scholarly journals Melanoma Arising after Imiquimod Use

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharad P. Paul

Imiquimod belongs to the class of 1H-imidazo-[4,5-c]quinolones—drugs originally developed as nucleoside analogues with the aim of finding new potential antiviral agents (Harrison et al., 1988). Indeed, Imiquimod was first released as treatment for genital warts before its actions against skin cancer were studied. Imiquimod is a relatively small sized molecule (Mr = 240.3) and is hydrophobic, allowing it to penetrate the skin epidermal barrier and therefore making it suitable for topical formulations (Gerster et al., 2005). Imiquimod has shown itself effective against skin cancers and precancerous lesions, especially basal cell cancers and actinic keratosis (Salasche et al., 2002, Beutner et al., 1999). There have been reports of Imiquimod being used as topical treatment against cutaneous metastases of melanoma and some authors have reported its use as first-line therapy against melanoma in situ (Smyth et al., 2011, Gagnon, 2011). We report a case of an invasive malignant melanoma arising de novo at the specific site of application of Imiquimod (Aldara cream 5%) for a biopsy-proven superficial BCC. Therefore while Imiquimod has added to our topical armamentarium against skin cancer, care must be exercised in prescribing this treatment and it is especially important to follow up patients regularly.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B Lamont ◽  
Andrew J Yee ◽  
Stuart L Goldberg ◽  
David S Siegel ◽  
Andrew D Norden

Abstract Genomic biomarkers inform treatment in multiple myeloma (MM) making patient clinical data a potential window into MM biology. We evaluated de novo MM patients for associations between specific MM cytogenetic patterns and prior cancer history. Analyzing a MM real-world dataset (RWD), we identified a cohort of 1,769 patients with fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) cytogenetic testing at diagnosis. Fully 241 patients (0.14) had histories of prior cancer(s). Amplification of the long arm of chromosome 1 [amp(1q)] varied by prior cancer history (0.31 with prior cancer vs 0.24 without; p = .02). No other MM translocations, amplifications, or deletions were associated with prior cancers. Amp(1q) and cancer history remained strongly associated in a logistic regression adjusting for patient demographic and disease attributes. The results merit follow-up regarding carcinogenic treatment effects and screening strategies for second malignancies. Broadly the findings suggest analyses of patient-level phenotypic-genomic RWD may accelerate cancer research through hypothesis generating studies.


Urology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 141 ◽  
pp. e51-e52
Author(s):  
Kevin Krughoff ◽  
Amichai Kilchevksy ◽  
Wayne Stadelmann ◽  
Timothy Gorman ◽  
Ramiro Madden-Fuentes

