scholarly journals Feasibility and Safety of Mark-Guided Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection for Treatment of Esophageal Submucosal Tumors Originating from the Muscularis Propria: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Ben-hua Wu ◽  
Rui-yue Shi ◽  
Hai-yang Zhang ◽  
Ting-ting Liu ◽  
Yan-hui Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Submucosal Tumors ◽  
Procedure Duration

Background. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has effectively removed esophageal submucosal tumors (SMTs) originating from the muscularis propria (MP) layer. However, clinical failure and adverse events of STER remain concerned. In this study, we described a mark-guided STER (markings before creating entry point) and evaluated its feasibility and safety for esophageal SMTs originating from MP. Methods. Patients receiving the mark-guided STER from October 2017 to July 2020 were included and followed up (ranged from 3 to 30 months). The primary outcomes included complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates. The secondary outcomes included procedure duration, main complication, and residual lesions. Results. A total of 242 patients with 242 SMTs (median diameter of 22 mm, ranging from 7 mm to 40 mm) received the mark-guided STER. The median procedure duration was 55 min (ranging from 35 min to 115 min). The complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates were 100%, 98.3%, and 97.5%, respectively. The adverse event rate was 4.5%. However, there was no severe complication. No residual SMTs were detected during the follow-up period. Logistic regression demonstrated that the SMT size and procedure duration were independent factors associated with en bloc resection ( P = 0.02 and P = 0.04 , respectively). Moreover, logistic regression demonstrated that the SMT size was an independent risk factor for main complications ( P = 0.02 ). Conclusion. Mark-guided STER was feasible and safe to remove esophageal SMTs ≦40 mm. However, it is necessary to further verify the feasibility and safety for the esophageal SMTs >40 mm.

Efficacy and complications of submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors and exploration for influencing factors

2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (04) ◽  
pp. 365-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shunzhe Song ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Shen Zhang ◽  
Yanxia Li ◽  
Xiaonan Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Tunneling Endoscopic Resection ◽  
Submucosal Tumors ◽  
Upper Gi ◽  
Upper Gastrointestinal

Abstract Background Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection (STER) has emerged as a feasible technique for resecting upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract submucosal tumors (SMTs) through natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. STER reduces the risk of postoperative perforation and abdominal infections and promotes rapid wound healing. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of STER for small (≤ 3.5 cm) upper GI SMTs and explore the potential factors influencing STER’s efficacy and complication rate. Methods Comprehensive literature searches were performed to find studies on STER for removal of SMTs. Several English-language databases were searched, including MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for the period January 2010 to June 2016. The medical terms “submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection or STER”, “upper gastrointestinal”, and “submucosal tumors” were used in the search. The primary outcome measures were the pooled estimates of the complete resection and en bloc resection rates. The secondary outcome measure was the pooled estimate of complications. Result Twelve studies including 397 patients and 430 lesions were identified. The pooled estimate of the complete resection rate was 98.1 % (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 95.9 – 99.2 %). The pooled estimate of en bloc resection was 94.9 % (95 % CI: 91.1 – 97.1 %). The pooled estimate of gas-related complications such as pneumoperitoneum and subcutaneous emphysema was 21.5 % (95 % CI: 13.2 – 33.1 %). The pooled estimate of inflammation-related complications including pleural and abdominal effusion was 8.4 % (95 % CI: 5.6 – 12.3 %). Gas-related complications occurred more frequently in the esophagogastric junction than in the stomach. In addition, the pooled estimate of delayed bleeding was 2.2 % (95 % CI: 1.0 – 4.7 %). Conclusion STER appeared to be an extremely effective technique for removing upper GI SMTs originating from the muscularis propria layer. In addition, the very low rate of complications also shows the safety of this technique. Tumor size, infiltration depth, and location may influence the complication rates.

The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis

Endoscopy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
De-feng Li ◽  
Ming-Guang Lai ◽  
Mei-feng Yang ◽  
Zhi-yuan Zou ◽  
Jing Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Colorectal Polyps ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mucosal Resection

Abstract Background Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a promising strategy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyp removal. However, the efficacy and safety of the technique for the treatment of ≥ 10-mm colorectal polyps remain unclear. We aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of UEMR for polyps sized 10–19 mm and ≥ 20 mm. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2012 to November 2019. Primary outcomes were the rates of adverse events and residual polyps. Secondary outcomes were the complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates. Results 18 articles including 1142 polyps from 1093 patients met our inclusion criteria. The overall adverse event and residual polyp rates were slightly lower for UEMR when removing colorectal polyps of 10–19 mm vs. ≥ 20 mm (3.5 % vs. 4.3 % and 1.2 % vs. 2.6 %, respectively). The UEMR-related complete resection rate was slightly higher for colorectal polyps of 10–19 mm vs. ≥ 20 mm (97.9 % vs. 92.0 %). However, the en bloc and R0 resection rates were dramatically higher for UEMR removal of polyps of 10–19 mm vs. ≥ 20 mm (83.4 % vs. 36.1 % and 73.0 % vs. 40.0 %, respectively). In addition, univariate meta-regression revealed that polyp size was an independent predictor for complete resection rate (P = 0.03) and en bloc resection (P = 0.01). Conclusions UEMR was an effective and safe technique for the removal of ≥ 10-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. However, UEMR exhibited low en bloc and R0 resection rates for the treatment of ≥ 20-mm polyps.

