scholarly journals Clinical Properties and Diagnostic Methods of COVID-19 Infection in Pregnancies: Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Banu Uygun-Can ◽  
Bilge Acar-Bolat ◽  
Kyousuke Takeuchi
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Diagnosis

We aimed to summarize reliable medical evidence by the meta-analysis of all published retrospective studies that examined data based on the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by clinical symptoms, molecular (RT-PCR) diagnosis, and characteristic CT imaging features in pregnant women. The MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, ClinicalKey, and CINAHL databases were used to select the studies. Then, 384 articles were received, including the studies until 01/May/2020. As a result of the full-text evaluation, 12 retrospective articles covering all the data related were selected. A total of 181 pregnant cases with SARS-CoV-2 infections were included in the meta-analysis within the scope of these articles. According to the results, the incidence of fever was 38.1% (95% CI: 14.2-65%) and cough was 22% (95% CI: 10.8-35.2%) among all clinical features of pregnant cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection. So, fever and cough are the most common symptoms in pregnant cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection, and 91.8% (95% CI: 76.7-99.9%) of RT-PCR results are positive. Moreover, abnormal CT incidence is 97.9% (95% CI: 94.2-99.9%) positive. No case was death. However, as this virus spreads globally, it should not be overlooked that the incidence will increase in pregnant women and maybe in the risky group. RT-PCR and CT can be used together in an accurate and safe diagnosis. In conclusion, these findings will provide important guidance for current studies regarding the clinical features and correct detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, as well as whether it will create emergency tables that will require the use of a viral drug.

scholarly journals CLINICAL PROPERTIES AND DIAGNOSTIC METHODS OF COVID-19 INFECTION IN PREGNANCIES: META-ANALYSIS

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Banu Uygun-Can ◽  
Bilge Acar-Bolat
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Retrospective Studies ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Medical Evidence ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Diagnosis

AbstractWe aimed to summarize reliable medical evidence by the meta-analysis of all published retrospective studies that examined data based on the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by clinical symptoms, molecular (RT-PCR) diagnosis and characteristic CT imaging features in pregnant women. MEDLINE PubMed, SCOPUS, ISI Web of Science, Clinical Key, and CINAHL databases were used to select the studies. Then, 384 articles were received, including the studies until 01/MAY/2020. As a result of the full-text evaluation, 12 retrospective articles covering all the data related were selected. A total of 181 pregnant cases with SARS-CoV-2 infections were included in the meta-analysis within the scope of these articles. According to the results, the incidence of fever was 38.1% (95% CI: 14.2–65%), and cough was 22% (95% CI: 10.8–35.2%) among all clinical features of pregnant cases with SARS-CoV-2 infection. So, fever and cough are the most common symptoms in pregnant cases with SARS-CoV- infection, and 91.8% (95% CI: 76.7–99.9%) of RT-PCR results are positive. Moreover, abnormal CT incidence is 97.9% (95% CI: 94.2–99.9%) positive. No case was death. However, as this virus spreads globally, it should not be overlooked that the incidence will increase in pregnant women and may be in the risky group. RT-PCR and CT can be used together in an accurate and safe diagnosis. In conclusion, these findings will provide important guidance for current studies regarding the clinical features and correct detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women, as well as whether it will create emergency tables that will require the use of a viral drug.

scholarly journals Clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-jie Gao ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
Jia-shuo Zhang ◽  
Yang-xue Yin ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Clinical Features of Coexisting Anti-NMDAR and MOG Antibody-Associated Encephalitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiayue Ding ◽  
Xiangyu Li ◽  
Zhiyan Tian
Keyword(s):  
Optic Neuritis ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Antibody Titer ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Involuntary Movement ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Abnormal Behavior ◽  
Fixed Effects Model

