scholarly journals Efficacy of Second-Line Pemetrexed-Carboplatin in EGFR-Activating Mutation-Positive NSCLC: Does Exon 19 Deletion Differ from Exon 21 Mutation?

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Joshi ◽  
Vanita Noronha ◽  
Vijay M. Patil ◽  
Anuradha Chougule ◽  
Atanu Bhattacharjee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Activating Mutation ◽  
Exon 19 Deletion ◽  
L858r Mutation ◽  
Egfr Mutated ◽  
Exon 19 ◽  
Better Than

Background. It is unknown whether the outcomes of second-line pemetrexed-carboplatin chemotherapy administered after progression on gefitinib are dependent on type of EGFR mutation present at baseline. Method. Adult non-small-cell lung cancer patients, with exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation, who progressed on gefitinib and received pemetrexed-carboplatin chemotherapy were selected for this analysis. Result. 55 patients received pemetrexed-carboplatin as second-line treatment. Response rates in evaluable patients were 39.3% in exon 19 patients (n=28) and 33.3% in exon 21 patients (n=15) (p=0.752, Fisher’s exact 2-sided p value). The median PFS in exon 19 and 21 cohorts was 5.900 months (95% CI: 4.274–7.526) and 4.767 months (95% CI: 1.374–8.159), respectively. The median overall survival in exon 19 patients was (11.8 months, 95% CI: 9.916–13.684 months) significantly better than that seen in exon 21 mutation patients (6.2 months, 95% CI: 4.215–8.118 months, p = 0.024) on univariate analysis; however, on multivariate analysis, this association was not confirmed (HR = 0.361, 95% CI: 0.090–1.439, p = 0.149). Conclusion. Exon 19 deletion has no impact on PFS and OS in EGFR-mutated patients treated with second-line pemetrexed-carboplatin.

Efficacy of pemetrexed for EGFR mutated lung carcinoma between L858R and Exon 19 deletion.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19073-e19073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihito Kogure ◽  
Hideo Saka ◽  
Masahide Oki ◽  
Chiyoe Kitagawa ◽  
Masashi Nakahata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Carcinoma ◽  
Exon 19 Deletion ◽  
Egfr Mutated ◽  
Exon 19

Clinical outcomes of patients enrolled in clinical trial compared with patients outside clinical trial in advanced gastric cancer.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 21-21
Author(s):  
Jaejoon Han ◽  
Jin Won Kim ◽  
Se Hyun Kim ◽  
Jeong-Ok Lee ◽  
Yu Jung Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Better Than

21 Background: Participation in clinical trials gives patients with cancer a chance to receive potential benefits, such as experimental treatment, meticulous follow-up and toxicity managements. We aimed to assess the evidence that such an effect exists in patients with gastric cancer. Methods: Clinical characteristics and overall survival of patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer who received fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination palliative chemotherapy within or outside clinical trials at tertiary referral hospital from January 2010 to December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Of the 244 patients, 84 patients (34%) were enrolled in clinical trials. During the study period, 20 patients in four phase 3 trials, 54 patients in eight phase 2 trials and ten patients in two phase 1 trials were participated in clinical trials. Twenty patients (8%) at first-line and 64 patients (38%) at second-line or later were enrolled in clinical trials. Younger age (P = 0.014), metastatic disease (P = 0.015) and HER2 IHC status (P = 0.005) were correlated with participation in clinical trials. The median overall survival of patients who participated in clinical trials at first-line was better than those who did not participated in clinical trials, although it was not statistically significant (16 months and 11 months, respectively, P = 0.407). Number of participation in clinical trials was not associated with survival outcome (1 versus ≥ 2 trials: 15 months and 18 months, respectively, P = 0.545). Second-line chemotherapy was administered in 167 patients. The median overall survival of patients who participated in clinical trials at second-line or later was also better than those who did not participated in clinical trials, however, it was not statistically significant (9 months and 6 months, respectively, P = 0.101). Conclusions: Younger patients, metastatic disease, positive HER2 IHC status, and clinical setting of second-line or later were associated with more participation in clinical trials. The median overall survival was numerically longer in patients who were enrolled in the clinical trials although it was not statistically significant.

