scholarly journals Peritoneal Spread of Ovarian Cancer Harbors Therapeutic Vulnerabilities Regulated by FOXM1 and EGFR/ERBB2 Signaling

2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (24) ◽  
pp. 5554-5568
Author(s):  
Deepak Parashar ◽  
Bindu Nair ◽  
Anjali Geethadevi ◽  
Jasmine George ◽  
Ajay Nair ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 209 (5) ◽  
pp. 462.e1-462.e11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Giuseppe Vizzielli ◽  
Pierandrea De Iaco ◽  
Daniela Surico ◽  
Alessandro Buda ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jens Ricke ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Constanze Hach ◽  
Enrique Hänninen ◽  
Werner Lichtenegger ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 99 (12) ◽  

PIPAC is a new technique for intra-abdominal administration of aerosol chemotherapy in a gaseous environment (capnoperitoneum). It can be indicated for peritoneal spread of various origins, most commonly ovarian cancer, stomach cancer and colorectal cancer. Due to its mini-invasiveness, the application can be repeated. The article provides a brief overview of current views of PIPAC and describes the first experience with PIPAC in the Czech Republic.


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 1488-1493 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hubert Fornalik ◽  
Hannah Brooks ◽  
Elizabeth S. Moore ◽  
Nicole L. Flanders ◽  
Michael J. Callahan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18058-e18058
Author(s):  
Manish Sharma ◽  
Oliver Bohnsack ◽  
Rudresh Jarecha ◽  
Jayant Narang ◽  
Anitha Singareddy ◽  
...  

e18058 Background: Metastasis is the leading cause of ovarian cancer (OC) related death with more than 70% of OC patients diagnosed with metastasis with five-year survival rates below 45%. OC cells mainly metastasize within the peritoneal cavity at presentation and throughout the course of the disease in 85% of the patients which involves exfoliation from the primary tumor, followed by survival and transport in the peritoneal fluid and finally metastatic colonization of the organs within the peritoneal cavity. There is a tendency of conventional imaging to underestimate the frequency of peritoneal spread. The purpose of the study was to obtain the frequency of organ involvement in OC metastasis and identify the most common route of OC metastasis. Methods: Retrospective study and analysis of two randomized double-blind trials was performed in patients with OC. Data was analyzed from these studies using blinded independent central review using RECIST 1.1 involving a total of 895 subjects, 528 and 367 respectively. A double read with adjudication by independent radiologists was performed for each scan based on the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Baseline tumor burden was assessed for all subjects using RECIST 1.1 criteria. At follow-up visits, data was specifically analyzed for New lesions. The readers had to select New lesion location from a pre-defined location list from a drop-down menu. Data was tabulated with frequency of subjects with New lesion per each location. Results: With both studies combined involving 895 subjects, total subjects with new metastasis observed in decreasing order for various organs were peritoneum/omentum (406), lymph nodes (315), ascites (207), liver (94), pleural effusion (65), pelvis (52) & lung (56). Other less common locations for new metastasis was abdominal wall, pleural deposits, spleen, brain, retroperitoneum and adrenal. We also looked at the possibility of disagreement between 2 readers in identifying such lesions leading to progression as below. Conclusions: It can be concluded that subjects with ovarian cancer tend to develop metastasis leading to progression per RECIST 1.1 in peritoneum / omentum, lymph nodes, liver and lung. Due to significant variability in identification of such discrete, ill-defined and/or small nature of lesions, targeted awareness and training should be incorporated to improve clinical outcome. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. S279
Author(s):  
Deepak Prashar ◽  
Anjali Geethadevi ◽  
Jasmine George ◽  
Ishaque Kadamberi ◽  
Sunila Pradeep ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 06 (14) ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Julia R. Embry-Schubert ◽  
Lubna Qamar ◽  
Monique Spillman ◽  
Michael G. Kelly ◽  
Susan A. Davidson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Kimon Chatzistamatiou ◽  
Leonidas Zepiridis ◽  
Grigorios Grimbizis

Laparoscopy can be used for almost all gynecological procedures and is considered as the indicated method for specific procedures. This is especially true for adnexal surgery. Of course, while it is considered a method of choice for the treatment of benign ovarian tumors, the same does not apply to malignant ones, although treatment of ovarian cancer either at an early or even at a more advanced stage is feasible with laparoscopy. Finding malignancy, when not suspected, during laparoscopic treatment of an ovarian cyst is a situation raising several issues, depending on whether the identification of malignancy is intra- or post-operative, which involve inadequate surgical staging, peritoneal spread of cancer cells, intraoperative rupture of a malignant ovarian cystic tumor, and port site metastasis. This chapter analyzes the possible adverse events related to the use of laparoscopy in the treatment of adnexal masses considered as benign but turn out to be malignant, and how they can be mitigated with careful preoperative patient selection and with adequate surgical experience.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 346-347
Author(s):  
W.Y. Hwang ◽  
S.I. Kim ◽  
M. Lee ◽  
K. Kim ◽  
J.H. No ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document