Coexisting anti-NMDAR and MOG antibody (anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG+)-associated encephalitis have garnered great attention. This study aimed to perform a secondary analysis to determine the clinical features of this disease. We searched several databases for related publications published prior to April 2021. A pooled analysis was conducted with the fixed-effects model using the Mante-Haenszel method (I2 ≤ 50%), or the random-effects model computed by the DerSimonian–Laird method (I2 > 50%). Stata software (version 15.0 SE) was used for the analyses. Nine observational studies and 16 case reports (58 cases with anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG+, 21.0 [8.5, 29.0] years, male 58.6%) were included. The incidences (95%CI) of anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG+ in the patients with serum MOG-IgG+ and CSF anti-NMDAR-IgG+ were 0.09 (0.02–0.19) and 0.07 (0.01–0.19), respectively. The median [IQR] of CSF anti-NMDAR antibody titer was 32 [10, 100], and the serum anti-MOG antibody titer was 100 [32, 320]. The prominent clinical symptoms were encephalitic manifestations, including seizures (56.9%) and abnormal behavior (51.7%), rather than demyelinating manifestations, such as speech disorder (34.5%) and optic neuritis (27.6%). Relapse occurred in 63.4% of anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG+ patients, in whom 50.0% of cases relapsed with encephalitic manifestations, and 53.8% relapsed with demyelinating manifestations. The common MRI changes were in the cortex or subcortex (70.7%) and brainstem (31.0%). 31.3% of patients presented with unilateral cerebral cortical encephalitis with epilepsy and 12.5% displayed bilateral frontal cerebral cortex encephalitis. Anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG+ patients showed more frequent mental behavior (OR, 95%CI, 68.38, 1.36–3,434.37), involuntary movement (57.86, 2.53–1,325.11), sleep disorders (195.00, 7.07–5,380.15), and leptomeninge lesions (7.32, 1.81–29.58), and less frequent optic neuritis (0.27, 0.09–0.83) compared to anti-NMDAR-IgG−/MOG-IgG+ patients and presented more common relapse (5.63, 1.75–18.09), preceding infection (2.69, 1.03–7.02), subcortical lesions (116.60, 4.89–2,782.09), basal ganglia lesions (68.14, 2.99–1,554.27), brainstem lesions (24.09, 1.01–574.81), and spinal cord lesions (24.09, 1.01–574.81) compared to anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG−. In conclusion, anti-NMDAR-IgG+/MOG-IgG+ was rarely observed, but the incidence rate of relapse was very high. The overall symptoms seemed to be similar to those of NMDAR encephalitis.

scholarly journals A Comparative Study on the Clinical Features of Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Pneumonia With Other Pneumonias

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (15) ◽  
pp. 756-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dahai Zhao ◽  
Feifei Yao ◽  
Lijie Wang ◽  
Ling Zheng ◽  
Yongjun Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Severe Pneumonia ◽  
Ground Glass Opacity ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Bilateral Involvement ◽  
Radiological Features ◽  
History Of ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Abstract Background A novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has raised world concern since it emerged in Wuhan, China in December 2019. The infection may result in severe pneumonia with clusters of illness onsets. Its impacts on public health make it paramount to clarify the clinical features with other pneumonias. Methods Nineteen COVID-19 and 15 other patients with pneumonia (non-COVID-19) in areas outside of Hubei were involved in this study. Both COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients were confirmed to be infected using throat swabs and/or sputa with/without COVID-2019 by real-time RT-PCR. We analyzed the demographic, epidemiological, clinical, and radiological features from those patients, and compared the differences between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. Results All patients had a history of exposure to confirmed cases of COVID-19 or travel to Hubei before illness. The median (IQR) duration was 8 (6–11) and 5 (4–11) days from exposure to onset in COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 cases, respectively. The clinical symptoms were similar between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19. The most common symptoms were fever and cough. Fifteen (78.95%) COVID-19 but 4 (26.67%) non-COVID-19 patients had bilateral involvement while 17 COVID-19 patients (89.47%) but 1 non-COVID-19 patient (6.67%) had multiple mottling and ground-glass opacity on chest CT images. Compared with non-COVID-19, COVID-19 presents remarkably more abnormal laboratory tests, including AST, ALT, γ-GT, LDH, and α-HBDH. Conclusions The COVID-19 infection has onsets similar to other pneumonias. CT scan may be a reliable test for screening COVID-19 cases. Liver function damage is more frequent in COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 patients. LDH and α-HBDH may be considerable markers for evaluation of COVID-19.

scholarly journals Confirmed or unconfirmed cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Italian patients: a retrospective analysis of clinical features

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia De Angelis ◽  
Brunella Posteraro ◽  
Federico Biscetti ◽  
Gianluca Ianiro ◽  
Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Etiologic Agent ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Rna Detection ◽  
Incubation Periods ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
To Receive

