scholarly journals Optimizing Negotiation Conflict in the Cloud Service Negotiation Framework Using Probabilistic Decision Making Model

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajkumar Rajavel ◽  
Mala Thangarathinam

Optimization of negotiation conflict in the cloud service negotiation framework is identified as one of the major challenging issues. This negotiation conflict occurs during the bilateral negotiation process between the participants due to the misperception, aggressive behavior, and uncertain preferences and goals about their opponents. Existing research work focuses on the prerequest context of negotiation conflict optimization by grouping similar negotiation pairs using distance, binary, context-dependent, and fuzzy similarity approaches. For some extent, these approaches can maximize the success rate and minimize the communication overhead among the participants. To further optimize the success rate and communication overhead, the proposed research work introduces a novel probabilistic decision making model for optimizing the negotiation conflict in the long-term negotiation context. This decision model formulates the problem of managing different types of negotiation conflict that occurs during negotiation process as a multistage Markov decision problem. At each stage of negotiation process, the proposed decision model generates the heuristic decision based on the past negotiation state information without causing any break-off among the participants. In addition, this heuristic decision using the stochastic decision tree scenario can maximize the revenue among the participants available in the cloud service negotiation framework.

Author(s):  
Rajkumar Rajavel ◽  
Sathish Kumar Ravichandran ◽  
G. R. Kanagachidambaresan

Challenges and issues in the field of cloud service negotiation framework optimization have been an active area of research. During service level agreement, the probability of negotiation conflict between the service consumers and providers is high. This may arise due to aggressive behavior, selfish misperception, vague preferences and uncertain goals of the negotiating participants. One of the key challenges identified in negotiation framework is optimizing the negotiation conflict among the negotiators. In order to minimize such conflicts, existing frameworks group the negotiation pairs that contain similar and non-aggressive behavioral patterns by exploiting the distance, binary, context dependent and fuzzy similarity approaches. These approaches get better success rate only if the dimensionality of negotiator attributes is low. As emerging real-time cloud service negotiation applications are characterized by negotiation attributes of high dimensionality, the existing approaches are inappropriate for these applications. In addition, the existing approaches group the negotiation pairs using distances based measure in two-dimensional negotiation attribute, whose value will vary for high-dimensional attributes. In this work, an Angle-based Similarity Grouping (ASG) approach is proposed that appropriately groups the highly cooperative negotiation pairs and thereby increases the success rate and decreases communication overhead.


2019 ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
Duong Truong Thi Thuy ◽  
Anh Pham Thi Hoang

Banking has always played an important role in the economy because of its effects on individuals as well as on the economy. In the process of renovation and modernization of the country, the system of commercial banks has changed dramatically. Business models and services have become more diversified. Therefore, the performance of commercial banks is always attracting the attention of managers, supervisors, banks and customers. Bank ranking can be viewed as a multi-criteria decision model. This article uses the technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method to rank some commercial banks in Vietnam.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (12) ◽  
pp. 1134-1153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiashuang Fan ◽  
Suihuai Yu ◽  
Jianjie Chu ◽  
Fangmin Cheng ◽  
Hao Fan ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jose Leao E Silva Filho ◽  
Danielle Costa Morais

This paper presents a group decision-making model using a distance aggregator based on Ordered Weighted Distance (OWD) which offers a solution that can reduce disagreement between decision makers (DMs). This paper discusses decision rules and sets out measures to evaluate compensatory effects that have a bearing on DMs’ opinions. The model uses formulations of distances to reveal the differences in opinion among DMs and discusses the meanings of distance and the information presented by each DM. Finally, a case study of a logistics problem is used to illustrate how the model is applied.


Author(s):  
I. J. PEREZ ◽  
F. J. CABRERIZO ◽  
E. HERRERA-VIEDMA

The aim of this paper is to present a new mobile group decision making model to deal with heterogeneous information and changeable decision contexts. This model takes into account that experts have different backgrounds and knowledge levels, allowing to use different preference representations as fuzzy preference relations or linguistic preference relations with multigranular linguistic information. Furthermore, we allow to introduce some changes on the alternatives of the problem at every stage of the decision process. To do that: i) a mobile implementation is proposed to reduce the number of changes and ii) a mechanism to insert/remove alternatives is included in the model. Finally, our new decision model incorporates a feedback mechanism that sends recommendations to the experts in order to quickly obtain a high consensus level.


