scholarly journals Effect of Prophylactic Antifungal Protocols on the Prognosis of Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching and Multistate Model Approach

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-Chan Chen ◽  
Ting-Shuo Huang ◽  
Yu-Chao Wang ◽  
Chih-Hsien Cheng ◽  
Chen-Fang Lee ◽  
...  

Background. Whether routine antifungal prophylaxis decreases posttransplantation fungal infections in patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis for patients receiving OLT.Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of a database at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. We have been administering routine antibiotic and prophylactic antifungal regimens to recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease scores (>20) since 2009. After propensity score matching, 402 patients were enrolled. We conducted a multistate model to analyze the cumulative hazards, probability of fungal infections, and risk factors.Results. The cumulative hazards and transition probability of “transplantation to fungal infection” were lower in the prophylaxis group. The incidence rate of fungal infection after OLT decreased from 18.9% to 11.4% (p=0.052); overall mortality improved from 40.8% to 23.4% (p<0.001). In the “transplantation to fungal infection” transition, prophylaxis was significantly associated with reduced hazards for fungal infection (hazard ratio: 0.57, 95% confidence interval: 0.34–0.96,p=0.033). Massive ascites, cadaver transplantation, and older age were significantly associated with higher risks for mortality.Conclusion. Prophylactic antifungal regimens in high-risk recipients might decrease the incidence of posttransplant fungal infections.

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshimi Kaido ◽  
Satoshi Morita ◽  
Sachiko Tanaka ◽  
Kohei Ogawa ◽  
Akira Mori ◽  
...  

Hepatic resection (HR) and liver transplantation (LT) are surgical treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, it is clinically impossible to perform a randomized, controlled study to determine the usefulness of these treatments. The present study compared survival rates and recurrence rates of HR versus living donor LT (LDLT) for HCC by using the propensity score method. Between January 1999 and August 2012, 936 patients (732 HR, 204 LDLT) underwent surgical therapy for HCC in our center. Using the propensity score matching, 80 well-balanced patients were defined. The 1- and 5-year overall survival rates were 90% and 53% in the HR group and 82% and 63% in the LT group, respectively. They were not significantly different between the two groups. The odds ratio estimated using the propensity score matching analysis was 0.842 (P=0.613). The 1- and 5-year recurrence rates were significantly lower in the LT group (9% and 21%) than in the HR group (43% and 74%) (P<0.001), and the odds ratio was 0.214 (P=0.001). In conclusion, HR should be considered a valid alternative to LDLT taking into consideration the risk for the living donor based on the results of this propensity score-matching study.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Moghniuddin Mohammed ◽  
Amit Noheria ◽  
Seth Sheldon ◽  
Madhu Reddy

Introduction: End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased complications due to oral anticoagulation (OAC) use for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is indicated for patients who cannot tolerate or prefer not to use OAC but the outcomes of LAAO in ESRD has not been well studied. Methods: Using National Readmission Database January 2016-December 2017, we identified all adult AF patients who had LAAO performed in the months of January to November with no missing length of stay and/or mortality information. We excluded patients who had ablation, device implantation/revision, other form of LAAO and/or coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed during index hospitalization. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed for patients with and without ESRD based on variables shown in Table 1. The main outcome of interest was early mortality defined as mortality of index hospitalization or 30-day readmissions and index hospital complications. Results: A total of 13,790 procedures were included and of these 370 patients had history of ESRD. The baseline characteristics before and after matching are shown in table 1. After propensity score matching, ESRD group was associated with significantly higher early mortality, 30-day readmissions, systemic embolism and pericardial complications (Table 2). In the matched cohort, none of the patients had postprocedural cerebrovascular accident, transient ischemic attack, device thrombosis and device embolization. After propensity matching 2 (0.5%) developed acute kidney injury requiring hemodialysis. Conclusions: ESRD is associated with higher LOS, index hospital complications and early mortality from LAAO compared to patients without ESRD. Further studies comparing outcomes between OAC use and LAAO are warranted.