Abstract Background Since December 2019, the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) emerged as a novel etiologic agent of viral pneumonia. We aimed to compare clinical features of 165 Italian patients with laboratory confirmed or unconfirmed 2019-nCoV pneumonia. Methods On March 31, 2020, hospitalized patients who presented with fever and/or respiratory symptoms, exposures, and presence of lung imaging features consistent with 2019-nCoV pneumonia were included. Before admission to a hospital ward, patients underwent RT-PCR based SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection in their nasopharyngeal swab samples. Results Of 165 patients studied, 119 had positive RT-PCR results and 46 were RT-PCR negative for 2 days or longer (i.e., when the last swab sample was obtained). The median age was 70 years (IQR, 58–78), and 123 (74.6%) of 165 patients had at least one comorbidity. The majority of patients (101/165, 61.2%) had a mild pneumonia, and the remaining patients (64/165, 38.8%) a severe/critical pneumonia. We did not find any substantial difference in symptoms, incubation periods, and radiographic/CT abnormalities as well as in many of the biological abnormalities recorded. However, at multivariable analysis, higher concentrations of hemoglobin (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11–1.65; P = 0.003) and lower counts of leukocytes (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.72–0.90; P < 0.001) were statistically associated with confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. While mortality rates were similar, patients with confirmed diagnosis were more likely to receive antivirals (95% vs 19.6%, P < 0.001) and to develop ARDS (63% vs 37%, P = 0.003) than those with unconfirmed COVID-19 diagnosis. Conclusions Our findings suggest that unconfirmed 2019-nCoV pneumonia cases may be actually COVID-19 cases and that clinicians should be cautious when managing patients with presentations compatible with COVID-19.

scholarly journals Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1023
Author(s):  
Temitope Emmanuel Komolafe ◽  
John Agbo ◽  
Ebenezer Obaloluwa Olaniyi ◽  
Kayode Komolafe ◽  
Xiaodong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Disease Prevalence ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Chest Computed Tomography ◽  
Pooled Prevalence ◽  
History Of

Background: The pooled prevalence of chest computed tomography (CT) abnormalities and other detailed analysis related to patients’ biodata like gender and different age groups have not been previously described for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), thus necessitating this study. Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT, common CT morphological abnormalities, disease prevalence, biodata information, and gender prevalence of patients. Methods: Studies were identified by searching PubMed and Science Direct libraries from 1 January 2020 to 30 April 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and RT-PCR, CT-imaging features, history of exposure, and biodata information were estimated using the quality effect (QE) model. Results: Out of 36 studies included, the sensitivity was 89% (95% CI: 80–96%) and 98% (95% CI: 90–100%) for chest CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively. The pooled prevalence across lesion distribution were 72% (95% CI: 62–80%), 92% (95% CI: 84–97%) for lung lobe, 88% (95% CI: 81–93%) for patients with history of exposure, and 91% (95% CI: 85–96%) for patients with all categories of symptoms. Seventy-six percent (95% CI: 67–83%) had age distribution across four age groups, while the pooled prevalence was higher in the male with 54% (95% CI: 50–57%) and 46% (95% CI: 43–50%) in the female. Conclusions: The sensitivity of RT-PCR was higher than chest CT, and disease prevalence appears relatively higher in the elderly and males than children and females, respectively.

scholarly journals INFLUENCE SIFILITIC IN PREGNANT WOMEN ON THE HEALTH OF NEWBORN CHILDREN

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 188-192
Author(s):  
Natalya Vladimirovna Matyskina ◽  
T. E Taranushenko ◽  
Yu. V Karacheva
Keyword(s):  
Child Health ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
High Mortality ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Congenital Syphilis ◽  
Pathological Process ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Syphilis Infection ◽  
Mucous Membranes

A particular challenge for child health represent cases of early and congenital syphilis, which is characterized by a severe multiorgan pathology in children and high mortality in newborns. Purpose. To study the incidence of early congenital syphilis, depending on the time of detection of syphilis infection in women and to present the clinical features of this disease in newborns with the frequency of the detection of the most important specific manifestations of the disease. Material and methods. We observed 114 women with confirmed syphilis infection and newborns from these mothers. Results. The data presented indicate the prevalence of Lues latens praecox in the structure of syphilis infection in pregnant women with newly diagnosed disease. In children from women who were diagnosed with syphilis during this pregnancy early congenital syphilis (PBC) exhibited in 74.3% of cases, while 27 cases in 19 newborns syphilis was accompanied by clinical symptoms. Conclusion. In the pathological process in congenital syphilis, with greatest frequency involved bone, followed - mucous membranes (rhinitis).

scholarly journals Clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yi-jie Gao ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
Jia-shuo Zhang ◽  
Yang-xue Yin ◽  
Min Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Clinical Features ◽  
Preterm Labor ◽  
Web Of Science ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Fetal Distress ◽  
Severe Case ◽  
Random Effects Model ◽  
Case Review ◽  
Ct Findings

