scholarly journals Association between Serum Vitamin C and the Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Ran ◽  
Wenli Zhao ◽  
Xiaodong Tan ◽  
Hongwu Wang ◽  
Kaito Mizuno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Vitamin C ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Serum Vitamin ◽  
Inverse Correlation ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
English Articles

Background. Hypertension is regarded as a major and independent risk factor of cardiovascular diseases, and numerous studies observed an inverse correlation between vitamin C intake and blood pressure. Aim. Our aim is to investigate the relationship between serum vitamin C and blood pressure, including the concentration differences and the correlation strength. Method. Two independent researchers searched and screened articles from the National Library of Medicine, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP databases, and WANFANG databases. A total of 18 eligible studies were analyzed in the Reviewer Manager 5.3 software, including 14 English articles and 4 Chinese articles. Results. In the evaluation of serum vitamin C levels, the concentration in hypertensive subjects is 15.13 μmol/L lower than the normotensive ones (mean difference=−15.13, 95% CI [-24.19, -6.06], and P=0.001). Serum vitamin C has a significant inverse relation with both systolic blood pressure (Fisher’s Z=−0.17, 95% CI [-0.20, -0.15], P<0.00001) and diastolic blood pressure (Fisher’s Z=−0.15, 95% CI [-0.20, -0.10], P<0.00001). Conclusions. People with hypertension have a relatively low serum vitamin C, and vitamin C is inversely associated with both systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure.

scholarly journals The Antihypertensive Effects and Safety of LCZ696 in Patients with Hypertension: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (13) ◽  
pp. 2824
Author(s):  
Su-Kiat Chua ◽  
Wei-Ting Lai ◽  
Lung-Ching Chen ◽  
Huei-Fong Hung
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
The Mean

Background: The management of hypertension remains suboptimal throughout the world. Methods: We performed a random-effects model meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to determine the effectiveness and safety of sacubitril/valsartan (LCZ696) for the treatment of high arterial pressure. Relevant published articles from PubMed, Cochrane base, and Medline were examined, and the last search date was December 2020. Only published randomized controlled trials and double-blind studies were selected for further analysis. The mean reductions in systolic blood pressure (msSBP) and diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) in the sitting position, as well as the mean reductions in ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP), were assumed as efficacy endpoints. Adverse events (AEs) were considered as safety outcomes. Results: Ten studies with a total of 5931patients were included for analysis. Compared with placebo, LCZ696 had a significant reduction in msSBP (weight mean difference (WMD) = −6.52 mmHg, 95% confidence interval (CI): −8.57 to −4.47; p < 0.001), msDBP (WMD = −3.32 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.57 to −2.07; p < 0.001), maSBP (WMD = −7.08 mmHg, 95% CI: −10.48 to −3.68; p < 0.001), maDBP (WMD = −3.28 mmHg, 95% CI: −4.55 to −2.02, p < 0.001). In subgroup analysis, only 200 mg and 400 mg LCZ696 showed a significant BP reduction. There was no difference in the AE rate between the LCZ696 and placebo groups (WMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.83 to 1.27, p = 0.54). Egger’s test revealed a potential publication bias for msSBP (p = 0.025), but no publication bias for other outcomes. Conclusion: LCZ696 may reduce blood pressure more efficaciously than traditional therapy in hypertensive patients without increasing adverse effects.

scholarly journals Influence of Mindfulness and Relaxation on Treatment of Essential Hypertension: Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Fushun Zhang ◽  
Yuanyuan Zhang ◽  
Nan Jiang ◽  
Qiao Zhai ◽  
Juanjuan Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Essential Hypertension ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Effect Size ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Biomedical Literature ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Effect Model

Background. Some studies published previously have shown a strong correlation between hypertension and psychological nature including impulsion emotion or mindfulness and relaxation temperament, among which mindfulness and relaxation temperament might have a benign influence on blood pressure, ameliorating the hypertension. However, the conclusion was not confirmed. Objective. The meta-analysis was performed to investigate the influence of mindfulness and relaxation on essential hypertension interventions and confirm the effects. Methods. Systematic searches were conducted in common English and Chinese electronic databases (i.e., PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) from 1980 to 2020. A meta-analysis including 5 studies was performed using Rev Man 5.4.1 software to estimate the influence of mindfulness and relaxation on blood pressure, ameliorating the hypertension. Publication bias and heterogeneity of samples were tested using a funnel plot. Studies were analyzed using either a random-effect model or a fixed-effect model. Results. All the 5 studies investigated the influence of mindfulness and relaxation on diastolic and systolic blood pressure, with total 205 participants in the control group and 204 in the intervention group. The random-effects model (REM) was used to calculate the pooled effect for mindfulness and relaxation on diastolic blood pressure (I2 = 0%, t2 = 0.000, P = 0.41 ). The random pooled effect size (MD) was 0.30 (95% CI = −0.81–1.42, P = 0.59 ). REM was used to calculate the pooled effect for mindfulness and relaxation on systolic blood pressure (I2 = 49%, t2 = 3.05, P = 0.10 ). The random pooled effect size (MD) was −1.05 (95% CI = −3.29–1.18, P = 0.36 ). The results of this meta-analysis were influenced by publication bias to some degree. Conclusion. All the results showed less influence of mindfulness and relaxation might act on diastolic or systolic blood pressure, when mindfulness and relaxation are used to intervene in treating CVD and hypertension.

