scholarly journals Long-Term Mortality and Morbidity Related to Congestive Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (CHFrEF) in Palestinian Patients Maintained on Submaximal Sacubitril/Valsartan Doses: A Pilot Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Raed Aqel ◽  
Tareq Z. Alzughayyar ◽  
Sadi A. Abukhalaf ◽  
Rami A. Misk ◽  
Jihad Samer Zalloum
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Combination Drug ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Classification

Background. The efficacy of sacubitril/valsartan, a newly introduced combination drug for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), was demonstrated in the PARADIGM-HF trial conducted in Western countries. However, these findings need to be verified in the Middle Eastern context, where patients may exhibit a different response due to different environmental and racial factors. Objectives. The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of submaximal sacubitril/valsartan doses in terms of improving the disease symptoms, as measured by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) percentage, as well as establish long-term morbidity and mortality associated with HFrEF among Palestinian patients administered target doses of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). Material and Methods. This study involved a retrospective review of charts related to patients with HFrEF maintained on sacubitril/valsartan and was conducted in a referral cardiology clinic in Palestine. The inclusion criteria were age 18+, HFrEF diagnosis, sacubitril/valsartan usage for at least six months during the period between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, and LVEF < 40 % . The exclusion criteria included LVEF ≥ 40 % and drug administration duration < 6 months. The collected data included NYHA class, as well as LVEF, serum sodium (Na), potassium (K), serum creatinine (Cr), and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels and the mortality rate before and after the minimum treatment duration. IBM SPSS STATISTICS for Windows, version 20.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. IBM Corp., released 2012, was used for data analysis, whereby T score was calculated for comparisons between numerical groups, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. The initial study sample comprised of 205 consecutive patients with HFrEF maintained on sacubitril/valsartan for at least six months from January 1, 2016, to June 30, 2019. Three patients were excluded due to attrition, along with further 12 patients with LVEF ≥ 40 % (based on the PARADIGM-HF trial criteria). Throughout the treatment period, most patients showed escalating improvement in terms of the LVEF and NYHA classification, as LVEF = 29.8 % and NYHA = 3 were obtained on average before initiating sacubitril/valsartan, compared to 41% and 1.7, respectively, after 6-month treatment ( p = 0.0003 and 0.046, respectively). These improvements in LVEF and NYHA class were noted across all sacubitril/valsartan doses (50−400 mg). However, 23 patients (12%) died while undergoing sacubitril/valsartan treatment. Conclusion. A significant long-term reduction in the mortality and morbidity rates was observed in Palestinian patients with HFrEF maintained on submaximal doses of sacubitril/valsartan.

Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Combined with Dapagliflozin on Long-Term Cardiac Mortality in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972110473
Author(s):  
Umut Karabulut ◽  
Kudret Keskin ◽  
Dilay Karabulut ◽  
Ece Yiğit ◽  
Zerrin Yiğit
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor

The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor dapagliflozin have been shown to reduce rehospitalization and cardiac mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to compare the long-term cardiac and all-cause mortality of ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy against ARNI monotherapy in patients with HFrEF. This retrospective study involved 244 patients with HF with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV symptoms and ejection fraction ≤40%. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ARNI monotherapy and ARNI+dapagliflozin. Median follow-up was 2.5 (.16–3.72) years. One hundred and seventy-five (71.7%) patients were male, and the mean age was 65.9 (SD, 10.2) years. Long-term cardiac mortality rates were significantly lower in the ARNI+dapagliflozin group (7.4%) than in the ARNI monotherapy group (19.5%) ( P = .01). Dapagliflozin [Hazard Ratio (HR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] = .29 [.10–.77]; P = .014] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [HR (95% CI) = .89 (.85–.93); P < .001] were found to be independent predictors of cardiac mortality. Our study showed a significant reduction in cardiac mortality with ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy compared with ARNI monotherapy.

