Abstract 4225: Disparities in cervical cancer screening participation: a comparison of Russian, Somali and Kurdish immigrants with the Finnish general population

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther E. Idehen ◽  
Päivikki Koponen ◽  
Tommi Harkanen ◽  
Tellervo Korhonen
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

scholarly journals Cervical Cancer Screening Participation among Women of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish Origin Compared with the General Finnish Population: A Register-Based Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (21) ◽  
pp. 7899
Author(s):  
Esther E. Idehen ◽  
Anni Virtanen ◽  
Eero Lilja ◽  
Tomi-Pekka Tuomainen ◽  
Tellervo Korhonen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Cervical Screening ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Migrant Health ◽  
Finnish Population ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

Migrant-origin women are less prone to cervical screening uptake compared with host populations. This study examined cervical cancer screening participation and factors associated with it in the Finnish mass screening program during 2008–2012 in women of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin compared with the general Finnish population (Finns) in Finland. The study population consists of samples from the Finnish Migrant Health and Well-being Study 2010–2012 and Health 2011 Survey; aged 30–64 (n = 2579). Data from the Finnish screening register linked with other population-based registry data were utilized. For statistical analysis we employed logistic regression. Age-adjusted screening participation rates were Russians 63% (95% CI: 59.9–66.6), Somalis 19% (16.4–21.6), Kurds 69% (66.6–71.1), and Finns 67% (63.3–69.8). In the multiple-adjusted model with Finns as the reference; odds ratios for screening were among Russians 0.92 (0.74–1.16), Somalis 0.16 (0.11–0.22), and Kurds 1.37 (1.02–1.83). Among all women, the substantial factor for increased screening likelihood was hospital care related to pregnancy/birth 1.73 (1.27–2.35), gynecological 2.47 (1.65–3.68), or other reasons 1.53 (1.12–2.08). Screening participation was lower among students and retirees. In conclusion, screening among the migrant-origin women varies, being significantly lowest among Somalis compared with Finns. Efforts using culturally tailored/population-specific approaches may be beneficial in increasing screening participation among women of migrant-origin.

scholarly journals Factors associated with cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women in Europe: a scoping review

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrícia Marques ◽  
Mariana Nunes ◽  
Maria da Luz Antunes ◽  
Bruno Heleno ◽  
Sónia Dias
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Migrant Women ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

Abstract Background Cervical cancer screening has been effective in reducing incidence and mortality of cervical cancer, leading European countries to implement screening programs. However, migrant women show lower screening participation compared to nationals. This scoping review aims to provide a synthesis of the growing evidence on factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening among migrant women in Europe. Methods Electronic peer-reviewed databases were searched in November 2019 for studies on factors related to the participation of migrants in cervical cancer screening conducted in EU/EFTA countries, using comprehensive search expressions. Retrieved articles were screened and those eligible were selected for data extraction. Quantitative and qualitative studies were included. Factors were classified in barriers and facilitators and were divided into further categories. Results Twenty out of 96 articles were selected and analyzed. Factors associated with participation in cervical cancer screening were classified in categories related to sociodemographic, healthcare-system, psychological, migration, knowledge, language, and cultural factors. Lack of information, lack of female healthcare providers, poor language skills, and emotional responses to the test (especially fear, embarrassment and discomfort) were the most reported barriers to cervical cancer screening. Encouragement from healthcare providers and information available in migrants’ languages were frequently stated as facilitators. Results on the role of sociodemographic factors, such as age, education, employment and marital status, are the most conflicting, highlighting the complexity of the issue and the possibility of interactions between factors, resulting in different effects on cervical cancer screening participation among migrant women. Several identified barriers to screening are like those to access to healthcare services in general. Conclusions Efforts to increase migrant women’s participation in CCS must target barriers to access to healthcare services in general but also specific barriers, including cultural differences about sexuality and gender, past traumatic personal experiences, and the gender and competences of healthcare professionals performing CCS. Healthcare services should strengthen resources to meet migrants’ needs, including having CCS information translated and culturally adapted, as well as healthcare providers with skills to deal with cultural background. These findings can contribute to improve CCS programs among migrant women, reducing health disparities and enhancing their overall health and well-being.

scholarly journals Disparities in cervical cancer screening participation in Iran: a cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 nationwide STEPS survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozhin Amin ◽  
Ali-Asghar Kolahi ◽  
Nader Jahanmehr ◽  
Ali-Reza Abadi ◽  
Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Screening Practice ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