P1691Impact of dose and duration of dietary salt reduction on blood pressure levels: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
L Huang ◽  
K Trieu ◽  
S Yoshimura ◽  
M Woodward ◽  
N Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Sodium Excretion ◽  
Salt Intake ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Dietary Salt ◽  
Baseline Blood Pressure ◽  
Salt Reduction ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Authoritative medical and public health agencies in most countries advise to reduce population dietary salt intake to under 5–6 g/day as a strategy for preventing high blood pressure and cardiovascular disease. However, there is still dispute about whether salt reduction should be adopted by all populations. In addition, the effect of duration of dietary salt reduction has not been sufficiently investigated. Purpose To understand the effect of dietary salt reduction on blood pressure and the impact of intervention duration. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. Randomized controlled trials that allocated participants to low and high salt intake, without confounding from unequal concomitant interventions, were included. We excluded studies done in individuals younger than 18 years, pregnant women, individuals with renal disease or heart failure, and studies with sodium excretion estimated from spot urine. Random effect meta-analysis was used to generate pooled estimates of the effect on 24-hour urinary sodium excretion, systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Multivariate meta-regression was used to quantify the dose response effect of dietary salt on blood pressure change and to understand the impact of the intervention duration. Results 125 studies were included with 162 data points extracted. Ninety-nine data points (61%) had interventions under 4 weeks. Overall, 24-hour urinary sodium excretion changed by −141 mmol (95% CI: −156; −126), systolic blood pressure changed by −4.4 mm Hg (95% CI: −5.2; −3.7) and diastolic blood pressure changed by −2.4 mm Hg (95% CI: −2.9; −1.9). Sodium reduction resulted in a significant decrease of systolic blood pressure in all subgroups except in participants with low baseline sodium intake (<109 mmol) (Figure 1). Each 100 mmol reduction of sodium was associated with 2.7 mm Hg (95% CI: 1.0; 4.4; p=0.002) reduction of systolic blood pressure and 1.2 mm Hg (95% CI: 0.0; 2.4; p=0.046) reduction of diastolic blood pressure after adjusting for intervention duration, age, sex, race, baseline blood pressure, baseline sodium intake and interaction between age and baseline blood pressure. For the same amount of salt reduction, a 10 mm Hg higher baseline systolic blood pressure would result in 2.5 mm Hg greater reduction of systolic blood pressure. There is not enough evidence to show the impact of intervention duration. Figure 1 Conclusions Our meta-analysis showed that sodium reduction could reduce blood pressure in all adult populations regardless of age, sex and race. The effect of salt reduction on systolic blood pressure increases with higher baseline blood pressure. Further studies, designed to investigate the impact of intervention duration, are needed to understand the significance of the duration. Acknowledgement/Funding None

scholarly journals A Meta-Analysis on the Effect and Safety of LCZ696 in the Treatment of Hypertension

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Li Zheng ◽  
Binbin Xia ◽  
Xuqian Zhang ◽  
Yan Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Blood Pressure Level ◽  
Evaluation Standard ◽  
Treatment Of Hypertension ◽  
Patient Will ◽  
Receptor Blockers

Objectives. To systematically evaluate the differences in effect and safety of LCZ696 and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in the treatment of hypertension. Methods. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, and Ovid, collected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about the effect and safety of LCZ696 and ARBs in hypertensive patients, extracted relevant data and evaluated the quality of the included literature according to the RCT quality evaluation standard recommended by Cochrane Reviewer’s Handbook, using RevMan 5.3, and performed meta-analysis. Results. Eight RCTs studies were included, with a total of 4313 patients. Compared with ARBs, LCZ696 can better reduce systolic blood pressure (msSBP) (WMD −4.29 mmHg; 95% CI: −5.37 to −3.21; P  < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) (WMD −1.87 mmHg; 95% CI:−2.38 to −1.36; P  < 0.01), ambulatory systolic blood pressure (maSBP) (WMD −3.37 mmHg; 95% CI:−4.26 to −2.47; P  < 0.01), and ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (maDBP) (WMD −1.47 mmHg; 95% CI: −1.97 to −0.97; P  < 0.01). In terms of safety, LCZ696 is basically the same as ARBs, but LCZ696 is more likely to cause cough than ARBs (OR = 2.38; 95% CI: 1.27 to 4.47; P  < 0.01). Conclusion. LCZ696 can significantly reduce the blood pressure level of patients with hypertension, but it is necessary to pay attention to whether the patient will experience coughing after taking the drug.

