Abstract 1689: Impact of pre-treatment body mass index on patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation

Author(s):  
Ngan M. Tsang
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6074-6074
Author(s):  
A. K. Jain ◽  
J. K. Salama ◽  
K. M. Stenson ◽  
E. Blair ◽  
E. E. Cohen ◽  
...  

6074 Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) offers high functional organ preservation rates for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer (LRAHNC) patients, but is associated with significant acute and chronic speech and swallowing toxicity. Recently, body mass index (BMI) has been suggested as a predictor of head and neck cancer patient outcome. In this analysis we sought to determine the impact of BMI on survival and toxicity outcomes in LRAHNC patients treated with CRT. Methods: 220 LRAHNC patients were treated on a multiinstitutional protocol consisting of induction carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by CRT. CRT was delivered for 4–5 cycles; each 14-day cycle consisted of 5 days concurrent paclitaxel, continuous infusion 5-FU, hydroxyurea, and 1.5 Gy twice daily radiation followed by 9 days without any treatment. Each patient's pre-treatment BMI was classified as overweight (BMI >= 25) or non-overweight (BMI < 25). As an independent variable, BMI was analyzed as a predictor of IndCT or CRT toxicity, locoregional control, and overall survival. BMI was analyzed as categorical variable, and also a continuous variable in a multivariate proportional hazards model. Results: There was no association between BMI and IndCT toxicity. During CRT overweight patients had significantly lower rates (24/103 vs 42/112) of grade 3 or higher neutropenia (p = 0.027), mucositis (p = 0.05), dermatitis (p = 0.028) and higher rates of anorexia (p = 0.05). Overweight patients had 12% long term PEG tube rate, compared to 34% of non-overweight patients (p < 0.001). On pooled survival analysis, patients with BMI > 25 had significantly better overall survival outcomes (mean 81.2 months, 95% CI 75.1–87.3 months) than patients with BMI < 25 (median 58.2 months; mean 56.5 months, 95% CI 49.6–63.3 months) (log-rank p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data suggest patients with pre-treatment BMI > 25 experience lower rates of toxicity commonly associated with chemoradiation, and have a significantly better prognosis than patients with BMI < 25. Although the mechanism of BMI as an independent predictor of outcomes is unclear, we are continuing to explore mechanisms underlying this association. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17547-e17547
Author(s):  
Katherine G. Douglas ◽  
Sylvia L. Crowder ◽  
Laura S. Rozek ◽  
Gregory T. Wolf ◽  
Anna Arthur

e17547 Background: The objective of this study was to determine if pre-treatment body mass index (BMI) is associated with the presence of self-reported, nutrition impact symptoms (NIS) 1-year post-treatment in head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors. We hypothesize that higher pre-treatment BMI may be associated with fewer reported NIS post treatment. Methods: This was a longitudinal study of 430 HNC survivors recruited from the University of Michigan Head and Neck Specialized Program of Research Excellence (HN-SPORE) study. Participants completed a pre-treatment health questionnaire which included self-reported height and weight. NIS were assessed at 1-year post-treatment using a Likert scale ranging from 1 (not at all) vs 5 (extremely) bothered by symptoms. Eight individual NIS were assessed (trismus, xerostomia, bothered chewing, dysphagia liquids, dysphagia solids, taste changes, mucositis, and shoulder or neck pain). Individual symptoms were summed to create a symptom summary score. Self-reported pre-treatment height and weight were used to calculate BMI in kg/m2. BMI was categorized as 1) underweight, 2) normal weight, 3) overweight and 4) obese. Pearson partial correlations between pre-treatment BMI status and individual post-treatment NIS and post-treatment NIS summary score were examined. Covariates included age, sex, tumor site, disease stage, smoking, alcohol consumption, and HPV status. Results: BMI was significantly inversely associated with bothered chewing, dysphagia liquids, dysphagia solids, taste alterations, and shoulder pain (p < 0.05). BMI was also significantly inversely correlated with the overall symptom summary score. Conclusions: Higher pre-treatment BMI may be associated with reduced risk of post-diagnosis symptom burden in HNC survivors. Funding: NIH/NCI P50CA097248; Hatch project 1011487; Carle-Illinois Cancer Scholars for Translational and Applied Research Fellowship.