2011 ◽  
Vol 201-203 ◽  
pp. 1268-1271
Author(s):  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Qiu Shuang Song

The coal plough equipment of traditional choice method has subjective capriciousness question, This paper discuss and analyze the assessment of mining method by entropy value law and gray connection theory, carries on the quantification recursive operation according to the normalizing formula, calculates all levels of membership function separately, it has established the coal plough way gray connection decision-making model. we research and analyze Yangquan coal mining to prove the model, it provide Selection of coal plough decision-making method.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chandramouli Chandrasekaran ◽  
Guy E. Hawkins

AbstractDecision-making is the process of choosing and performing actions in response to sensory cues so as to achieve behavioral goals. A sophisticated research effort has led to the development of many mathematical models to describe the response time (RT) distributions and choice behavior of observers performing decision-making tasks. However, relatively few researchers use these models because it demands expertise in various numerical, statistical, and software techniques. Although some of these problems have been surmounted in existing software packages, the packages have often focused on the classical decision-making model, the diffusion decision model. Recent theoretical advances in decision-making that posit roles for “urgency”, time-varying decision thresholds, noise in various aspects of the decision-formation process or low pass filtering of sensory evidence, have proven to be challenging to incorporate in a coherent software framework that permits quantitative evaluations among these competing classes of decision-making models. Here, we present a toolbox —Choices and Response Times in R, orCHaRTr— that provides the user the ability to implement and test a wide variety of decision-making models ranging from classic through to modern versions of the diffusion decision model, to models with urgency signals, or collapsing boundaries. Earlier versions ofCHaRTrhave been instrumental in a number of recent studies of humans and monkeys performing perceptual decision-making tasks. We also provide guidance on how to extend the toolbox to incorporate future developments in decision-making models.


2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 339-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shankar Chakraborty ◽  
Ankan Mitra

Purpose The purpose of this paper is thus to develop a hybrid decision-making model for optimal coal blending strategy. Coal is one of the major resources contributing to generation of electricity and anthropogenic carbon-dioxide emission. Being formed from dead plant matter, it undergoes a series of morphological changes from peat to lignite, and finally to anthracite. Because of non-uniform distribution of coal over the whole earth and continuous variation in its compositions, coals mined from different parts of the world have widely varying properties. Hence, it requires an ideal blending strategy such that the coking coal having the optimal combination of all of its properties can be used for maximum benefit to the steel making process. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, a multi-criteria decision-making approach is proposed while integrating preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE II and V) and geometrical analysis for interactive aid (GAIA) method to aid in formulating an optimal coal blending strategy. The optimal decision is arrived at while taking into account some practical implications associated with blending of coal, such as coal price from different reserves. Findings Different grades of coal are ranked from the best to the worst to find out the composition of constituent coals in the final blending process. Coals from the mines of two different geographical regions are considered here so as to prove the applicability of the proposed model. Adoption of this hybrid decision-making model would subsequently improve the performance of coal after blending and help in addressing some sustainability issues, like less pollution. Originality/value As this model takes into account the purchase price of coals from different reserves, it is always expected to provide more realistic solutions. Thus, it would be beneficial to deploy this decision-making model to different blending optimization problems in other spheres of a manufacturing industry. This model can further accommodate some more realistic criteria, such as availability of coal in different reserves as a topic of future research work.


2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dinh Xuan Cuong ◽  
Hoang Thi Hien ◽  
Tran Long

The commercial banks (CBs) performance evaluating has been a necessary problem in currently integration trend and usually implemented by a committee of experts under criteria selected. Therefore, it is considered as a Multi - Criteria Decision - Making model (MCDM). Nowadays, there have been many researches proposing various standards and models to evaluate and rank CBs. But in Vietnam, the number of studies related to the Vietnamese banking evaluation model have still been limited. As a result, this study develops a multi-criteria decision model integrating Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Fuzzy the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (FTOPSIS). The proposed model has evaluated and ranked five Vietnamese commercial banks including CTG, VCB, BIDV, TCB and MB. The paper revealed their ranks. Besides, the results of the research show that the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model is suitable for applying it to the process evaluating bank performance.


2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 656-669
Author(s):  
David W. Mealia

This article describes a macro/micro decision making model designed to aid the T/D specialist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document