scholarly journals The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D Patoulias ◽  
A Boulmpou ◽  
C E Papadopoulos ◽  
F Siskos ◽  
K Stavropoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Ambulatory Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

Abstract Background Hypertension augments overall cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), constituting a major additional burden for diabetic subjects; however, control rates of hypertension remain suboptimal. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), second-line treatment option for diabetics, have revolutionized the field of T2DM therapeutic management due to their pleiotropic effects, while they seem to hold multiple cardiovascular benefits. A few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluated the effect of GLP-1RAs on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) provides a better method to predict long-term cardiovascular outcomes than office blood pressure. Purpose We sought to determine the effect of GLP-1RAs on ABPM, pooling data from relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods We searched 2 major electronic databases, namely PubMed and Cochrane/CENTRAL, along with grey literature sources, for RCTs assessing the effect of various GLP-1RAs on ABP in patients with T2DM. Results After screening of the potentially eligible records, 7 RCTs were finally included in our meta-analysis (4 parallel-group and 3 cross-over). GLP-1RA treatment compared to placebo or active control resulted in a nonsignificant decrease in 24-h systolic blood pressure (MD=−1.57 mm Hg, 95% CI: −4.12 to 0.98, I2=63%) (Figure 1) and in 24-h diastolic blood pressure (MD=1.28 mmHg, 95% CI: −0.31 to 2.87, I2=49%) (Figure 2). No subgroup differences between the various GLP-1RAs were identified. More specifically, it was demonstrated that liraglutide once daily produced a non-significant decrease in 24-h systolic blood pressure (MD=−1.43 mm Hg, 95% CI: −5.24 to 2.38, I2=72%) and a non-significant increase in 24-h diastolic blood pressure (MD=1.47 mm Hg, 95% CI: −1.12 to 4.05, I2=61%), while data concerning the effect of once weekly dulaglutide and twice daily exenatide on ABPM were pooled from one RCT respectively (Figures 1, 2). Conclusions Antidiabetic treatment with GLP-1RAs does not influence either systolic or diastolic ABP in patients with T2DM. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1 Figure 2

Selective versus non-selective alpha-blockade prior to adrenalectomy for pheochromocytoma – systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karolina Zawadzka ◽  
Krzysztof Więckowski ◽  
Piotr Małczak ◽  
Michał Wysocki ◽  
Piotr Major ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Adrenergic Blockade ◽  
Alpha Blockers ◽  
Alpha Blockade ◽  
Sympathetic Paraganglioma

Objective: Alpha-adrenergic blockade is currently the first choice of preoperative treatment in patients with functional pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma. Nevertheless, there is no consensus whether selective or non-selective alpha-blockade is superior for preventing both perioperative hemodynamic instability and complications. Design: Our study aimed to compare selective and non-selective alpha-blockade through a systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were searched for eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies comparing selective and non-selective alpha-blockade in pheochromocytoma and sympathetic paraganglioma surgery in adults were included. Data on perioperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative outcomes were extracted. Results: Eleven studies with 1,344 patients were enrolled. Patients receiving selective alpha-blockade had higher maximum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (WMD 12.14 mm Hg, 95% CI 6.06-18.21, p<0.0001) compared to those treated with non-selective alpha-blockade. Additionally, in the group pretreated with selective alpha-blockers, intraoperative vasodilators were used more frequently (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.44-4.20, p=0.001). Patients treated with selective alpha-blockers had lower minimum intraoperative systolic blood pressure (WMD -2.03 mmHg, 95% CI -4.06 to -0.01, p=0.05) and shorter length of hospital stay (WMD -0.58 days, 95% CI -1.12 to -0.04, p=0.04). Operative time, overall morbidity and mortality did not differ between the groups. Conclusions: This meta-analysis shows non-selective alpha-blockade was more effective in preventing intraoperative blood pressure fluctuations while maintaining comparable risk of both intraoperative and postoperative hypotension and overall morbidity.

