (P = .000005). However, in the physician group, there was no significant difference in the influenza vaccination rates between those answering correctly and those answering incorrectly (P = .459).Conclusion:Belief in commonly held influenza vaccine misconceptions was significantly associated with influenza vaccine declination among nursing staff and may act as a barrier to greater rates of influenza vaccination. Reasons for influenza vaccine nonreceipt may differ between nursing and physician staff.

Download Full-text

The COVID States Project #62: COVID-19 vaccine attitudes among healthcare workers

10.31219/osf.io/yhk5j ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

David Lazer ◽

Hong Qu ◽

Katherine Ognyanova ◽

Matthew Baum ◽

Roy H. Perlis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Healthcare Workers ◽

Vaccination Campaign ◽

The Elderly ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Department Of Veterans Affairs ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

Healthcare Settings ◽

Care Workers ◽

Hospital Systems ◽

Mandatory Vaccination

The vaccination status of healthcare workers is of particular importance, for two key reasons:First, healthcare workers have been a harbinger of trends among the broader population through the entire vaccination campaign, as they were among the first to gain access to vaccines. The early inequalities in terms of access among healthcare workers were predictive of inequalities within the broader population. The divides in terms of vaccine skepticism presaged those of the broader population; and, as we will see below, the plateauing of vaccination rates anticipated the slowdown in vaccinations within the broader population.Second, the vaccine decisions of healthcare workers have particular ramifications with respect to the spread of COVID-19, and, especially, with respect to morbidity and mortality resulting from COVID-19. In particular, unvaccinated healthcare workers are potentially a vector of infection of the elderly and the vulnerable, who have been vastly more likely to die of the disease.A recent outbreak in a nursing home in Kentucky is illustrative. Despite the fact that over 90% of the residents had been fully vaccinated, only 53% of the healthcare workers had been. In a subsequent outbreak, 31% of residents were infected (more than two third of whom had been vaccinated); and 33% of healthcare workers (20% of whom had been vaccinated). Two residents died as a result. In short, the low vaccination rate of the healthcare workers supplied the kindling for the outbreak. The question going forward is to what extent might this occur in other healthcare settings around the country.Healthcare institutions thus face critical decisions regarding the vaccination of their employees. In late July, the Department of Veterans Affairs issued a vaccine mandate for all its frontline health care workers. A joint statement by nearly 60 major medical organizations called for mandatory vaccination of healthcare workers. Brown University's School of Public Health built a Hospital Vaccine Mandate Tracker to gather and list hospital systems that require their staff to be vaccinated. Many more institutions have announced that they will issue mandates once vaccines are formally approved by the U.S. FDA.

Download Full-text

The Impact of Healthcare Worker Influenza Vaccination on Nosocomial Influenza in a Tertiary Hospital: An Ecological Study

10.21203/rs.2.13528/v1 ◽

2019 ◽

Author(s):

Wycliffe Enli Wei ◽

Stephanie Fook-Chong ◽

Wen Kai Chen ◽

Maciej Piotr Chlebicki ◽

Wee Hoe Gan

Keyword(s):

Influenza Vaccination ◽

Healthcare Worker ◽

Healthcare Workers ◽

Ecological Study ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Vaccination Rate ◽

Incidence Rates ◽

Vaccination Rates ◽

The Impact

Abstract Background To protect hospitalized patients who are more susceptible to complications of influenza, seasonal influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCW) has been recommended internationally. However, its effectiveness is still being debated. To assess the effectiveness of HCW influenza vaccination, we performed an ecological study to evaluate the association between healthcare worker influenza vaccination and the incidence of nosocomial influenza in a tertiary hospital within Singapore between 2013-2018.Methods Nosocomial influenza was defined by influenza among inpatients diagnosed 7 days or more post-admission by laboratory testing, while healthcare worker influenza vaccination rate was defined as the proportion of healthcare workers that was vaccinated at the end of each annual seasonal vaccination exercise. A modified Poisson regression was performed to assess the association between the HCW vaccination rates and monthly nosocomial influenza incidence rates.Results Nosocomial influenza incidence rates followed the trend of non-nosocomial influenza, showing a predominant mid-year peak. Across 2,480,010 patient-days, there were 256 nosocomial influenza cases (1.03 per 10,000 patient-days). Controlling for background influenza activity and the number of influenza tests performed, 10% increase in vaccination coverage corresponded to 11% decrease in nosocomial influenza incidence rate (IRR 0.89, 95%CI:0.69-1.15, p =0.37).Conclusion We observed a negative association between influenza vaccination rates and nosocomial influenza incidence rates, although statistical significance was not reached. Aligning local HCW vaccine timing and formulation to that of the Southern Hemisphere may improve effectiveness. HCW vaccination remains important but demonstrating its effectiveness in preventing nosocomial influenza is challenging.

Download Full-text