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1356-1356
Author(s):  
Xiaoxia Hu ◽  
Libing Wang ◽  
Lei Gao ◽  
Sheng Xu ◽  
Shenglan Gong ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is generally regarded as a stem cell disease, known as leukemic initiating cells (LIC), which initiate the disease and contribute to relapses. Although the phenotype of these cells remains unclear in most patients, they are enriched within CD34+CD38- compartment. In core binding factor (CBF) AML, the cytogenetic abnormablities are also existed in LIC. The aim of this study was to determine the prognostic power of minimal residual disease measured by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in flow sorted CD34+CD38- cells (FISH+CD34+CD38- population) at different period during the therapy. Thirty-six patients under 65 years of age with de novo CBF AML and treated with CHAML 2010 protocol were retrospectively included in this study. FISH efficiently identified the LICs (FISH+CD34+CD38-) in the CD34+CD38- population. The last follow-up was March 31, 2013, and the median follow-up was 336 days (range: 74-814 days). 33 patients with complete remission (CR) were eligible for the study, and 23 patients (23/33, 69.7%) with t (8;21) or AML1/ETO, and the remaining (10/33, 30.3%) with inv(16)/t(16;16) or CBFβ/MYH11. Flow-cytometry based FISH (F-FISH) procedure was performed at diagnosis, before every cycle of consolidation therapy, and every 3 months during follow-up. The FISH+ percentage at diagnosis constituting an average of 2.1% (range: 0.01%-27.5%) of the blast cells and 64.6% (range: 14%-87.8%) of the CD34+CD38- cells. Before the consolidation, FISH+CD34+CD38- population was detected in 13/33 (39.4%) patients. At this checkpoint, we have found the existence of FISH+CD34+CD38- population had prognostic value for the end points relapse free survival (RFS, 12% versus 68%, P=.008), and retained prognostic significance for RFS in multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the detection of FISH+CD34+CD38- before consolidation was found to be significantly associated with decreased OS. (11% versus 75%, P=.0005) Minimal residual disease (MRD) detected with F-FISH had a prognostic value at an earlier checkpoint when compared with flow cytometry and RT-PCR. Meanwhile, the concordance of flow cytomety, RT-PCR and F-FISH was investigated in the same patient cohort. 14 (70%) of 20 samples with detectable fusion transcripts by PCR did not have detectable leukemic cells by F-FISH. Therefore, the concordance for PCR and F-FISH was 63.7%. The concordance of FC and F-FISH was 64.3%: in 40 samples MRD was detected by both methods and in 61 samples MRD was ruled out by a negative result with the tests. With further analysis, the discrepancies among MRD detected with different MRD monitoring approaches before consolidation and after the first consolidation therapy contribute to 84% of the disconcordance. In summary, the detection of FISH+CD34+CD38- cells before consolidation therapy was significantly correlated with long-term survival in de novo CBF AML patients. F-FISH might be easily adopted as MRD monitor approach in clinical practice to identify patients at risk of treatment failure from the early stage during therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4772-4772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geffen Kleinstern ◽  
Abdul Rishi ◽  
Sara J Achenbach ◽  
Kari Rabe Chaffee ◽  
Neil E. Kay ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: It is well established that the incidence of skin cancers in patients with CLL are significantly elevated compared to age- and sex- matched controls. However, little is known about the characteristics of CLL patients who develop skin cancer. Herein, we evaluate the associations of CLL clinical and prognostic characteristics, along with UV radiation exposure, with risk of first skin cancer following CLL diagnosis. Methods: Newly diagnosed CLL patients from Minnesota, Iowa, and Wisconsin were enrolled in the Mayo Clinic case-control study from 2002-2015 and systematically followed in the Iowa/Mayo Lymphoma SPORE. Clinical and prognostic CLL data were obtained from the Mayo Clinic CLL database, and skin cancer clinical data were abstracted from medical records using a standard protocol. The CLL international prognostic index (CLL-IPI) was computed using a weighted average of five independent CLL prognostic factors (IGHV mutational status, serum b2-microglobulin, Rai stage, age, and FISH 17p deletion/TP53 status). Self-reported history of midday sun exposure at various ages (birth to age 12; 13 to 21 years; 22 to 40 years, and 41+ years) was obtained from a risk factor questionnaire. For each age, we asked the extent of mid-day sun as: practically no exposure (under 3 hours per week), little exposure (4-7 hours per week), moderate exposure (8 to 14 hours per week) and extensive exposure (15+ hours per week). Midday sun exposure was modeled as an ordinal covariate. To evaluate associations with risk of skin cancer following CLL diagnosis, we calculated time from date of CLL diagnosis to date of first skin cancer, death, or last known follow-up. We used Cox regression analysis to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. CLL treatment was considered a time-dependent covariate. Results: Among 846 CLL patients enrolled, the median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 28-91), 68% were male, 7% had Rai stage III-IV at diagnosis. Based on the CLL-IPI, 42% were categorized as low risk, 33% as intermediate risk, and 25% as high or very-high risk. 109 CLL cases (13%) had one or more reported skin cancers at or prior to CLL diagnosis. Melanoma was observed in 19 (2%) cases and non-melanoma was in 90 (11%) cases. At a median follow-up of 7 years from CLL diagnosis, 165 patients (20%) had one or more skin cancers after CLL diagnosis. Among these patients, 49 had skin cancer before CLL diagnosis. The most frequent skin cancer was squamous cell carcinoma (59%), followed by basal cell (31%), melanoma (5%), and Merkel cell (1%). 552 (65%) of the 846 patients returned a questionnaire. Significant associations of clinical and prognostic characteristics with risk of first skin cancer were observed for age (HR=1.35 per 10 year increase, 95% CI=1.17-1.56, P<0.001), male sex (HR=1.38, 95% CI 0.98-1.96, p=0.07), prior history of skin cancer (HR=4.19, 95% CI=2.98-5.88, P<0.001), and CLL-IPI (HR=1.26, 95% CI= 1.03-1.54, P=0.026, after adjusting for age, sex, and prior skin cancer). Of note, the risk of first skin cancer in those CLL patients categorized as very high via CLL-IPI had 2.28 fold risk (95% CI 1.02-5.11). Midday sun exposures for each of the ages considered showed no evidence of association with risk of first skin cancer (all P>0.05). 50 CLL patients were treated prior to first skin cancer following CLL diagnosis; we observed no evidence of association between treatment and risk of first skin cancer (HR=1.44, 95% CI= 0.93-1.92, P=0.12). Conclusion: CLL patients who are at an increased risk of skin cancer following CLL diagnosis are those who either have had a prior history of skin cancer or a more aggressive CLL disease at diagnosis, according to CLL IPI. Routine skin cancer screening is currently recommended for CLL patients. Our data suggest that more frequent screening would be particularly important among patients with aggressive CLL and who have a prior history of skin cancer. Unexpectedly, we found no evidence of association of skin cancer risk with UV radiation following CLL diagnosis or with CLL treatment. Further investigation is needed to determine whether other factors increase the risk of skin cancer following CLL diagnosis. Disclosures Shanafelt: Genentech: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithkKine: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Cephalon: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Hospira: Research Funding.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009
Author(s):  
B. Bonanni ◽  
B. Santillo ◽  
D. Serrano ◽  
U. Veronesi ◽  
M. Rosselli Del Turco ◽  
...  

