scholarly journals Tabu Search and Machine-Learning Classification of Benign and Malignant Proliferative Breast Lesions

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Habib Dhahri ◽  
Ines Rahmany ◽  
Awais Mahmood ◽  
Eslam Al Maghayreh ◽  
Wail Elkilani
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Tabu Search ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Benign Tumors ◽  
Machine Learning Classification ◽  
Malignant And Benign Tumors ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer among women around the world. The development of computer-aided diagnosis tools is essential to help pathologists to accurately interpret and discriminate between malignant and benign tumors. This paper proposes the development of an automated proliferative breast lesion diagnosis based on machine-learning algorithms. We used Tabu search to select the most significant features. The evaluation of the feature is based on the dependency degree of each attribute in the rough set. The categorization of reduced features was built using five machine-learning algorithms. The proposed models were applied to the BIDMC-MGH and Wisconsin Diagnostic Breast Cancer datasets. The performance measures of the used models were evaluated owing to five criteria. The top performing models were AdaBoost and logistic regression. Comparisons with others works prove the efficiency of the proposed method for superior diagnosis of breast cancer against the reviewed classification techniques.

scholarly journals Classification of Liver Patient Dataset Using Machine Learning Algorithms

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3.34) ◽  
pp. 323
Author(s):  
S Muthuselvan ◽  
S Rajapraksh ◽  
K Somasundaram ◽  
K Karthik
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Medical Information ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Medical Industry ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Classification Algorithms ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Aided Diagnosis

Prediction of the disease in the human being is the very long and difficult process in early days. Now a days, computer aided diagnosis is the important role in the medical industry for predicting, analyzing and storing medical information with the images. In this paper will discuss and classify the liver patients with the help of the liver patient dataset with the help of the machine learning algorithms. WEKA is the software used here for implement the some of the classification algorithms with the data selected from the liver disease dataset. After the successful implementation of the all the algorithms, the best algorithms selected from the output of the all the algorithms execution. 

scholarly journals Performance Improvement of Decision Tree: A Robust Classifier Using Tabu Search Algorithm

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 6728
Author(s):  
Muhammad Asfand Hafeez ◽  
Muhammad Rashid ◽  
Hassan Tariq ◽  
Zain Ul Abideen ◽  
Saud S. Alotaibi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Tabu Search ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Decision Trees ◽  
Search Algorithm ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Performance Comparison ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Supervised Machine Learning ◽  
Tabu Search Algorithm

Classification and regression are the major applications of machine learning algorithms which are widely used to solve problems in numerous domains of engineering and computer science. Different classifiers based on the optimization of the decision tree have been proposed, however, it is still evolving over time. This paper presents a novel and robust classifier based on a decision tree and tabu search algorithms, respectively. In the aim of improving performance, our proposed algorithm constructs multiple decision trees while employing a tabu search algorithm to consistently monitor the leaf and decision nodes in the corresponding decision trees. Additionally, the used tabu search algorithm is responsible to balance the entropy of the corresponding decision trees. For training the model, we used the clinical data of COVID-19 patients to predict whether a patient is suffering. The experimental results were obtained using our proposed classifier based on the built-in sci-kit learn library in Python. The extensive analysis for the performance comparison was presented using Big O and statistical analysis for conventional supervised machine learning algorithms. Moreover, the performance comparison to optimized state-of-the-art classifiers is also presented. The achieved accuracy of 98%, the required execution time of 55.6 ms and the area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for proposed method of 0.95 reveals that the proposed classifier algorithm is convenient for large datasets.

scholarly journals 174 A comparison of machine learning algorithms in the classification of beef steers finished in feedlot

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. 126-127
Author(s):  
Lucas S Lopes ◽  
Christine F Baes ◽  
Dan Tulpan ◽  
Luis Artur Loyola Chardulo ◽  
Otavio Machado Neto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Relevant Parameter ◽  
Good Prediction ◽  
Quality Traits ◽  
C4.5 Decision Tree

Abstract The aim of this project is to compare some of the state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms on the classification of steers finished in feedlots based on performance, carcass and meat quality traits. The precise classification of animals allows for fast, real-time decision making in animal food industry, such as culling or retention of herd animals. Beef production presents high variability in its numerous carcass and beef quality traits. Machine learning algorithms and software provide an opportunity to evaluate the interactions between traits to better classify animals. Four different treatment levels of wet distiller’s grain were applied to 97 Angus-Nellore animals and used as features for the classification problem. The C4.5 decision tree, Naïve Bayes (NB), Random Forest (RF) and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) Artificial Neural Network algorithms were used to predict and classify the animals based on recorded traits measurements, which include initial and final weights, sheer force and meat color. The top performing classifier was the C4.5 decision tree algorithm with a classification accuracy of 96.90%, while the RF, the MLP and NB classifiers had accuracies of 55.67%, 39.17% and 29.89% respectively. We observed that the final decision tree model constructed with C4.5 selected only the dry matter intake (DMI) feature as a differentiator. When DMI was removed, no other feature or combination of features was sufficiently strong to provide good prediction accuracies for any of the classifiers. We plan to investigate in a follow-up study on a significantly larger sample size, the reasons behind DMI being a more relevant parameter than the other measurements.

scholarly journals Identification of Target Chicken Populations by Machine Learning Models Using the Minimum Number of SNPs

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Dongwon Seo ◽  
Sunghyun Cho ◽  
Prabuddha Manjula ◽  
Nuri Choi ◽  
Young-Kuk Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Learning Algorithms ◽  
Machine Learning Algorithms ◽  
Fixation Index ◽  
Machine Learning Classification ◽  
Genetic Components ◽  
Marker Combination ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Minimum Number ◽  
Native Chickens

A marker combination capable of classifying a specific chicken population could improve commercial value by increasing consumer confidence with respect to the origin of the population. This would facilitate the protection of native genetic resources in the market of each country. In this study, a total of 283 samples from 20 lines, which consisted of Korean native chickens, commercial native chickens, and commercial broilers with a layer population, were analyzed to determine the optimal marker combination comprising the minimum number of markers, using a 600 k high-density single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Machine learning algorithms, a genome-wide association study (GWAS), linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis, and principal component analysis (PCA) were used to distinguish a target (case) group for comparison with control chicken groups. In the processing of marker selection, a total of 47,303 SNPs were used for classifying chicken populations; 96 LD-pruned SNPs (50 SNPs per LD block) served as the best marker combination for target chicken classification. Moreover, 36, 44, and 8 SNPs were selected as the minimum numbers of markers by the AdaBoost (AB), Random Forest (RF), and Decision Tree (DT) machine learning classification models, which had accuracy rates of 99.6%, 98.0%, and 97.9%, respectively. The selected marker combinations increased the genetic distance and fixation index (Fst) values between the case and control groups, and they reduced the number of genetic components required, confirming that efficient classification of the groups was possible by using a small number of marker sets. In a verification study including additional chicken breeds and samples (12 lines and 182 samples), the accuracy did not significantly change, and the target chicken group could be clearly distinguished from the other populations. The GWAS, PCA, and machine learning algorithms used in this study can be applied efficiently, to determine the optimal marker combination with the minimum number of markers that can distinguish the target population among a large number of SNP markers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document