scholarly journals Gestational Weight Gain: Results from the Delta Healthy Sprouts Comparative Impact Trial

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Thomson ◽  
Lisa M. Tussing-Humphreys ◽  
Melissa H. Goodman ◽  
Sarah E. Olender

Introduction. Delta Healthy Sprouts trial was designed to test the comparative impact of two home visiting programs on weight status, dietary intake, and health behaviors of Southern African American women and their infants. Results pertaining to the primary outcome, gestational weight gain, are reported.Methods. Participants (n=82), enrolled early in their second trimester of pregnancy, were randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms. Gestational weight gain, measured at six monthly home visits, was calculated by subtracting measured weight at each visit from self-reported prepregnancy weight. Weight gain was classified as under, within, or exceeding the Institute of Medicine recommendations based on prepregnancy body mass index. Chi-square tests and generalized linear mixed models were used to test for significant differences in percentages of participants within recommended weight gain ranges.Results. Differences in percentages of participants within the gestational weight gain guidelines were not significant between treatment arms across all visits.Conclusions. Enhancing the gestational nutrition and physical activity components of an existing home visiting program is feasible in a high risk population of primarily low income African American women. The impact of these enhancements on appropriate gestational weight gain is questionable given the more basic living needs of such women. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.govNCT01746394, registered 4 December 2012.

Epidemiology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 243-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren A. Wise ◽  
Julie R. Palmer ◽  
Linda J. Heffner ◽  
Lynn Rosenberg

Obesity ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon J. Herring ◽  
Jane F. Cruice ◽  
Gary G. Bennett ◽  
Marisa Z. Rose ◽  
Adam Davey ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 779-787 ◽  
Author(s):  
Delia Smith West ◽  
Paul G. Greene ◽  
Polly P. Kratt ◽  
Leavonne Pulley ◽  
Heidi L. Weiss ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. 1837-1843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon J. Herring ◽  
Tasmia Q. Henry ◽  
Alicia A. Klotz ◽  
Gary D. Foster ◽  
Robert C. Whitaker

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 374-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Seaton Banerjee ◽  
Sharon J. Herring ◽  
Katelyn E. Hurley ◽  
Katherine Puskarz ◽  
Kyle Yebernetsky ◽  
...  

Purpose: Low-income, African American women are disproportionately impacted by obesity. Little is known about the interactions between low-income, African American women who successfully lost weight and their primary care physicians (PCPs). Design: Mixed methods, positive deviance study. Setting: Urban university-based family medicine practice. Participants: The positive deviance group comprised low-income, African American women who were obese, lost 10% body weight, and maintained this loss for 6 months. Measures: The PCP- and patient-reported weight-related variables collected through the electronic medical record (EMR), surveys, and interviews. Analysis: Logistic regression of quantitative variables. Qualitative analysis using modified grounded theory. Results: The EMR documentation by PCPs of dietary counseling and a weight-related medical problem were significant predictors of positive deviant group membership. Qualitative analyses of interviews revealed 5 major themes: framing obesity in the context of other health problems provided motivation; having a full discussion around weight management was important; an ongoing relationship with the physician was valuable; celebrating small successes was beneficial; and advice was helpful but self-motivation was necessary. Conclusion: The PCP counseling may be an important factor in promoting weight loss in low-income, African American women. Patients may benefit from their PCPs drawing connections between obesity and weight-related medical conditions and enhancing intrinsic motivation for weight loss.


2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Meng ◽  
Susan W. Groth ◽  
Patricia Stewart ◽  
Joyce A. Smith

Background: Excessive gestational weight gain (GWG) has a long-term impact on women’s body weight and contributes to the development of obesity in the mother and her child. Many risk factors for GWG have been identified, but to date, only 6–33.8% of the variance in GWG has been explained. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall variance of GWG that can be explained by including weight-adjusted resting metabolic rate (aRMR) and a genetic risk score constructed on obesity-related genes in addition to sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Methods: In this observational study involving 55 African American women, data collected/measured during pregnancy included sociodemographic factors, medical information, lifestyle factors, aRMR, and seven obesity-related genes. Multivariable linear regression was performed to evaluate the variance in GWG explained by the potential risk factors listed above. Results: The mean GWG was 15 kg (±7.5 kg), and 63.6% of women gained more than the Institute of Medicine’s GWG recommendations. The final regression model explained 53.3% of the variance in GWG. Higher genetic risk score, lower aRMR, and higher dietary intake of total energy and percentage of fat were significantly associated with increased GWG ( p < .05). These factors explained 18% additional variance in GWG over that explained by significant sociodemographic and lifestyle factors in the analysis (i.e., maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index, parity, illegal drug use, and education). Conclusion: Overall, our results indicate that the genetic risk score, aRMR, and dietary intake have a substantial impact on GWG in African American women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document