Abstract Background: COVID-19 outbreak in Wuhan, China recently. It quickly spread throughout worldwide. In this study, we systematically reviewed the clinical features and outcomes of pregnant women with COVID-19.Methods: PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、MEDLINE were searched from January 1, 2020 to April 16, 2020. Case review of pregnant women infected with COVID-19 were included. Two reviewers screened 366 literatures and 14 studies included, four reviewers independently extracted the features of the literatures. We used random-effects model to analyze incidence (P) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.Results: The meta- analysis included 236 pregnant women with COVID-19. The results were as follows: positive CT findings (71%; 95%CI, 0.49~0.93), cesarean section (65%; 95%CI, 0.42~0.87), fever (51%; 95%CI, 0.35~0.67), lymphopenia (49%; 95%CI, 0.29~0.70), coexisting disorders (33%; 95%CI, 0.21~0.44), cough (31%; 95%CI, 0.23~0.39), fetal distress (29%; 95%CI, 0.08~0.49), preterm labor (23%; 95%CI, 0.14~0.32), severe case or death (12%; 95%CI, 0.03~0.20). The subgroup analysis showed compared with nonpregnant patients, pregnant women with COVID-19 had significantly lower incidences of fever (pregnant women group, 51%; nonpregnant patients group, 91%; P＜0.00001) and cough (pregnant women group, 31%; nonpregnant patients group, 67%; P＜0.0001). Conclusions: The incidence of fever, cough and positive CT findings in pregnant women with COVID-19 is less than that in the general population, preterm labor is the opposite. There is no evidence that COVID-19 can propagate vertically for the time being.

scholarly journals Point-of-Care Diagnostic Tests for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Riccò ◽  
Pietro Ferraro ◽  
Giovanni Gualerzi ◽  
Silvia Ranzieri ◽  
Brandon Michael Henry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Rapid Diagnostic Tests ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Healthcare Facilities

SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for a highly contagious infection, known as COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 was discovered in late December 2019 and, since then, has become a global pandemic. Timely and accurate COVID-19 laboratory testing is an essential step in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. To date, assays based on the reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in respiratory samples are the gold standard for COVID-19 diagnosis. Unfortunately, RT-PCR has several practical limitations. Consequently, alternative diagnostic methods are urgently required, both for alleviating the pressure on laboratories and healthcare facilities and for expanding testing capacity to enable large-scale screening and ensure a timely therapeutic intervention. To date, few studies have been conducted concerning the potential utilization of rapid testing for COVID-19, with some conflicting results. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to explore the feasibility of rapid diagnostic tests in the management of the COVID-19 outbreak. Based on ten studies, we computed a pooled sensitivity of 64.8% (95%CI 54.5–74.0), and specificity of 98.0% (95%CI 95.8–99.0), with high heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias. We can conclude that: (1) rapid diagnostic tests for COVID-19 are necessary, but should be adequately sensitive and specific; (2) few studies have been carried out to date; (3) the studies included are characterized by low numbers and low sample power, and (4) in light of these results, the use of available tests is currently questionable for clinical purposes and cannot substitute other more reliable molecular tests, such as assays based on RT-PCR.

scholarly journals Clinical features, treatments and outcomes of severe and critical severe patients infected with COVID-19: A system review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-yue Zhang ◽  
Fang-zhou Jiao ◽  
Xiao-jun Wu ◽  
Min Shang ◽  
Yu-chuan Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Cardiac Injury ◽  
Fatal Outcome ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Multiple Organs

Abstract Backgrounds: The outbreak of COVID-19 caused by a novel coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2, has been listed as a public health emergency of international concern by WHO. Most COVID-19 patients presented with a mild infection, but many challenges exist in therapy of severe and critical severe patients. This paper systematically reviewed clinical features, treatments and outcomes of severe and critical severe patients infected COVID-19. Methods: The clinical, laboratory, imaging features, treatment and outcomes of COVID-19 were collected. The data were analyzed by using STATA 15 statistical software to estimate the prevalence and 95% CI in severe and critical severe patients with COVID-19. A random or fixed effect model was used to estimate the prevalence and 95% CI. Results: After screening, 8 studies including a total of 275 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The percentage of severe and critical severe patients in confirmed COVID-19 cases was 25% (95% CI 16-36%). Fever, cough, dyspnea, lymphopenia and bilateral distribution of patchy shadows were the most prevalent findings in these patients. Utilization rate of antiviral drugs, corticosteroid, non-invasive ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation was high in therapy strategies. The most prevalent complications were ARDS, shock, and acute cardiac injury. Discussion: Severe and critical severe COVID-19 patients usually had complications even a fatal outcome. As vaccines and anti-coronaviral drugs are under development, the principles of treatment for these patients should be focused on improving oxygenation, lung protective and function support of multiple organs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document