1009 Background: HRT is beneficial on menopausal disturbancies and decreased bone fracture risk and colorectal cancer (CRC), but increased VTE, cardiovascular events and breast cancer in the WHI trial. However, the WHI characteristics (median age 63.3 yrs, median BMI 28.5, use of oral HRT) diminish generalization of results. The WHI trial shows an increased BC risk, only with oral combined HRT. HRT and tamoxifen (T) was safe in subgroups of two prevention trials. T at low doses showed antiproliferative effects similar to the standard dose, without significant menopausal symptoms and endometrial proliferation. Methods: The HRT+T combination is being investigated in a multicentric, phase III trial in current or de novo HRT users, randomized to either T 5 mg/day or placebo for 5 yrs. The primary endpoint is the reduction of invasive and in situ BC. Results: Of 5,032 women contacted, 1,989 refused, 1,109 were not eligible, and 1,806 were enrolled in 46 centres. Median age is 53 years (33–72). BMI is <20 in 65.7%, <25 in 26.3%, >25 in 8.0%. Current or de novo users are 80.1% and 19.9%. In the former group, 45.9% use oral and 54.1% use TTS. Hysterectomized women are 389. Current users ≤3 years are 48.0%, 3–5 years 12.1%, >5 years 18.8%. 1256 women (74.2%) have at least one follow-up visit. Compared to baseline, most frequent side effects were: hot flashes (42.0% vs 35.0%), night sweating (39.0% vs 29.0%), anxiety/depression (41.0% vs 27.4%), vaginal dryness (29.2% vs 19.3%), headache (32.1% vs 25.1%), fluid retention (24.0% vs 19.0%). “Drop-outs” are 17.3%, of which 11.2% due to adverse events (AE). The 35 AE include: 12 cancers (incl. 7 invasive BC’s, 1 DCIS, 1 CRC), 11 cardiovascular (incl. 1 stroke, 1 AMI, 2 VTE, 1 angina, 2 TIA), 2 gynecologic (uterine polyps). Conclusions: In spite of the current negative scenario for HRT, we have reached over 1,800 women on study. Compliance is acceptable and treatment appears safe. The rate of AE is far lower than the WHI trial, possibly as a result of the different population characteristics. These preliminary findings justify the carry-on of the study in order to reach enough power for the main endpoint and perform secondary evaluations. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 70-74
Author(s):  
Nurimar C. Fernandes ◽  
Flauberto de Sousa Marinho

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate discharge in a group of patients with cutaneous melanoma according to recently established criteria. METHODS: we conducted an observational, cross-sectional study with 32 patients at the Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho (HUCFF) / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), between 1995 and 2013, in the following stages: IA (17 cases, 53.12%), IB (4 cases, 12.5%), IIA (3 cases, 9.37%), IIC (1 case, 3.12%), IIIB (1 case, 3.12%), IIIC (3 cases, 9.37%), melanomas in situ (2 cases, 6.25%), Tx (1 case, 3.12%). RESULTS: the follow-up time varied from one to 20 years (stage IA), five to 15 years (stage IB), six to 17 years (stage IIA), 20 years (stage IIC), 23 years (stage IIIB) and 14 to 18 years (stage IIIC). One melanoma in situ (subungueal) was discharged in the fourth year of follow-up and the other was promptly discharged. The Tx melanoma was followed for 12 years. We observed no relapses or recurrences in the period. CONCLUSION: although a controversial issue, it was possible to endorse the discharge of the patients since our follow-up time had already exceeded the one recommended by the other authors.


2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 322-327
Author(s):  
Eimei Iwama ◽  
Taku Fujimura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Kusakari ◽  
Takahiro Haga ◽  
Setsuya Aiba

Melanoma is an aggressive skin cancer that originates from melanocytes, and about one half of melanoma cases possess a BRAF mutation. Together with PD-L1 expression, the BRAFV600E mutation is one of the optimal therapeutic targets for the treatment of melanoma. In this report, we describe a case of multifocal melanoma in situ on the foot, which carried the p.V600E mutation in the BRAF gene. Interestingly, the spotted melanoma lesion is demarcated by normal skin, and in all spotted pigmented lesions, there were no signs of dermal invasion of melanoma cells or spontaneous regression. Our case presented atypical clinical features, which might correlate with the local mutations of BRAF gene and the immunological expression of PD-L1.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2011-2011
Author(s):  
Jennifer Berano Teh ◽  
Farah Abdulla ◽  
Kelly Peng ◽  
Liezl Atencio ◽  
Alicia Gonzales ◽  
...  

