Abstract 5298: Finding new molecules to bypass the tumor suppressor gene TP53 and restore cell cycle checkpoint control

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Moore ◽  
Jessica Blackburn
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Tumor Suppressor Gene ◽  
Suppressor Gene ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Gene Tp53

scholarly journals Association between tobacco substance usage and a missense mutation in the tumor suppressor gene P53 in the Saudi Arabian population

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245133
Author(s):  
Mikhlid H. Almutairi ◽  
Bader O. Almutairi ◽  
Turki M. Alrubie ◽  
Sultan N. Alharbi ◽  
Narasimha R. Parine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Tumor Suppressor Gene ◽  
Saudi Arabian ◽  
Suppressor Gene ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Potential Association ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Gene Tp53 ◽  
Blood Specimens ◽  
Arabian Population

The tumor suppressor gene TP53 and its downstream genes P21 and MDM2 play crucial roles in combating DNA damage at the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint. Polymorphisms in these genes can lead to the development of various diseases. This study was conducted to examine a potential association between tobacco substance usage (TSU) and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at the exon regions of the P53, P21, and MDM2 genes by comparing populations of smokers and non-smokers from Saudi Arabia. P53 rs1042522 (C/G), P21 rs1801270 (A/C), and MDM2 rs769412 (A/G) were investigated by genotyping 568 blood specimens: 283 from male/female smokers and 285 from male/female non-smokers. The results obtained from the smokers and their control non-smokers were compared according to age, sex, duration of smoking, and type of TSU. Heterozygous CG, homozygous GG, and CG+GG genotypes, as well as the G allele of rs1042522 were significantly associated with TSU in Saudi smokers compared with non-smokers. The C allele frequency of rs1801270 was also associated with TSU in smokers (OR = 1.33, p = 0.049) in comparison with non-smokers, in younger smokers (≤29 years) (OR = 1.556, p = 0.03280) in comparison with non-smokers of the same age, in smokers who had smoked cigarettes for seven years or less (OR = 1.596, p = 0.00882), and in smokers who had consumed shisha (OR = 1.608, p = 0.04104) in comparison with the controls. However, the genotypic and allelic frequencies for rs769412 did not show significant associations with TSU in Saudis. The selected SNP of P53 was strongly associated with TSU and may be linked to TSU-induced diseases in the Saudi Arabian population.

Neuroradiology Manifestations of Li-Fraumeni Syndrome: Epidemiology, Genetics, Imaging Findings, and Management

Neurographics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 228-235
Author(s):  
S. Naganawa ◽  
T. Donohue ◽  
A. Capizzano ◽  
Y. Ota ◽  
J. Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Tumor Suppressor Gene ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Suppressor Gene ◽  
Imaging Findings ◽  
Li Fraumeni Syndrome ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Li Fraumeni ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a familial cancer predisposition syndrome associated with germline mutation of the tumor suppressor gene 53, which encodes the tumor suppressor p53 protein. Affected patients are predisposed to an increased risk of cancer development, including soft-tissue sarcomas, breast cancer, brain tumors, and adrenocortical carcinoma, among other malignancies. The tumor suppressor gene TP53 plays an important, complex role in regulating the cell cycle, collaborating with transcription factors and other proteins. The disruption of appropriate cell cycle regulation by mutated TP53 is considered to be the cause of tumorigenesis in Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Appropriate surveillance, predominantly by using MR imaging, is used for early malignancy screening in an effort to improve the survival rate among individuals who are affected. Patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome are also at increased risk for neoplasm development after radiation exposure, and, therefore, avoiding unnecessary radiation in both the diagnostic and therapeutic settings is paramount. Here, we review the epidemiology, genetics, imaging findings, and the current standard surveillance protocol for Li-Fraumeni syndrome from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network as well as potential treatment options.Learning Objective: Describe the cause of second primary malignancy among patients with Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

DNA damage checkpoint kinases in cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah L. Smith ◽  
Harriet Southgate ◽  
Deborah A. Tweddle ◽  
Nicola J. Curtin
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Environmental Dna ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Integrated Network ◽  
Checkpoint Kinases ◽  
G1 Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
High Level

Abstract DNA damage response (DDR) pathway prevents high level endogenous and environmental DNA damage being replicated and passed on to the next generation of cells via an orchestrated and integrated network of cell cycle checkpoint signalling and DNA repair pathways. Depending on the type of damage, and where in the cell cycle it occurs different pathways are involved, with the ATM-CHK2-p53 pathway controlling the G1 checkpoint or ATR-CHK1-Wee1 pathway controlling the S and G2/M checkpoints. Loss of G1 checkpoint control is common in cancer through TP53, ATM mutations, Rb loss or cyclin E overexpression, providing a stronger rationale for targeting the S/G2 checkpoints. This review will focus on the ATM-CHK2-p53-p21 pathway and the ATR-CHK1-WEE1 pathway and ongoing efforts to target these pathways for patient benefit.

Role of the p16 tumor suppressor gene in cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 1197-1206 ◽  
Author(s):  
W H Liggett ◽  
D Sidransky
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Tumor Suppressor Gene ◽  
Human Cancer ◽  
Suppressor Gene ◽  
Premalignant Lesions ◽  
Early Event ◽  
Cyclin Dependent Kinase ◽  
Primary Tumors

Since its discovery as a CDKI (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor) in 1993, the tumor suppressor p16 (INK4A/MTS-1/CDKN2A) has gained widespread importance in cancer. The frequent mutations and deletions of p16 in human cancer cell lines first suggested an important role for p16 in carcinogenesis. This genetic evidence for a causal role was significantly strengthened by the observation that p16 was frequently inactivated in familial melanoma kindreds. Since then, a high frequency of p16 gene alterations were observed in many primary tumors. In human neoplasms, p16 is silenced in at least three ways: homozygous deletion, methylation of the promoter, and point mutation. The first two mechanisms comprise the majority of inactivation events in most primary tumors. Additionally, the loss of p16 may be an early event in cancer progression, because deletion of at least one copy is quite high in some premalignant lesions. p16 is a major target in carcinogenesis, rivaled in frequency only by the p53 tumor-suppressor gene. Its mechanism of action as a CDKI has been elegantly elucidated and involves binding to and inactivating the cyclin D-cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (or 6) complex, and thus renders the retinoblastoma protein inactive. This effect blocks the transcription of important cell-cycle regulatory proteins and results in cell-cycle arrest. Although p16 may be involved in cell senescence, the physiologic role of p16 is still unclear. Future work will focus on studies of the upstream events that lead to p16 expression and its mechanism of regulation, and perhaps lead to better therapeutic strategies that can improve the clinical course of many lethal cancers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document