Exercise and Resting Blood Pressure in Children and Adolescents: A Meta-Analysis

2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 83-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
George A. Kelley ◽  
Kristi S. Kelley
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Resting Blood Pressure ◽  
Initial Blood Pressure

The purpose of this study was to use the meta-analytic approach to examine the effects of exercise on resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure in children and adolescents. Twenty-five studies that included 84 groups (45 exercise, 39 control) and 3,189 subjects (1,885 exercise, 1,304 control) met the criteria for inclusion. Using a random effects model, non-significant decreases of approximately 2% were found for resting systolic (mean – SEM, –2 – 1 mmHg, 95% CI, –4 to 1 mmHg) and diastolic (mean – SEM, –1 – 1 mmHg, 95% CI, –3 to 1 mmHg) blood pressure. Greater decreases in resting systolic blood pressure were found for nonrandomized versus randomized controlled trials (p = 0.001). There was also a statistically significant association between changes in resting systolic blood pressure and initial blood pressure (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) and body weight (r = 0.64, p < 0.001). However, when limited to randomized trials, these results were no longer statistically significant. The results of this study suggest that exercise does not reduce resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure in children and adolescents. However, a need exists for additional randomized controlled trials, especially among hypertensive children and adolescents.

The effect of regular aquatic exercise on blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yutaka Igarashi ◽  
Yoshie Nogami
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Endurance Exercise ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Aquatic Exercise ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Background No meta-analysis has examined the effect of regular aquatic exercise on blood pressure. The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of regular aquatic exercise on blood pressure. Design A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods Databases were searched for literature published up to April 2017. The randomized controlled trials analysed involved healthy adults, an intervention group that only performed aquatic exercise and a control group that did not exercise, no other intervention, and trials indicated mean systolic blood pressure or diastolic blood pressure. The net change in blood pressure was calculated from each trial, and the changes in blood pressure were pooled by a random effects model, and the risk of heterogeneity was evaluated. Subgroup analysis of subjects with hypertension, subjects who performed endurance exercise (or not), and subjects who only swam (or not) was performed, and the net changes in blood pressure were pooled. Results The meta-analysis examined 14 trials involving 452 subjects. Pooled net changes in blood pressure improved significantly (systolic blood pressure −8.4 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure −3.3 mmHg) and the changes in systolic blood pressure contained significant heterogeneity. When subjects were limited to those with hypertension, those who performed endurance exercise and subjects who did not swim, pooled net changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased significantly, but the heterogeneity of systolic blood pressure did not improve. Conclusion Like exercise on land, aquatic exercise should have a beneficial effect by lowering blood pressure. In addition, aquatic exercise should lower the blood pressure of subjects with hypertension, and other forms of aquatic exercise besides swimming should also lower blood pressure.

scholarly journals Effects of music on systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate: a meta-analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 309-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit S. Loomba ◽  
Rohit Arora ◽  
Parinda H. Shah ◽  
Suraj Chandrasekar ◽  
Janos Molnar
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Blood Pressure Variability and Prognosis in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Yuliang Zhao ◽  
Letian Yang ◽  
Shaobin Yu ◽  
Stephen Salerno ◽  
Yi Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Coefficient Of Variation ◽  
Blood Pressure Variability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Stratified Analysis

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The prognostic value of blood pressure variability (BPV) in patients receiving hemodialysis is inconclusive. In this study, we aimed to assess the association between BPV and clinical outcomes in the hemodialysis population. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Pubmed/Medline, EMBASE, Ovid, the Cochrane Library, and the Web of Science databases were searched for relevant articles published until April 1, 2020. Studies on the association between BPV and prognosis in patients receiving hemodialysis were included. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 14 studies (37,976 patients) were included in the analysis. In patients receiving hemodialysis, systolic BPV was associated with higher all-cause (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.19; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.10–1.22; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) mortality. In the stratified analysis of systolic BPV, interdialytic systolic BPV, rather than 44-h ambulatory systolic BPV or intradialytic systolic BPV, was identified to be related to both all-cause (HR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.05–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.001) and cardiovascular (HR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.06–1.22; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) mortality. Among the different BPV metrics, the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was a predictor of both all-cause (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and cardiovascular (<i>p</i> = 0.002) mortality. Although diastolic BPV was associated with all-cause mortality (HR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.01–1.17; <i>p</i> = 0.02) in patients receiving hemodialysis, it failed to predict cardiovascular mortality (HR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52–1.42; <i>p</i> = 0.56). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> This meta-analysis revealed that, in patients receiving hemodialysis, interdialytic systolic BPV was associated with both increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the coefficient of variation of systolic blood pressure was identified as a potentially promising metric of BPV in predicting all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The use of 44-h ambulatory systolic BPV, intradialytic systolic BPV, and metrics of diastolic BPV in the prognosis of the hemodialysis population require further investigation (PROSPERO registry number: CRD42019139215).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document