scholarly journals Minimizing ED Waiting Times and Improving Patient Flow and Experience of Care

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assaad Sayah ◽  
Loni Rogers ◽  
Karthik Devarajan ◽  
Lisa Kingsley-Rocker ◽  
Luis F. Lobon

We conducted a pre- and postintervention analysis to assess the impact of a process improvement project at the Cambridge Hospital ED. Through a comprehensive and collaborative process, we reengineered the emergency patient experience from arrival to departure. The ED operational changes have had a significant positive impact on all measured metrics. Ambulance diversion decreased from a mean of 148 hours per quarter before changes in July 2006 to 0 hours since April 2007. ED total length of stay decreased from a mean of 204 minutes before the changes to 132 minutes. Press Ganey patient satisfaction scores rose from the 12th percentile to the 59th percentile. ED patient volume grew by 11%, from a mean of 7,221 patients per quarter to 8,044 patients per quarter. Compliance with ED specific quality core measures improved from a mean of 71% to 97%. The mean rate of ED patients that left without being seen (LWBS) dropped from 4.1% to 0.9%. Improving ED operational efficiency allowed us to accommodate increasing volume while improving the quality of care and satisfaction of the ED patients with minimal additional resources, space, or staffing.

CJEM ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 455-461 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Ducharme ◽  
Robert J. Alder ◽  
Cindy Pelletier ◽  
Don Murray ◽  
Joshua Tepper

ABSTRACT Objective: We sought to assess the impact of the integration of the new roles of primary health care nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) on patient flow, wait times and proportions of patients who left without being seen in 6 Ontario emergency departments (EDs). Methods: We performed a retrospective review of health records data on patient arrival time, time of initial assessment by a physician, time of discharge from the ED and discharge status. Results: Whether a PA or NP was directly involved in the care of patients or indirectly involved by being on duty, the wait times, lengths of stay and proportion of patients who left without being seen were significantly reduced. When a PA or NP were directly involved in patients' care, patients were 1.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–2.1, p < 0.05) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.6–2.8, p < 0.05) times more likely to be seen within the wait time benchmarks, respectively. Lengths of stay were 30.3% (95% CI 21.6%–39.0%, p < 0.01) and 48.8% (95% CI 35.0%–62.7%, p < 0.01) lower when PAs and NPs, respectively, were involved. When PAs and NPs were not on duty, the proportion of patients who left without being seen were 44% (95% CI 31%–63%, p < 0.01) and 71% (95% CI 53%–96%, p < 0.05), respectively. Conclusion: The addition of PAs or NPs to the ED team can improve patient flow in medium-sized community hospital EDs. Given the ongoing shortage of physicians, use of alternative health care providers should be considered. These results require validation, as their generalizability to other locations or types of EDs is not known.


2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 1757-1773
Author(s):  
Elvan Gökalp

Accident and emergency departments (A&E) are the first place of contact for urgent and complex patients. These departments are subject to uncertainties due to the unplanned patient arrivals. After arrival to an A&E, patients are categorized by a triage nurse based on the urgency. The performance of an A&E is measured based on the number of patients waiting for more than a certain time to be treated. Due to the uncertainties affecting the patient flow, finding the optimum staff capacities while ensuring the performance targets is a complex problem. This paper proposes a robust-optimization based approximation for the patient waiting times in an A&E. We also develop a simulation optimization heuristic to solve this capacity planning problem. The performance of the approximation approach is then compared with that of the simulation optimization heuristic. Finally, the impact of model parameters on the performances of two approaches is investigated. The experiments show that the proposed approximation results in good enough solutions.


CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Gray ◽  
Christopher M.B. Fernandes ◽  
Kristine Van Aarsen ◽  
Melanie Columbus