scholarly journals The central arterial stiffness parameters in decompensated versus compensated states of heart failure: a paired comparative cohort study

2022 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmed El Fol ◽  
Waleed Ammar ◽  
Yasser Sharaf ◽  
Ghada Youssef
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Arterial Stiffness ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Pulse Wave ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Arterial stiffness is strongly linked to the pathogenesis of heart failure and the development of acute decompensation in patients with stable chronic heart failure. This study aimed to compare arterial stiffness indices in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) during the acute decompensated state, and three months later after hospital discharge during the compensated state. Results One hundred patients with acute decompensated HFrEF (NYHA class III and IV) and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% were included in the study. During the initial and follow-up visits, all patients underwent full medical history taking, clinical examination, transthoracic echocardiography, and non-invasive pulse wave analysis by the Mobil-O-Graph 24-h device for measurement of arterial stiffness. The mean age was 51.6 ± 6.1 years and 80% of the participants were males. There was a significant reduction of the central arterial stiffness indices in patients with HFrEF during the compensated state compared to the decompensated state. During the decompensated state, patients presented with NYHA FC IV (n = 64) showed higher AI (24.5 ± 10.0 vs. 16.8 ± 8.6, p < 0.001) and pulse wave velocity (9.2 ± 1.3 vs. 8.5 ± 1.2, p = 0.021) than patients with NYHA FC III, and despite the relatively smaller number of females, they showed higher stiffness indices than males. Conclusions Central arterial stiffness indices in patients with HFrEF were significantly lower in the compensated state than in the decompensated state. Patients with NYHA FC IV and female patients showed higher stiffness indices in their decompensated state of heart failure.

P3547Real world experience of sacubitril/valsartan: insights on tolerability and outcome from a specialised heart failure clinic

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
K C Neoh ◽  
D Rasoul ◽  
F Hunt ◽  
D W S Chong
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
National Database ◽  
Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Sacubitril/Valsartan has been shown to improve symptoms and outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) reduced ejection fraction in a single large randomised controlled trial. However, real-world data on its effect is limited. Purpose Our centre operates a dedicated HF clinic for the initiation and titration of Sacubitril/Valsartan in suitable patients. We report on patient tolerability and incidence of adverse effects. We also assessed change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) post-treatment, as well as HF hospitalisation and mortality at 6 months. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients seen in the clinic between January 2016 to January 2019. Patient demographics and pre-initiation treatments were recorded. We compared NYHA class and LVEF category as measured by echocardiography, at initiation and post-titration to the maximum tolerated dose. Data on HF admissions were obtained from electronic hospital records and mortality from a national database. Results A total of 179 patients were initiated on Sacubitril/Valsartan and included in the study. Mean age was 71 years (41–90), and 138 (77%) were male. Half of the patient cohort (89) had an ischaemic aetiology. Prior to initiation, all patients were established on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. Almost all were on a beta-blocker (99%) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (98%). 56 patients (31%) had a Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy (CRT) device and 31 (17%) had an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD). Only 4 patients (2%) had to discontinue treatment completely due to an adverse reaction. Among them, 3 patients sustained an acute kidney injury (AKI) while 1 patient had increased breathlessness. 40 patients (22%) reported symptomatic hypotension which required dose reduction. 7 patients (4%) sustained an AKI. 2 patients reported a rash and 1 patient reported nausea. Figure 1 shows the change in NYHA class after establishment on Sacubitril/Valsartan. Data on change in LVEF post establishment of Sacubitril/Valsartan was available in 124 patients and is shown in figure 2. A total of 133 patients had completed titration of treatment by July 2018 and included in the analysis of 6-month outcome. 13 patients had one HF hospitalisation and all-cause mortality was 4.5% (6 patients). Only 1 patient had heart failure documented as the primary cause of death. Change in NYHA class and LVEF Conclusion In our cohort of well treated HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, 40% of patients experienced an improvement in NYHA class after establishment on Sacubitril/Valsartan while 35% of patients also experienced a significant improvement in LVEF. Treatment was well tolerated and the discontinuation rate was low when managed in a dedicated HF clinic focused on initiation of Sacubitril/Valsartan.

