Abstract IA12: Developing precision medicine-based new lung cancer therapeutics

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Minna ◽  
Elizabeth McMillan ◽  
Luc Girard ◽  
Michael Peyton ◽  
Kenneth Huffman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics

scholarly journals Using stem cell biology to design precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. S4-S5
Author(s):  
Christine M. Fillmore ◽  
Chunxiao Xu ◽  
Francisco J. Sánchez-Rivera ◽  
Tyler Jacks ◽  
Kwok-Kin Wong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Biology ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Biology ◽  
Small Cell Lung

scholarly journals Requirement for PKC Epsilon in Kras-Driven Lung Tumorigenesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachana Garg ◽  
Mariana Cooke ◽  
Shaofei Wang ◽  
Fernando Benavides ◽  
Martin C. Abba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Rna Seq ◽  
Lung Tumorigenesis ◽  
Mechanistic Analysis ◽  
Oncogenic Driver ◽  
Histological Form

ABSTRACTNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the most frequent subtype of lung cancer, remains a highly lethal malignancy and one of the leading causes of cancer deaths worldwide. Mutant KRAS is the prevailing oncogenic driver of lung adenocarcinoma, the most common histological form of NSCLC. In this study, we examined the role of PKCε, an oncogenic kinase highly expressed in NSCLC and other cancers, in KRAS-driven tumorigenesis. Notably, database analysis revealed an association between PKCε expression and poor outcome in lung adenocarcinoma patients specifically having KRAS mutation. By generating a PKCε-deficient, conditionally activatable allele of oncogenic Kras (LSL-KrasG12D;PKCε−/− mice) we were able to demonstrate the requirement of PKCε for Kras-driven lung tumorigenesis in vivo, which is consistent with the impaired transformed growth observed in PKCε-deficient KRAS-dependent NSCLC cells. Moreover, PKCε-knockout mice were found to be less susceptible to lung tumorigenesis induced by benzo[a]pyrene, a carcinogen that induces mutations in Kras. Mechanistic analysis using RNA-Seq revealed little overlapping for PKCε and KRAS in the control of genes/biological pathways relevant in NSCLC, suggesting that a permissive role of PKCε in KRAS-driven lung tumorigenesis may involve non-redundant mechanisms. Our results thus highlight the relevance and potential of targeting PKCε for lung cancer therapeutics.

Patient-Centered Palliative Care for Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer S. Temel ◽  
Laura A. Petrillo ◽  
Joseph A. Greer
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Advanced Lung Cancer ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Patient Reported

The evidence base demonstrating the benefits of an early focus on palliative care for patients with serious cancers, including advanced lung cancer, is substantial. Early involvement of specialty-trained palliative care clinicians in the care of patients with advanced lung cancer improves patient-reported outcomes, such as quality of life, and health care delivery, including hospice utilization. Since the time that many of these palliative care trials were conducted, the paradigm of cancer care for many cancers, including lung cancer, has changed dramatically. The majority of patients with advanced lung cancer are now treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors or targeted therapies, both of which have had a significant impact on patient's experience and outcomes. With this changing landscape of lung cancer therapeutics, patients are facing new and different challenges, including dealing with novel side effect profiles and coping with greater uncertainty regarding their prognosis. Patients who are living longer with their advanced cancer also struggle with how to address survivorship issues, such as sexual health and exercise, and decision making about end-of-life care. Although palliative care clinicians remain well-suited to address these care needs, they may need to learn new skills to support patients treated with novel therapies. Additionally, as the experience of patients with advanced lung cancer is becoming more varied and individualized, palliative care research interventions and clinical programs should also be delivered in a patient-centered manner to best meet patient's needs and improve their outcomes. Tailored and technology-based palliative care interventions are promising strategies for delivering patient-centered palliative care.

Impact of rapid multigene assays with short turnaround time (TAT) on the development of precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9094-9094
Author(s):  
Shingo Matsumoto ◽  
Takaya Ikeda ◽  
Kiyotaka Yoh ◽  
Akira Sugimoto ◽  
Terufumi Kato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Gene Testing ◽  
Genomic Screening ◽  
Nsclc Patients