Multicenter prospective trial of customized erlotinib for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (p) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: Final results of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8023-8023
Author(s):  
B. Massuti ◽  
T. Morán ◽  
R. Porta ◽  
C. Queralt ◽  
F. Cardenal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
First Line ◽  
Exon 19 Deletion ◽  
L858r Mutation ◽  
Exon 19

8023 Background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of erlotinib and the feasibility of screening for EGFR mutations in advanced NSCLC p (chemonaive or relapsed after 2 prior chemotherapy regimens). Methods: Exon 19 deletions and L858R mutations in tumor and paired serum DNA were assessed in one central laboratory, using three different techniques. Results: From April 2005 to December 2008, 2507 p were screened. EGFR mutations were detected in 358 p; 217 were entered on the trial: 158 (72.8%) female; 148 (68.2%) never-smokers; 176 (81.1%) adenocarcinoma; 134 (62.3%) exon 19 deletion, 83 (37.7%) L858R mutation; 112 (51.6%) first-line, 104 (48.4%) second-line. Response in 139/197 evaluable p (70.6%); complete response (CR) in 24 p (12.2%). Odds ratio for response: 3 for p with exon 19 deletion (P=0.001). Time to progression (TTP): 14 months (m). Median survival (MS): 27 m. MS according to response shown in table. Cox model for TTP showed that male gender (hazard ratio [HR], 2.3; P=0.001), L858R mutation (HR, 1.8; P=0.008), and mutated EGFR in serum (HR,1.6; P=0.03) had a negative impact. Conclusions: A multicenter study of customized erlotinib, using a central screening laboratory, is feasible and shows the outstanding benefit to p for selecting erlotinib treatment based on EGFR mutation status. The SLCG has initiated a randomized trial of first-line erlotinib vs chemotherapy. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy of gefitinib in patients with advanced non-small cell carcinoma of the lung harboring common, uncommon and complex EGFR mutations

2021 ◽  
Vol 08 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wang Chun Kwok ◽  
Ka Yan Chiang ◽  
James Chung Man Ho ◽  
Terence Chi Chun Tam ◽  
Mary Sau Man Ip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Exon 19 Deletion ◽  
L858r Mutation ◽  
First Line Treatment ◽  
Exon 19

Background: As the commonest EGFR-TKI being used in Hong Kong, gefitinib has shown to be efficacious and safe as first line treatment for L858R mutation and exon 19 deletion with less gastrointestinal and cutaneous adverse events than erlotinib and afatinib. However, the evidence for therapeutic efficacy for uncommon and complex EGFR mutations is lacking. Whether gefitinib is efficacious for uncommon and complex EGFR mutations worth studying. Objectives: To assess the therapeutic efficacy of gefitinib, as measured by progression-free survival and overall survival, among advanced stage lung cancer patients with common, uncommon and complex EGFR mutations. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study that included 241 Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell carcinoma of lung harboring EGFR mutations and received gefitinib 250 mg daily as first-line treatment. The progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS] for patients with different EGFR mutations, namely exon 19 deletion, L858R mutation in exon 21, uncommon EGFR mutations and complex EGFR mutations were analyzed. Results: Among the 241 patients, 118 [49%] had exon 19 deletion, 104 [43%] had L858R mutation in exon 21, 6 [2.5%] had uncommon EGFR mutations, 13 [5.4%] had complex EGFR mutations. The mean age was 69. 72% of the patients were female and with 81% being non-smoker. For patients with complex EGFR mutations, regardless of the presence of exon 19 deletion and L858R mutation as the component, have better PFS and OS than patients with single common EGFR mutations [Exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation]. Patients with uncommon EGFR mutations have inferior PFS and OS than those with common EGFR mutations. Conclusion: Gefitinib is a possible option for patients with complex EGFR mutations while it may not be the preferred treatment option in patients with single uncommon EGFR mutations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document