2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Buckman ◽  
Luis A. Fernandez

Fungal infections remain an important cause of morbidity and mortality in surgical settings, with critically ill patients, transplant patients, and sick neonates all being especially vulnerable. Over the past few decades, technological and scientific advancements have improved physicians’ ability to sustain life in critically ill patients, developments in chemotherapeutics and immune-based therapies have yielded increased survival for many cancer patients, organ transplantation has evolved dramatically, and the use of invasive therapies has increased markedly. With these changes has come an increase in the incidence of serious Candida infections, as well as an increase in the less common but potentially fatal noncandidal infections caused by Aspergillus and the Zygomycetes Mucor and Rhizopus. Antifungal prophylaxis has emerged as a potential means of reducing the occurrence of serious fungal infections. This review covers fungal colonization versus infection, types of fungal infection, epidemiology and risk factors, clinical evaluation, investigative studies, management of acute candidemia and acute disseminated candidiasis, management of nonhematogenous candidiasis, peritonitis and intra-abdominal abscess, management of other fungal infections (Aspergillus, Cryptococcus, Mucor, Rhizopusi), systemic antifungal agents, and the pathogenesis of Candida infection. Tables describe the clinical presentation and diagnostic methods for common fungal infections, antimicrobial agents of choice for candida infections, antifungal chemotherapy, and characteristics of currently available antifungals. Figures show Candida endophthalmitis; superficial candidiasis; biopsy samples of chronic progressive disseminated histoplasmosis and thick-walled, broad-based budding yeasts typical for Blastomyces dermatitidis; and the various forms of Candida. Algorithms demonstrate the approach to the surgical patient at risk for candidiasis, aspergillosis, and other types of fungal infection. This review contains 5 figures, 4 tables, and 189 references.


Blood ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 101 (9) ◽  
pp. 3365-3372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver A. Cornely ◽  
Andrew J. Ullmann ◽  
Meinolf Karthaus

Invasive fungal infection is an increasing source of morbidity and mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies, particularly those with prolonged and severe neutropenia (absolute white blood cell count < 100/μL). Early diagnosis of invasive fungal infection is difficult, suggesting that antifungal prophylaxis could be the best approach for neutropenic patients undergoing intensive myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Consequently, antifungal prophylaxis has been extensively studied for more than 20 years. Nonabsorbable polyenes reduce superficial mycoses but are not effective in preventing or treating invasive fungal infections. Intravenous amphotericin B and the newer azoles were used in numerous clinical trials, but the value of antifungal prophylaxis in defined risk groups with cancer is still open to discussion. Recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants and patients with a relapsed leukemia are high-risk patient populations. In addition, certain risk factors are well defined, for example, neutropenia more than 10 days, corticosteroid therapy, sustained immunosuppression, and graft-versus-host disease. In contrast to study efforts, evidence-based recommendations on the clinical use of antifungal prophylaxis according to risk groups are rare. The objective of this review of 50 studies accumulating more than 9000 patients is to assess evidence-based criteria with regard to the efficacy of antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic cancer patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 524
Author(s):  
Michael Scolarici ◽  
Margaret Jorgenson ◽  
Christopher Saddler ◽  
Jeannina Smith

