scholarly journals Poorly Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor of the Rectum Coexistent with Giant Rectal Villous Adenoma Presenting as McKittrick-Wheelock Syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sammy G. Nakhla ◽  
Traci T. Murakami ◽  
Srinath Sundararajan

McKittrick-Wheelock Syndrome is a rare disorder, noted for electrolyte and fluid depletion caused by secretory colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. We report here the first reported case of a 55-year-old man with a large rectal villous adenoma coexistent with a poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumor of rectum presenting with McKittrick-Wheelock Syndrome. Palliative chemotherapy resulted in complete resolution of symptoms and improved quality of life.

2021 ◽  
pp. 030157422110234
Author(s):  
Mohamed Iqbal J

Huntington’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disease characterized by motor, cognitive, and psychiatric symptoms. Dystonia of muscles is a characteristic feature of this condition. A case of Huntington’s disease, with orofacial dystonia, leading to severe uncontrolled biting of the lips, was referred by the Department of Neurology. Deep traumatic ulcerations were found in both upper and lower lips. A simple Essix retainer was fabricated and inserted, which acted as a barrier for the teeth from injuring the lips. The ulcers showed complete resolution in 3 to 4 weeks. The vacuum-formed retainers resulted in a good fit and resisted removal by the uncontrolled contortions of the orofacial muscles. The Essix retainer can be effectively used in improving the quality of life of patients, with Huntington’s disease, having such dystonia-related injuries to lips.


2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. A430
Author(s):  
L.M. Wintner ◽  
A. Zabernigg ◽  
J.M. Giesinger ◽  
M. Sztankay ◽  
K. Gattringer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elham Akhlaghi ◽  
Rebecca H. Lehto ◽  
Mohsen Torabikhah ◽  
Hamid Sharif Nia ◽  
Ahmad Taheri ◽  
...  

Abstract Background When curative treatments are no longer available for cancer patients, the aim of treatment is palliative. The emphasis of palliative care is on optimizing quality of life and provided support for patients nearing end of life. However, chemotherapy is often offered as a palliative therapy for patients with advanced cancer nearing death. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the state of the science relative to use of palliative chemotherapy and maintenance of quality of life in patients with advanced cancer who were at end of life. Materials and methods Published research from January 2010 to December 2019 was reviewed using PRISMA guidelines using PubMed, Proquest, ISI web of science, Science Direct, and Scopus databases. MeSH keywords including quality of life, health related quality of life, cancer chemotherapy, drug therapy, end of life care, palliative care, palliative therapy, and palliative treatment. Findings 13 studies were evaluated based on inclusion criteria. Most of these studies identified that reduced quality of life was associated with receipt of palliative chemotherapy in patients with advanced cancer at the end of life. Conclusion Studies have primarily been conducted in European and American countries. Cultural background of patients may impact quality of life at end of life. More research is needed in developing countries including Mideastern and Asian countries.


2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1056-1062 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. B. Detmar ◽  
M. J. Muller ◽  
J. H. Schornagel ◽  
L. D.V. Wever ◽  
N. K. Aaronson

PURPOSE: To determine the frequency with which health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) considerations lead to modification or discontinuation of palliative chemotherapy, and the association between physicians’ ratings of patients’ HRQL and such treatment decisions. METHODS: Four consecutive medical consultations of 203 patients receiving outpatient palliative chemotherapy were tape-recorded and the content was analyzed to determine the frequency of and reasons for treatment alterations. Physicians rated their patients’ HRQL by using the COOP/WONCA health assessment charts. Data on tumor response and treatment toxicity were obtained from the audiotapes and, when necessary, were confirmed by medical chart audits. RESULTS: Treatment was modified in 54 cases (26%) and discontinued in 40 (20%). The primary reasons for modifying treatment were toxicity (n = 22), HRQL considerations (n = 18), and tumor progression (n = 14). The primary reasons for discontinuation of treatment were tumor progression (n = 23), HRQL considerations (n = 6), and toxicity (n = 3). For eight patients, a combination of tumor progression and HRQL issues resulted in discontinuation of treatment. Treatment decisions were associated significantly with physicians’ global ratings of patients’ HRQL but not with more specific HRQL domains. In the presence of tumor progression or serious toxicity, HRQL considerations played little or no role in treatment decisions. Furthermore, approximately 70% of patients without evidence of tumor progression or toxicity, but with seriously impaired HRQL, continued to receive their treatment as planned. CONCLUSION: Contrary to previous findings based on physicians’ self-report data, HRQL considerations seem to play a relatively minor role in decisions regarding modification or discontinuation of palliative chemotherapy.


2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 1266-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Doyle ◽  
Michael Crump ◽  
Melania Pintilie ◽  
Amit M. Oza

PURPOSE: The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can $12,500. CONCLUSION: Patient expectations from these treatments are often unrealistic. Although objective responses are low, active palliation with chemotherapy is associated with substantive improvement in patients’ emotional function and global QL, with overall costs that seem relatively modest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document