Introduction: Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-related factors, such as total body irradiation (TBI) used for conditioning, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD), and prolonged exposure to calcineurin-inhibitors, can result in high risk for subsequent skin cancers in long-term survivors. Previous studies examining skin cancers after HCT have largely focused on patients transplanted in earlier eras (<2000), which may not be as informative for providers caring for survivors treated with contemporary conditioning (e.g. less myeloablative) approaches or GvHD treatment regimens, and do not account for newer stem cell sources (e.g. cord, haploidentical) with their evolving immunosuppression risk. Additionally, due to registry reporting, past studies have largely focused on melanoma, which underestimates the burden due to more common skin cancers such as squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). The current study describes the incidence and risk factors of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in a large contemporary cohort of HCT survivors. Methods: 2338 consecutive patients who underwent a first HCT between 2005 and 2014 at City of Hope (COH) and survived ≥1 year, were included in the study. Patients with a history of skin cancer prior to HCT were excluded from the cohort. All skin cancers were validated using pathology reports, and physician notes (20%) whenever the former was not available. Skin cancers included SCC, BCC, melanoma, atypical fibroxanthoma, and merkel cell carcinoma. Patients were followed from HCT to death, second HCT, last known alive date, or December 31, 2018, whichever occurred first. Cumulative incidence of skin cancer was estimated taking into consideration competing risk of death. Fine-Gray sub-distributional hazard regression was used to calculate hazard ratio (HR) estimates, adjusted for relevant covariates. Results: Median age at HCT was 51.8y (range: 0.7-78.7); 57.6% were male; 56.5% were non-Hispanic white (NHW); 4.4% had a history of Pre-HCT cancer (antecedent to primary diagnosis); 47.7% underwent allogeneic HCT; 22.0% received myeloablative TBI (≥1200 cGy)-based conditioning. Among survivors of allogeneic HCT, 57.2% developed ≥moderate chronic GvHD (84% involving the skin); the most common immunosuppressive agents used for the management of ≥moderate chronic GvHD were tacrolimus (84.6%), followed by sirolimus (76.5%), and cyclosporine (28.4%). Burden of skin cancer over time: 179 survivors developed a total of 450 skin cancers after HCT; median time from HCT to first skin cancer was 2.8 years (range: 0.2-13.6). SCC was the most common subtype (59.1%), followed by BCC (31.3%), melanoma (5.1%), and other (4.4%); 43.4% of patients with SCC had invasive or high grade disease at presentation. The cumulative incidence of de novo skin cancer after HCT was 8.3% at 5 years, and 14.8% at 10 years (figure). Eighty-nine patients with skin cancer had a second skin cancer at a median of 0.5 years (range: 0.2 to 7.2) from the first; 55.1% were of a different histology. The cumulative incidence of a second skin cancer was 41.9% at 5-years (figure). Risk factors: Multivariate analysis revealed male sex (HR=1.7, p=0.0008), NHW race/ethnicity (HR=9.0, p<0.0001), older age HCT (≥50years at HCT, HR=2.4, p<0.0001), allogeneic HCT (HR=2.2, p<0.0001), and a history non-skin cancer prior to HCT (HR=1.7, p=0.04) to be significant and independent predictors of post-HCT skin cancer risk. Among allogeneic HCT patients, neither severity of chronic GvHD, location (e.g. skin), nor duration of post-HCT immunosuppression were associated with risk of de novo skin cancer, irrespective of skin cancer histology. Conclusions: This study confirms the higher risk of skin cancer by sex, race/ethnicity, and age at HCT, and highlights the greater than two-fold risk of skin cancer among allogeneic HCT survivors compared to autologous patients, a finding that is not entirely explained by GvHD and its treatment. Further, we identified a previously unreported association between pre-HCT (non-skin) cancer and post-HCT cancer risk, and describe the very high burden of multiple histologically distinct skin cancers over time. Taken together, these data set form the basis for implementation of updated risk-based screening and prevention practices in survivors at highest risk of skin cancer after HCT. Disclosures Abdulla: Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Elorac: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Stemline: Research Funding; MiRagen: Research Funding; Bionz: Research Funding; Mallinckrodt: Research Funding; Mallinckrodt: Consultancy; Mallinckrodt: Speakers Bureau. Nakamura:Merck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan; Alexion: Other: support to a lecture at a Japan Society of Transfusion/Cellular Therapy meeting ; Kirin Kyowa: Other: support for an academic seminar in a university in Japan.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document