scholarly journals Data Expression and Protection of Intellectual Property Education Resources Based on Machine Learning

Complexity ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Meng Mei ◽  
Hui Tan

With the improvement and growth of instructional informatisation, the contradiction between the open supply of academic resources, information expression, and mental property safety is turning into greater acute. Remedying the relationship between the two is very necessary for the overall performance of records expression of academic assets and the advent of true surroundings for mental property protection. The safety of mental property rights is to shield the rights and pursuits of know-how owners, defend the strength of information producers to produce knowledge, and defend the supply of academic sources sharing. The data expression and protection of intellectual property education resources based on machine learning is a kind of protection tool for the intellectual property of education resources developed using the characteristics of automation, real-time monitoring, and growth of machine learning. It can prevent web crawlers from harming e-commerce websites, prevent them from stealing the intellectual property of e-commerce websites, and analyse web crawlers that visit websites to prevent important website data from being stolen by them. From this point of view, based on the relationship between the fact expression of instructional sources and the safety of mental property rights, this paper advocates to promote the records expression and safety of mental property rights of academic sources from a couple of perspectives.

Author(s):  
Олександр Бутнік-Сіверський

The article summarizes theoretical and methodical problems related to the need to create a logical valuation theory and methodology of intellectual property, identification and valuation of intellectual property rights and its relation to accounting; the problem of methods of valuation of intellectual property rights within their subject characteris considered, as well as identification of the majority of intellectual resources that take part in production and contribute to the improvement of product quality, technological update, innovative orientation of economic processes; the need to strengthen the state policy of carrying out the valuation of intellectual property rights in relation to intangible assets within the objects of intellectual propertyrights (OIPRs) has been considered. The author analyzes the relationship to the value appraisal of OIPRs, which is most often done by using a narrow range of methods (approaches) within the generally recognized: income, cost and market (comparative) approaches, that affects the limitation of the selected methods of valuation, leads to a template use of valuation methodic without a variety of  OIPRs that have specific features of their use. Also it is disclosed the meaningful meaning of the development of a single terminology and value classification, whichcan be carried out on the basis of synthesis of foreign experience in the field of valuation and value management, as well as the analysis of valuation standards.The problem became due to the OIPRs conducting of value appraisal of the advanced intellectual capital, that is complicated by the fact that by economic essence it does not belong to the traditional assets of the enterprise and has its own peculiarities. It is urgent to rethink existing standards on valuation and supplement them with new ones in the direction of minimizing fundamental contradictions between the traditional accounting methodology and the valuation of OIPRs, taking into account the peculiarities of the development of the information and intellectual economy. It is methodically detailed by the economic content the techniques used to determine the value of OIPRs, which are divided into three groups: approaches, methods and methodologies, from the point of view of economic content, conditions of application and valuation procedure, as well as requirements for the appraisal of the value of OIPRs in the privatization of state enterprises and  organizations. The author considers the problems of organization of training of professional ppraisers in Ukraine taking into account the requirements of State Property Fund of Ukraine and their legal support.


Author(s):  
Danai Christopoulou ◽  
Nikolaos Papageorgiadis ◽  
Chengang Wang ◽  
Georgios Magkonis

AbstractWe study the role of the strength of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) law protection and enforcement in influencing horizontal productivity spillovers from inward FDI to domestic firms in host countries. While most WTO countries adopted strong IPR legislation due to exogenous pressure resulting from the signing of the Trade-Related Aspects of IPR (TRIPS) agreement, public IPR enforcement strength continues to vary significantly between countries. We meta-analyse 49 studies and find that public IPR enforcement strength has a direct positive effect on horizontal productivity spillovers from inward FDI to domestic firms and a negative moderating effect on the relationship between IPR law protection strength and horizontal productivity spillovers from inward FDI to domestic firms.


2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160
Author(s):  
Ciprian Raul Romiţan

The moral rights represent the legal expression of the relationship between the workand its creator; they precede, survive and exert a permanent influence on the economic rights.Moral rights are independent of economic rights, the author of a work preserving these rightseven after the transfer of its property rights.The right to claim recognition as the author of the work, called in the doctrine as the"right of paternity of the work" is enshrined in art. 10 lit. b) of the law and it is based on theneed to respect the natural connection between the author and his work. The right toauthorship is the most important prerogative that constitutes intellectual property rights ingeneral and consists of recognizing the true author of a scientific, literary or artistic work.


Author(s):  
Paul Torremans

This chapter discusses the enforcement procedures used in relation to intellectual property rights, the civil remedies that apply, and some issues which arise in relation to the gathering of evidence in intellectual property cases. It identifies three essential elements in the relationship between intellectual property rights and remedies. First, there are the traditional remedies headed by damages that are normally granted at the trial. Second, intellectual property infringement often requires immediate action or a pre-emptive strike. Finally, gathering evidence that is vital for the full trial in an infringement case.