Efficacy and Safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction during the Vulnerable Phase: A Multicenter, Assessor-Blinded, Prospective, Observational, Cohort Study

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Yun He ◽  
Xuemei Lu ◽  
Yi Zheng ◽  
Mingbao Song ◽  
Bin Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Valsartan Group

<b><i>Background:</i></b> The 3-month period after hospitalization for acute cardiac failure is a vulnerable phase with the highest risk of mortality and rehospitalization. Safety and efficacy of early initiation of sacubitril/valsartan during the index hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) is unclear. Therefore, we tested whether sacubitril/valsartan could result in a lower rate of a composite outcome of first hospitalization for heart failure and death from cardiovascular causes compared to inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system alone. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We enrolled patients hospitalized for ADHF and reduced ejection fraction at 4 sites; patients were divided into a sacubitril/valsartan group or an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) group. All patients were followed up for 3 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was outcomes as a composite of death from cardiovascular causes and rehospitalization for heart failure. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 251 patients who received sacubitril/valsartan and 251 patients who received ACEIs/ARBs had similar propensity scores and were included and compared. The primary endpoint was reached in 40 patients (15.9%) treated with sacubitril/valsartan and in 59 patients (23.5%) managed by ACEI/ARB (HR, 0.650; 95% CI: 0.435–0.971; <i>p</i> = 0.035). The NYHA class improved in 72.1% of patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group and in 59.8% of patients in the ACEI/ARB group (HR, 1.303; 95% CI: 1.097–1.548, <i>p</i> = 0.004). The key safety outcomes endpoints did not significantly differ. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Among patients hospitalized with ADHF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, we observed that sacubitril/valsartan therapy led to reduction in death from cardiovascular causes and rehospitalizations for heart failure when compared to ACEI/ARB therapy alone during the vulnerable phase. Our results support that sacubitril/valsartan may be administered early in the vulnerable phase after ADHF and improves NYHA class.

scholarly journals Clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure taking tolvaptan: a comparison of patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Seki ◽  
Yoshiaki Kubota ◽  
Junya Matsuda ◽  
Yukichi Tokita ◽  
Yu-ki Iwasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

AbstractFew studies have investigated the clinical benefit of the long-term use of tolvaptan (TLV) for heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the long-term prognosis of patients administered TLV for > 1 year among patients who had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those who had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Overall, 591 consecutive patients were admitted to our hospital and administered TLV for HF between 2011 and 2018. We retrospectively enrolled 147 patients who were administered TLV for > 1 year. We divided them into the HFpEF group (n = 77, 52.4%) and the HFrEF group (n = 70; 47.6%). Their clinical backgrounds and long-term prognosis were examined. Compared with the patients in the HFrEF group, the patients in the HFpEF group were significantly older and included more women. Moreover, the HFpEF group showed significantly lower all-cause mortality (38.6% vs. 24.7%; log-rank, P = 0.014) and cardiovascular mortality during the average 2.7-year follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that all-cause mortality was correlated with male sex, HFpEF, and changes in serum creatinine levels from baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that HFpEF was an independent influencing factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.86; P = 0.017). Long-term administration of TLV may be more beneficial for HFpEF than for HFrEF.