2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (7) ◽  
pp. 1180-1185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore R. McRackan ◽  
John M. Watkins ◽  
Amy E. Herrin ◽  
Elizabeth M. Garrett-Mayer ◽  
Anand K. Sharma ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 188 (11) ◽  
pp. 2031-2039
Author(s):  
Patrick T Bradshaw ◽  
Jose P Zevallos ◽  
Kathy Wisniewski ◽  
Andrew F Olshan

Abstract Previous studies have suggested a “J-shaped” relationship between body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)2) and survival among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, BMI is a vague measure of body composition. To provide greater resolution, we used Bayesian sensitivity analysis, informed by external data, to model the relationship between predicted fat mass index (FMI, adipose tissue (kg)/height (m)2), lean mass index (LMI, lean tissue (kg)/height (m)2), and survival. We estimated posterior median hazard ratios and 95% credible intervals for the BMI-mortality relationship in a Bayesian framework using data from 1,180 adults in North Carolina with HNC diagnosed between 2002 and 2006. Risk factors were assessed by interview shortly after diagnosis and vital status through 2013 via the National Death Index. The relationship between BMI and all-cause mortality was convex, with a nadir at 28.6, with greater risk observed throughout the normal weight range. The sensitivity analysis indicated that this was consistent with opposing increases in risk with FMI (per unit increase, hazard ratio = 1.04 (1.00, 1.08)) and decreases with LMI (per unit increase, hazard ratio = 0.90 (0.85, 0.95)). Patterns were similar for HNC-specific mortality but associations were stronger. Measures of body composition, rather than BMI, should be considered in relation to mortality risk.


2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 497-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mia M. Gaudet ◽  
Alpa V. Patel ◽  
Juzhong Sun ◽  
Janet S. Hildebrand ◽  
Marjorie L. McCullough ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 24s-24s
Author(s):  
Renata Abrahao ◽  
Sandra Perdomo ◽  
Luis Kowalski ◽  
Marta Vilensky ◽  
Jose Carlos Oliveira ◽  
...  

Abstract 65 Purpose Incidence of head and neck cancer (HNC) is high in South America, and survival data are scarce in this region. The InterCHANGE study was established by clinical groups from across South America and the International Agency for Research on Cancer, with the primary aim to study the impact of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and sociodemographic, clinic, and lifestyle factors on survival after this malignancy. The current study examined the main predictors of survival after HNC in South America and estimated overall and conditional survival probabilities. Methods Patients were recruited during 2010 to 2016 from seven centers in Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, and Uruguay. A questionnaire obtained information on age, stage, and body mass index at diagnosis; sex; education; race; and comprehensive smoking and alcohol history. Blood samples were collected for HPV16 E6 testing—a surrogate marker for HPV16 infection. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression were used for statistical analyses. Results Of 1,314 patients, 348 had oropharynx cancer and 966 nonoropharynx cancer (larynx, n = 381; hypopharynx, n = 75; and oral cavity, n = 510). All cases were confirmed by histology or cytology. Most patients were male (81%), of white race (64%), ever smokers (85%), ever drinkers (82%), had a median age at diagnosis of 60 years, and only a basic education (54%). The majority of patients (66%) was diagnosed with stage IV disease, ranging from 53% for larynx to 83% for oropharynx disease. Median follow-up time for patients who died or survived was 0.9 years of 2.3 years, respectively. By October 31, 2017, 628 patients (48%) had died. Three-year overall survival was 53% for larynx, 47% for oral cavity, 40% for oropharynx, and 36% for hypopharynx disease. Main predictors of worse survival were late stage at diagnosis, older age, and underweight (body mass index < 18.5kg/m2) at diagnosis, with some variation according to tumor site. In a subset analysis of 156 patients with oropharynx cancer with available HPV16 E6 serology, those who were negative for HPV16 E6 had significantly lower 3-year survival (27% v 73%), and a corresponding 3.5 times higher mortality rate (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.5; CI, 1.2 to 10.6) than those who were positive for HPV16 E6. Conclusion Most patients presented with strikingly advanced disease, and stage at diagnosis was an important predictor of survival. The reasons for late diagnosis are unclear, and efforts to improve survival will largely depend on efforts to diagnose HNC at an early stage. Patients with HPV-related versus HPV-unrelated oropharynx cancer had better survival, which supports previous results from Europe and North America. AUTHORS' DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST No COIs from the authors.


2014 ◽  
Vol 22 (9) ◽  
pp. 2361-2369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Ottosson ◽  
Ulrika Lindblom ◽  
Peter Wahlberg ◽  
Per Nilsson ◽  
Elisabeth Kjellén ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document