2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 726-736
Author(s):  
Paulo Burnier da Silveira ◽  
João Felipe Aranha Lacerda

The relationship between competition policy and intellectual property has been largely analyzed by the specialized literature. Nonetheless, the competitive impact of the enforcement of intellectual property rights in aftermarkets is still a challenging field of study. This article discusses the interface between intellectual property and competition in light of a case concerning the Brazilian automobile aftermarket.


Author(s):  
Alison Jones ◽  
Brenda Sufrin

All books in this flagship series contain carefully selected substantial extracts from key cases, legislation, and academic debate, providing able students with a stand-alone resource. This chapter examines some of the different types of intellectual property rights (IPRs) before outlining the relationship between intellectual property and both EU competition law and the EU free movement rules. It focuses, however, on IP licensing agreements and their treatment under Article 101. The chapter is organized as follows. Section 3 traces the development of EU competition policy to IP licensing agreements. Sections 4 and 5 examine the current Technology Transfer Block Exemption, Regulation 772/2004 (TTBER) and the Guidelines in detail (noting where significant changes might occur in 2014). Sections 6, 7, and 8 deal with trade mark licences, trade mark delimitation agreements, and copyright (other than software) licences not covered by the TTBER and Guidelines. Section 9 outlines issues arising in cases involving IPRs under Article 102, while Section 10 concludes.


2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Rodriguez

Patent pools do not correct all problems associated with patent thickets. In this respect, patent pools might not stop the outsider problem from striking pools. Moreover, patent pools can be expensive to negotiate, can exclude patent holders with smaller numbers of patents or enable a group of major players to form a cartel that excludes new competitors. For all the above reasons, patent pools are subject to regulatory clearance because they could result in a monopoly. The aim of this article is to present the relationship between patents and competition in a broad context.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1147
Author(s):  
Ignat Kulkov ◽  
Björn Berggren ◽  
Kent Eriksson ◽  
Magnus Hellström ◽  
Kim Wikstrom

PurposeThis paper focuses on medical device university spin-offs (USOs), taking into account the peculiarities of financial and nonfinancial support and intellectual property rights (IPRs). The authors declare that these parameters play a significant role in business development at the early stages.Design/methodology/approachThis empirical data consist of individual and group interviews in Finland and Sweden, which are later inductively analyzed.FindingsThe results show that public financial support contributes to the formation and start of sales stages in small countries and local markets. However, at the validation stage, approaches for supporting entrepreneurship in the field of medical devices may differ. The ownership of IPRs assists in the development of entrepreneurship in the region due to the transfer of research results and researchers to the industry and increases the number of spin-offs and the cooperation of universities with business.Originality/valueThis contribution is in the identification of the key parameters for the formation, support and development of the USOs from the point of view of the availability of financial resources and the ownership of IPRs.


Upravlenie ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-78
Author(s):  
Рогожин ◽  
S. Rogozhin ◽  
Сазанова ◽  
S. Sazanova

The authors consider the intellectual property rights from two points of view: legal theory and institutional economical theory. Contents of “intellectual property” and “intellectual rights” concepts have been revealed in this paper, and the necessity of their study has been justified not only from the legal point of view, but also from the economic one. The authors emphasize that the institutional economics in general and the economic theory of property rights, in particular, have a great potential in the study both of theoretical and practical aspects related to intellectual rights. According to the authors, it is the institutional approach which will create an effective legislation in this area.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 44
Author(s):  
Desriyana Desriyana ◽  
H.A. Lawali Hasibuan

<p class="JudulAbstrakInggris"><em>Application of Article 68 Paragraph 1 Jo Article 4 and 6 of Law No. 15 of 2001 in Brand Dispute Resolution Kok Tong Kopitiam of Decision No. 05 / Merek / 2010 / PN.Niaga Medan</em></p><p class="JudulAbstrakInggris">Abstract</p><h1>Brands are the result of human thought and intelligence which can take the form of discovery. Brands are used as a differentiator between products produced by a person or legal entity with products produced by other parties. The current journey to free trade, aspects of intellectual property rights, will play a very important role in national and international trade. Intellectual property rights are rights that arise or are born due to human intellectual abilities in the form of findings, works, creations or creations in the field of technology, science, art and literature. Based on Article 68 paragraph (1) of Law Number 15 of 2001 which states that "Brand cancellation claims can be filed by interested parties based on the reasons referred to in Article 4, Article 5, and Article 6. This type of research is normative juridical namely research which is focused on reviewing the application or rules or norms in positive law. The nature of this research is analytical descriptive, which carefully describes the characteristics of the facts to determine the frequency of something that happens. The purpose of this study was to find out the judge's consideration in resolving the dispute over the Kong Tong Kopi Tiam brand and to find out the relationship between Article 68 paragraph (1) Jo. Articles 4 and 6 of Law Number 15 of 2001 in the resolution of the Kok Tong Kopi Tiam brand dispute.</h1>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document