scholarly journals Improvement of left ventricular systolic performance during sacubitril/valsartan in a cohort of patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Monosilio ◽  
D Filomena ◽  
S Cimino ◽  
M Neccia ◽  
F Luongo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Right Atrial ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Sacubitril/valsartan is a well-established therapeutic option for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). While it was clearly demonstrated to improve patients’ clinical conditions, its potential role in inducing left ventricle (LV) reverse remodeling is still under investigation.  Purpose to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic effect of sacubitril/valsartan on a cohort of patients with HFrEF after six months of therapy. Methods 36 patients with HFrEF eligible to start a therapy with sacubitril/valsartan were enrolled. A standard and advanced echocardiographic evaluation was performed before starting the therapy and after six months of follow up (FU). Off-line analysis of left ventricle global longitudinal strain (GLS), longitudinal strain of the free wall of the right ventricle (RVFWSL) and left atrial strain (LAS) was conducted. Clinical and biochemical parameters were evaluated as well. Results At six months of FU NYHA class improved in the vast majority of patients (NYHA class III at baseline vs FU: 56% vs 5%, p 0.001). We observed a significant reduction in LV end-diastolic (99.62 ± 33.24 vs 91.54 ± 33.36, p 0.043) and end-systolic (69.99 ± 26.01 vs 58.68 ± 25.7, p 0.001) volumes and an improvement of LV ejection fraction (30.4 ± 5.02 vs 37.3 ± 6.4, p &lt; 0.001). After six months of therapy, GLS significantly improved (-9.71 ± 2.87 vs -13.04 ± 3.14, p &lt; 0.001). No differences in left and right atrial volumes (respectively 56.6 ± 29 vs 54 ± 30, p 0.349; 54.7 ± 23.7 vs 48.3 ± 19, p 0.157), RVFWSL (-16,5 ± 5,4 vs -16,8 ± 1,5) and LAS (14 ± 6 vs 19 ± 8, p 0.197) were found at FU.  Conclusion Left ventricular function evaluated with standard and advanced echocardiographic parameters improved after six months of therapy with sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients. Reduction in LV volumes was found as well. Echo Analysis Baseline Echo Analysis (n= 36) 6 Months FU Echo Analysis (n= 36) p LVEDVi, mL/m2 99, 62 ± 33,24 91,54 ± 33,36 0,043 LVESVi, mL/m2 69,99 ± 26,01 58,68 ± 25,7 0,001 LVEF, % 30,4 ± 5, 02 37,3 ± 6,4 &lt; 0,001 E/E’ average 12,16 ± 3,74 9,71 ± 1,33 0,023 LS Endo Average ,% -9,71 ± 2,87 -13,04 ± 3,14 &lt; 0,001 LVEF left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDVi: left ventricular end diastolic volume indexed, LVESVi: left ventricular end systolic volume indexed; LS: longitudinal strain

Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction – A Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Otto A Smiseth ◽  
Anders Opdahl ◽  
Espen Boe ◽  
Helge Skulstad
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Diastolic Heart Failure ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Filling Pressure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Objective Evidence

Heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (HF-PEF), sometimes named diastolic heart failure, is a common condition most frequently seen in the elderly and is associated with arterial hypertension and left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. Symptoms are attributed to a stiff left ventricle with compensatory elevation of filling pressure and reduced ability to increase stroke volume by the Frank-Starling mechanism. LV interaction with stiff arteries aggravates these problems. Prognosis is almost as severe as for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF), in part reflecting co-morbidities. Before the diagnosis of HF-PEF is made, non-cardiac etiologies must be excluded. Due to the non-specific nature of heart failure symptoms, it is essential to search for objective evidence of diastolic dysfunction which, in the absence of invasive data, is done by echocardiography and demonstration of signs of elevated LV filling pressure, impaired LV relaxation, or increased LV diastolic stiffness. Antihypertensive treatment can effectively prevent HF-PEF. Treatment of HF-PEF is symptomatic, with similar drugs as in HF-REF.

scholarly journals Long-term outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia and heart failure with preserved or reduced ejection fraction

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 307-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kavita B Khaira ◽  
Ellen Brinza ◽  
Gagan D Singh ◽  
Ezra A Amsterdam ◽  
Stephen W Waldo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Critical Limb Ischemia ◽  
Limb Ischemia ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Long Term Survival ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
History Of