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are one of the most feared complications associated with liver transplantation, with high rates of morbidity and mortality. We discuss the most common invasive fungal infections in the setting of liver transplant, including Candida, Aspergillus, and Cryptococcal infections, and some less frequent but devastating mold infections. Further, we evaluate the use of prophylaxis to prevent invasive fungal infection in this population as a promising mechanism to reduce risks to patients after liver transplant.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4126-4126
Author(s):  
Evan C. Chen ◽  
Yiwen Liu ◽  
Eric S. Winer ◽  
Marlise R. Luskin ◽  
Martha Wadleigh ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The Phase 3 VIALE-A study established the combination of venetoclax and a hypomethylating agent (VEN/HMA) as a new standard of care option for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy due to age (≥ 75 years) or comorbidities. The NCCN recommends antifungal prophylaxis (AFP) for relapsed/refractory AML patients receiving VEN/HMA, but its role in newly diagnosed AML patients treated with VEN/HMA remains controversial. Additionally, the impact of VEN dose-reduction due to concomitant azole use on AML outcomes and rates of fungal infection remains unclear. We evaluated the pattern of AFP use and its association with infectious and AML outcomes in patients receiving VEN/HMA at our institution. Methods: Consecutive patients aged ≥18 who received frontline VEN/HMA for newly diagnosed AML at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute between 2016-2021 were identified in the Hematologic Malignancy Data Repository for retrospective chart review. Antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis use at any time during VEN/HMA therapy and reasons for hospitalizations were recorded. Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) were adjudicated as "possible," "probable," or "proven" according to consensus guidelines (Donnelly, Clin Infect Dis 2020). Rates of complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) per European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria were determined. Descriptive statistics on patient characteristics were compared between groups via nonparametric testing including Wilcoxon rank-sum, chi-squared, and the Fisher's Exact tests. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier, and log-rank tests were used to compare survival between groups. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to obtain hazard ratios between groups. Results: 131 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 22 patients (16%) received AFP at any time. For the entire cohort, the median age at AML diagnosis was 72 (range 22-89), and the majority of patients were &lt;75 years old (66%), had ELN adverse risk (70%), and had secondary AML (sAML)/sAML-like disease (73%; "sAML-like" defined per Lindsley, Blood 2015). Frequently mutated genes include TP53 (37%), ASXL1 (22%), and RUNX1 (19%). These baseline characteristics did not differ between patients who did and did not receive AFP. However, compared to patients who never received AFP, patients receiving AFP at any time were more likely to have received HMA therapy for an antecedent hematologic malignancy (41% vs. 13%, p=0.004) and concomitant antibacterial prophylaxis at any time (82% vs. 54%, p=0.016). Among the 171 hospitalizations that occurred in 90/131 patients, bacterial infection was suspected or identified in 139 admissions, and possible/probable/proven IFIs were identified in 21. Receiving AFP prior to admission was not associated with fewer hospitalizations in which an IFI was suspected or identified (Table, p=0.36). 3/21 IFIs were deemed "probable" or "proven." All 21 IFIs prompted antifungal therapy. No patient experienced more than one hospitalization involving an IFI. After a median of two cycles (range 1-15), best response (CR/CRi) for the entire cohort was 49%. Receiving AFP at any time was associated with lower CR/CRi than never receiving AFP (57% vs. 32%, p=0.014). The median OS for the entire cohort was 11.0 months (95% CI 8.8-14.6) and did not differ based on AFP use (11.9 months for patients without AFP, 8.1 months for those receiving AFP; p=0.23). In a multivariable model that included patient age, ELN risk, and AML ontogeny, AFP use was not significantly associated with OS (HR 1.40, p=0.22). Conclusion: AFP use and incidence of invasive fungal infection were overall low at our institution. Receiving AFP was not associated with improved OS nor with decreased number of hospitalizations for a suspected or confirmed IFI. At an institution where the incidence of fungal infections is low, there is presently no clear role for antifungal prophylaxis in newly-diagnosed AML patients receiving HMA with venetoclax. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Winer: Takeda: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy. Lane: AbbVie: Research Funding; Stemline Therapeutics: Research Funding; Qiagen: Consultancy, Honoraria; N-of-One: Consultancy, Honoraria. Neuberg: Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Madrigal Pharmaceuticals: Other: Stock ownership. DeAngelo: Blueprint Medicines Corporation: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; GlycoMimetics: Research Funding; Autolus: Consultancy; Abbvie: Research Funding; Shire: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; Forty-Seven: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Incyte Corporation: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding. Stone: Syros: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Innate: Consultancy; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy; Aprea: Consultancy; Actinium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; BerGen Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Gemoab: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Syndax: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onconova: Consultancy; Foghorn Therapeutics: Consultancy; Elevate Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Arog: Consultancy, Research Funding; Boston Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Syntrix/ACI: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Agios: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Macrogenics: Consultancy. Garcia: Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AstraZeneca: Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Prelude: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document