AbstractObjectivesComputerized provider order entry (CPOE) has been established as a method to improve patient safety by avoiding medication errors; however, its effect on emergency department (ED) flow remains undefined. We examined the impact of CPOE implementation on three measures of ED throughput: wait time (WT), length of stay (LOS), and the proportion of patients that left without being seen (LWBS).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all ED patients of 18 years and older presenting to London Health Sciences Centre during July and August 2013 and 2014, before and after implementation of a CPOE system. The three primary variables were compared between time periods. Subgroup analyses were also conducted within each Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) level (1–5) individually, as well as for admitted patients only.ResultsA significant increase in WT of 5 minutes (p=0.036) and LOS of 10 minutes (p=0.001), and an increase in LWBS from 7.2% to 8.1% (p=0.002) was seen after CPOE implementation. Admitted patients’ LOS increased by 63 minutes (p<0.001), the WT of CTAS 3 and 5 patients increased by 6 minutes (p=0.001) and 39 minutes (p=0.005), and LWBS proportion increased significantly for CTAS 3–5 patients, from 24.3% to 42.0% (p<0.001) for CTAS 5 patients specifically.ConclusionsCPOE implementation detrimentally impacted all patient flow throughput measures that we examined. The most striking clinically relevant result was the increase in LOS of 63 minutes for admitted patients. This raises the question as to whether the potential detrimental effects to patient safety of CPOE implementation outweigh its benefits.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina Dalbosco Gadenz ◽  
Josué Basso ◽  
Patrícia Roberta Berithe Pedrosa de Oliviera ◽  
Stephan Sperling ◽  
Marcus Vinicius Dutra Zuanazzi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Management of patient flow within a healthcare network, allowing equitable and qualified access to healthcare, is a major challenge for universal health systems. Implementation of telehealth strategies to support referral management has been shown to increase primary care resolution and to promote coordination of care. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of telehealth strategies on waiting lists and waiting times for specialized care in Brazil. Methods Before-and-after study with measures obtained between January 2019 and February 2020. Baseline measurements of waiting lists were obtained immediately before the implementation of a remotely operated referral management system. Post-interventional measurements were obtained monthly, up to six months after the beginning of operation. Data was extracted from the database of the project. General linear models were applied to assess interaction of locality and time over number of cases on waiting lists and waiting times. Results At baseline, the median number of cases on waiting lists ranged from 2961 to 12,305 cases. Reductions of the number of cases on waiting lists after six months of operation were observed in all localities. The magnitude of the reduction ranged from 54.67 to 88.97 %. Interaction of time measurements was statistically significant from the second month onward. Median waiting times ranged from 159 to 241 days at baseline. After six months, there was a decrease of 100 and 114 waiting days in two localities, respectively, with reduction of waiting times only for high-risk cases in the third locality. Conclusions Adoption of telehealth strategies resulted in the reduction of number of cases on waiting lists. Results were consistent across localities, suggesting that telehealth interventions are viable in diverse settings.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 116-116
Author(s):  
Louise Bedard ◽  
Jennifer J. Griggs

116 Background: The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between the introduction of value-based payment, the initiation of a quality improvement project, and practices’ performance to refer or administer tobacco cessation counseling to patients. Methods: The Michigan Oncology Quality Consortium (MOQC) is a statewide quality collaborative sponsored by Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Michigan (BCBSM). MOQC uses ASCO's Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) for measurement.Value-based payment (VBP) was introduced in 2017 by BCBSM. The VBP is achieved if a region reaches a target established for four QOPI measures. One of the four quality measures is QOPI's core measure 22bb: tobacco cessation counseling administered or patient referred. At the time the VBP was introduced, a subset of MOQC practices chose to initiate a quality project to improve performance on this measure. Analyses describes the performance of all MOQC practices with the introduction of the VBP, and performance of the practices who chose to revise their tobacco cessation processes to address performance. Results: The proportion of patients who were administered or referred to tobacco cessation services in participating MOQC practices was 49% (n = 793 charts) from abstracted rounds Spring 2014 - 2017. After the introduction of VBP, this proportion increased to 58% (n = 307 charts) in Fall 2017. Performance improved on this QOPI measure for both subsets of MOQC practices - those practices that chose to initiate a quality project focused on this measure (n = 19) and practices that selected another measure (n = 27). Practices that developed a quality project improved their aggregate proportion from 46% (Spring 2014-2017, n = 839 charts) to 51% (Fall 2017, n = 266 charts). Practices that focused on another quality measure improved from 51% (Spring 2014-2017, n = 789 charts) to 65% (Fall 2017, n = 265 charts). Conclusions: Our data suggest that the presence of VBP may have had a positive impact on referral patterns for tobacco cessation services for cancer patients. Additional analyses are required to determine if there is a combination or sequencing of VBP and process improvement strategies to optimize the delivery of quality care.


CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 96-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander K. Leung ◽  
Shawn D. Whatley ◽  
Dechang Gao ◽  
Marko Duic

AbstractObjectiveTo study the operational impact of process improvements on emergency department (ED) patient flow. The changes did not require any increase in resources or expenditures.MethodsThis was a 36-month pre- and post-intervention study to evaluate the effect of implementing process improvements at a community ED from January 2010 to December 2012. The intervention comprised streamlining triage by having patients accepted into internal waiting areas immediately after triage. Within the ED, parallel processes unfolded, and there was no restriction on when registration occurred or which health care provider a patient saw first. Flexible nursing ratios allowed nursing staff to redeploy and move to areas of highest demand. Last, demand-based physician scheduling was implemented. The main outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included time to physician initial assessment (PIA), left-without-being-seen (LWBS) rates, and left-against-medical-advice (LAMA) rates. Segmented regression of interrupted time series analysis was performed to quantify the impact of the intervention, and whether it was sustained.ResultsPatients totalling 251,899 attended the ED during the study period. Daily patient volumes increased 17.3% during the post-intervention period. Post-intervention, mean LOS decreased by 0.64 hours (p<0.005). LOS for non-admitted Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale 2 (-0.58 hours, p<0.005), 3 (-0.75 hours, p<0.005), and 4 (-0.32 hours, p<0.005) patients also decreased. There were reductions in PIA (43.81 minutes, p<0.005), LWBS (35.2%, p<0.005), and LAMA (61.9%, p<0.005).ConclusionA combination of process improvements in the ED was associated with clinically significant reductions in LOS, PIA, LWBS, and LAMA for non-resuscitative patients.