Endoscopic mucosa-sparing lateral dissection for treatment of gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective cohort study

Endoscopy ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 50 (09) ◽  
pp. 886-890 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yue Li ◽  
Qiang Zhang ◽  
Chaojun Zhu ◽  
Yuchen Luo ◽  
Zelong Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Clinicopathological Characteristics ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Tumors ◽  
Gastric Submucosal Tumors ◽  
Estimated Blood Loss ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background In our previous work, we developed a modified method for the removal of gastric submucosal tumors (SMTs), called endoscopic mucosa-sparing lateral dissection (EMSLD). This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and postoperative outcomes of EMSLD. Methods We prospectively enrolled 25 consecutive patients with gastric SMTs, who received EMSLD treatment. Clinicopathological characteristics and operation-related outcomes were analyzed. Results The mean age of patients was 49.3 ± 9.7 years, and the mean tumor size was 14.6 ± 6.1 mm. En bloc resection was achieved in all cases. The mean procedure time was 47.3 ± 25.9 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was 4.8 ± 3.5 mL. Endoscopic full-thickness resection was performed in six patients (24 %) because the tumors originated from the deep muscularis propria layer. All perforations and resection defects were successfully closed by the retained mucosa and endoclips. No serious complications related to EMSLD were encountered during or after the procedure. Conclusions EMSLD was reliable and effective for the removal of gastric SMTs. However, large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed.

scholarly journals Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (11) ◽  
pp. E1340-E1348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl-Fredrik Rönnow ◽  
Noriya Uedo ◽  
Ervin Toth ◽  
Henrik Thorlacius
Keyword(s):  
Learning Curve ◽  
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Colorectal Neoplasia ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
High Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Submucosal Dissection ◽  
Immediate Bleeding

Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) allows en bloc resection of large colorectal lesions but ESD experience is limited outside Asia. This study evaluated implementation of ESD in the treatment of colorectal neoplasia in a Western center. Patients and methods Three hundred and one cases of colorectal ESD (173 rectal and 128 colonic lesions) were retrospectively evaluated in terms of outcome, learning curve and complications. Results Median size was 4 cm (range 1 – 12.5). En bloc resection was achieved in 241 cases amounting to an en bloc resection rate of 80 %. R0 resection was accomplished in 207 cases (69 %), RX and R1 were attained in 83 (27 %) and 11 (4 %) cases, respectively. Median time was 98 min (range 10 – 588) and median proficiency was 7.2 cm2/h. Complications occurred in 24 patients (8 %) divided into 12 immediate perforations, five delayed perforations, one immediate bleeding and six delayed bleedings. Six patients (2 %), all with proximal lesions, had emergency surgery. Two hundred and four patients were followed up endoscopically and median follow-up time was 13 months (range 3 – 53) revealing seven recurrences (3 %). En bloc rate improved gradually from 60 % during the first period to 98 % during the last period. ESD proficiency significantly improved between the first study period (3.6 cm2/h) and the last study period (10.8 cm2/h). Conclusions This study represents the largest material on colorectal ESD in the west and shows that colorectal ESD can be implemented in clinical routine in western countries after appropriate training and achieve a high rate of en bloc and R0 resection with a concomitant low incidence of complications. ESD of proximal colonic lesions should be attempted with caution during the learning curve because of higher risk of complications.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Visible Dysplasia Treatment in Ulcerative Colitis Patients: Cases Series and Systematic Review of Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffaele Manta ◽  
Angelo Zullo ◽  
Donato Alessandro Telesca ◽  
Danilo Castellani ◽  
Ugo Germani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Pooled Data ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Neoplastic Lesions

Abstract Background and Aims Ulcerative colitis [UC] patients are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer due to chronic inflammation. Endoscopic submucosal dissection [ESD] allows removal of non-invasive neoplastic lesions in the colon, but few data are available on its efficacy in UC patients. Methods Data from consecutive UC patients diagnosed with visible dysplastic lesions in the colon who underwent ESD were evaluated. The en bloc removal, R0 resection and complication rates were calculated. Local recurrence and metachronous lesions during follow-up were identified. A systematic review of the literature with pooled data analysis was performed. Results A total of 53 UC patients [age: 65 years; range 30–74; M/F: 31/22] underwent ESD. The en bloc resection rate was 100%, and the R0 resection rate was 96.2%. Bleeding occurred in seven [13.2%] patients, and perforation in three [5.6%] cases, all treated at endoscopy. No recurrence was observed, but two metachronous lesions were detected. Data from six other studies [three Asian and three European] were available. By pooling data, en bloc resection was successful in 88.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 83.5–92) of 216 lesions and in 91.8% [95% CI = 87.3–94.8] of 208 patients. R0 resection was achieved in 169 ESDs, equivalent to a 78.2% [95% CI = 72.3–83.2] rate for lesions and 81.3% [95% CI = 75.4–86] rate for patients. No difference between European and Asian series was noted. Conclusions This pooled data analysis indicated that ESD is a suitable tool for safely and properly removing non-invasive neoplastic lesions on colonic mucosa of selected UC patients.