Abstract Background One of the most important concerns in every healthcare system is the elimination of disparities in health service utilization and achievement of health equity. This study aimed to investigate the disparities in cervical cancer screening participation in Iran. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Non-Communicable Risk Factors Survey in 2016 (STEPs 2016). Data on cervical cancer screening in addition to demographic and socio-economic factors from 15,975 women aged 18 and above were analyzed. The distribution of surveyed women with regard to cervical cancer screening practice was described. Chi square and logistic regression were used to assess the association of demographic and socio-economic factors with cervical cancer screening participation. Results Overall, 52.1% of women aged 30–59 years, had undergone cervical cancer screening at least once in their lifetime. Participation rate in cervical cancer screening programs varied between provinces; ranging from 7.6% in Sistan and Baluchestan to 61.2% in Isfahan. Single marital status, illiteracy, being employed, and having no insurance coverage were associated with lower participation. Age and area of residence were insignificant predictors for participating in cervical cancer screening program. Analysis of the cervical cancer uptake rates across the socio-economic levels revealed that the service is less utilised by high income groups. Conclusions Participation in cervical cancer screening program in Iran is not optimal and could be improved. With regard to the distribution of cervical cancer screening practice, social and geographical disparities indicate the need for further research and more comprehensive strategies in order to reduce them.

scholarly journals Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Participation in Iran: a Cross-sectional Analysis of the 2016 Nationwide Steps Survey

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rozhin Amin ◽  
Ali-Asghar Kolahi ◽  
Nader Jahanmehr ◽  
Ali-Reza Abadi ◽  
Mohammad-Reza Sohrabi
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Screening Practice ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening Program ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

Abstract Background: One of the most important concerns in every healthcare system is the elimination of disparities in health service utilization and achievement of health equity. This study aims to investigate the disparities in cervical cancer screening participation in Iran.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using data from the National Non-Communicable Risk Factors Survey in 2016 (STEPs 2016). Data on cervical cancer screening in addition to demographic and socio-economic factors from 15975 women aged 18 and above were analyzed. The distribution of surveyed women with regard to cervical cancer screening practice was described. Chi Square and logistic regression were used to assess the association of demographic and socio-economic factors with cervical cancer screening participation.Results: Overall, 52.1% of women aged 30-59 years, had undergone cervical cancer screening at least once in their lifetime. Participation rate in cervical cancer screening programs varied between provinces; ranging from 7.6% in Sistan and Baluchestan to 61.2% in Isfahan. Single marital status, illiteracy, being employed, and having no insurance coverage were associated with lower participation. Age and area of residence were insignificant predictors for participating in cervical cancer screening program. Analysis of the cervical cancer uptake rates across the socio-economic levels revealed that the service is less utilised by high income groups.Conclusions: Participation in cervical cancer screening program in Iran is not optimal and could be improved. With regard to the distribution of cervical cancer screening practice, social and geographical disparities indicate the need for further research and more comprehensive strategies in order to reduce them.

Cervical Cancer Screening Participation among Immigrants in Finland

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Idehen ◽  
P Koponen ◽  
T Juntunen ◽  
M Kangasniemi ◽  
AM Pietilä ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

scholarly journals Screening participation after a false positive result in organized cervical cancer screening: a nationwide register-based cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pernille Thordal Larsen ◽  
Susanne Fogh Jørgensen ◽  
Mette Tranberg ◽  
Sisse Helle Njor
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cervical Cancer Screening ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Intraepithelial Neoplasia ◽  
Cervical Cytology ◽  
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade ◽  
Screening Participation ◽  
Cancer Screening Participation

Abstract Our aim was to investigate whether receiving a false positive (FP) cervical cytology result affected subsequent cervical cancer screening participation. This Danish nationwide register-based cohort study included 502,380 women aged 22.5–45 attending cervical cancer screening in 2012–2014 with a normal (n = 501,003) or FP (n = 1,377) cytology screening result. A FP result was defined as a cervical cytology showing high grade cytological abnormalities followed by a normal or ‘Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia grade 1’ biopsy result. Women were categorized as subsequent participants if they had a cervical cytology within 24–42 months after their last screening or surveillance test. We compared subsequent participation among women with a normal versus a FP result, using odds ratios including 95% confidence intervals. Participation was slightly higher among women with FP results than among women with normal results (71.5% vs. 69.2%, p = 0.058). After adjustment for age and screening history, women with FP results participated significantly more than women with normal results (OR: 1.19, 95% CI 1.06–1.35). Women receiving a FP result did not participate less in subsequent cervical cancer screening than women receiving a normal result. In fact, the use of opportunistic screening seemed to be increased among women receiving a FP result.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document