2021 ◽  
pp. 089801012110374
Author(s):  
Patty Magee ◽  
Diane Raines

A Caring Arts Program (CAP) was inspired and carried out by the vision of an in-resident nurse-artist and the chief nursing officer in a private, not-for-profit health system. Together they envisioned a program that would impact family, patients, and staff while improving patient/family care practices. The impact of the CAP was evaluated through mixed methods which included stories, fieldnotes, comments, and the Listen360(R) which rates patient satisfaction scores. The synergy between the evaluations and the attempt to understand what creates patient satisfaction using creative arts was a prime objective of this article. The qualitative results represented by field notes and written patient comments revealed a positive impact on participants. The quantitative results demonstrated an improvement in patient satisfaction scores during the time of the project. The positive trend in the scores combined with the qualitative stories and interviews suggests that the CAP contributed to the improvement in patient satisfaction at Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center. During a worldwide pandemic, supporting human caring and self-expression was more critical than ever.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e000542 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra von Guionneau ◽  
Charlotte M Burford

BackgroundLong waiting times in accident and emergency (A&E) departments remain one of the largest barriers to the timely assessment of critically unwell patients. In order to reduce the burden on A&Es, some trusts have introduced ambulatory care areas (ACAs) which provide acute assessment for general practitioner referrals. However, ACAs are often based on already busy acute medical wards and the availability of clinical space for clerking patients means that these patients often face long waiting times too. A cheap and sustainable method to reducing waiting times is to evaluate current space utilisation with the view to making use of underutilised workspace. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve accessibility to pre-existing clinical spaces, and in doing so, reduce waiting times in acute admissions.MethodsData were collected retrospectively from electronic systems and used to establish a baseline wait time from arrival to having blood taken (primary outcome). Quality improvement methods were used to identify potential implementations to reduce waiting time, by increasing access to clinical space, with serial measurements of the primary outcome being used to monitor change.ResultsData were collected over 54 consecutive days. The median wait time increased by 55 min during the project period. However, this difference in waiting time was not deemed significant between the three PDSA cycles (p=0.419, p=0.270 and p=0.350, Mann-Whitney U). Run chart analysis confirmed no significant changes occurred.ConclusionIn acute services, one limiting factor to seeing patients quickly is room availability. Quality improvement projects, such as this, should consider facilitating better use of available space and creating new clinical workspaces. This offers the possibility of reducing waiting times for both staff and patients alike. We recommend future projects focus efforts on integration of their interventions to generate significant improvements.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e001179
Author(s):  
Ahmed Elkholi ◽  
Huda Althobiti ◽  
Jamal Al Nofeye ◽  
Mohamed Hasan ◽  
Ahmed Ibrahim

Long waiting times in the emergency department (ED) are associated with decreased patient satisfaction and increased morbidity and mortality. Triage may be a contributing factor to prolonged wait times in the ED. At Alhada Armed Forces Hospital (Taif, Saudi Arabia), patients other than level 1 and 2 on the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale are requested to wait until triage. During peak hours (08:00−22:00), the waiting time prior to triage is prolonged, and several patients leave the ED before triage. In this project, a multidisciplinary team was assembled to revise patient flow from the time of arrival at the ED to the time of triage. Lean methodology was used to identify the redundancies and design a seamless flow process for ED patients. Through reorganising the triage area using minimal additional resources, the project team devised a novel floor plan for the triage area which provided a unique patient flow in the ED. The median patient wait time from arrival to triage was reduced from 27 min to 4.09 min and the percentage of patients leaving the ER before triage was reduced to 0%. This project is the first of its kind in Saudi Arabia, as well as in the Gulf region, and provides a radical solution to the problem of patient waiting in the ED during peak hours.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G Gordon ◽  
A Fadulelmola ◽  
S Scott

Abstract Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has seen fundamental organisational changes to emergency departments internationally. Specialties throughout the hospital setting have been asked to change their working practice, often with the aim of adapting to new processes in emergency departments. Early in the pandemic, the orthopaedic team at one district general hospital were required to provide 24/7 onsite cover in a multi-specialty area. Confusion over the referral pathways of two specialties (orthopaedics and plastic surgery) led to increase waiting times, constrained patient flow and poor patient and staff satisfaction. Method This quality improvement project occurred over three cycles of data collection and intervention over a two-month period. A novel referral pathway was developed and implemented after discussion with consultants in orthopaedics, plastics, and emergency medicine. Interventions included staff teaching, clarifying of roles at morning meetings and the deployment of posters. Results In cycle 1, 39% of orthopaedic referrals were inappropriately referred. By cycle 3, 0% of orthopaedic patients were inappropriately referred. Average time in department for patients referred to orthopaedics improved from 124 minutes to 88 minutes. Staff reported increased satisfaction, with appreciation for the clarification on referral criteria. Conclusions This QUIP demonstrates how simple interventions during times of crisis can solve complex organisational issues.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document