9094 Background: A variety of oncogene drivers have been identified in NSCLC and molecularly-stratified precision medicine has led to improved survival in advanced NSCLC. Next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing is utilized to detect actionable gene alterations; however, the TAT of NGS is often too long to translate into clinical decision making. Thus, rapid multi-gene testing alternatives are needed. Methods: A lung cancer genomic screening project (LC-SCRUM-Asia) capturing clinical outcome was established in 2013 to identify patients with oncogene drivers and to support the development of novel targeted therapies. Since February 2013 to May 2019 (LC-SCRUM-Asia 1st-phase), single gene testing and/or a targeted NGS assay, Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCA), were used for the genomic screening. Since June 2019 to December 2020 (2nd-phase), a multi-gene PCR assay (Amoy 9-in-1 test) and a rapid NGS assay (Genexus/Oncomine Precision Assay [OPA]) were also implemented as rapid multi-gene testing. Results: A total of 10667 Japanese NSCLC patients, including 6826 in the 1st-phase and 3841 in the 2nd-phase, were enrolled in the LC-SCRUM-Asia. Success rate for OCA: 93%, for 9-in-1 test: 98%, for Genexus/OPA: 96%. Median TAT for OCA: 21 days, for 9-in-1 test: 3 days, for Genexus/OPA: 4 days. The frequencies of genetic alterations detected in the 1st-/2nd-phase were EGFR: 17/24%, KRAS: 15/16%, HER2 ex20ins: 4/3%, ALK fusions: 3/3%, RET fusions: 3/2%, ROS1 fusions: 3/2%, MET ex14skip: 2/2%, BRAF V600E: 1/1%, NRG1 fusions: 0/0.2% and NTRK3 fusions: 0.05/0.04%. Overall percent agreement of 9-in-1 test compared with OCA for EGFR/KRAS/HER2/BRAF/MET/ALK/ROS1/RET/NTRK3 alterations was 98%, and that of OPA compared with OCA was 95%. The rate of patients who received targeted therapies as 1st-line treatment was significantly elevated in the 2nd-phase compared with the 1st-phase (510/3841 [13%] vs. 567/6826 [8%], p < 0.001). Through the genomic screening, 1410 (37%) and 1269 (18%) candidate patients for clinical trials of KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET or TRK-targeted drugs were identified in the 2nd-phase and in the 1st-phase, respectively. The rate of patients who were actually enrolled into the genotype-matched clinical trials were also significantly higher in the 2nd-phase than in the 1st-phase (222 [6%] vs. 186 [3%], p < 0.001). In 1st-line treatments for advanced NSCLC patients, the median progression-free survival was 8.5 months (95% CI, 7.7−9.4) in the 2nd-phase (n = 1839) versus 6.1 months (95% CI, 5.9−6.3) in the 1st-phase (n = 4262) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Both the 9-in-1 test and Genexus/OPA had short TATs (3−4 days), high success rates (96−98%) and good concordance (95−98%) compared with another NGS assay (OCA). These rapid multi-gene assays highly contributed to enabling precision medicine and the development of targeted therapies for advanced NSCLC.

Implementation of functional precision medicine for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-rearranged non-small lung cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 19-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Hamilton ◽  
Barbara Rath ◽  
Adelina Plangger ◽  
Maximilian Hochmair
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Precision Medicine ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase ◽  
Anaplastic Lymphoma

scholarly journals Towards a precision medicine in venous thromboembolism associated to lung cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (S26) ◽  
pp. S3064-S3066
Author(s):  
Luis Jara-Palomares ◽  
Teresa Elias-Hernandez ◽  
Maria Isabel Asensio-Cruz ◽  
Samira Marin-Romero ◽  
Remedios Otero-Candelera
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Precision Medicine

scholarly journals PTEN in Lung Cancer: Dealing with the Problem, Building on New Knowledge and Turning the Game Around

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anastasios Gkountakos ◽  
Giulia Sartori ◽  
Italia Falcone ◽  
Geny Piro ◽  
Ludovica Ciuffreda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Cancer Susceptibility ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Cancer Therapeutics ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Protein Loss ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Dismal Prognosis ◽  
Frequent Event

Lung cancer is the most common malignancy and cause of cancer deaths worldwide, owing to the dismal prognosis for most affected patients. Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted in chromosome 10 (PTEN) acts as a powerful tumor suppressor gene and even partial reduction of its levels increases cancer susceptibility. While the most validated anti-oncogenic duty of PTEN is the negative regulation of the PI3K/mTOR/Akt oncogenic signaling pathway, further tumor suppressor functions, such as chromosomal integrity and DNA repair have been reported. PTEN protein loss is a frequent event in lung cancer, but genetic alterations are not equally detected. It has been demonstrated that its expression is regulated at multiple genetic and epigenetic levels and deeper delineation of these mechanisms might provide fertile ground for upgrading lung cancer therapeutics. Today, PTEN expression is usually determined by immunohistochemistry and low protein levels have been associated with decreased survival in lung cancer. Moreover, available data involve PTEN mutations and loss of activity with resistance to targeted treatments and immunotherapy. This review discusses the current knowledge about PTEN status in lung cancer, highlighting the prevalence of its alterations in the disease, the regulatory mechanisms and the implications of PTEN on available treatment options.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document