The impact of heart failure (HF) on long-term survival in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) has not been well described. Outcomes stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) are also unknown. A single center retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent treatment for CLI from 2006 to 2013. Baseline demographics, procedural data and outcomes were analyzed. HF diagnosis was based on appropriate signs and symptoms as well as results of non-invasive testing. Among 381 CLI patients, 120 (31%) had a history of HF and 261 (69%) had no history of heart failure (no-HF). Within the HF group, 74 (62%) had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and 46 (38%) had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The average EF for those with no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF were 59±13% vs 56±9% vs 30±9%, respectively. The likelihood of having concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) was lowest in the no-HF group (43%), higher in the HFpEF group (70%) and highest in the HFrEF group (83%) ( p=0.001). Five-year survival was on average twofold higher in the no-HF group (43%) compared to both the HFpEF (19%, p=0.001) and HFrEF groups (24%, p=0.001). Long-term survival rates did not differ between the two HF groups ( p=0.50). There was no difference in 5-year freedom from major amputation or freedom from major adverse limb events between the no-HF, HFpEF and HFrEF groups, respectively. Overall, the combination of CLI and HF is associated with poor 5-year survival, independent of the degree of left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

scholarly journals Long-Term clinical outcomes of subcutaneous implantable defibrillator therapy in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a single center experience

EP Europace ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Ben Kilani ◽  
P Jacon ◽  
A Carabelli ◽  
S Venier ◽  
P Defaye
Keyword(s):  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): P. JACON consultant: Boston Scientific France Introduction The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is the most effective therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) has been considered as a comparable and relatively safer alternative to transvenous ICD in patients (pts) without pacing indication. Purpose Our aim was to assess the clinical "real-life" outcomes of S-ICD in patients with HFrEF and primary or secondary prevention, over a long-term follow-up (FU) period after S-ICD implantation. Methods All pts with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%) implanted with a S-ICD and a FU above 6 months were included in a cross-sectional monocentric study. Pts were followed by remote monitoring. Results 88 pts were included (52 ± 12.8 years old, male 87.5%). Indications were: primary 92% and secondary 8% prevention  (ischemic cardiopathy 46%; dilated 46%; hypertrophic 5%; congenital 2%; valvular 1%). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 27%. 9 pts had a previous transvenous ICD implanted, but required revision because of infection or lead defects. The mean FU period was 33 ± 18 months with a mortality rate of 10% (S-ICD-related death secondary to inappropriate (inap) shocks for one patient). 5 pts underwent S-ICD system extraction after a mean FU period of 30 ± 21 months. Reasons were infectious complication (1 pt), pacing indication (2 pts) and S-ICD lead dysfunction (2 pts). Extraction after heart transplant was performed in 4 pts. During FU, 18 pts (20.5%) experienced at least one therapy: 8 pts (9%) with appropriate (ap) (3.3% per year) and 11 pts (12%) with inap shocks (4.36% per year). A total number of 24 ap shocks have been observed (3 ± 4 ap shocks per patient, several shocks for 3 pts), the first shock occurred after a mean FU period of 24 ± 14 months. 2 pts were referred to VT ablation and no recurrence of events was observed after medical therapy modification for the other pts. For the 11 pts with inap shocks, time to the first event was 19 ± 20 months. Reasons were: supraventricular arrhythmias (18%), T wave (36%) and noise (54%) oversensing. There was 1.8 ± 1.6 shock per patient with several shocks for 4 pts. Among pts with inap shocks, 2 pts required S-ICD system extraction, 1 pt died, while reprogramming and medical therapy options were efficient in other pts. Conclusion In pts with HFrEF at high risk of sudden cardiac death, S-ICD has proven to be effective in treating ventricular arrhythmias. However, more investigations must be conducted to explain the real-life high rate of inappropriate therapies. Abstract Figure. Survival-free from therapies curve

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document