scholarly journals Long-Term Clinical Efficacy and Perioperative Safety of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Early Gastric Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yajie Zhao ◽  
Chengfeng Wang
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence Rate ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Prolonged Operative Time

Background. To systematically evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) for early gastric cancer (EGC). Methods. We searched the databases of PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 2000 to April 2017 and included studies that compared the outcomes of ESD with EMR for EGC. These eligible studies that met the inclusion criteria were screened out and were assessed by two independent investigators. Result. In total, 18 retrospective cohort studies were eligible for analysis. Our results indicated that ESD is more beneficial than EMR in increasing the complete resection rate and en bloc resection rate and decreasing the local recurrence rate. However, ESD prolonged operative time and increased incidence of gastric perforation than EMR. No differences were found in postoperative bleeding rate between the two approaches. Conclusion. Compared with EMR, ESD offers higher complete resection rate, higher en bloc resection rate, and lower local recurrence rate but has prolonged operative time and increased incidence of gastric perfusion. There is no statistical difference in the rate of postoperative bleeding between the two groups. However, the above conclusion needs further verification by well-designed, randomized trials with larger samples and long follow-up periods.

Efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection with full or partial circumferential incision using a snare tip for difficult colorectal lesions

Endoscopy ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 51 (09) ◽  
pp. 871-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohisa Yoshida ◽  
Ken Inoue ◽  
Osamu Dohi ◽  
Ritsu Yasuda ◽  
Ryohei Hirose ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Complete Resection ◽  
Benign Lesions ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Therapeutic Outcomes ◽  
Mucosal Incision

Abstract Background We analyzed the efficacy of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), which is a method of making a full or partial circumferential mucosal incision around a tumor with a snare tip for en bloc resection. Methods We reviewed cases from 2011 to 2018 in which precutting EMR (n = 167) and standard EMR (n = 557) were performed for lesions of 10 – 30 mm. Precutting EMR was indicated for benign lesions of 20 – 30 mm or lesions of < 20 mm for which standard EMR was difficult. Through propensity score matching of the two groups, the therapeutic outcomes for 35 lesions of ≥ 20 mm and 98 lesions of < 20 mm in each group were analyzed. Results In the two sizes of lesion, there were significant differences between the precutting and standard groups in the en bloc resection rate (≥ 20 mm 88.6 % vs. 48.5 %, P < 0.001; < 20 mm 98.0 % vs. 85.7 %, P = 0.004) and the histological complete resection rate (≥ 20 mm 71.4 % vs. 42.9 %, P = 0.02; < 20 mm 87.8 % vs. 67.3 %, P < 0.001). Conclusion Precutting EMR enabled high en bloc resection rates in cases involving difficult lesions.

scholarly journals Endoscopic Mucosal Resection of a Proximal Esophageal Pyogenic Granuloma

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Elias Estifan ◽  
Varun Patel ◽  
Matthew Grossman
Keyword(s):  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Muscularis Propria ◽  
Pyogenic Granuloma ◽  
En Bloc Resection ◽  
Bloc Resection ◽  
Capillary Hemangioma ◽  
Prognostic Information ◽  
En Bloc ◽  
Mucosal Resection

Pyogenic Granuloma (PG), also known as lobular capillary hemangioma, is usually seen as a polypoid red lesion found on the skin or the mucosal surface of the oral cavity. PG of the gastrointestinal tract is rare, in particular involving the esophagus, only 14 cases have been reported in the English literature. We present an 80-year-old male who underwent endoscopy for evaluation of dysphagia and was found to have a single, red, bilobed 10 mm polyp with adherent white exudate approximately 19 cm from the incisors. Endoscopic ultrasound was performed with a 20 mHz miniprobe which showed the lesion contained to the mucosal layer with no muscularis propria invasion. A decision was made to perform endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). A mixture of saline and methylene blue was injected into the submucosal plane to raise the lesion with subsequent successful mucosal hot snare resection. The resection defect was then approximated and closed with a hemostatic clip to prevent bleeding. Pathology of the specimen revealed small capillary vessels growing in a lobular architecture with an edematous stroma and a florid inflammatory infiltrate representing a pyogenic granuloma. EMR allows for an en bloc resection of mucosal lesions with tumor-free margins, thereby providing both diagnostic and prognostic information. Comparing EMR with the novel technique of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the incidence of bleeding and perforation is much lower; making EMR the best and safest resection option for this rare hemangioma. In this case, we demonstrate that EMR is a safe technique in removing a pyogenic granuloma in the esophagus.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document